What's the future of SERP Tracking? And... Is SEOMoz's SERP Rank Tracking in compliance with Google Adwords API Terms of Service?
-
My question is:
Is SEOMoz's SERP Rank Tracking in compliance with Google Adwords API Terms of Service?
Background:
The reason I ask is because Raven Tools is now removing their SERP Reporting tool because it uses scraped Google position data.
So, it looks like SEO's will either have to find a new rank tracking tool or find new ways to traffic the effects that rankings have on a website traffic volumes.
For instance, there is a way to get the position a search results was in Google when it was clicked. We could create a secondary profile in Google Analytics for each client and use a custom filter to record the position that the keywords was in when the search result was clicked ( http://www.seomoz.org/blog/show-keyword-position-using-filters-and-advanced-segments )
Or perhaps we'll have to use Google Webmaster Tools' SEO Report to get data somehow ( http://support.google.com/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1308626 )
What are your thoughts on this? As you know, ranking data is still a great way to show clients if they are gaining or losing visibility in the search engines. It helps SEO's to report how effective their efforts have been.
Because other ranking software companies uses Adwords API data to show the keyword search volume and advertiser competition of a keyword, they can not or eventually will not be able to use scraped ranking data any more.
But, if another rank tracking tool out there doesn't need to be in compliance with the Adwords API TOS because they don't use that API to show search volume and advertiser competition, they can still technically provide their ranking data and not be violating any TOS, right?
I'm just trying to understand the best way to continue reporting impact of organic keyword rankings on a website.
Does the SEOMoz SERP Tracker comply with Adwords API? Is there another rank tracking tool out there that already is using Average Position data from the GWT SEO Report tool? Should we all just stop reporting rankings to clients altogether?
Scott
-
ANAL, but from my understanding of the US laws (LinkedIn vs. hiQ Labs) and having worked on SerpAPI.com, if the data is public, it's in your rights to scrape it.
-
Where did you read that at? I was not aware of that? Is it the same for analytics?
-
Ah ha. I can see how that wouldn't be nearly as useful.
-
No an average ranking from WMT will not be useful because it is based on broad match not exact match.
-
I saw a tweet from Raven, which basically suggests that they will implement the Google Webmaster Tools rankings data into the reporting tool. Probably that's the best way of presenting keyword rankings, because it shows the average positions. Rankings are being affected by so many factors, that it's difficult to tell which ranking report is the most accurate. Location, search history, logged in personalised data, etc, etc.
An average ranking report from Google Webmaster Tools might be more useful than the ones from Raven or SEOMoz.
-
Just a little followup on this topic on my blog here: http://www.scottofford.com/2012/12/what-is-the-future-of-serp-tracking/ ~ Scott O.
-
I was worried too, so I asked SEOMoz on Twitter: I really hope @__SEOmoz__ won't shut down the rank tracking tool, like Raven Tools did.
and they replied: We currently have no plans to change our data service options & are listening to what our community has to say
-
One of the most important things to me was Raven's ability to do automated reporting as PDF files sent to my clients' inboxes on a monthly basis. That, combined with Traffic reports, etc was a cornerstone of our progress reporting.
I'm not considering abandoning Raven just yet. A lot of our internel processes are tied into Raven and their Content Manager and Link Manager, and other tools they have, but it does make it much more appetizing to go find other viable solutions that can help me manage my Internet Marketing client base.
-
The simple answer is NO. Scraping SERP data is against Google's TOS and they have not given permission/ rights to any company.
The situation with Raven really stinks. In my opinion its Google using its dominant position in search to enforce their rules. And I hope we do not lose access to SEOMoz's Ranking data.
Also, is there a clarity about Google Analytics API? Does that also have the same condition (that you cannot use Google Scraped data)?.
I think this whole thing is counterproductive. Google forcing an SEO SaaS company to change one of its core service - is an example of bullying which reminds me of MS. The easier option would have been to create a rankings API and give it to SEO community. They had a Search API before (which was broken and never worked). And the Google WMT data is unreliable at best. I anticipate more automated search queries to google behind private proxies or more business to companies like AuthorityLabs.
-
Hi Scott. I have never used Raven Tools and am just at the end of their 30 day free trial. I have always used SEOMoz rankings reports and SEO reports to give to my CEO (I am in-house). Honestly, he rarely looks at the rankings and is far more interested in the trend and sources of organic traffic and revenue. I appreciate where he's coming from because if the rankings look great but revenue stinks, then the rankings aren't really worth a hill of beans. I think it's much more valuable for me to identify opportunities and threats more than anything else.
Now that Raven Tools isn't going to have the Rank Tracker or SEMRush info (I was more disappointed about that part actually), are you reconsidering your Raven Tools subscription? Do you think it's still worth the money? The reason I ask is that my free trial ends on December 9th and I've already got approval to upgrade, but am not sure if I want to now. Thoughts?
-
Dana, how do you currently report rankings to your clients or team members? Do you plan on continuing doing it that way or will you try to ween off of using ranking reports in the future?
Scott
-
Hi Dana. I guess SEOmoz doesn't have Adwords API data right directly inline with ranking results, so that could be true. It seems they use the Google Analytics API more than anything.
There is a lot of discussion going around here about this on Raven's announcement:
http://raventools.com/scraped-data/ (127 comments as of the time I posted this reply)
Perhaps someone from SEOmoz knows for sure?
Scott
-
Great question Scott. I was wondering the same thing when I read the notice from Raven Tools this morning. My guess is that this isn't an issue for SEOMoz because they aren't pulling Adwords data in as part of their SEOMoz pro tools reports.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How do you find popular blog topics (methodology) to rank in Google (organically)
Hi guys Do you guys have any advice and experience into how to find very popular blog topics? The purpose is to be able to rank them organically in Google. If you could share your methodology I would be really thankful as well if possible. Cheers John
Moz Pro | | igniterman750 -
What's more valuable: new content or optimizing old content
We are a niche legacy print publication that's been around for close to 20 years. Recently, we combined several old sites in one new responsive site. We have over 7,000 articles -many of which are evergreen and can be repurposed when needed. Most of the old pieces although published, have not been optimized for SEO. However, as we create new pieces, we optimize them for search and social and they tend to get more organic traffic. Where we're torn is on how much we should balance our limited editorial resources between cleaning up and optimizing our extensive archive to improve our organic reach, vs. pumping out new original pieces each week. I realize that without a lot of data the answers will be varied - I guess I'm looking for a best practices approach for content publishers. If it helps at all, our main conversion goal is selling subscriptions to our print and digital publications. We know that organic traffic tends to be more engaged than our social referrals. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the magazine fulfilment business, it's tough to know which channels convert better. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | RicardoSalcedo0 -
Solving 'duplicate content' for page 2 of X for 1 blog post
Hi to all SEO wizards, For my Dutch blog google-plus-marketing.nl I'm using WordPress Genesis framework 2.0 with news theme pro 2.0 responsive theme. I love the out of the box SEO friendliness and features. One of those features is that it allows for a blog post or page to be divided into several pages. This results in MOZ signaling duplicate titles for all pages after the 1st page. Now I was thinking that a canonical url set to the first page should do the trick for me as I reason that the rank will go the the first page and the rest will not be seen as duplicates. Genesis does some good stuff on it's own and places the following meta tags in the header for the first page. All looks well and my question is about the same meta tags for the 2nd page and higher that I pasted below this one for the 1st page. Meta tags page 1 of X for blog post Meta tags page 2 of X for the same blog post Would it not be better to point the canonical url for page 2 till X to always point to the first page? In this case:
Moz Pro | | DanielMulderNL0 -
Massive Rank Changes in Bing/Yahoo Only - What's up w/ Rank Tracker?
I'll be honest, it's pretty shameful how little attention I give Bing and Yahoo. But something recently caught my eye - I have a client who according to rank tracker is all over the place in yahoo/bing...up 20 positions for some kw's, down 12 for others...meanwhile Google's holding steady, and Google data seems mostly accurate - with one exception of showing 46th position for an exact match branded search that they're #1 for. I know Rank Tracker has been going through some fine tuning, right? I don't manually check Yahoo/Bing - I can't imagine those #'s are accurate though. Am I right to assume it's incorrect data? Just curious, any insight would be much appreciated. Thanks
Moz Pro | | SVmedia0 -
Question about SEOMoz Pro and Root Domain vs. Subdomain tracking
I currently have two Pro campaigns set up. They are both tracking the root domains of two different e-commerce sites. I also am tracking three competitors for each company, in each campaign. I have those set up by subdomains, like so www.Competitor.com. So in my Historical link analysis I am getting MyRootDomain.com, compared to www.competitor1.com, www.competitor2.com and www.competitor3.com Is this a problem? Would it be better for me to switch my company campaigns to track subdomains too, or to switch my competitor tracking to root domains. This is probably pretty rudimentary, but it never even occurred to me until just now. I realize that if I switch to subdomains for my own company tracking this would necessitate setting up a completely new campaign. This would be a problem because I am maxed out on my 1,000 keywords. Last but not least, does the fact that I have been tracking my own site root domains compared to competitors subdomains mean all of my competitive domain and link analysis is, well, garbage?...because I haven't really been comparing the same things?
Moz Pro | | danatanseo1 -
You've recently updated your brand rules. We're fetching your new data, and we should have it ready for you within the hour.
Why do i always see this message when entering a certain campaign? "You've recently updated your brand rules. We're fetching your new data, and we should have it ready for you within the hour." I didnt change a thing since i started this campaign two-three weeks ago ...
Moz Pro | | alsvik0 -
Why is the SEOmoz customer service on this site so awful?
Half the time the tools don't work and there isn't any accountability. Has anyone else had the same experience?
Moz Pro | | wpsoule1 -
Why is the Rankings Report of SeoMoz always show inaccurate results?
I have been using SEOmoz PRO tool from last two months but I am not happy with the SEOmoz PRO Ranking Report.The results are very inaccurate and I am not able to understand why there is such a difference in the ranking results when SEOmoz tracks and when I track?Please reply at the earliest. Regards, Prashakth Kamath
Moz Pro | | 1prashakth0