There seems to be something obvious stopping our product pages from being listed in organic results - help!
-
Hello All
Firstly new to SEO MOZ but what a fantastic resource, good work!
I help run a platform at ethical community (dot) com (have phrased it like that so google doesn't pick up this thread hope thats ok).
We seem to have something glaringly obvious with the SEO ability of our product pages. We now have over 7000 products on the site and would like to think we have done a pretty good job in terms of optimisning them, lots of nice keywords, relevant page titles, good internal links, and even recently have reduced the loading speeds a fair amount. We have a sitemap set up feeding in URLS to Google and some of them are now nearly a year old.
The problem, when doing an EXACT google search on a product title the product pages dont show up for the majority of the 7000 products.
HOWEVER.... we get fantastic ranking in google products, and get sales through other areas of the site, which seems even more odd. For example, if you type in "segway" you'll see us ranking on the first page of google in google products, but the product page itself is nowhere to be seen.
For example "DARK CHOCOLATE STRANDS 70G CAKE DECORATION" gets no results on google (aside from google products) when we have this page at OURDOMAIN/eco-shop/food/dark-chocolate-strands-70g-cake-decoration-5592
Can anyone help identify if there is a major bottleneck here our gut feeling is there is one major factor that is causing this.
-
Can stephen/anyone else help with my latest question here?
-
HI Stephen did you manage to look into that new example I gave any further?
-
Thanks for this Stephen - very helpful.
Ajax wise we made some amendments last week which seem to already be having an impact (our pagination on search results had /# links and now they have crawlable urls). Google has already crawled more pages so far. We are going to move away from the ajax search altogether in the next few weeks too.
One thing that still bugs us all is this example: http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=CEBRA+RHASSOUL+ORGANIC+MOROCCAN+LAVA+CLAY This bugs the hell out of us because
a) The product page for this (http://www.ethicalcommunity.com/eco-shop/toiletries-and-cosmetics/cebra-rhassoul-organic-moroccan-lava-clay-8206) IS in the our sitemap
b) It features on our homepage (has done for 1 week at least) so in theory google should have crawled this link by now
c) We get a huge amount of traffic (well, relative, but about 40% of total traffic on sunday) for the term RHASSOUL CLAY. What's annoying is this links to a content piece on the clay but the product itself is nowhere to be seen.Even googling an exact URL to the product page returns nothing, so if google does know about it, its blocking it.
This also would tend to perhaps invalidate the theory that its the search causing all of this problem as actually this product has accessible links from the homepage.
I have a feeling solving this one case would solve the issue for most of the other products on the site.
Any ideas here?
-
I think that navigation issues may well be what trip you up.
http://www.ethicalcommunity.com/eco-shop/buy/Food-and-Drink when I navigate through the product pages, I am not seeing the html changing to reflect the new contents, the html reflects the coffee content of the first page
However when I copy+paste the url directly to page 3 I get the correct html for the products on the page
Ajax isnt my strong point, but you need to aim to give engines access to your products via clear categorisation and pagination. Has your developer considered using a hashbang (#!)?
Here's a SEOmoz post that may help http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-allow-google-to-crawl-ajax-content
Let me know if this is the issue, interested to know
S
-
thanks will do and look forward to it Stephen
-
check your ajax and what happens to your html when your products load. will look more later
-
Also!...
- You touched on slow loading speeds, can you give me something quantifiable here as as far as we know these should be fairly competitive and have run various speeds tests and they seem to come out ok in terms of loading time. Can you back up that statement with some more solidity? Many thanks again
-
RE: 3)..... perhaps I misunderstood here but maybe what you meant by duplicate content was a lot of the content on the pages is "re-used" stuff for example
ETHICAL CREDENTIALS
Click the icons below to learn about this product's ethical credentials.
etc......
is that more what you meant rather than the product descriptions being copied/pasted from other shop site (as only some of the descriptions will be copy/paste jobs)
- Benchmark...
http://www.etsy.com/listing/70625156/waving-leaves-crisp-white-and-lime-green?ref=fp_treasury_2 is a huge benchmark for us in terms of high volume optimised pages (and a similar model to us so one to review for sure). I guess if you break down the elements on that page a lot of the content are individual to the page... is this what you mean?
-
Hi Stephen
Thank you for your feedback here...
-
Stripping the pages down. Thanks for this and a valid comment here, will get our developer to look into what we can strip out to put more focus on the content.
-
That server would appear to be from Woopra which as you may know is a live tracking tool for us to see live site action/pathway analysis etc. We use it quite a lot and have not heard that this could impact the site, do you know otherwise?
-
Duplicate content, I wouldnt say the majority of pages are duplicated, of course some sellers have their own product pages and copy/paste into ours but a lot of them also write them fresh. Even the ones that are writing them fresh are no-where to be seen
I personally think there is another factor influencing this as it still doesnt explain why some of the pages dont come up literally at all with an exact product search (even when searching the URLs)
look forward to hearing further thoughts and thanks again for your time on this.
-
-
http://www.ethicalcommunity.com/eco-shop/coffee/papua-new-guinean-coffee-454g-10261
All these coffee pages look like crappy duplicate content - you have such a tiny percentage of actual content product description vs all the other stuff on the page - on product pages strip out all the extraneous crap and just focus on selling your product
Also the site is very slow for me, run yslow/google page speed optimiser and see what you can improve
Also check woopra-ns.com
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Consolidating product pages during website migration
Hello, We are an e-commerce & content site undergoing a website migration and redesign in the coming months. We will be getting an entirely new website. Many of our URLs will be changing: Current URL setup: www.mysite.com/catalog/SKU12345/product-title-here
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | katelynroberts
Future URL setup: www.mysite.com/catalog/product-title-here So we're aware we will be using plenty of 301 redirects to achieve this. Further to this though, we currently have a product page for each configuration of a product - for example, a single-sided bookmark has its own page and URL, and the double-sided version of the same bookmark has its own page and URL. In our site redesign, we are hoping to consolidate each of these instances into one product page where users can select single or double-sided and the price will update accordingly. The bookmark URLs would then go from:
_www.mysite.com/catalog/SKU12345/bookmark-single-sided _(call this URL A for simplicity)www.mysite.com/catalog/SKU67890/bookmark-double-sided (call this URL B) To (after migrating to the new URL structure for the new site, and the now-consolidated single- & double-sided product pages):
www.mysite.com/catalog/bookmark (call this URL C) What is the best way to make this transition without losing too much of our SEO value? I understand there is nearly always traffic loss with URL changes but I'd like to at least minimize the damage as best I can. We have backlinks and ranks for many product pages so I want to make sure we pass as much of this as we can. (And is this at all further complicated by the fact that URL A & B won't exist on the new site, and URL C doesn't exist on the current site? Does this impact the use of the 301 redirects and if so, how?) Are we better off to approach this page consolidation after the site migration and treat it as a separate project? This is something that is important to our user experience, and is definitely a change we want to make. Any advice is appreciated - thank you! I'm a fairly beginner-intermediate SEO so this is all somewhat new but I want to be able to at least convey some understanding to our developer of what we need to do. I was able to find this discussion (https://moz.com/community/q/merging-pages-and-seo) which describes a similar situation and solutions if we were just consolidating the pages but doesn't quite have the complicating factor of the entire site migration happening at the same time. Thanks so much!0 -
Conditional Noindex for Dynamic Listing Pages?
Hi, We have dynamic listing pages that are sometimes populated and sometimes not populated. They are clinical trial results pages for disease types, some of which don't always have trials open. This means that sometimes the CMS produces a blank page -- pages that are then flagged as thin content. We're considering implementing a conditional noindex -- where the page is indexed only if there are results. However, I'm concerned that this will be confusing to Google and send a negative ranking signal. Any advice would be super helpful. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | yaelslater0 -
Url structure on product pages - Should we apply canonicalized links in breadcrumbs or entry folders
We have products in the that go into mulitiple categories on our e-commerce site. But of course, each product is only canonicalized to one category. My question is: what should the breadcrumbs look like when users access a product from a non-canonicalized/primary category ?Should we apply canonicalized links in breadcrumbs or entry folders? For example: Let´s say we have product called "glacier hiking in the alps". It is in two categories; 1) glacier hiking 2) mountain tours. And is canonicalized to the glacier hiking category. If a user accesses it from the mountain tours category, should the url/breadcrumbs look like this: www.example.com/glacier-hiking/glacier-hiking-in-the-alps (because that is the canonicalized version) Or should it look like like this: www.example.com/mountain-tours/glacier-hiking-in-the-alps (because that is where the user came from) Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | guidetoiceland0 -
How can I stop spam Google Organic traffic?
Hey Moz, I'm a rather experienced SEO who just encountered a problem I have never faced. I am hoping to get some advice or be pointed in the right direction. I just started work for a new client. Really great client and website. Nicer than most design/content. They will need some rel canonical work but that is not the issue here. The traffic looked great at first glance 131k visits in April. Google Analytics Acquisition Overview showed 94% of the traffic as organic. When I dug deeper and looked at the organic source I saw that Google was 99.9% of it. Normal enough. Then I looked at the time on site and my jaw dropped. 118,454 Organic New Users for Google only stayed on the site for 3 seconds. There is no way that the traffic is real. It does not match what Google Webmaster tools, Moz, and Ahrefs are telling me. How do I stop a service that is sending fake organic Google traffic?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | placementLabs0 -
Organic Listings showing Google Tag Manager + Google Page Title...?
I'm a bit stumped with this. I optimise all my titles etc for Australia - and now the organic liatings are showing something strange. For example ( we sell health supplements ) Meta title = "My Product , Buy Online Australia" If I type "My Product" - the title in the organic listings says "My Product - My Company Limited" - and the only place I can see it getting that from is a combination of Meta Data used in Google Tag Manager + the Name on my Google places page. This is much more obvious for categories.. but it's a pain in the butt. If I type "My Product Australia" Then the original "My Product , Buy Online Australia" comes up. Any ideas on policy etc? I have taken the "Limited" off the Google business page - so hopefully this will change over time - but I can't find any information on why google would do something like this. If you had shed any light on this - would be much appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | s_EOgi_Bear0 -
What can you do when Google can't decide which of two pages is the better search result
On one of our primary keywords Google is swapping out (about every other week) returning our home page, which is more transactional, with a deeper more information based page. So if you look at the Analysis in Moz you get an almost double helix like graph of those pages repeatedly swapping places. So there seems to be a bit of cannibalizing happening that I don't know how to correct. I think part of the problem is the deeper page would ideally be "longer" tail searches that contain the one word keyword that is having this bouncing problem as a part of the longer phrase. What can be done to try prevent this from happening? Can internal links help? I tried adding a link on that term to the deeper page to our homepage, and in a knee jerk reaction was asked to pull that link before I think there was really any evidence to suggest that that one new link made a positive or negative effect. There are some crazy theories floating around at the moment, but I am curious what others think both about if adding a link from a informational to a transactional page could in fact have a negative effect, and what else could be done/tried to help clarify the difference between the two pages for the search engines.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | plumvoice0 -
Is there a negative effect to show categories and products on the same page?
I mean having say 5 different categories on a page and showing the products that are in those categories below the categories. Just In case people don't want to dig deeper to find there product because they know what they need already. I would also want those categories for the people that need to do a little more searching and have a better reference guide. So is there any negatives to my SEO doing it that way?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mike.Bean0 -
Google swapped our website's long standing ranking home page for a less authoritative product page?
Our website has ranked for two variations of a keyword, one singular & the other plural in Google at #1 & #2 (for over a year). Keep in mind both links in serps were pointed to our home page. This year we targeted both variations of the keyword in PPC to a products landing page(still relevant to the keywords) within our website. After about 6 weeks, Google swapped out the long standing ranked home page links (p.a. 55) rank #1,2 with the ppc directed product page links (p.a. 01) and dropped us to #2 & #8 respectively in search results for the singular and plural version of the keyword. Would you consider this swapping of pages temporary, if the volume of traffic slowed on our product page?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JingShack0