Local business with multiple sites
-
I'm auditing a local business' sites (a spa) and I wanted to run my recommendations by everyone.
There are 3 sites:
www.sitename1.com -- main store location, used for Google Places listing #1 www.sitename2.com -- 2nd store location, used for Google Places listing #2 www.sitename3.com -- used for product sales for both locations
Sitename1.com has the most ranking power. I'm going to recommend that they move sitename2.com and sitename3.com to sitename1.com as subfolders, 301 redirecting each page to the corresponding page on sitename1.com/subfolder.
Google Places listing #2 would be changed from www.sitename2.com to www.sitename.com/location2.
Any risks or problems with this strategy anyone can see?
-
Hi Keith,
If these businesses are in the same metropolitan area, then I definitely give thumbs up to consolidation. Yes, put 301 redirects in place.
Regarding optimizing the footer, there is not a problem with listing several addresses. As long as you have 10 or less locations, consider this a fine practice. I do recommend using hCard for the the formatting of the addresses...and do make your Contact Page a good strong page featuring both addresses in hCard. Also a good idea to make a Google MyMap for each location and embed and link to it on the contact page.
Make the copy clear that you've got the 2 locations from the homepage forward.
I feel you are making a smart choice for this business. Good luck!
-
Related question: if location #2 is brought under site 1 as a location page, what's best practice as far as putting the address in the footer sitewide? Put location 1 address in the footer everywhere but the location 2 page(s)? Avoid altogether?
Thanks --
-
Hi -- thanks for your help. Here is more info. in response to your answer:
-I have picked up duplicate content problems and will be working with the client to fix this
-The locations are in the same metro area (good to know that separate states can be a good reason to keep separate sites)
-The lost rankings/Places shake-up is a bit concerning. Site 1 is well-established and has domain authority of 38 and home page authority of 48 (this is the site I'd likely move everything to). Location 2's site is 2.5 years old but has 23 domain authority and 36 page authority. Site 3 is an online store for spa products and very new (not yet launched).
For queries that trigger a Places result, location #1 outranks location #2 in every instance I can find. Having location #2 disappear for a while wouldn't be great, but from what I see the location #1 site ranks really well Organically (and there is a prominent link to location #2 on the home page) so we may be OK.
Also, there are a few queries where local results are not triggered, and the location #2's site ranks high. I'm not worried about the Organic ranking scenario in this case because a 301 redirect should largely preserve the position, correct?
In any case, I think the benefits outweigh the costs and consolidated ranking power potential. I'll keep my fingers crossed that the Places shake-up will be short-lived and advise the client accordingly.
Thanks -- let me know if I missed anything.
-
Hi Keith!
Thanks for coming to Q&A with your question. I'm the Local SEO Associate here in the forum. I will do my best to answer your question.
It's a very common practice for companies to have a single website for their multiple locations. For example, an auto dealership with locations in San Jose, San Francisco and San Rafael does not need to have 3 websites. They can simply have one and do landing pages for each of the three cities.
The main benefit I can discern of consolidating your client's 3 sites will be greater ease of management.
One thing I can imagine that you are going to need to be careful about is this: do sites 1, 2 or 3 duplicate one another's content in any way? If so, you need to avoid this. Don't have the landing page copy for the 2 different locales be the same.
Another thing I'm curious about is the locales of the 2 physical offices. How far apart are they? If they were in different states, I'd be inclined to keep the businesses on separate sites, but if they are in the same state, I think having the one site will be fine.
My only other concern would be potential lost rankings for the other sites. Are they old and established, or relatively new and low ranking? If the former, it would be a tough decision to get rid of them. If the latter, this re-organization could be a smart idea.
Finally, do realize that when you make changes in Google Places, it can cause a temporary shakeup. Even small changes like altering the domain the Place Page is pointing to can result in a time delay until Google's updates its index. Prepare the client for that possibility.
I hope my thoughts have been helpful, Keith. Good luck!
-
Hi sorry I have read your initial question more in detail and did some further pondering and research and as I understand it, according to Google's places quality guidelines if you are moving all the store locations to best ranking domain as sub folders you should still only have one listing for the central store and add service areas.
You can go that way but then you will loose two possbile places listings. But then again on the other hand some one can report the listings as is to Google and they can remove the listing and see it as duplicate listing.
http://support.google.com/places/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=107528
I would do what you suggested above accept only keep one listing as is to best ranking domain and then edit the listing with service areas if not already listed.
Even though they do not say this in detail in their help I am sure Google might flag your edit if you point to an existing domain places listing.
Hope this helps,
-
Hi -- there are no subdomains in the equation here. I would be moving to subfolder pages (not subdomains), and the current domains are separate domain names altogether.
Thanks --
-
After panda there has been a few people that would create sub domains saying that this worked as lets say all content that is related to yellow went to yellow.domain.com and red to red.domain.com.
Why I am bringing this up I think you should maybe look at this and be sure if moving to main domain as sub domain that Google Panda will not penalise the over all site, this can be prevented by making sure you not moving over any of the old content that was low performing, if there is some of the old content that was low performing I would improved it and the move it over to sub domain and 301 redirect as you said to the new sub domain and content that is better when it comes to post panda on site seo factors (if this makes sense).
Here is a interesting forum thread you could read that might influence your decission.
http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4394776.htm
Hope this helps,
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it problematic for Google when the site of a subdomain is on a different host than the site of the primary domain?
The Website on the subdomain runs on a different server (host) than the site on the main domain.
Technical SEO | | Christian_Campusjaeger0 -
Site Navigation
Hello, I have some questions about best practices with site navigation & internal linking. I'm currently assisting aplossoftware.com with its navigation. The site has about 200 pages total. They currently have a very sparse header with a lot of links in the footer. The three most important keywords they want to rank for are nonprofit accounting software, church accounting software and file 990 online. 1. What are your thoughts about including a drop down menu in the header for the different products? (they have 3 main products). This would allow us to include a few more links in the header and give more real estate to include full keywords in anchor text. 2. They have a good blog with content that gets regularly updated. Currently it's linked in the footer and gets a tiny amount of visits. What are your thoughts about including it as a link in the header instead? 3. What are best practices with using (or not using) no follow with site navigation and footer links? How about with links to social media pages like Facebook/Twitter? Any other thoughts/ideas about the site navigation for this site (www.aplossoftware.com) would be much appreciated. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | stageagent0 -
Site not indexed after 1 month
Hi people, I have been working on this new website for a month now and it has still not been indexed, here is a link: http://bit.ly/HNgzKG Can any of you spot anything wrong with it? I have tried submitting and also submitted an xml sitemap but still no joy.
Technical SEO | | Eavesy0 -
Internal Ads on A Site
We serve ads on our site using a sub-domain. All ads use a re-direct from ads.domain before redirecting users to the proper, normal, internal url. Most the content on our home page is ad block driven. Is it possible and does it make sense to enter the sub-domain as url parameter in Google Webmaster tools, letting Google know that this is something to be ignored. Many thanks
Technical SEO | | CeeC-Blogger0 -
Site Map Problems or Are They?
According to webmaster tools my Sitemap contains urls which are blocked by robots.txt Our site map is generically generated and encompasses all web pages, whether I have excluded them using the robots.txt file As far as I am aware this has never been an issue until recently. Is this hurting my rankings and how do I fix it? Secondly, webmaster tools says there is over 5,000 error/warnings on my site map. But site map is only 1,400 or so pages submitted. How do I see what is going on?
Technical SEO | | Professor0 -
Is it best to create multiple xml sitemaps for different sections of a site?
I have a client with a very big site that includes a blog, videos, photo gallery, etc. Is it best to create a separate xml file for each of these sections? It seems to me like that would be the best way to keep everything organized. Or at least separate the blog out from the main site. Does anybody have any tips or recommendations? I'm not finding any good information about this.
Technical SEO | | MichaelWeisbaum0 -
Sitemap Creation + Site speed
Hi there, I am looking for a sitemap creation tool, so I can submit my site to Google. My site is www.vallnord.com On the other hadn I would like to speed up my web. Any tip? Regards, Guido.
Technical SEO | | SilbertAd0 -
The course of action to move my macro site to some mini sites- justin if you can help
We have a site that we want to break up into mini sites but keep the old site for the major brands. Empirecovers.com is the major and we want to break it off into Empire Truck Covers and Empire Boat covers. What I am thinking of doing is linking from the home to Empiretruckcovers.com instead of a mini page on the site and 301 redirect the mini page to empiretruckcovers.com. Than (there wont be duplicate content) making a small page for truck covers on empire just so people do not get confused. Is this the best way to go or what do you suggest? We are doing this because I feel there is seo value in having mini sites and also the user experience will be cleaner and people will trust it a lot more than inside a big site. The other problem is I have some great rankings on the pages so I want to do it so there is as little damage as possible. I guess once I start I will do all the free directories, yahoo directory and try to get links as fast as I can. Any suggestions would be great. I am going to do a/b testing to see if my adwords convert better on mini site or on the big site for certain keywords too
Technical SEO | | goldjake17880