[wtf] Mysterious Homepage De-Indexing
-
Our homepage, as well as several similar landing pages, have vanished from the index. Could you guys review the below pages to make sure I'm not missing something really obvious?!
URLs: http://www.grammarly.com http://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker
- It's been four days, so it's not just a temporary fluctuation
- The pages don't have a "noindex" tag on them and aren't being excluded in our robots.txt
- There's no notification about a penalty in WMT
Clues:
-
WMT is returning an "HTTP 200 OK" for Fetch, is showing a redirect to grammarly.com/1 (alternate version of homepage, contains rel=canonical back to homepage) for Fetch+Render. Could this be causing a circular redirect?
-
Some pages on our domain are ranking fine, e.g. https://www.google.com/search?q=grammarly+answers
-
A month ago, we redesigned the pages in question. The new versions are pretty script-heavy, as you can see.
-
We don't have a sitemap set up yet.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance, friends!
-
Did this get resolved? I'm seeing your home-page indexed and ranking now.
I'm not seeing any kind of redirect to an alternate URL at this point (either as a browser or as GoogleBot). If you 301'ed to an alternate URL and then rel=canonical'ed back to the source of the 301, that could definitely cause problems. It's sending a pretty strong mixed-signal. In that case you'd probably want to 302 or use some alternate method. Redirects for the home-page are best avoided, in most cases.
-
Are you sure it was missing for a time? Ultimately I wouldn't use a third-party (Google) as a tool to diagnose problems (faulty on-site code) that I know are problems and need to be fixed.I'd fix the problems I know are issues and then go from there. Or hire someone capable of fixing the problems.
-
Thanks, Ryan. I'll get to work on the issues you mentioned.
I do have one question for you - grammarly.com/proofreading (significantly fewer links, identical codebase) is now back on the index. If the issue was too many scripts or HTML errors, wouldn't both pages still be de-indexed?
-
Here are some issues just going down the first few lines of code...
- There's a height attribute in your tag.
- Your cookie on the home page is set to expire in the past, not the future
- Your tag conflicts with your script and other code issues (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21363090/doctype-html-ruins-my-script)
- Your Google Site Verification meta tag is different than other pages.
- Your link to the Optimizely CDN is incorrect... (missing 'http:' so it's looking for the script on your site)
- You have many other Markup Issues.
And that's prior to getting into the hundreds of lines of code preceding the start of your page at the tag... 300 lines or so on your other indexed pages 1100+ on your home page. So not only are you not following best practices as outlined by Google, but you have broken stuff too.
-
The saga continues...
According to WMT, there are no issues with grammarly.com The page is fetched and rendered correctly.
Google! Y u no index? Any ideas?
-
Like Lynn mentioned below, if you're having redirection take place across several portions of the site, that could cause the spikes, and a big increase in total download time is worrying if you're crossing the average bounce rate threshold for most people's patience.
Here's the Google Page speed take on it: https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgrammarly.com&tab=desktop. They go over both desktop and mobile.
-
Hmm, was something done to fix the googlebot redirect issue or did it just fix itself? Here it states that googlebot will often identify itself as mozilla and your fetch/render originally seemed to indicate that at least some of the time that was the page google was getting. It is a bit murky technically what exactly is going on there but if google is getting redirected some of the time then as you said you are getting into a circular situation between the redirect and the canonical where it is a bit difficult to predict what will happen. If that is 100% fixed now and google sees the main page all the time then I would wait a day or two to see if the page comes back into the index (but be 100% sure that you know it is fixed!). I still think that is the most likely source of your troubles...
-
Excellent question, Lynn. Thank you for chiming in here. There's a user agent based javascript redirect that keeps Chrome visitors on grammarly.com (Chrome browser extension) and sends other browsers to grammarly.com/1 (Web app that works on all browsers).
UPDATE: According to WMT Fetch+Render, the Googlebot redirection issue has been fixed. It is no longer being redirected anywhere and returning a 200 OK for grammarly.com.
Kelly, if that was causing the problem, how long should I hold my breath for re-indexing after re-submitting the homepage?
-
Yup definitely. Whether you're completely removed or simply dropped doesn't matter. If you're not there anymore, for some reason Google determined you're no longer an authority for that keyword. So you need to find out why. Since you just redesigned, the way way is to back track, double check all the old tags and compare them to the new site, check the text and keyword usage on the website, look for anything that's changed that could contribute to the drop. If you don't find anything, tools like majesticSEO are handy to checking if your backlinks are still healthy.
-
Hi Alex, Thank you for your response. The pages didn't suffer in ranking, they were completely removed from the index. Based on that, do you still think it could be a keyword issue?
-
That's actually a great point. I suppose Google could have been holding on to a pre-redesign cached version of the pages.
There has been a 50-100% increase in page download times as well as some weird 5x spikes for crawled pages. I know there could probably be a million different reasons, but do any of them stick out at you as being potential sources of the problem?
-
How does that second version of the homepage work and how long has it been around for? I get one version of the homepage in one browser and the second in another, what decides which version is served and what kind of redirect is it? I think that is the most likely source of your troubles.
-
Yes, but the pages were indexed prior to the redesign, no? Can you look up your crawl stats in GWT to see if there's been a dramatic up tick in page download times, and a down trend in pages crawled. That will at least give you a starting point as to differences between now and then: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/crawl-stats
-
Logo definitely needs to be made clickable to Home.
Did you compare the old design and the new design's text to make sure you're still covering the same keywords. In many cases a redesign is more "streamlined" which also means less text or a re-write which is going to impact the keywords your site is relevant for.
-
Thanks, Ryan. Improving our code-to-text ratio is on our roadmap, but could that really be the issue here? The pages were all fully indexed without problems for a full month after our redesign, and we haven't added any scripts. Was there an algorithm update on Monday that could explain the sudden de-indexing?
-
VERY script heavy. Google has recently released updates on a lot of this (Q4 2014) here: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.mx/2014/10/updating-our-technical-webmaster.html. With further guidance given here: https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/optimizing-content-efficiency/optimize-encoding-and-transfer. Without doing a deep dive that's the most glaring issue and obvious difference between pages that are still being indexed and those that are not.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I disable the indexing of tags in Wordpress?
Hi, I have a client that is publishing 7 or 8 news articles and posts each month. I am optimising selected posts and I have found that they have been adding a lot of tags (almost like using hashtags) . There are currently 29 posts but already 55 tags, each of which has its own archive page, and all of which are added to the site map to be indexed (https://sykeshome.europe.sykes.com/sitemap_index.xml). I came across an article (https://crunchify.com/better-dont-use-wordpress-tags/) that suggested that tags add no value to SEO ranking, and as a consequence Wordpress tags should not be indexed or included in the sitemap. I haven't been able to find much more reliable information on this topic, so my question is - should I get rid of the tags from this website and make the focus pages, posts and categories (redirecting existing tag pages back to the site home page)? It is a relatively new websites and I am conscious of the fact that category and tag archive pages already substantially outnumber actual content pages (posts and news) - I guess this isn't optimal. I'd appreciate any advice. Thanks wMfojBf
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JCN-SBWD0 -
React.js Single Page Application Not Indexing
We recently launched our website that uses React.js and we haven't been able to get any of the pages indexed. Our previous site (which had a .ca domain) ranked #1 in the 4 cities we had pages and we redirected it to the .com domain a little over a month ago. We have recently started using prerender.io but still haven't seen any success. Has anyone dealt with a similar issue before?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | m_van0 -
Blog snippets on homepage a potential detriment to rankings?
Hey guys, I realize similar topics have surfaced before, but mainly related to duplicate content penalties, which is not my concern in this case. My client is parsing blog snippets to the home page; actually 3 large snippets consisting of of approximately 200 words each. They create at least one fresh blog post per month pertaining to the specific industry. I realize this practice has widely embraced to satisfy the "freshness factor" but I am concerned it could be hindering the ability for the home page to rank for our two targeted phrases. It would seem that by continually rotating the blog snippets which contain content related to the industry, but not necessarily relevant to the home page's targeted key phrases - combined with the fact that the home page has very slim static content - the bots are attempting to assign new taxonomies of information on a monthly basis. My thoughts are to create a decent block of static content highly-relevant to the home page's target phrases, while reducing the amount of info. contained in the blog snippets, to perhaps only a headline and date. Comments and suggestions would be appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SCW0 -
Adding Orphaned Pages to the Google Index
Hey folks, How do you think Google will treat adding 300K orphaned pages to a 4.5 million page site. The URLs would resolve but there would be no on site navigation to those pages, Google would only know about them through sitemap.xmls. These pages are super low competition. The plot thickens, what we are really after is to get 150k real pages back on the site, these pages do have crawlable paths on the site but in order to do that (for technical reasons) we need to push these other 300k orphaned pages live (it's an all or nothing deal) a) Do you think Google will have a problem with this or just decide to not index some or most these pages since they are orphaned. b) If these pages will just fall out of the index or not get included, and have no chance of ever accumulating PR anyway since they are not linked to, would it make sense to just noindex them? c) Should we not submit sitemap.xml files at all, and take our 150k and just ignore these 300k and hope Google ignores them as well since they are orhpaned? d) If Google is OK with this maybe we should submit the sitemap.xmls and keep an eye on the pages, maybe they will rank and bring us a bit of traffic, but we don't want to do that if it could be an issue with Google. Thanks for your opinions and if you have any hard evidence either way especially thanks for that info. 😉
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | irvingw0 -
Remove content that is indexed?
Hi guys, I want to delete a entire folder with content indexed, how i can explain to google that content no longer exists?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Valarlf0 -
Why is a page with a noindex code being indexed?
I was looking through the pages indexed by Google (with site:www.mywebsite.com) and one of the results was a page with "noindex, follow" in the code that seems to be a page generated by blog searches. Any ideas why it seems to be indexed or how to de-index it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | theLotter0 -
How important is the number of indexed pages?
I'm considering making a change to using AJAX filtered navigation on my e-commerce site. If I do this, the user experience will be significantly improved but the number of pages that Google finds on my site will go down significantly (in the 10,000's). It feels to me like our filtered navigation has grown out of control and we spend too much time worrying about the url structure of it - in some ways it's paralyzing us. I'd like to be able to focus on pages that matter (explicit Category and Sub-Category) pages and then just let ajax take care of filtering products below these levels. For customer usability this is smart. From the perspective of manageable code and long term design this also seems very smart -we can't continue to worry so much about filtered navigation. My concern is that losing so many indexed pages will have a large negative effect (however, we will reduce duplicate content and be able provide much better category and sub-category pages). We probably should have thought about this a year ago before Google indexed everything :-). Does anybody have any experience with this or insight on what to do? Thanks, -Jason
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cre80 -
Why are so many pages indexed?
We recently launched a new website and it doesn't consist of that many pages. When you do a "site:" search on Google, it shows 1,950 results. Obviously we don't want this to be happening. I have a feeling it's effecting our rankings. Is this just a straight up robots.txt problem? We addressed that a while ago and the number of results aren't going down. It's very possible that we still have it implemented incorrectly. What are we doing wrong and how do we start getting pages "un-indexed"?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MichaelWeisbaum0