Our Firefox organic traffic seems to have been re-allocated to direct - anyone know why?!
-
In Google Analytic, the majority of organic traffic via Firefox browsers to one of our websites suddenly dropped off, and an immediate lift in direct traffic via Firefox browsers appeared.
This trend has continued ever since. I've searched to find Firefox releases that might have affected it (eg. security/cookie settings), but haven't been able to find anything, or talk of this happening to other people, and the anomaly doesn't appear in our other website analytics either...anyone have any ideas?!
The attached GA graphs show Firefox browser versions 21.0 and 22.0, but it's the same story across all versions. (You can also see that I'd also filtered out traffic via IOS 6 and Android 4 operating systems to remove any effect from these known issues).
Thanks for any help that you can offer!
-
I was curious about this, so I poked around in the metrics of some of the websites I work on, to see if I could find anything similar (big increase in Firefox (direct) traffic). I did find that about 80% of all Firefox traffic from mobile devices was showing up as (direct) traffic.
The sites I work on get very little of this type of traffic, so I hadn't really noticed that previously. In the data I looked at, it didn't really seem like that recent of a change, however. Maybe you've had a recent surge in mobile traffic? I think Firefox mobile traffic is typically from Android devices.
-
that makes a lot of sense browsers switching to SSL by default I bet by now it's more than just Safari on iPhone's doing it.
Thank you EGOL
sincerely,
Thomas
-
Just read how Apple has been blocking lots of search query data and making it look like "direct". This explains why my direct data was ramping up in 2012.
http://searchengineland.com/ios-6-removes-all-google-search-referer-data-134560
-
I agree with you I think Google is messing with the data quite a bit and looking at Google analytics everything you say makes sense.
I still see the big drop however the drop is not as intense for instance it shows approximately twice as many visitors as hubspot is showing.
The GA and kiss metrics version of what I can see is dramatic in the middle of July as well.
For instance kiss metrics shows a fall on July 4 where hubspot shows what is seen above.
I think Google could be blocking quite a bit of data coming out.
sincerely,
Thomas
-
Mine looks similar to that.... but my drop did not occur until July and was not as dramatic as is shown on your chart.
Something is going on. Google is messing with the data.
-
you are absolutely right. Thank you for having me do that in fact as you can see direct traffic and organic traffic has fallen off a cliff this shows the beginning of June until today.
So the traffic went from approximately 20,000 visitors a day down to approximately 2000 visitors a day.
Almost all of it was direct traffic before does this match with what you had seen?
As far as the amount of direct verse organic?
thank you sincerely,
Thomas
-
Go back one month. I bet you had a lot of direct in mid July that dropped in late July or the first week of August.
-
Here is a general outlook from HubSpot this is a site I'm working on.
The blue equals direct traffic the green equals organic search the orange equals referral and yellow social media.
When I go back in my analytics I get about the same portion of organic verse direct.
Is this something that looks odd to you or do you think this is in line with what you see as well?
I'm sorry I cannot show the numbers for you I hope you guys understand.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
I am using Clicky.com for my analytics. My direct traffic started an unreasonable climb over one year ago. Showed a huge drop in early August but now is back on an unreasonable power climb. It has to be google. I know its not bots or course management systsms. And, there is no other reason for me to be getting that much traffic from direct visitors - although I do have a lot of direct.
-
Hi EGOL you bring up a great point I just checked my Google Analytics and found the exact same thing.
I agree it has to be a change with Google in fact I have almost 100% direct traffic via GA but HubSpot shows me much more it must be Google changing things however check out hubspot and you'll see what I mean.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
I am getting amazing amounts of this "direct" traffic.
It has to be smoke from Google.
-
it appears this is very common.
if I were you I would set up accounts with alternate analytics providers and see what you get.
Or
mix panel does not cost anything to use when starting out. I would utilize them as a backup to Google analytics
if you're using WordPress a free plug-in is available here
https://github.com/zippykid/mixpanel-wordpress
a alternative is to use https://segment.io/ either with Google analytics or without it this will allow you much more granular control over GA or whatever analytics provider you choose.
To fix this problem though I would
Here's some more information on how to fix this
http://www.orbitmedia.com/blog/inaccurate-google-analytics-traffic-sources
if you scroll down in this link and you will see someone talking about JavaScript errors in Firefox on Windows 8
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/analytics/QUgzuaabqVs
https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/2558811?hl=en
One recommendation is to set up campaigns and use URL builder
https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1033867?hl=en-GB&rd=1
sincerely,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Filter Remote Workers Traffic
For the most part in the past our company has worked on location. So filtering internal traffic was as simple as filtering out our company IPs as well as a few remote workers IPS. Now a large number of employees are working from home due to Covid-19. I am seeing an uptick in traffic that is clearly employee-related. I am hoping some of you who work with large remote teams may have some suggestions on how to best filter out traffic from remote working employees. I found a few articles from a couple of years ago where people were using a cookie but not sure we can get that implemented in time as our Dev team is backed up. Any help is much appreciated.
Reporting & Analytics | | RMATVMC0 -
Does anyone know of a way to do a profile level filter to exclude all traffic if it enters the site via certain landing pages?
Does anyone know of a way to do a profile level filter to exclude all traffic if it enters the site via certain landing pages? The problem I have is that we have several pages that are served to visitors of numerous other domains but are also served to visitors of our site. We end up with inflated Google Analytics numbers because people are viewing these pages from our partners' domains but never actually entering our site. I've made an advanced segment that serves the purpose but I'd really like to filter it at the profile level so the numbers across the board are more accurate without having to apply an advanced segment to every report. The advanced segment excludes visits that hit these pages as landing pages but includes visits where people have come from other pages on our domain. I know that you can do profile filters to exclude visits to pages or directories entirely but is there a way to filter them only if they are a landing pages? Any other creative thoughts? Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | ATIseo0 -
What will you do when seeing the rank and traffic are dropping?
No black-hat SEO strategy was adopted, so we suppose it's not a penalty, but ranks and organic traffics are dropping. What will you do in this situation? And how long it takes for you to make sure it's not a normal flux, but something wrong happens on your site? Thanks in advance
Reporting & Analytics | | JonnyGreenwood0 -
Figuring Out the Source of "direct traffic" by looking at landing page parameters
I have a client who runs an e-commerce website, and I noticed that 40% of his traffic and 25% of his sales are all attributable to Direct Traffic. At first, I tried to solve this problem by tagging all of the previously untagged links in his e-newsletter, which I expect to be very helpful. However, then I looked at the landing pages for his direct traffic, and I see that it is almost entirely filled with thousands of unique URLs that begin with a question mark followed by the name of his e-newsletter or shopping cart vendor. It would be the equivalent of having a url like the following: "www.willmarlow.com/?constantcontact=keya;sldkfjsdlfkjdf;sldkjf" If we have this amount of information in the link, shouldn't there be a way to add additional parameters to the URL to move this traffic out of the Direct column? Has anyone encountered this before? Thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | williammarlow0 -
Google Analytics - Referral Traffic Question
How Google Analytics determine that some particular web site referred traffic if there is no back link on that site?
Reporting & Analytics | | DiamondJewelryEmpire1 -
301 redirects reduce traffic considerably
I recently identified an issue with our site whereby we had three different URL types for each article. As an example, we might have something like: /articles/my-article-name /articles/my-article-name.aspx /articles/My-Article-Name We've since taken action to address this by implement 301 redirects from the second and third formats to the first (so everything is without the .aspx extension and is in lower case). But the results have been disconcerting. Before the change, one of our articles receives 150 or so hits per day via the .aspx version. The other two existed but had very low traffic (1-3 per day). We decided the non .aspx and lowercase version was the version we wanted. Sure enough, when we introduced the 301 redirects on September 25th the traffic for the .aspx version just stopped (after a day) and the traffic for the non-.aspx version climbed. But not enough. After the change, the non-.aspx version is receiving about 60-70% of the traffic that we used to have on the .aspx version. So, instead of receiving 150 per day (to the .aspx version) we are receiving around 100 or so to the non-.aspx version. This pattern has occured across all our articles and, as a result, our site-wide traffic has dropped by about 40% or so. Since we are using 301 redirects I had assumed that the search engines would just update to reflect the non-.aspx version. I am sure I am missing something here. Any help would be most appreciated. Thanks. Mark
Reporting & Analytics | | MarkWill0 -
Traffic dropped 75% - Panda 2 Penalized?
Hello everyone, My e-commerce website traffic dropped by 75% overnight, on April 12th. The website has been around since 2003 and growing every year. Over the years gained some great placement for some competitive keywords and stayed on page 1 for some time. After the Panda update, some of our major keywords dropped from page 1 to page 10. The first Panda update had a slightly negative effect on us, by bumping up all the brand's websites (brands we carry) placing the brands in the first couple positions (giving them 2-3 first spots) pushing us down. However, the Panda 2 killed us. I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on my situation. Did anyone ever have luck or would recommend contacting Google, and asking them for advise or reasons why the site was dropped. The website in question is www.instyleswimwear.com Thanks in advance,
Reporting & Analytics | | AlexGop
Alex0 -
RE: Google Analytics keywords metric and appropriate keywords
Greetings, When running Google Analytics' keyword report, I see that the over 85% of the top 100 keywords used to find us include a word in our name (Eagle's Nest Foundation and Camp -- with "eagle" or "eagle's nest" being the most frequent) or the name of one of our programs. Does this mean that most folks searching for summer camps in North Carolina already know about us and that we therefore need to optimize for broader keywords, to cast a wider net for folks who don't already know about us? Thanks, Dave
Reporting & Analytics | | DMoff0