Duplicate Theme, different Content, competing keywords?
-
Hello,
We have 2 versions of a website. Notes: They will be the same theme, and slightly different images but the written content is different. SEO optimization is the same for both sites targeting the same the city and they will be competing for certain keywords mainly vanity keywords.
So we have websites examples:
http://mycompanytor.com http://mycompanytoronto.com How does google handle 2 websites like this, will one get penalized? Or will it treated as 2 different sites, even though the company name which is the brand shows up on the main url?Thanks for your help
-
Sorry for the late reply. The reason why we need a second website is because one has adult orientated images.
As google places does not allow nude.http://mycompanytor.com - Has the Google Plus Business - Non Nude
http://mycompanytoronto.com - Has the Company Branding - Nude.I hope this is clear.
Thanks for your input.
-
Hi Everworld,
I'm going to address this purely from a Local SEO perspective. The main issue here is that having more than one website for the same business can lead to NAP+W consistency issues and big confusion for Google. I'll explain this.
As Google crawls the web, what they 'want' to find, in order to be clear about the data they have about your business, is multiple references to your business' name, address, phone number and website address. If we put ourselves in the bots' shoes, let's say we find a listing for your business at YP.com with your name, address and phone number being associated with domain number one. A-okay. But then we go to Yelp and find your name, address and phone number being associated with domain number two. Which of these two references are we, as the bots, supposed to believe?
So, the problem is that you are creating confusion for Google, and, it's vital to mention, probably for your customers, too. You are also creating confusion for any of the major players in the Local Search Ecosystem which draw data from various sources and distribute it to other sources. The fact that the two domains are so similar may even be adding further murkiness to the scenario for the various entities.
When Google becomes confused about your NAP, it is believed that various problems can result, including ranking failures, because of Google's lack of trust in the data they've gathered about your business.
Because of this, I almost never recommend a multi-site approach to any local business. With a few exceptions, it's simply a better idea to build a single, authoritative website for your brand and link all of your various assets to it. If you find it absolutely necessary to keep two websites, my advice is as follows:
-
Do not put any part of your NAP in crawlable text on the second domain. No name, address or phone number.
-
Do not link to this second domain from any other property, including your own website, your citations, offsite content or anything else in any way that associates this second website with any part of your business NAP
-
Do not duplicate any content of any kind between the two websites.
When you look at this list of provisos, it may become even clearer why having two websites just isn't of much benefit. I'm not sure I'm understanding what you've explained about having one of the websites due to considerations about Google+. Could you not just own that second domain and 301 redirect it to your authoritative domain, without having a second website? Just a thought. I hope this is helpful!
-
-
The Main reason as to we are having the 2 websites is
http://mycompanytor.com - Has the Google Plus Business
http://mycompanytoronto.com - Has the Company Branding.One thing is though that the phone number is the same.
-
can I ask why concentrate on two different websites, without knowing what you would be selling / listing its a bit difficult, but as Moosa said having the same address / telephone number google might think they are the same business and link them, but more importantly why do you want two different domains.
In my opinion your spending time creating great unique content on two different sites, managing two different domains etc - why not simply put all the content onto one great site (rather than two good sites) and 301 one url to the other. It would be easier to get one great website higher up the SERPs rather than trying to get two good sites to link.
All your efforts would be to get links to one site, rather than two different domains, you would be ineffective splitting your domain authority (doesn't quite work evenly like that).
But if you really do need to have two different websites and are willing to put in the extra work, the best thing to do would be get them listed separately on Google places (ideally at a different address), have different contact details, names on their so that search engines don't try and link them.
-
Will the company name and title tags if your doing company + phrases also match up on both? How different is the content? Same topics and format? What's your reasoning behind having two separate sites from the same company competing for same/similar keywords?
I would try to differentiate as much as possible using separate hosting accounts or c-blocks, or take it even further with separate hosts.
-
You got two different domains that have the same themes with slight difference of color and images but the content on both websites are completely different.
If this is exactly what you said then there should be no problem and Google in my opinion should consider those two domain names are two different websites.
Domain sounds like a local business so I believe having the same business address may give a hint to Google that they are actually similar business (if it really is!) but technically they are two different domains in the eye of Google.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I want to rank a national home page for a local keyword phrase
Hello - We are a nationally available brand based in Denver, CO. Our home page currently ranks #8 (used to be 5) for "real estate photography in Denver" -- I want to improve this ranking, but our home page is generalized and not geared toward Denver, CO but to all of our markets. I'm trying to troubleshoot this and have a few ideas.... I would love advice on the best route, or a different route altogether: Create a Denver-specific page -- _will that page compete with my home page that is already ranked in the top ten? _ Add the keyword phrase in the image alt attribute Add keyword phrase into the content - need to make sure that viewers realize we are national I already updated the meta description to say "real estate photography in Denver and beyond"
Local Website Optimization | | virtuance_photography1 -
Keyword Tool Best Practices
VERY much a newbie with MOZ Pro (10 days into my 30-day trial), so for that, I apologize. I just want to get an idea of the time needed to accumulate data for keywords, and if I am doing all this right. I'm guessing this...use the tool and enter as many keyword possibilities as I can come up with for my website. Then wait a week or so. Then make a keyword decision. Is this the recommended or best practice? If it makes a difference, my website pertains to a local onsite service that I provide. Any web traffic more than 50 miles of my physical location would be a waste. My 1 on 1 session with Seun was great, but now I need to put it all together and make some traffic happen! Any other ideas, please throw them my way. If I'm completely off-base with this, feel free to send insults!
Local Website Optimization | | NewSEOguy0 -
Seeking advise about my new landing pages for different cites
I have just created 6 new location landing pages for my Dallas insurance agency. Each one is for a different city, but I have a feeling I did it wrong 😞 Because my site is rather large, I put two different lines of insurance on each page. Homeowners insurance and business insurance. Now I'm wondering if I should of done 12 different pages? i.e **1 city + 1 product = 1 page ** Here's one of the new pages: http://thumannagency.com/personal-insurance/frisco-insurance I'm having a guess here, but would it be better if the Navigation was; thumannagency.com/personal-insurance/frisco thumannagency.com/business-insurance/frisco ??? Thank you so much in advance!!
Local Website Optimization | | MissThumann0 -
Blogs/content marketing or slower salesfunnel on webshop?
Hi all, Im considering about building contents en blogs on a webshop, because a visitor will get see a lot of information about blogs, etc. The salefunnel will be chaotic, purchasing will be slower on a webshop. The webshop has more then 5000 products. Focus on gamers. For example Ikea or mahuranna shop, they have builded a website near their webshops. To get more traffic ofcourse, but its to hard to do both of them. Your focus will get lost and they way of communication on website/shop will be changing. Your brand and strategic will also change a lot, thats why im considering to find the right way. Who can give me an advice?
Local Website Optimization | | Dreamgame20160 -
Massive duplicate content should it all be rewritten?
Ok I am asking this question to hopefully confirm my conclusion. I am auditing a domain who's owner is frustrated that they are coming in #2 for their regionally tagged search result and think its their Marketer/SEOs fault. After briefly auditing their site, the marketing company they have doing their work has really done a great job. There are little things that I have suggested they could do better but nothing substantial. They are doing good SEO for the most part. Their competitor site is ugly, has a terrible user experience, looks very unprofessional, and has some technical SEO issues from what I have seen so far. Yet it is beating them every time on the serps. I have not compared backlinks yet. I will in the next day or so. I was halted when I found, what seems to me to be, the culprit. I was looking for duplicate content internally, and they are doing fine there, then my search turned externally...... I copied and pasted a large chunk of one page into Google and got an exact match return.....rutro shaggy. I then found that there is another site from a company across the country that has identical content for possibly as much as half of their entire domain. Something like 50-75 pages of exact copy. I thought at first they must have taken it from the site I was auditing. I was shocked to find out that the company I am auditing actually has an agreement to use the content from this other site. The marketing company has asked the owners to allow them to rewrite the content but the owners have declined because "they like the content." So they don't even have authority on the content for approximately 1/2 of their site. Also this content is one of three main topics directed to from home page. My point to them here is that I don't think you can optimize this domain enough to overcome the fact that you have a massive portion of your site that is not original. I just don't think perfect optimization of duplicate content beats mediocre optimization of original content. I now have to convince the owners they are wrong, never an easy task. Am I right or am I over estimating the value of original content? Any thoughts? Thanks in advance!
Local Website Optimization | | RossM0 -
Should digital marketing agencies treat SEO differently when it comes to homepage content?
When I review competitor digital agency sites, they seem to have very little homepage content. But how would this be beneficial in gaining a higher SERP rank?
Local Website Optimization | | randomagency1 -
Does Google play fair? Is 'relevant content' and 'usability' enough?
It seems there are 2 opposing views, and as a newbie this is very confusing. One view is that as long as your site pages have relevant content and are easy for the user, Google will rank you fairly. The other view is that Google has 'rules' you must follow and even if the site is relevant and user-friendly if you don't play by the rules your site may never rank well. Which is closer to the truth? No one wants to have a great website that won't rank because Google wasn't sophisticated enough to see that they weren't being unfair. Here's an example to illustrate one related concern I have: I've read that Google doesn't like duplicated content. But, here are 2 cases in which is it more 'relevant' and 'usable' to the user to have duplicate content: Say a website helps you find restaurants in a city. Restaurants may be listed by city region, and by type of restaurant. The home page may have links to 30 city regions. It may also have links for 20 types of restaurants. The user has a choice. Say the user chooses a region. The resulting new page may still be relevant and usable by listing ALL 30 regions because the user may want to choose a different region. Altenatively say the user chooses a restaurant type for the whole city. The resulting page may still be relevant and usable by giving the user the ability to choose another type OR another city region. IOW there may be a 'mega-menu' at the top of the page which duplicates on every page in the site, but is very helpful. Instead of requiring the user to go back to the home page to click a new region or a new type the user can do it on any page. That's duplicate content in the form of a mega menu, but is very relevant and usable. YET, my sense is that Google MAY penalize the site even though arguably it is the most relevant and usable approach for someone that may or may not have a specific region or restaurant type in mind.. Thoughts?
Local Website Optimization | | couponguy0 -
One location performing worse than the rest despite no major difference in SEO strategy
Hi all, I'm flummoxed. I'm dealing with a business that has 15 or so offices in three cities, and one city is performing horribly (this includes every office therein). The other two cities have shown consistently stellar results with massive traffic increases month over month for the past year; the city in question dropped unexpectedly in June and hasn't ever recovered. We didn't perform any major website changes during or immediately prior to that time period, and the website in general hasn't been negatively affected by Hummingbird. All locations for the business are optimized in the exact same way and according to best practices; there's no significant difference in the number of local listings, reviews, G+ fans, social signals, etc across locations. All meta data and content is optimized, NAPs are all consistent, we've built links wherever we can: the SEO for every location has been by-the-books. We've run a competitor audit in this particular city that included pulling our top competitors and exploring their domain authority, meta data, on-page keyword grade for the term we're trying to rank for, number and type of inbound links, social signals, and more; and we didn't spot any patterns or any websites that were significantly outperforming us in any area (besides actual rankings). It's frustrating because the client is expecting a fix for this city and I can't find anything that needs to be fixed! Have any multi-local SEOs out there run into a similar problem? What did you do about it?
Local Website Optimization | | ApogeeResults0