Can you 301 redirect to a page that has other pages 301 to it?
-
Two years ago updated url page to include better keywords and used a 301 redirect from the old page to the new.
so www.example.com/keyword-1st-generation.html now points to ...
www.example.com/keyword-2nd-generation.html
That moved the pages up in ranking, but now have better kw for the url,
so is it okay to redirect the /keyword-2nd-geration-html to
www.example.com/keyword-3rd-generation.html
And what is a good length of time before removing the 1st-generation url?
It's been 3 years and there is no chance of using it again. Plus, no sign of it in analytics.
-
There's always a risk anytime you migrate any URL. Generally we advise that unless you have a good reason, it's usually better in the long run to leave your URLs as they are. That said, there are many circumstances that warrant it.
Most of the time, changing the URL to get a better keyword in the URL won't give you much of a boost, although it might help with click-through rates. Keep the following in mind:
- A "normal" 301 is expected to pass about 80% of it's original link juice
- Google and other search engines are fine at following a single 301 redirect, but a trail of multiple 301's strung together starts to get dicey.
- Each new 301 redirect in the chain further degrades link juice.
Q. And what is a good length of time before removing the 1st-generation url?
If I understand correctly, you want to know when to remove the 301 from the 1st URL? If there are links still pointed at the original, then it's wise to keep the 301 in place indefinitely, to keep your link juice flowing. That said, if there is a 301 on there now, it wouldn't show in analytics anyway, so if I am mis-understanding the question, please let me know.
Hope this helps!
-
Appreciate everyone's input. What can I say, I see the light after reading the responses.
Since the pages are optimized without changing the URLs, I won't be needing the redirect. But only understand that from the advice received.
-
Why change urls over and over again, keep both do different keywords testing liek A/B testing.
if you want to change even though. why not put 301 to 1st and 2nd generation towards 3rd? so both redirects at 3rd now as it will be your live one right?
-
Sean is correct and I'm glad you mentioned this because I left it out according to your examples if you're really trying to change your URL for a keyword over and over again instead of building new pages it simply is not going to work well for you if you want to rank in Google. Landing pages can come and go sometimes but you want to make a website that keeps its pages if one is not performing well the only reason to cut it would be link juice however you would only truly want to do this after examining a lot of information from Google analytics and then after that most likely rewording the page instead of cutting it to A/B testing make the page work because the older the link the better just like domains
-
Yes you can 301 a page that has 301s. Just do not want to cause a 301 redirect loop. But the more important question here is why you keep changing urls based solely on keywords. You hint at it above. You do not need to keep changing your url over and over based on whatever the head term is. That is silly and if you think how google would want, this does not make sense. But that's just my two cents.
-
it would be easier to answer if you posted your URL. However if you are using example.com as your URL and it is never changing yes you can easily through 301 redirect one page into another without any issue.
Sincerely,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Combine poorly ranking pages into a single page?
I'm doing on-page optimizations for an apartment management company, and they have about seven apartments listed on their site. Rather than include everything on the same page - /apartments/apartment-name/ - they have the following setup: /apartments/apartment-name/contact /apartments/apartment-name/features /apartments/apartment-name/availability /apartments/apartment-name/gallery /apartments/apartment-name/neighborhood With very few exceptions, none of these pages appear to rank for anything, and those that do either rank very poorly for seemingly random keywords or for keywords like the apartment complex name (alongside the main landing page for the complex). I'm of the mind to recommend combining the pages into a single one that contains all the info, eliminates the chances for duplicate content (all of the neighborhood pages contain the same content verbatim), and prevents keyword cannibalization. Thoughts? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | Alces1 -
Can Javascript Links Be Used to Reduce Links per Page?
We are trying to reduce the number of links per page, so for the low-value footer links we are considering coding them as javascript links. We realize Google can read java, but the goal is to reduce level of importance assigned to those internal links. Would this be a valid approach? So the question is would converting low-value footer links to js like below help reduce the number of links per page in google's eyes even though we're reasonably sure they can read javascript. <a <span="" class="html-tag">href</a><a <span="" class="html-tag">="</a><a class="html-attribute-value html-external-link" target="_blank">javascript:void(0);</a>" data-footer-link="/about/about">About Us
On-Page Optimization | | Jay-T0 -
Is there any decent web browser that still displays the full page title at the top of the page?
I just updated to the latest version of Firefox on my Mac and saw that they now hide most of the page title in the browser tab, like Chrome and Safari. I like to be able to see the full page title at all times (for reasons I'm sure you all understand) and that's pretty much the only reason I stuck with Firefox all these years. Now I'm looking for an alternative – any suggestions?
On-Page Optimization | | matt-145671 -
Noindex pages being indexed
Hi all Wondering if anyone could offer a pointer on a problem i am having please. I am developing an affiliate store and to prevent problems with duplicate content I have added name="robots" content="NOINDEX,FOLLOW" /> to all the product pages to avoid google penalties. However, Google appears to be indexing product pages. When I do a site: search I see a few hundred product pages in the engine. This is odd as the site has always had noindex on these pages. Even viewing the cache of the indexed page shows the noindex meta tag to be in place. I'm at a loss as to why these pages are being indexed and could do with removing them asap to stop any penalties on the site. Many thanks for any help.
On-Page Optimization | | carl_daedricdigital0 -
301 directs
How do i determine which of my pages have been indexed by Google? and if they haven't been indexed how is this achieved? Also how do I set up a 301 redirect?
On-Page Optimization | | Hardley1110 -
On Page Optimisation Reports
Firstly sorry if this has already been answered - I did look I promise.
On-Page Optimization | | Jock
Secondly sorry if the answer to this is blatently obvious! In the process of trying to optimise my landing pages, I am using On Page Optimisation reports. I have several (ok lots) with F grades which is not surprising as the landing page is not the landing page optimised for a certain keyword. If I change the landing page to the one that I have for a certain keyword then hey presto A or B grade (clever me)! Now here's the thing - presumably the landing page that is listed by default is the one that Google "sees" for a particular keyword. How do I change this if I can or do I have to be patient or am I just being plain daft?! Many thanks0 -
Should one page with markers or six separate pages?
Hi - I'm working on a site that was set up with 6 bios on one page, with markers jumping to each person's name. I was thinking about separating those into 6 different pages, but not sure if that's the right thing to do. Advice about keeping the bios on one page vs splitting them up? (Am I more likely to rank for those peoples' names if I have a unique page, or is the one page url with each different marker in it, just as good?) Ranking well for those names isn't a huge goal of the site, but it would be nice to make the choice that would help with that rank. Thanks for your input Emma
On-Page Optimization | | emmas0