2013: Top 10 content SEO tips survey
-
Hi folks,
I was asked to write a short top 10 SEO list for editors. My search returned outdated results and SEO is changing fast these days…
So, here is my little survey: What are the best settings for these most important things:
- Title tag: How many characters / words? Best keyword positions? Best tricks?
- Meta description: How many characters / words? Best keyword positions? Best tricks?
- Meta keywords: Use them? How many?
- H1 tag: How many characters / words? Best keyword positions? Best tricks?
- H2-H6 tags: How many characters? Best keyword positions? Best tricks?
- Image alternative text: How many characters / words? Best tricks?
- Text length: Minimum, maximum? What’s better: 1 long article or split an article in several pages?
- How much links within an article? Min? Max?
- Usage of keywords within links?
- Your favorite SEO tip?
I would love to hear your thoughts
Best wishes,
Georg. -
Hi Mike,
wow, what a comprehensive reply, thanks a lot!
I think it's time for a new SEO cheat sheet
Best wishes,
Georg.
-
These are all off the top of my head but I know i have guideline notes somewhere in the mess of my desk that we usually follow. These will change on a regular basis as is necessary in order to keep up with best practices and algorithm changes. The things posted below could all be completely different 3 months from now if Google decides to release a Zebra Algorithm targeting websites with puppies on them.
- Title tag: How many characters / words? Best keyword positions? Best tricks?
- Over 10 characters and under 70 characters though there are instances where titles will be truncated due to character width. I usually aim for 56. Keep in mind that Google can choose to replace your title in the SERPs with what they feel is more relevant. We stick to the format of either <sitename>[seperator] <relevant core="" terms,="" descriptor,="" or="" short="" sentence="" with="" terms="" near="" the="" front="">or we flip it.</relevant></sitename>
- Meta description: How many characters / words? Best keyword positions? Best tricks?
- Over 70, under 160... closer to 156 and similar to title can be truncated due to overall character width. Core terms nearer to the front where applicable. Keep in mind that Google can choose to replace your title in the SERPs with what they feel is more relevant.
- Meta keywords: Use them? How many?
- Bing and Yahoo can still make use of meta keywords. Google does not (unless you're News and using the new News related keywords tag). We often continue to include them but more as an idea concerning the interrelation of pages on our sites.
- H1 tag: How many characters / words? Best keyword positions? Best tricks?
- Core term or most relevant terms concerning the page. If it includes a keyword we aim for closer to the beginning but that may not always be necessary. Make sure they make sense for the over-arching theme of the page.
- H2-H6 tags: How many characters? Best keyword positions? Best tricks?
- We keep them concise and to the point. Core terms near the beginning where applicable.
- Image alternative text: How many characters / words? Best tricks?
- Short, sweet, concise and relevant.
- Text length: Minimum, maximum? What’s better: 1 long article or split an article in several pages?
- I stick to one long article with relevant h2-h6 tags highlighting important parts. Three sentences in word looks like nothing, on your page that may look like a huge paragraph. Keep paragraphs concise, 3-4 sentences each. Breaking things up with an image is always nice.
- How much links within an article? Min? Max?
- As are necessary. You can get away with no links if you really wanted to but a few can help point out other relevant copy either on your site or off. But too many links will look cluttered and spammy. This is more a personal choice but if it looks bad then it probably is bad. We had a basic rule of thumb of no more than 1 link per 100 words in the copy... this was not adhered to and often it was less links.
- Usage of keywords within links?
- Natural sounding links are best now. Stay away from overusing heavily keyword laden text links too often. One or two every now and then is fine but overall you want them to be simple and natural. More people link to sites using the site name, site url or phrases like "Click here" than they do with terms like "Cheap Red Widgets".
- Your favorite SEO tip?
- Canonicals are your friend.
- Title tag: How many characters / words? Best keyword positions? Best tricks?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical: Same content but different countries
I'm building a website that has content made for specific countries. The url format is: MyWebsite.com/<country name="">/</country> Some of the pages for <specific url="">are the same for different countries, the <specific url="">would be the same as well. The only difference would be the <country name="">.</country></specific></specific> How do I deal with canonical issues to avoid Google thinking I'm presenting the same content?
On-Page Optimization | | newbyguy0 -
Tags - Good or bad for SEO
We are getting Moz errors for duplicate content because tag pages share the same blog posts. Is there any way to fix this? Are these errors bad for SEO, or can I simply disregard these and ignore them? We are also getting Moz errors for missing descriptions on tag pages. I am unsure how to fix these errors, as we do not actually have pages for these on our WordPress site where we are able to put in a description. I have heard that having tags can be good for SEO? (We don't mind having several links that show up when searching for us on google...) As far as the SEO goes, I am not sure what to do. Does anyone know the best strategy?
On-Page Optimization | | Christinaa0 -
Duplicate Content for Event Pages
Hi Folks, I have event pages for specific training courses running on certain dates, the problem I have is that MOZ indicates that I have 1040 duplicate content issues because I'm serving pages like this https://purplegriffon.com/event/2521/mop-practitioner I'm not sure how best to go about resolving this as, of course, although each event is unique in terms of it's start date, the courses and locations could be identical. Will Google penalise us for these types of pages, or will they even index them? Should I add a canonical link to the head of the document pointing to the related course page such as https://purplegriffon.com/courses/project-management/mop-management-of-portfolios/mop-practitioner. Will this solve the issue? I'm a little stuck on what to do for the best. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks. Kind Regards Gareth Daine
On-Page Optimization | | PurpleGriffon0 -
Best wordpress theme seo 2014
In your opinion what are the best wordpress theme in 2014 that are responsive, good speed and seo buildup
On-Page Optimization | | maestrosonrisas0 -
Duplicate Content?
Hi All, I have a new client site, a static site with navigation across the top, and down the left side. Two of the menus from the top navigation are replicated in the navigation structure on the left hand side. They have the exact same url structure, they are in fact the same exact page, listed on the site in two areas. My question is - is this a case of duplicate content, or, as they urls are the exact same, will they be seen as a single page? A canonical tag on one would be replicated on the other by the CMS - so do I leave it, or try to get them to re-structure removing one of the links? (I doubt they will do this as its a brand new site they just has developed). Many thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | Webrevolve0 -
Is this duplicate content okay?
We have a client who wants to rank locally, nationally and internationally for their products. I wrote a line that goes, "We can ship our products to you whether you’re here in Illinois, nationwide, or international." I added that line after a paragraph or two of unique product description on each of their 30-odd product pages. Will this damage their ranking? I tried researching this but only found full page duplicate content topics. Any advice would be great.
On-Page Optimization | | optimalwebinc0 -
Not using H1's with keywords to simulate natural non SEO'd content?
There has been a lot of talk lately about making a website seem like it is not SEO'd to avoid over optimization penalties with the recent Google Algorithmic updates. Has anyone come across the practice of not using Headings (H1's, H2's etc..) properly to simulate that the current webpage isn't over optimized? I've come across a site that used to use multiple keywords within their headings & now they are using none. In fact they are marking their company name & logo as an H1 and non keyworded H2's such as our work or Contact. Is anyone holding back on their old SEO tactics to not seem over optimized to Google? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | DCochrane0 -
Cross Domain Duplicate Content
Hi My client has a series of websies, one main website and several mini websites, articles are created and published daily and weekly, one will go on a the main website and the others on one, two, or three of the mini sites. To combat duplication, i only ever allow one article to be indexed (apply noindex to articles that i don't wanted indexed by google, so, if 3 sites have same article, 2 sites will have noindex tag added to head). I am not completely sure if this is ok, and whether there are any negative affects, apart from the articles tagged as noindex not being indexed. Are there any obvious issues? I am aware of the canonical link rel tag, and know that this can be used on the same domain, but can it be used cross domain, in place of the noindex tag? If so, is it exactly the same in structure as the 'same domain' canonical link rel tag? Thanks Matt
On-Page Optimization | | mattys0