Posting youtube videos on your site-use irframe or "old embed code"
-
If you choose "embed" now, youtube gives you the choice of using an iframe:
<iframe width="430" height="352" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0-nKXALtHWs?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
or, the old embed code:
<object width="430" height="352"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0-nKXALtHWs?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0-nKXALtHWs?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="430" height="352" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></object>
Is either better when it comes to seo?
-
This is really exciting! I've configured the code to put a line after the video that says, "Want this video on your website? Here's the code:" and then if they use the code intact it will show the video with a line underneath that says, "Courtesy of mywebsite."
-
Perfectly possible. YouTube is a service where you host your videos, but the main "screen" is your site, so it is also "ethically" permitted (if you value the ethic in links).
In the case of a video which is not yours... you can configure the code to show two links: to the author youtube page and to your site.
-
I would also check out www.wistia.com where you can also track stats for the video.
-
Gianluca, that is an incredible find! That article is talking about adding a link back to your youtube channel when people choose to embed the code from your site. But, what if you gave your viewers embed code that contained a link saying, "Video shared by www.yourwebsite.com"? with a link back to your site???
-
Depends... if your blog/site has a big volume of visit from mobile, the iframe is surely the best option, because - if I am not wrong - that way you are sure that users will actually see the video in their mobile device.
But, if I've to choose, I would choose the old embed code until it is available. The reason? This awesome trick explained in this old post by Paddy Moogan in the Distilled blog: Getting Links and SEO Value from your YouTube Video; a trick that needs the old embed code to work.
Finally, whatever you choose, don't forget to create the video sitemaps.
-
I would imagine that it doesn't really make a difference. There is no textual content for the bots to read (unless you write out the transcript for the video) so theoretically, each of these would return the same SEO result.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does google penalize you if you post content in french and english on a website
I'm trying to encourage content editors to only post content in either English or French. For example we have a French press release but the team are wanting it on our site in French and English. I thought this would fall under duplicate content rules. Does google penalize you if you post content in French and English on a website?
Content Development | | EstherBrice0 -
Content Duplication Issue On Content Publishing Site
I am running Free Article Posting site but I discover people are posting their content which already has been published on different sites before. What should i need to do in order to save my site from Google penalty.3 waiting for your kind help in this regard Thanks in advance
Content Development | | Mustansar0 -
What happens if use PR release as a guest blog article?
What happens if use a PR release as a guest blog article on someone else blog as we want to distribute PR as many places as possible? Thanks
Content Development | | Rubix0 -
The rel="alternate" tag
Hey guys and gals. So I run a hyperlocal blog and get a heap of press releases sent to me daily. I don't have time to rewrite each one before posting it to the website, so I am aware that I am duplicating content and possibly extracting link juice from the original source. Would using the rel="alternate" tag highlighting the source on each press release page fix this? Am I correct in saying this tag tells google that the content on the page is sourced from elsewhere? I also get requests from other sites for my original posts to be posted on their websites but I decline because of duplicate content, would asking for this same ' the rel="alternate" tag' fix on their website be wise? Thanks in advance JC
Content Development | | jonnycraft0 -
How does WordPress 3.5.1 impact site rankings?
We have a user interested in having a WordPress 3.5.1 blog on their own existing, robust site. There is a blog module available in the CMS but the user feels more familiar with WordPress. It will be set up at the root as a subdirectory. Based on the URL structure, Google should see the WordPress blog and the user's website as the same website. (www.website.com/wordpress). There will not be a 301 needed. Does using the Wordpress module impact rankings? We've understood that Google doesn't care for Wordpress because 99% of spammers use it... is that only if it is hosted on WordPress.com? Also, are there any other reasons that our user should use/avoid WordPress?
Content Development | | dianemahan0 -
URL structure on moving from old nukedit site to Drupal
I am currently rebuilding a site in Drupal. The old site was in Nukedit and all the urls end in .asp. Given the new urls will not end in .asp is there any point in matching the rest of the url or will using 301 redirects (to better seo'd pages) be sufficient to minimise any (temporary) ranking loss?
Content Development | | chunki0 -
A site review please
Hi, first post here so hope i have posted this in the right place. From reading the forums a number of people have asked for site reviews and received some very good feedback so I thought I would jump aboard too. One of my companies, Digital Cow, is based around the world of affiliate marketing and had been doing very well until recent Google changes killed the whole process of making sites based around other people's datafeeds. Through considerable testing we have countered this by increasing the blend of duplicate content and unique, niche related, content. As a result a website we launched about 2 months ago is currently getting around 350 unique hits a day but seems to have stagnated. We know the potential is there for thousands of daily hits on this site and well over 20,000 hits a day on all our websites, but we are having issues with Google at the moment. One week we could be position 10 for a keyword, next position 90, then back to position 10 again and so on. In the last week some 95 keywords moved up the ranking and 62 moved down - we are seoing for a couple of hundred keywords. A small sample of some of these words and our ranking for them are listed below bodysuits women 13
Content Development | | Grumpy_Carl
tumbum 14
bright leggings 18
bright tights 18
bridal hold ups 19
opaque hold ups 20
girls in leggings 21
pretty polly hold up 21
fish net hold ups 22
slimming tights 22
tum bum 26
magic knickers 27
toeless tights 28 and there are many more. The website in question is www.brighttights.com. If anyone could spare a moment to offer their opinion on what they think of the site re seo that would be most welcome. Given it's an ecommerce site there are limits to the content we can add on the homepage. Many thanks Carl0