Traffic dropped 75% - Panda 2 Penalized?
-
Hello everyone,
My e-commerce website traffic dropped by 75% overnight, on April 12th. The website has been around since 2003 and growing every year. Over the years gained some great placement for some competitive keywords and stayed on page 1 for some time. After the Panda update, some of our major keywords dropped from page 1 to page 10. The first Panda update had a slightly negative effect on us, by bumping up all the brand's websites (brands we carry) placing the brands in the first couple positions (giving them 2-3 first spots) pushing us down. However, the Panda 2 killed us.
I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on my situation.
Did anyone ever have luck or would recommend contacting Google, and asking them for advise or reasons why the site was dropped.
The website in question is www.instyleswimwear.com
Thanks in advance,
Alex -
You're welcome Alex.
Actually my recommendation is to not noindex category or pagination pages. They each need a unique title, meta description & h1 tag, and categories need quality descriptive content on the 1st (default) page in the pagination sequence.
I would not have that content repeat on subsequent pages in category pagination sequence - allowing each of those to stand alone as supporting pages - the unique products on each should be enough to communicate uniqueness of content if you've got thumbnails and captions for each.
I would use noindex/follow on all other filter types though, or block those filters from search bots altogether (it's easier to do noindex/follow).
-
Alan,
Thanks for your help. Recent post by Dr. Pete had some great pointers as well. In reference to the pagination and category pages, do you recommend NOINDEXing them?
-
Alex
content scraping is a challenge, to say the least. going after scrapers is monumental. I bet they scraped by sucking up the feed that bizrate uses. The best defense against such action is to provide a different description to bizrate than that which you use on the site. Yes, it's more work, however it can help a lot.
Whether Google recognizes bizrate for what it is or not, I honestly don't know. I do know that the overriding scrape issue and the potential that bizrate's pages are battling yours dictates the two different description solution.
-
Alan,
Thanks so much for taking the time to check out my site. I didn't think of searching exact match on descriptions. But now that I did, I see the same site (with different domain) scraped my site and using my product descriptions.
hoodieswebsitedesigner.com, <cite>coolauthentichoodies.com, etc.</cite>
In addition, I found another online store that are steeling our descriptions, <cite>summerfashionshop.com</cite>
And finally, as you have pointed out, Bizrate also shows up, however these are our listings on Bizrate.
Having all this data, what can I do about Google seeing my site as the content owner. And also, does Google realize that Bizrate uses our descriptions, since they are linking back to our product pages?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Alex
-
Great Insight Alan. Awesome observation! Ecommerce websites are faced with faceted navigation, duplicate content and canonical URL issues. Thats why ecommerce websites are more prone to relegation on Google updates.
Something has to change drastically on the way ecommerce websites exist. Otherwise, Google may end up delisting or relegating a huge number of such websites.
-
Alex,
I've had the opportunity (misfortune?) to perform audits on a few ecommerce sites that saw a major hit due to Panda. I can tell you that Google set up a mechanism for submitting your site to let them know. You won't however, get individual site reconsideration, you'll simply be giving them an opportunity to include your site in their ongoing evaluation process. And be able to commiserate with others.
Taking a quick look at your site here's a few factors:
**1. Duplicate product descriptions. **
I pulled up a random product on your site and did an exact match search for the first line in the product description. I got your site among some bizrate.com listings, and a couple rogue sites.
Having a truly unique description for every product page is critical. It should be at least a few paragraphs long. Yes, that's a massive time-suck. However it's one of the most significant factors in the long list of factors.
2. Topical Confusion
With so many sorting options included in primary navigation (New Arrivals, full catalog, Sale, Final Sale links up top as well as the entire left sidebar navigation that's site-wide), you're not doing anything to help Google comprehend content relationships that are unique on the site. Many of these pages are purely pagination with no unique content other than product images, a one word product name, and price. There's no way any of that content can stand out as truly strong content pages uniquely identified to a particular set of important phrases.
There's also no navigation breadcrumbs, which would reinforce topical relationship focus and separation.
3. Inbound Link Profile
A quick check in OpenSiteExplorer.org shows the majority of links contain "swimsuit" anchor text. Overall, there are hardly any phrases built around variations such as "bikinis" or "women's bathing suits" or any of countless other variations - without that breadth, your site is too heavy on too few variations.
That's just an overview that should get you going in the right direction, however it's just what stood out in a quick review.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why is Indeed.com traffic appearing as organic in Google Analytics?
A large number of sessions in my client's Google Analytics account appear to come from medium: organic and source:Indeed. Since I'm focused on SEO for this project, I'd prefer that Indeed be treated as referral traffic. Any ideas for fixing this issue? Also, and I'm sure the answer is no, is there a way to fix the past data in Google Analytics that has already reported Indeed as an organic medium?
Reporting & Analytics | | Kevin_P0 -
Increase in Direct traffic, drop in Google traffic, after updating Google Analytics settings.
I made some changes to our Google Analytics property settings (see notes in screenshot). As a result, there was an equal drop in Google traffic and increase in Direct traffic. Has anyone else seen something like this before? I'm wondering if I should revert. jE7buO6
Reporting & Analytics | | vcj0 -
Newer iteration of Avinash Kaushik's Web 2.0
Greetings all! Does anyone know if there is a more recent, but comparable, book that covers the topic of analytics like Avinash Kaushik's Web Analytics 2.0: The Art of Online Accountability and Science of Customer Centricity or Brian Clifton's Advanced Web Metrics with Google Analytics, 2nd Edition? These were published in 2009 & 2010. I know the core concepts remain the same, but the technology has improved greatly.
Reporting & Analytics | | AfroSEO0 -
Improved keyword ranking but less traffic
Hello fellow mozzers! My collegue and I are a bit puzzled in regards to our recent website statistics. In november 2013, we upgraded the technological platform of our website to be fully HTML5 coded, and implemented the schema.org Products scheme to systematically tag all our products on the site. To prevent too much loss of visitors, we created a 301-redirect table from almost all our old URL's to the specific new ones, as we implemented a new URL structure as well. The first few months were bumpy as expected, making a huge drop in rankings before rising up again. Our keyword rankings are better then ever (60% of the keywords in top 3, average competition, 25% more on first SERP) but our number of visits dropped by about 10%. Our bounce rate went down from 20% to 14%, our returning visits are stable, but our new visitors stats dropped by 25% as well. This comparison was made between equal periods in the current year and last year, using organic data stats. (new technical platform vs. the old one) What could be the reason that our number of visits dropped 10% while our keyword ranking is better then ever? We don't have any manual penalties in GWT and can't understand why visits would drop so much while ranking improved. May it be so easy that there's just less search volume on our ranked content or does anyone have other ideas? Thank you all in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | EconostoNL0 -
Strange Traffic / Viewed content in Analytics
Hi Im looking at the content viewed in December for a clients site and there's a high number of page views for some non-existent pages which received multiple hits eg. domain.com/dr-capability/ with 241 page views (54 unique page views) How can you have multiple page views (and many unique page views) for pages that don't exist ? Is it possible page is being generated automatically or something ? if so how come ? Any ideas as to whats causing this much appreciated ? All Best Dan ps - also many above average home page views
Reporting & Analytics | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Our Firefox organic traffic seems to have been re-allocated to direct - anyone know why?!
In Google Analytic, the majority of organic traffic via Firefox browsers to one of our websites suddenly dropped off, and an immediate lift in direct traffic via Firefox browsers appeared. This trend has continued ever since. I've searched to find Firefox releases that might have affected it (eg. security/cookie settings), but haven't been able to find anything, or talk of this happening to other people, and the anomaly doesn't appear in our other website analytics either...anyone have any ideas?! The attached GA graphs show Firefox browser versions 21.0 and 22.0, but it's the same story across all versions. (You can also see that I'd also filtered out traffic via IOS 6 and Android 4 operating systems to remove any effect from these known issues). Thanks for any help that you can offer! kPRnrcd.png dy0Bjg7.png
Reporting & Analytics | | HubMDP1 -
Rank #1 for a 110,000/month query search, but barely any traffic?
Hi guys, As it says in the title, we've recently reached the absolute #1 position for a certain key phrase in the travel industry which the Google Keyword Tool tells me averages 110,000 local (165,000 global) searches a month... however we have received barely any traffic at all over the past TWO months for it and I'm trying my best to determine why. We've checked on multiple different devices with all forms of personalisation off, different browsers, 3G connections as opposed to office Wi-FI etc. and it still returns us as the #1 rank. Meta descriptions and title tags are pretty much pristine if I don't say so myself, however what should be a very lucrative key phrase is currently returning little to no traffic results. Has anyone had experience in a similar situation to this? Any possible causes that I might be missing? Would greatly appreciate any help. Thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | ExperienceOz0 -
What is the impact of a panda refresh on a Pandalized site?
When a panda refresh hits and you have a pandalized site, If the site were to de-pandalized, would you see traffic back to pre-panda levels right away? Or any type of movement right away?
Reporting & Analytics | | jessefriedman0