Discontinued Products
-
We have a medium/large ecommerce site that imports manufacturer products every year (or when new products come in/out) We are trying to decide what to do with the discontinued product pages.
As we are using shopify we do not have an option of custom404 error pages so we cannot use this. We also cannot do a 30 redirect with a custom message as to why they are being redirected so dont like that idea. What we were thinking of doing was leaving the page with its content and adding a message that the item has been discontinued and a few similar products listed below with an option of clicking on a link to go up a level to the category/subcategory of that products brand.
My question is:
Should we noindex/follow these pages when they go out of stock so search engines don't continue to index them.
Should we add the tag:
(we do not have advance warning so it would be at the time that we update the listing to say item is no longer available)
My concern with doing the above and leaving it to be indexed is that google may regard these pages as soft 404 if the bounce rate gets very high - as users will not be staying very long on the page.
Any advice would be very much appreciated!
-
http://www.apelectric.com/6241-Generac-Guardian-Series-14kW-p/6241.htm
This is the code I used:
-
Thanks for your response - you are the first one I found who uses it - can you give me an example of a page you've used it on so I can see how you did it? Do you think its a problem to do it in bulk and to only do it once the item is actually discontinued - we get updates from the company of lists of items which are discontinued so its a lot at a time and without much prior warning!
-
I do use it. Whether or not it is a good or bad thing I can't really tell you. In my opinion, it is the best practice because it gives both the searcher and the engine the optimal information and provides the best experience for both. I use the discontinued tag on the pages that I don't 404.
-
Thanks for all your responses. Sounds like everyone thinks keeping the page and just displaying a message that the item is discontinued with alternative suggestions is the best idea which is what we were thinking of doing.
However, noone has answered regarding google's discontinued tag- has anyone used it? Is it recommended or not?
-
Hi there,
I work for a rather large supply company as well. When we have large items go out of stock we repurpose existing pages to advertise new pages. If it is a small product, like a part or something, we 404 the page.
This is an example of a repurposed page: http://www.apelectric.com/6241-Generac-Guardian-Series-14kW-p/6241.htm
404 errors are not a negative thing per say. Of course you don't want hundreds of them because it creates a negative user experience. If a product is truly discontinued, it is better to let the searcher and the engine know that. No following the pages isn't the best idea because it can prevent traffic from getting to your site. We have about 87 404 pages and they have not influenced our organic rankings. I don't recommend 301 redirecting product pages because it can be misleading to the searcher. For example, we rank really well for the Generac 6241. I wanted to 301 that URL to the replacement model, but if someone types in Generac 6241 and lands on Generac 6461, they are probably going to bounce right off the page. That is not good either. One thing I have done in the past is redirect the product page to a related category page. So, the Generac 6241 could have been redirected to the Air Cooled Generators page. I think this was the better way to do it however.
If a page has value, and can be used as a way to direct traffic to another source that is my favorite way to handle discontinued products. At the end of the day, a $15 part doesn't justify the amount of time it will take me to redesign the page, so I let it become a 404 error.
This is a video from Matt Cutts at Google on how they handle 404 pages. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oya9Pl7ukNo
-
As per Moosa's response, I would agree that leaving the products in place is the best option. Would you rather have these pages none existent to search? or would you rather have them available where serps and users can still find them.
If a user can still find them you can then try to upsell from a discontinued item or cross sell to another variant. This way you have a second bite at the cherry and have the chance to still convert a sale. If nothing is available you may miss out on these additional opportunities.
Simply make sure that you demonstrate effectively that the item is not longer available, but these other products may help.
-
In your given scenario the best idea is to leave a message a t the top of the page that the product is discontinued and for new products take them to the new products page. Leaving them no follow or follow is up to you.
- If you will leave them follow with a custom message that will take them to a relevant page will help decrease the overall bounce rate of the website.
- If you no-follow them it slowly and gradually will be no index from the Google and the traffic that was coming from search engine to those pages will be discounted.
If I would be at your place, I would have designed the powerful message with bright color at the top of the page and will leave them follow as this will allow some of the traffic on that page to move to other areas of the website.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Placement of /p/ in URL structure for ecommerce site product URLs
Hi, We're a discussion about how to structure a clients ecommerce site product page URLs where 12345 represent the product SKU/number: https://domain.com/Item--i-12345 https://domain.com/product-name/p/12345 https://domain.com/p/12345 It's a toss up between the second and the third URL, but the SEO company is saying the third is best because of the placement with the /p/ and creating a silo for "products" that help search engines recognize it is a product. Does anyone have thoughts on this? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | AliMac260 -
Using Google to find a discontinued product.
Hi Guys. I mostly use this forum for business questions, but now it's a personal one! I'm trying to find a supplier that might still have discontinued product. It's the Behritone C5A speaker monitor. All my searches bring up a plethora of pages that appear to sell the product... but they have no stock. (Wouldn't removing these pages make for a better internet?) No 2nd hand ones on eBay 😞 Do you have any suggestion about how I can get more relevant results... i.e find supplier that might still have stock? Any tips or trick I may be able to use to help me with this? Many thanks in advance to an awesome community 🙂 Isaac.
Algorithm Updates | | isaac6631 -
Product descriptions & category pages
Hi I wanted to ask if anyone knew how much, if at all, product page titles/descriptions affected the rankings of the category page they're linked from? I am looking for ways to improve the ranking of category pages, but we don't want to put too much content which overshadows the product listings. Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Multiple products with legitimate duplicate descriptions
We are redeveloping a website for a card company who have far too many products to write unique descriptions for each. Even if they could I don't think it would be beneficial to the user. However they do have unique descriptions for each range which is useful for users viewing an individual card. Which is better practice: a) Ignore the duplicate content issue and supply the user with info about the range b) Provide clear enticing links to find out more about the range which will leave the individual card page a little void of content. Many thanks
Algorithm Updates | | SoundinTheory0 -
Any SEO thoughts about Google's new Data Highlighter for products?
After searching around on the web for a while I couldn't find any case studies or interesting posting about Google's new feature to highlight structured data. In Google Webmaster Tools you can now tag your products to be displayed as structured data in Google's search results. Two questions that rose immediately: 1. What effect will Google's new Data Hightlighter for products have on your SEO? Can we expect better CTR's for productspage results in Google? Better conversion rates perhaps? Any case studies that show KPI improvements after using structured data for products? 2. I would love to see some examples in the search results to see what productpages would look like after Data Highlighting it. Your thoughts or input about this subject will be much appreciated.
Algorithm Updates | | SDIM0 -
Which Google Snippet to use? Products or Review
A "product" page that includes "user reviews/ratings" and "comparison prices", which Google snippet do/should you use? Thanks in advance
Algorithm Updates | | righty0 -
Google Shopping Blocking All Vitamins and Natural Products - Glitch or Deliberate Censorship?
Hi everyone. We have a client that manufactures and supplies dietary supplements all around the world. We are slightly concerned that a recent Google shopping glitch (or change) is now seemingly excluding products from the shopping search results. This currently appears only to be happening in the US but we are really concerned, as our client ships all over the world and the potential loss of revenue could be quite large. There is already a YouTube video that demonstrates what is going on which is available below: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNDyS0tF4dY Just to clarify, these are products that should not be included in any of Google's “sensitive” categories as they currently stand. Taking Vitamin B12 as an example, it is recognised as a permissible dietary supplement within pretty much every regulatory framework around the world, including those governed by the US FDA, The Euopean Commission and the Australian TGA. Therefore there would be no legal reasons to prevent it's inclusion in shopping results in any country. Has this just slipped under the radar or can anyone point us to a resource that may be able to clarify why this has happened? Thanks in advance guys!
Algorithm Updates | | AduroLabs0 -
Does Schema.org markup create a conflict with Power Reviews' standard microformat markup for e-commerce product pages?
Does anyone have experience implementing Schema.org markup on e-commerce websites that are already using Power Reviews (now Bazaar)? In Google's documentation they say that it's generally not a good idea to use two types of semantic markup for the same item (reviews in this case), but I wouldn't think that there would be a problem marking up other items on the page with Schema such as price, stock status, etc... Anyone care to provide some insight? Also in a related topic, have you all noticed that Google has really dialed back the frequency in which they display rich snippets for product searches? A few weeks ago the site that I'm referring to had hundreds of products that were displaying snippets, now it seems that only about 10% (roughly) of them are still showing. Thanks everybody.
Algorithm Updates | | BrianCC0