Poor internal linking?
-
Hi guys,
Analyzing a large e-commerce site 10,000 pages on Magento and not getting much organic traffic to level 3 sub-category pages, the URLs are like:
Primary Keyword Target: BODY MOISTURISERS
https://www.adorebeauty.com.au/skin-care/bath-body/moisturisers.html
Primary Keyword Target: LIP MASKS
https://www.adorebeauty.com.au/skin-care/masks/lip-masks.html
Plus another 40 other URLs at level 3 with low organic performance.
Authority of the domain is strong, so it's not an authority issue I believe its internal linking.
Besides linking form the blog and breadcrumbs is there anything we can do to improve internal linking to these level 3 pages?
Cheers.
-
Hey Natty,
Not sure how much organic traffic you consider to be "not much", but either way, there are a few things you may want to consider:
1. Create content for each category page that is unique to them (e.g. create category description for "Body Moisturizers"). This will help create relevancy and reduce your overall "thin" and "duplicate" content throughout the site.
2. While it appears that the page is in main GG's index (as found here), I'd recommend adding links on the home page that deep link to the categories you're wanting to gain more traction with. Doing this will help reduce the crawl depth of the page and would help distribute some of the authority that the home page has, directly to those sub-pages. You could do this in a "categorical module" (e.g. create a visual box for a category "Skin Care") which has a sentence or two description w/ links to the sub-cats you really want to bring further up...could do max 5 links with a "view all skin care products" at the bottom of it.
3. You'll notice in the site search link from above that you have many pages indexed for the single page we searched for. This represents a duplicate content issue. Checking the paginated results pages (which is what those extra results are), you'll notice the URL canonicals to itself (which is fine if the content is truly unique, but in this case, it doesn't appear to be). You'll also notice that the canonical references conflict with the hreflang references.
In any event, just some thoughts. Hope this helps!
Cheers.
-
Hello,
This can be hard because you have a bunch of products on the page and very little text on each one. In my opinion, I think Google may be a little confused and so more links that are descriptive on a particular product level may help. Keep trying to get hi-quality "Do-Follow" links to the particular product pages that are as specific as possible.
Then follow up with a lot of category-based links to the particular category pages. It is not easy, but it looks like you are on the right track and just have to keep pushing to get the desired results.
Best Regards
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Back links with instant effect?!
I realise this is incredibly controversial! And I also realise I’ll get a ton of trolls pulling me to shreds but… I’m in need of running a short-term experiment, but to do the experiment I need to get a test site ranking high very quickly (not worried about if it gets penalised, it is only a short-term test).
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
New link explorer
I was checking this new tool which is really cool by the way and was wondering if I can outrank big guys with just content. I have a Domain authority of 28 with a spam score of 28 % Can I outrank with amazing content a site that hase a domain authority of 50 and a spam score of 1 % ? Should I ask for all my bad links to be removed so that my spam score goes down or doesn't it matter anymore those days and what matters is good content, link just don't count anymore ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics1 -
Rel=canonical and internal links
Hi Mozzers, I was musing about rel=canonical this morning and it occurred to me that I didnt have a good answer to the following question: How does applying a rel=canonical on page A referencing page B as the canonical version affect the treatment of the links on page A? I am thinking of whether those links would get counted twice, or in the case of ver-near-duplicates which may have an extra sentence which includes an extra link, whther that extra link would count towards the internal link graph or not. I suspect that google would basically ignore all the content on page A and only look to page B taking into account only page Bs links. Any thoughts? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | unirmk0 -
Internal Linking
Hi I've been looking over my pages and it says for this page for example http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/1-6kw-halogen-heater I have too many links, I think it was about 178. These links are from the menu and bottom of the page - how much of an issue is this for internal linking structure? I wouldn't want to remove the menus or change them too much. Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
International Subdomain Headache
My client set up a separate domain for their international clients, then set up separate subdomains for each country where they're active (so, for example, the original site is xx.com and the global is xxworldwide.com, with subdomains like mx.xxxworldwide.com). They auto-translated a large amount of content and put the translations on those international sites. The idea was to draw in native speakers. Now, I don't think this is a great practice, obviously, and I'm worried that it could hurt their original site (the xxx.com in the example above). My concern is that Google will see through the translated text, since it was handled with Google Translate, and penalize both sites. I don't think the canonical tag applies here, since Google recommends a no-follow for autotranslated text, but I've also never dealt with this type of situation before. Anyways, if you made it through all of that, congratulations. My question is whether xxx.com is getting any negative effects other than a potential loss of link juice -- and whether there's any legitimate way to present auto-translated text with a few minor changes without incurring a penalty.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ask44435230 -
Does Disavowing Links Negate Anchor Text, or Just Negates Link Juice
I'm not so sure that disavowing links also discounts the anchor texts from those links. Because nofollow links absolutely still pass anchor text values. And disavowing links is supposed to be akin to nofollowing the links. I wonder because there's a potential client I'm working on an RFP for and they have tons of spammy directory links all using keyword rich anchor texts and they lost 98% of their traffic in Pengiun 1.0 and haven't recovered. I want to know what I'm getting into. And if I just disavow those links, I'm thinking that it won't help the anchor text ratio issues. Can anyone confirm?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MiguelSalcido0 -
Outbound link to PDF vs outbound link to page
If you're trying to create a site which is an information hub, obviously linking out to authoritative sites is a good idea. However, does linking to a PDF have the same effect? e.g Linking to Google's SEO starter guide PDF, as opposed to linking to a google article on SEO. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | underscorelive0 -
Can links indexed by google "link:" be bad? or this is like a good example by google
Can links indexed by google "link:" be bad? Or this is like a good example shown by google. We are cleaning our links from Penguin and dont know what to do with these ones. Some of them does not look quality.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bele0