There seems to be something obvious stopping our product pages from being listed in organic results - help!
-
Hello All
Firstly new to SEO MOZ but what a fantastic resource, good work!
I help run a platform at ethical community (dot) com (have phrased it like that so google doesn't pick up this thread hope thats ok).
We seem to have something glaringly obvious with the SEO ability of our product pages. We now have over 7000 products on the site and would like to think we have done a pretty good job in terms of optimisning them, lots of nice keywords, relevant page titles, good internal links, and even recently have reduced the loading speeds a fair amount. We have a sitemap set up feeding in URLS to Google and some of them are now nearly a year old.
The problem, when doing an EXACT google search on a product title the product pages dont show up for the majority of the 7000 products.
HOWEVER.... we get fantastic ranking in google products, and get sales through other areas of the site, which seems even more odd. For example, if you type in "segway" you'll see us ranking on the first page of google in google products, but the product page itself is nowhere to be seen.
For example "DARK CHOCOLATE STRANDS 70G CAKE DECORATION" gets no results on google (aside from google products) when we have this page at OURDOMAIN/eco-shop/food/dark-chocolate-strands-70g-cake-decoration-5592
Can anyone help identify if there is a major bottleneck here our gut feeling is there is one major factor that is causing this.
-
Can stephen/anyone else help with my latest question here?
-
HI Stephen did you manage to look into that new example I gave any further?
-
Thanks for this Stephen - very helpful.
Ajax wise we made some amendments last week which seem to already be having an impact (our pagination on search results had /# links and now they have crawlable urls). Google has already crawled more pages so far. We are going to move away from the ajax search altogether in the next few weeks too.
One thing that still bugs us all is this example: http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=CEBRA+RHASSOUL+ORGANIC+MOROCCAN+LAVA+CLAY This bugs the hell out of us because
a) The product page for this (http://www.ethicalcommunity.com/eco-shop/toiletries-and-cosmetics/cebra-rhassoul-organic-moroccan-lava-clay-8206) IS in the our sitemap
b) It features on our homepage (has done for 1 week at least) so in theory google should have crawled this link by now
c) We get a huge amount of traffic (well, relative, but about 40% of total traffic on sunday) for the term RHASSOUL CLAY. What's annoying is this links to a content piece on the clay but the product itself is nowhere to be seen.Even googling an exact URL to the product page returns nothing, so if google does know about it, its blocking it.
This also would tend to perhaps invalidate the theory that its the search causing all of this problem as actually this product has accessible links from the homepage.
I have a feeling solving this one case would solve the issue for most of the other products on the site.
Any ideas here?
-
I think that navigation issues may well be what trip you up.
http://www.ethicalcommunity.com/eco-shop/buy/Food-and-Drink when I navigate through the product pages, I am not seeing the html changing to reflect the new contents, the html reflects the coffee content of the first page
However when I copy+paste the url directly to page 3 I get the correct html for the products on the page
Ajax isnt my strong point, but you need to aim to give engines access to your products via clear categorisation and pagination. Has your developer considered using a hashbang (#!)?
Here's a SEOmoz post that may help http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-allow-google-to-crawl-ajax-content
Let me know if this is the issue, interested to know
S
-
thanks will do and look forward to it Stephen
-
check your ajax and what happens to your html when your products load. will look more later
-
Also!...
- You touched on slow loading speeds, can you give me something quantifiable here as as far as we know these should be fairly competitive and have run various speeds tests and they seem to come out ok in terms of loading time. Can you back up that statement with some more solidity? Many thanks again
-
RE: 3)..... perhaps I misunderstood here but maybe what you meant by duplicate content was a lot of the content on the pages is "re-used" stuff for example
ETHICAL CREDENTIALS
Click the icons below to learn about this product's ethical credentials.
etc......
is that more what you meant rather than the product descriptions being copied/pasted from other shop site (as only some of the descriptions will be copy/paste jobs)
- Benchmark...
http://www.etsy.com/listing/70625156/waving-leaves-crisp-white-and-lime-green?ref=fp_treasury_2 is a huge benchmark for us in terms of high volume optimised pages (and a similar model to us so one to review for sure). I guess if you break down the elements on that page a lot of the content are individual to the page... is this what you mean?
-
Hi Stephen
Thank you for your feedback here...
-
Stripping the pages down. Thanks for this and a valid comment here, will get our developer to look into what we can strip out to put more focus on the content.
-
That server would appear to be from Woopra which as you may know is a live tracking tool for us to see live site action/pathway analysis etc. We use it quite a lot and have not heard that this could impact the site, do you know otherwise?
-
Duplicate content, I wouldnt say the majority of pages are duplicated, of course some sellers have their own product pages and copy/paste into ours but a lot of them also write them fresh. Even the ones that are writing them fresh are no-where to be seen
I personally think there is another factor influencing this as it still doesnt explain why some of the pages dont come up literally at all with an exact product search (even when searching the URLs)
look forward to hearing further thoughts and thanks again for your time on this.
-
-
http://www.ethicalcommunity.com/eco-shop/coffee/papua-new-guinean-coffee-454g-10261
All these coffee pages look like crappy duplicate content - you have such a tiny percentage of actual content product description vs all the other stuff on the page - on product pages strip out all the extraneous crap and just focus on selling your product
Also the site is very slow for me, run yslow/google page speed optimiser and see what you can improve
Also check woopra-ns.com
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Validated pages on GSC displays 5x more pages than when performing site:domain.com?
Hi mozzers, When checking the coverage report on GSC I am seeing over 649,000 valid pages https://cl.ly/ae46ec25f494 but when performing site:domain.com I am only seeing 130,000 pages. Which one is more the source of truth especially I have checked some of these "valid" pages and noticed they're not even indexed?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ty19860 -
Highly interlinking a particular page shows up in Google search results?
Hi All, As we can see the below statement from Google about internal linking: "The number of internal links pointing to a page is a signal to search engines about the relative importance of that page."
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vtmoz
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/138752?hl=en So if we interlink a page highly than other pages, will it rank on search results instead of homepage? Moreover if the page have "keyword" in URL slug...like www.website.com/keyword. Thanks0 -
Changing my pages URL name - HELP NEEDED FAST
Hello, I need to change the URL name for a few pages on my site. The site was launched just recently, so it has no obvious ranking and traffic. My question is, what is the best practice for changing/deleting the page name? after deleting the page, should I go to Google webmaster tool and use URL Removal and remove the old page? I know that I have to also create a new XML sitemap file, but not sure about the old pages in google search result Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mdmoz0 -
What is happening with this page's rankings? (G Analytics screenprint attached) help me.
Hi, At the moment im confused. I have a page which shows up for the query 'bank holidays' first page solid for 2 years - this also applies to the terms 'mothers day', 'pancake day' and a few others (UK Google). And there still ranking. Here is the problem: Usually I would rank for 'bank holidays 2014' (the terms with the year in are the real traffic drivers) and would be position 3/5. Over the last 3 months this has decayed dropping position to 30+. From the screenprint you can see the term 'Bank Holidays' is holding on but the term 'bank holidays 2014' is slowly decaying. If you query 'bank holidays 2015' we don't appear in rankings at all. What is causing this? The content is ok, social sharing happens and the odd link is picked up hear and there. I need help, how do I start pushing this back in the other direction, its like the site is slowly dying. And what really kills me, is 2 pages are ranking on page1 off link farms. URL: followuk.co.uk/bank-holidays serp-decay.jpg
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | followuk0 -
Show parts of page A on page B & C?
Good afternoon,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rayvensoft
A quick question. I am working on a website which has a large page with different sections. Lets say: Page 1
SECTION A
SECTION B
SECTION C Now, they are adding a new area where they want to show only certain sections, so it would look like this: Page 2
SECTION A Page 3
SECTION C Page 4
SECTION D So my question is, would a rel='canonical' tag back to Page 1 be the correct way of preempting any duplicate content issues? I do not need Page 2-4 to even be indexed, it is just a matter of usability and giving the users what they are looking for without all the rest of the extra stuff. Gracias. Tesekürler. Salamat Ko. Thanks. (bonus thumbs up for anybody who knows which languages each of those are) 🙂0 -
How to rank product pages?
Hi guys, Please advice me on something improving my product pages ranking. We are doing well for head terms, categories but not ranking for product pages. We have issues with product pages which I am think is hard to tackle. For instance we have duplicate products (different colors), duplicate content internally (colors) and from manufacturer websites. Product pages linked from sub-category i.e. Home > Category > Sub-Category (20 per page) using pagination for next 20 and so on. Product pages linked internally via widgets that says other Similar products, featured products etc. Another issue with our product pages is that we are using third party reviews platform and whenever users add reviews to product pages this platform creates an hyperlink to different anchors which is not relevant to product. Example - http://goo.gl/NUG652 Can somebody please give some advice on how to improve rankings for product pages. writing unique content for thousands of pages is not possible. Even our competitor not writing unique content.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Webmaster_SEO0 -
I have search result pages that are completely different showing up as duplicate content.
I have numerous instances of this same issue in our Crawl Report. We have pages showing up on the report as duplicate content - they are product search result pages for completely different cruise products showing up as duplicate content. Here's an example of 2 pages that appear as duplicate : http://www.shopforcruises.com/carnival+cruise+lines/carnival+glory/2013-09-01/2013-09-30 http://www.shopforcruises.com/royal+caribbean+international/liberty+of+the+seas We've used Html 5 semantic markup to properly identify our Navigation <nav>, our search widget as an <aside>(it has a large amount of page code associated with it). We're using different meta descriptions, different title tags, even microformatting is done on these pages so our rich data shows up in google search. (rich snippet example - http://www.google.com/#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=http:%2F%2Fwww.shopforcruises.com%2Froyal%2Bcaribbean%2Binternational%2Fliberty%2Bof%2Bthe%2Bseas&oq=http:%2F%2Fwww.shopforcruises.com%2Froyal%2Bcaribbean%2Binternational%2Fliberty%2Bof%2Bthe%2Bseas&gs_l=hp.3...1102.1102.0.1601.1.1.0.0.0.0.142.142.0j1.1.0...0.0...1c.1.7.psy-ab.gvI6vhnx8fk&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.44442042,d.eWU&fp=a03ba540ff93b9f5&biw=1680&bih=925 ) How is this distinctly different content showing as duplicate? Is SeoMoz's site crawl flawed (or just limited) and it's not understanding that my pages are not dupe? Copyscape does not identify these pages as dupe. Should we take these crawl results more seriously than copyscape? What action do you suggest we take? </aside> </nav>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JMFieldMarketing0 -
Ok to use rich snippets for same product on multiple pages?
I am developing a new set of pages for a series of products which exist on separate sub domains linked to the root domain. The product pages on the sub domains have rich snippets; review count, review score etc. The new pages im building out are for the same products though on the root domain and with different content. Im not comfortable marking those pages up with rich snippets too given they will have the same review counts, scores etc though would like to if its viable? Any thoughts/opinions? Thanks, Andy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AndyMacLean0