Our Firefox organic traffic seems to have been re-allocated to direct - anyone know why?!
-
In Google Analytic, the majority of organic traffic via Firefox browsers to one of our websites suddenly dropped off, and an immediate lift in direct traffic via Firefox browsers appeared.
This trend has continued ever since. I've searched to find Firefox releases that might have affected it (eg. security/cookie settings), but haven't been able to find anything, or talk of this happening to other people, and the anomaly doesn't appear in our other website analytics either...anyone have any ideas?!
The attached GA graphs show Firefox browser versions 21.0 and 22.0, but it's the same story across all versions. (You can also see that I'd also filtered out traffic via IOS 6 and Android 4 operating systems to remove any effect from these known issues).
Thanks for any help that you can offer!
-
I was curious about this, so I poked around in the metrics of some of the websites I work on, to see if I could find anything similar (big increase in Firefox (direct) traffic). I did find that about 80% of all Firefox traffic from mobile devices was showing up as (direct) traffic.
The sites I work on get very little of this type of traffic, so I hadn't really noticed that previously. In the data I looked at, it didn't really seem like that recent of a change, however. Maybe you've had a recent surge in mobile traffic? I think Firefox mobile traffic is typically from Android devices.
-
that makes a lot of sense browsers switching to SSL by default I bet by now it's more than just Safari on iPhone's doing it.
Thank you EGOL
sincerely,
Thomas
-
Just read how Apple has been blocking lots of search query data and making it look like "direct". This explains why my direct data was ramping up in 2012.
http://searchengineland.com/ios-6-removes-all-google-search-referer-data-134560
-
I agree with you I think Google is messing with the data quite a bit and looking at Google analytics everything you say makes sense.
I still see the big drop however the drop is not as intense for instance it shows approximately twice as many visitors as hubspot is showing.
The GA and kiss metrics version of what I can see is dramatic in the middle of July as well.
For instance kiss metrics shows a fall on July 4 where hubspot shows what is seen above.
I think Google could be blocking quite a bit of data coming out.
sincerely,
Thomas
-
Mine looks similar to that.... but my drop did not occur until July and was not as dramatic as is shown on your chart.
Something is going on. Google is messing with the data.
-
you are absolutely right. Thank you for having me do that in fact as you can see direct traffic and organic traffic has fallen off a cliff this shows the beginning of June until today.
So the traffic went from approximately 20,000 visitors a day down to approximately 2000 visitors a day.
Almost all of it was direct traffic before does this match with what you had seen?
As far as the amount of direct verse organic?
thank you sincerely,
Thomas
-
Go back one month. I bet you had a lot of direct in mid July that dropped in late July or the first week of August.
-
Here is a general outlook from HubSpot this is a site I'm working on.
The blue equals direct traffic the green equals organic search the orange equals referral and yellow social media.
When I go back in my analytics I get about the same portion of organic verse direct.
Is this something that looks odd to you or do you think this is in line with what you see as well?
I'm sorry I cannot show the numbers for you I hope you guys understand.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
I am using Clicky.com for my analytics. My direct traffic started an unreasonable climb over one year ago. Showed a huge drop in early August but now is back on an unreasonable power climb. It has to be google. I know its not bots or course management systsms. And, there is no other reason for me to be getting that much traffic from direct visitors - although I do have a lot of direct.
-
Hi EGOL you bring up a great point I just checked my Google Analytics and found the exact same thing.
I agree it has to be a change with Google in fact I have almost 100% direct traffic via GA but HubSpot shows me much more it must be Google changing things however check out hubspot and you'll see what I mean.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
I am getting amazing amounts of this "direct" traffic.
It has to be smoke from Google.
-
it appears this is very common.
if I were you I would set up accounts with alternate analytics providers and see what you get.
Or
mix panel does not cost anything to use when starting out. I would utilize them as a backup to Google analytics
if you're using WordPress a free plug-in is available here
https://github.com/zippykid/mixpanel-wordpress
a alternative is to use https://segment.io/ either with Google analytics or without it this will allow you much more granular control over GA or whatever analytics provider you choose.
To fix this problem though I would
Here's some more information on how to fix this
http://www.orbitmedia.com/blog/inaccurate-google-analytics-traffic-sources
if you scroll down in this link and you will see someone talking about JavaScript errors in Firefox on Windows 8
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/analytics/QUgzuaabqVs
https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/2558811?hl=en
One recommendation is to set up campaigns and use URL builder
https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1033867?hl=en-GB&rd=1
sincerely,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is Google's Knowledge Graph stealing sessions from the organic channel?
Does Google count it as an organic session in Google Analytics when a searcher clicks on the "get directions", "call" or even "website" from Google's Knowledge Graph. Are the articles that prove or disprove this question? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | SearchOpt0 -
How do I track specific referral traffics journey through a website?
Hello, A client has asked us to track the journey each separate referral traffic visitor takes through out the website. I have had a look through analytics and am not sure how to ensure I can do this for all referral traffic visitors? Can anyone help? Thank you.
Reporting & Analytics | | mblsolutions0 -
Google referral traffic drop around 14th July 2014 (UK). Anyone else seeing it?
We've seen around a 25% drop in Google referral traffic from the 14th July 2014 onwards and having real trouble identifying why and from what search terms we're being effected. WMT and Moz Pro don't show any movement. Is anyone else seeing the same thing on UK search terms? Seems a bit late to be the effect of Panda 4.0? Any help would be amazing. Thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | whis1 -
What is the difference between "Organic Traffic" and the "Non-Paid Search Traffic" default segment in Google Analytics?
These two filtering options ("organic traffic" in the left sidebar and "non-paid search traffic" in the advanced segments) give me slightly different numbers. Any idea why this would be the case?
Reporting & Analytics | | FPD_NYC1 -
Does anyone know of a way to do a profile level filter to exclude all traffic if it enters the site via certain landing pages?
Does anyone know of a way to do a profile level filter to exclude all traffic if it enters the site via certain landing pages? The problem I have is that we have several pages that are served to visitors of numerous other domains but are also served to visitors of our site. We end up with inflated Google Analytics numbers because people are viewing these pages from our partners' domains but never actually entering our site. I've made an advanced segment that serves the purpose but I'd really like to filter it at the profile level so the numbers across the board are more accurate without having to apply an advanced segment to every report. The advanced segment excludes visits that hit these pages as landing pages but includes visits where people have come from other pages on our domain. I know that you can do profile filters to exclude visits to pages or directories entirely but is there a way to filter them only if they are a landing pages? Any other creative thoughts? Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | ATIseo0 -
Magic UVs - PPC landing pages delivering organic traffic by magic...
I have checked and double checked this. GA is showing over the last couple of weeks mysite.com/ppc/landingpage1 as a landing page for organic traffic, where it shouldn't. Main facts: The entire /ppc/ folder is blocked from the googlebot, and doesn't appear on any internal site maps. As far as I can tell, these pages have never been cached for the main index. I cannot recreate any of the organic searches myself (i.e. typing in keywords that triggered the traffic, even the almost unique long-tail ones). We just don't appear in the organic listings with these pages. The analytics and adwords accounts are linked. We are not paying for this mystery traffic through our PPC - these keywords are not appearing in our AdWords account (though other keywords / traffic are). The traffic is real - we have received phone calls from these pages, tracked to the visits recorded as organic These pages should only receive PPC traffic. They are receiving organic traffic also, but I can't recreate it. Can anyone suggest what's going on? I'm concerned about duplicate content issues and also skewing the analysis of the PPC campaign. Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | RobPell0 -
Woes in organic ranking... Post Penguin issue?
Hello all, First post here. Site:http://www.symbolphoto.com I'd done a ton of work to get my SEO where it needs to be, however, after looking at my traffic post April 15-22nd, it's gone completely downhill. I don't rank organically, which i'd like for one single term 'b*ston wedding photographer'. What am i missing? I'm assuming Penguin may be a part of this, but i haven't participated in any link schemes... am i being penalized and if so, is it evident why? Help is much appreciated! replace * with o.
Reporting & Analytics | | symbolphoto0 -
How much direct traffic is really direct?
Does anyone else think that a large chunk of traffic labelled as "Direct" in your analytics isn't direct at all. When you analyse traffic trends it seems that a large percentage could just be browsers with their referring URL hidden so it only appears direct. Here's the evidence: When we've been affected by major search algorithm changes, we've seen big changes in direct traffic as well as organic, but not in referral traffic. If direct traffic is just bookmarks, typed-in URLs, and people clicking through from emails why is direct traffic 85% new visitors? We don't do any offline advertising, so you'd expect genuine direct traffic to be returning visitors -- either our brand loyalists or subscribers to our email newsletters. If you segment direct traffic into new and returning visitors and look at a major algo update as discussed in 1), you find all the drop in direct traffic is from New Direct visitors, with no drop at all in Returning Direct visitors. Can anyone explain who these New, Direct visitors are if not simply mislabelled new, search visitors. Cookie deletion can't be the problem (ie: they can't be Returning, Direct really) because the traffic doesn't behave like returning, direct (that is, it varies too much). I'd be really interest to hear theories, and whether anyone has any figures on the extent of HTTP referrer blocking.
Reporting & Analytics | | Dennis-529610