Improving Crawl Efficieny
-
Hi
I'm reading about crawl efficiency & have looked in WMT at the current crawl rate - letting Google optimise this as recommended.
What it's set to is 0.5 requests every 2 seconds, which is 15 URLs every minute.
To me this doesn't sound very good, especially for a site with over 20,000 pages at least?
I'm reading about improving this but if anyone has advice that would be great
-
Great thank you for this! I'll take them on board
Becky
-
You may be overthinking this, Becky. Once the bot has crawled a page, there's no reason (or benefit to you) for it to crawl the page again unless its content has changed. The usual way for it to detect this is through your xml sitemap,. If it's properly coded, it will have a <lastmod>date for Googlebot to reference.
Googlebot does continue to recrawl pages it already knows about "just in case", but your biggest focus should be on ensuring that your most recently added content is crawled quickly upon publishing. This is where making sure your sitemap is updating quickly and accurately, making sure it is pinging search engines on update, and making sure you have links from solid existing pages to the new content will help. If you have blog content many folks don't know that you can submit the blog's RSS feed as an additional sitemap! That's one of the quickest ways to get it noticed.
The other thing you can do to assist the crawling effectiveness is to make certain you're not forcing the crawler to waste its time crawling superfluous, duplicate, thin, or otherwise useless URLs.</lastmod>
Hope that helps?
Paul
-
There are actually several aspects to your question.
1. Google will make its own decision as to how important pages and therefore how often it should be crawled
2. Site speed is a ranking factor
3. Most SEO's belief that Google has a maximum timeframe in which to crawl each page/site. However, I have seen some chronically slow sites which have still crawl and indexed.
I forgot to mention about using an xml site map can help search engines find pages.
Again, be very careful not to confuse crawling and indexing. Crawling is only updating the index, once indexed if it doesn't rank you have another SEO problem, not a technical crawling problem.
Any think a user can access a crawler should be able to find it no problem, however if you have hidden pages the crawler may not find them.
-
Hi
Yes working on that
I just read something which said - A “scheduler” directs Googlebot to crawl the URLs in the priority order, under the constraints of the crawl budget. URLs are being added to the list and prioritized.
So, if you have pages which havent been crawled/indexed as they're seen as a low priority for crawling - how can I improve or change this if need be?
Can I even impact it at all? Can I help crawlers be more efficient at finding/crawling pages I want to rank or not?
Does any of this even help SEO?
-
As a general rule pages will be indexed unless there is a technical issue or a penalty involved.
What you need to be more concerned with is the position of those pages within the index. That obviously comes back to the whole SEO game.
You can use the site parameter followed by a search term that is present on the page you want to check to make sure the pages indexed, like: site:domain.com "page name"
-
Ok thank you, so there must be ways to improve on the number of pages Google indexes?
-
You can obviously do a fetch and submit through search console, but that is designed for one-off changes. Even if you submit pages and make all sorts of signals Google will still make up its own mind what it's going to do and when.
If your content isn't changing much it is probably a disadvantage to have the Google crawler coming back too often as it will slow the site down. If a page is changing regularly the Google bot will normally gobble it pretty quick.
If it was me I would let you let it make its own decision, unless it is causing your problem.
Also keep in mind that crawl and index are two separate kettles of fish, Google crawler will crawl every site and every page that it can find, but doesn't necessarily index.
-
Hi - yes it's the default.
I know we can't figure out exactly what Google is doing, but we can improve crawl efficiency.
If those pages aren't being crawled for weeks, isnt there a way to improve this? How have you found out they haven't been crawled for weeks?
-
P.S. I think the crawl rate setting you are referring to is the Google default if you move the radio button to manual
-
Google is very clever working out how often it needs to crawl your site, pages that get updated more often will get crawled more often. There is no way of influencing exactly what the Google bot does, mostly it will make its own decisions.
If you are talking about other web crawlers, you may need to put guidelines in place in terms of robots.txt or settings on the specific control panel.
20,000 pages to Google isn't a problem! Yes, it may take time. You say it is crawling at '0.5 requests every 2 seconds' - if I've got my calculation right in theory Google will have crawled 20,000 URLs in less than a day!
On my site I have a page which I updated about 2 hours ago, and the change has already replicated to Google, and yet other pages I know for a fact haven't been crawled for weeks.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to Improve DA and PA of my Blog?
Greetings, Please help me how i can improve DA and PA of my new blog. I am new in this field.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Umer36700 -
Google Search Console Crawl Errors?
We are using Google Search Console to monitor Crawl Errors. It seems Google is listing errors that are not actual errors. For instance, it shows this as "Not found": https://tapgoods.com/products/tapgoods__8_ft_plastic_tables_11_available So the page does not exist, but we cannot find any pages linking to it. It has a tab that shows Linked From, but if I look at the source of those pages, the link is not there. In this case, it is showing the front page (listed twice, both for http and https). Also, one of the pages it shows as linking to the non-existant page above is a non-existant page. We marked all the errors as fixed last week and then this week they came up again. 2/3 are the same pages we marked as fixed last week. Is this an issue with Google Search Console? Are we getting penalized for a non existant issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TapGoods0 -
Ipad Sales & Traffic Improvement for my Ecommerce site
Do you guys know any tool or software which provides follow things for my ecommerce site? Real Time/ next day data for ipad traffic Real Time/ next day data for ipad urls visited Read time/ next day data for ipad Page rendering load time for all the urls separately Real Time/ next day data for ipad network load time for all the urls separately Real Time/ next day data for ipad dom processing time for the all the urls separately Real Time/ next day data for ipad request queuing load time for all the urls separtely Real Time/ next day data for ipad web application load time for all the urls separtely Real Time/ next day data for ipad total load time for each url Real Time/ Next day data for ipad timestamp i.e Time of each url being accessed by the visitor Real Time/ next day data for ipad visitor city Real Time/ next day data for ipad visitor country code Real Time/ next day data for ipad visitor duration on that page Real Time/ next day data for ipad visitor user agent name foreg chrome, IE, safari, firefox etc Real time/ next day data for ipad visitor user agent OS foreg. ipad only Real time/ next day data for ipad user agent version foreg. ipad 8.0, ipad 6.0, ipad air, ipad ratina, ipad mini etc Real time/ next day data for ipad visitor for each url session trace in water fall like backend time, dom processing, page load, waiting on ajax, interactions of visitors etc Real time/ next day data for ipad visitor for each url with total request for each page. Real time/ next day data for ipad visitors for each url with javascript error on the page and javascript url plus stake track of that error. Real time/ next day data for ipad visitors for each url with ajax error on the page and ajax url plus stake track of the error Real time/ next day data for ipad visitors for each and every url where each and every request time taken in waterfall layout. Real time/ next day data for ipad visitors funnel visiualization tracking Real time/ next day data for ipad visitors transcations tracking. Please note that all above data also require day wise, country wise, previous days and month, model wise sorting, pagination feature, etc. waiting for your reply Regards, Mit
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mit0 -
When Mobile and Desktop sites have the same page URLs, how should I handle the 'View Desktop Site' link on a mobile site to ensure a smooth crawl?
We're about to roll out a mobile site. The mobile and desktop URLs are the same. User Agent determines whether you see the desktop or mobile version of the site. At the bottom of the page is a 'View Desktop Site' link that will present the desktop version of the site to mobile user agents when clicked. I'm concerned that when the mobile crawler crawls our site it will crawl both our entire mobile site, then click 'View Desktop Site' and crawl our entire desktop site as well. Since mobile and desktop URLs are the same, the mobile crawler will end up crawling both mobile and desktop versions of each URL. Any tips on what we can do to make sure the mobile crawler either doesn't access the desktop site, or that we can let it know what is the mobile version of the page? We could simply not show the 'View Desktop Site' to the mobile crawler, but I'm interested to hear if others have encountered this issue and have any other recommended ways for handling it. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | merch_zzounds0 -
Can submitting sitemap to Google webmaster improve SEO?
Can creating fresh sitemap and submitting to Google webmaster improve SEO?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | chanel270 -
Does Google make continued attempts to crawl an old page one it has followed a 301 to the new page?
I am curious about this for a couple of reasons. We have all dealt with a site who switched platforms and didn't plan properly and now have 1,000's of crawl errors. Many of the developers I have talked to have stated very clearly that the HTacccess file should not be used for 1,000's of singe redirects. I figured If I only needed them in their temporarily it wouldn't be an issue. I am curious if once Google follows a 301 from an old page to a new page, will they stop crawling the old page?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RossFruin0 -
Duplicate site (disaster recovery) being crawled and creating two indexed search results
I have a primary domain, toptable.co.uk, and a disaster recovery site for this primary domain named uk-www.gtm.opentable.com. In the event of a disaster, toptable.co.uk would get CNAMEd (DNS alias) to the .gtm site. Naturally the .gtm disaster recover domian is an exact match to the toptable.co.uk domain. Unfortunately, Google has crawled the uk-www.gtm.opentable site, and it's showing up in search results. In most cases the gtm urls don't get redirected to toptable they actually appear as an entirely separate domain to the user. The strong feeling is that this duplicate content is hurting toptable.co.uk, especially as .gtm.ot is part of the .opentable.com domain which has significant authority. So we need a way of stopping Google from crawling gtm. There seem to be two potential fixes. Which is best for this case? use the robots.txt to block Google from crawling the .gtm site 2) canonicalize the the gtm urls to toptable.co.uk In general Google seems to recommend a canonical change but in this special case it seems robot.txt change could be best. Thanks in advance to the SEOmoz community!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | OpenTable0