There seems to be something obvious stopping our product pages from being listed in organic results - help!
-
Hello All
Firstly new to SEO MOZ but what a fantastic resource, good work!
I help run a platform at ethical community (dot) com (have phrased it like that so google doesn't pick up this thread hope thats ok).
We seem to have something glaringly obvious with the SEO ability of our product pages. We now have over 7000 products on the site and would like to think we have done a pretty good job in terms of optimisning them, lots of nice keywords, relevant page titles, good internal links, and even recently have reduced the loading speeds a fair amount. We have a sitemap set up feeding in URLS to Google and some of them are now nearly a year old.
The problem, when doing an EXACT google search on a product title the product pages dont show up for the majority of the 7000 products.
HOWEVER.... we get fantastic ranking in google products, and get sales through other areas of the site, which seems even more odd. For example, if you type in "segway" you'll see us ranking on the first page of google in google products, but the product page itself is nowhere to be seen.
For example "DARK CHOCOLATE STRANDS 70G CAKE DECORATION" gets no results on google (aside from google products) when we have this page at OURDOMAIN/eco-shop/food/dark-chocolate-strands-70g-cake-decoration-5592
Can anyone help identify if there is a major bottleneck here our gut feeling is there is one major factor that is causing this.
-
Can stephen/anyone else help with my latest question here?
-
HI Stephen did you manage to look into that new example I gave any further?
-
Thanks for this Stephen - very helpful.
Ajax wise we made some amendments last week which seem to already be having an impact (our pagination on search results had /# links and now they have crawlable urls). Google has already crawled more pages so far. We are going to move away from the ajax search altogether in the next few weeks too.
One thing that still bugs us all is this example: http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=CEBRA+RHASSOUL+ORGANIC+MOROCCAN+LAVA+CLAY This bugs the hell out of us because
a) The product page for this (http://www.ethicalcommunity.com/eco-shop/toiletries-and-cosmetics/cebra-rhassoul-organic-moroccan-lava-clay-8206) IS in the our sitemap
b) It features on our homepage (has done for 1 week at least) so in theory google should have crawled this link by now
c) We get a huge amount of traffic (well, relative, but about 40% of total traffic on sunday) for the term RHASSOUL CLAY. What's annoying is this links to a content piece on the clay but the product itself is nowhere to be seen.Even googling an exact URL to the product page returns nothing, so if google does know about it, its blocking it.
This also would tend to perhaps invalidate the theory that its the search causing all of this problem as actually this product has accessible links from the homepage.
I have a feeling solving this one case would solve the issue for most of the other products on the site.
Any ideas here?
-
I think that navigation issues may well be what trip you up.
http://www.ethicalcommunity.com/eco-shop/buy/Food-and-Drink when I navigate through the product pages, I am not seeing the html changing to reflect the new contents, the html reflects the coffee content of the first page
However when I copy+paste the url directly to page 3 I get the correct html for the products on the page
Ajax isnt my strong point, but you need to aim to give engines access to your products via clear categorisation and pagination. Has your developer considered using a hashbang (#!)?
Here's a SEOmoz post that may help http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-allow-google-to-crawl-ajax-content
Let me know if this is the issue, interested to know
S
-
thanks will do and look forward to it Stephen
-
check your ajax and what happens to your html when your products load. will look more later
-
Also!...
- You touched on slow loading speeds, can you give me something quantifiable here as as far as we know these should be fairly competitive and have run various speeds tests and they seem to come out ok in terms of loading time. Can you back up that statement with some more solidity? Many thanks again
-
RE: 3)..... perhaps I misunderstood here but maybe what you meant by duplicate content was a lot of the content on the pages is "re-used" stuff for example
ETHICAL CREDENTIALS
Click the icons below to learn about this product's ethical credentials.
etc......
is that more what you meant rather than the product descriptions being copied/pasted from other shop site (as only some of the descriptions will be copy/paste jobs)
- Benchmark...
http://www.etsy.com/listing/70625156/waving-leaves-crisp-white-and-lime-green?ref=fp_treasury_2 is a huge benchmark for us in terms of high volume optimised pages (and a similar model to us so one to review for sure). I guess if you break down the elements on that page a lot of the content are individual to the page... is this what you mean?
-
Hi Stephen
Thank you for your feedback here...
-
Stripping the pages down. Thanks for this and a valid comment here, will get our developer to look into what we can strip out to put more focus on the content.
-
That server would appear to be from Woopra which as you may know is a live tracking tool for us to see live site action/pathway analysis etc. We use it quite a lot and have not heard that this could impact the site, do you know otherwise?
-
Duplicate content, I wouldnt say the majority of pages are duplicated, of course some sellers have their own product pages and copy/paste into ours but a lot of them also write them fresh. Even the ones that are writing them fresh are no-where to be seen
I personally think there is another factor influencing this as it still doesnt explain why some of the pages dont come up literally at all with an exact product search (even when searching the URLs)
look forward to hearing further thoughts and thanks again for your time on this.
-
-
http://www.ethicalcommunity.com/eco-shop/coffee/papua-new-guinean-coffee-454g-10261
All these coffee pages look like crappy duplicate content - you have such a tiny percentage of actual content product description vs all the other stuff on the page - on product pages strip out all the extraneous crap and just focus on selling your product
Also the site is very slow for me, run yslow/google page speed optimiser and see what you can improve
Also check woopra-ns.com
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will more comprehensive content on product pages help improve ranking?
We're working to improve the ranking of one of our product landing pages. The page that currently ranks #1 has a very simple, short layout with the main keyword many times on the page with otherwise very little text. One thought we had was to make a more comprehensive page including more info on the features and benefits of the product. The thought being that a longer form page would be more valuable and potentially look better to Google if the other SEO pieces are on par. Does that make sense to do? Or would it be better to keep the product page simple and make some more related content on our blog linking back to that landing page? Thanks in advance to any help you can provide!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bob_Kastner0 -
Fetch as Google -- Does not result in pages getting indexed
I run a exotic pet website which currently has several types of species of reptiles. It has done well in SERP for the first couple of types of reptiles, but I am continuing to add new species and for each of these comes the task of getting ranked and I need to figure out the best process. We just released our 4th species, "reticulated pythons", about 2 weeks ago, and I made these pages public and in Webmaster tools did a "Fetch as Google" and index page and child pages for this page: http://www.morphmarket.com/c/reptiles/pythons/reticulated-pythons/index While Google immediately indexed the index page, it did not really index the couple of dozen pages linked from this page despite me checking the option to crawl child pages. I know this by two ways: first, in Google Webmaster Tools, if I look at Search Analytics and Pages filtered by "retic", there are only 2 listed. This at least tells me it's not showing these pages to users. More directly though, if I look at Google search for "site:morphmarket.com/c/reptiles/pythons/reticulated-pythons" there are only 7 pages indexed. More details -- I've tested at least one of these URLs with the robot checker and they are not blocked. The canonical values look right. I have not monkeyed really with Crawl URL Parameters. I do NOT have these pages listed in my sitemap, but in my experience Google didn't care a lot about that -- I previously had about 100 pages there and google didn't index some of them for more than 1 year. Google has indexed "105k" pages from my site so it is very happy to do so, apparently just not the ones I want (this large value is due to permutations of search parameters, something I think I've since improved with canonical, robots, etc). I may have some nofollow links to the same URLs but NOT on this page, so assuming nofollow has only local effects, this shouldn't matter. Any advice on what could be going wrong here. I really want Google to index the top couple of links on this page (home, index, stores, calculator) as well as the couple dozen gene/tag links below.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jplehmann0 -
How do we avoid duplicate/thin content on +150,000 product pages?
Hey guys! We got a rather large product range (books) on our eCommerce site (+150,000 titles). We get book descriptions as meta data from our publishers, which we display on the product pages. This obviously is not unique, as many other sites display the same piece of description of the book. It is important for us to rank on those book titles, so my question to You is: How would you go about it? I mean, it seems like a rather unrealistic task to paraphrase +150,000 (and growing) book descriptions. As I see it, there are these options: 1. Don't display the descriptions on the product pages (however then those pages will get even thinner!)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jacob_Holm
2. Display the (duplicate) descriptions, but put no-index on those product pages in order not to punish the rest of the site (not really an option, though).
3. Hire student workers to produce unique product descriptions for all 150,000 products (seems like a huge and expensive task) But how would You solve such a challenge?
Thanks a lot! Cheers, Tommy.0 -
Can too many "noindex" pages compared to "index" pages be a problem?
Hello, I have a question for you: our website virtualsheetmusic.com includes thousands of product pages, and due to Panda penalties in the past, we have no-indexed most of the product pages hoping in a sort of recovery (not yet seen though!). So, currently we have about 4,000 "index" page compared to about 80,000 "noindex" pages. Now, we plan to add additional 100,000 new product pages from a new publisher to offer our customers more music choice, and these new pages will still be marked as "noindex, follow". At the end of the integration process, we will end up having something like 180,000 "noindex, follow" pages compared to about 4,000 "index, follow" pages. Here is my question: can this huge discrepancy between 180,000 "noindex" pages and 4,000 "index" pages be a problem? Can this kind of scenario have or cause any negative effect on our current natural SEs profile? or is this something that doesn't actually matter? Any thoughts on this issue are very welcome. Thank you! Fabrizio
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau0 -
What our peoples list from from 1 to 10 the most important "on page" Factors
we are all at different stages in our SEO and all have different skills and experiences would like to see if people have the same list or similar with this question.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ReSEOlve0 -
Category Pages up - Product Pages down... what would help?
Hi I mentioned yesterday how one of our sites was losing rank on product pages. What steps do you take to improve the SERPS of product pages, in this case home/category/product is the tree. There isn't really any internal linking, except one link from the category page to each product, would setting up a host of internal links perhaps "similar products" linking them together be a place to start? How can I improve my ranking of these more deeply internal pages? Not just internal links?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | xoffie0 -
Competitor using shady SEO tactics but still ranks at the top in Organic listings
A competitor of my client has been ranking consistently in the top 2 spots in the organic listings on Google for years. They have the advantage of keywords in the URL but no matter what we do we just can't bump them out of the top position. Recently we discovered that they have 7 or so .org sites set up claiming to be run by volunteers and their opinions are un-biased that "highly recommend" products from the main site's company. Is this against Google's policies? I've submitted a spam report to Google but of course haven't heard anything back from them. Our AdWords rep told us that the policy team doesn't respond directly to claims because of privacy reasons? Anyone know any other way to report things like this to Google? We got dropped from the rankings for 3 months due to malicious code (spammy links) injected into all the pages on our site but these people sit steadily at the top. I don't get it.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pidot0 -
Does having multiple links to the same page influence the Link juice this page is able to pass
Say you have a page and it has 4 outgoing links to the same internal page. In the original Pagerank algo if these links were links to an page outside your own domain, this would mean that the linkjuice this page is able to pass would be devided by 4. The thing is i'm not sure if this is also the case when the outgoing link, is linking to a page on your own domain. I would say that outgoing links (whatever the destination) will use some of your link juice, so it would be better to have 1 outgoing link instead of 4 to the same destination, the the destination will profit more form that link. What are you're thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TjeerdvZ0