Responsive web design and SEO
-
Hi guys,
Do any of you know about responsive web design? In short it's a method that ensures that your website adopts to the resolution on the users screen. The point is that you don't have to make a site for each format, it's all there in your overall design.
So, to the question: Does, to your knowledge, an integration of responsive web design harm your SEO?
I tried to search for "responsive we design + SEO" but I really didn't get any useful information.
Thanks a lot - all comments are very much appreciated.
-
For regular websites this is a good solution. Except for the case in which the HTML and assets are quite large for a mobile device to load. In that case I always prefer to use a mobile version of the website on a subdomain.
I believe this is the best solution for high traffic websites which need to show quite some content per page.
-
You too buddy, take it good and easy!
-
Thanks Marcus. Nice article. There are arguments to and for the various ways to approach things especially as you say when user experience (load time) can be impacted and also of course when considering the particular client in question. But as you say in the article not only is Google recommending the responsive approach but it does have SEO management benefits.
Good chatting with you.
-
Hey Nick
It is worded pretty much perfectly on the Google blog post where they state their preference for responsive design even over same URLs with slightly different content.
"Sites that use responsive web design, i.e. sites that serve all devices on the same set of URLs, with each URL serving the same HTML to all devices and using just CSS to change how the page is rendered on the device. This is Google’s recommended configuration"
So, you use the same HTML, nothing changes apart from the layout and you use CSS media queries to handle formating the CSS for each device.
Alternatively, you can serve different HTML content on the same URLs and technically do this however you see fit but this is not the preferred way of doing things but... if your site does this at the moment, I would not worry not about it too much for now. The idea behind this approach is that the content is equivalent - much like wptouch does and it shows the article but removes any supplemental widgets so the page retains it's essence, but drops any flab. Personally I would script this so those additional elements are not output at all rather than hide them with CSS though but that's just my take.
Short answer, go responsive if you can, it's what they want and creates the most consistent approach across devices but remember, that means not hiding anything and just moving it about.
Personally, I question if responsive is always the best option and if the mobile data connection is weak then a stripped down version works better but... hey, who am I to question big G's reasoning here!
As it goes, I wrote a piece about this yesterday that may help:
http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/responsive-web-design/
half way down there is a diagram showing how your responsive layout could work for various devices.
Hope it helps!
Marcus -
Hey Marcus,
Many thanks for your thoughts. So if I'm reading this correctly, you went with same URLS and check user agent on the server and then serve back the same content but a different CSS, which then controls the display of elements accordingly. This as opposed to building in rules in the CSS to control display of elements using media queries which as Google's Developer Site mentions has some advantages given the possible impact of the 'user-agent query' set-up on page load time. My preference would be to control display according to device with media queries but was just wondering whether we'd be penalised for the hidden elements in this manner. As you rightly say though, if the intention is not there to gain but to provide a good user experience, all should be OK!
Cheers, Nick
-
Hey Nick
Google have thrown their hat in the ring here and stated that responsive design is preferred, probably due to the reasons you are stating that people could start to try and play silly games with only rendering specific content for specific devices, but, as with everything SEO, I would not worry about that if you are not looking to cheat.
The article is here with further reading linked out:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/recommendations-for-building-smartphone.html
& here
https://developers.google.com/webmasters/smartphone-sites/
They basically state that it depends on your requirements, as it always does but in order of preference they want the following.
1. Responsive Design
2. Mobile site on same URLs with containing 'equivalent content' - now this is important as if I serve my mobile site, the main piece of content is the same, but some of the widgets are dropped, but this is just extras and the main purpose of the page, page title, URL and everything else is the same - the page is a parred down equivalent for mobiles.
Alternatively, you may have a completely different site for mobile users but this is not really the route you want to take in this smartphone driven world.
If you did want to test this and make sure you were not going to run into any problems you could simply set up a wordpress site with some supplemental text widgets and then use the wptouch plugin to show trimmed down versions of the content on the same URLs. This will give you a test environment you can rig up in a couple of hours max and you can put your mind at rest.
Give me a shout if you need any help!
Marcus
-
Hi all, just came across this conversation string when I too was looking for information about SEO implications for responsive design and whether Google would penalise sites who were hiding elements using on a page with CSS with good intentions. I know hiding text blocks is generally a no-no but in some situations it might be preferable from a user experience point of view when they are accessing via a mobile device.
MPO - how did you get on with your project. Any thoughts?
Andreas - you mentioned some research you were doing in this area. Have you come to any further conclusions?
Thanks, Nick
-
Hi Marcus,
Thank you very much for your thorough reply.
Here is an example I stumbled upon which use hidden div's: http://www.fork-cms.com/
I will look into hiding content for mobile devices using scripting but since you say that it wont harm my SEO I might just go with the easy solution and hide the div's in the css files.
Thanks again!
-
Hey MPO, maybe an example could help?
But, there are lots of options here and there is nothing stopping a developer showing certain divs to certain devices although if you were going to take that approach I would favour doing this in scripting and not rendering the content at all.
Ultimately, googlebot should see the full page and get ranking should be based on that. It is not till you have searched, found a result and clicked on it that there will be any kind of filtering for the specific device.
Most mobile themes for wordpress just show the main content OR have a separate set of widgetised areas for the mobile theme to show a simplified menu or content blocks.
Really, you are just trying to let the user have the best experience on the device they have chosen to use and whilst many smartphones can do the full experience my data connection is not always so great that I would opt for that over the core article or content I was chosing to look at.
Also, you can always give people the option to view the full site if they so choose.
But to go back to the question, does it harm your SEO, well no, not unless you are doing something dodgy and cloaking content for google bot specifically, you will be fine!
-
Hey Marcus
Thanks for your reply, much appreciated.
Seems like there isn't any downside to use responsive webdesign.However, I noticed a lot of responsive websites using hidden div's to hide certain parts of their websites in smaller resolutions.
From what I understand Google are not very happy about hidden div's, so I was wondering how it would react to a responsive website using hidden div's.
Would the page get crawled as it was original intended or will Google crawl the website using a lower resolution to simulate a mobile device?
Hope you, or anybody else for that matter, might have some input regarding this issue.
-
Agree with Marcus. Using different CSS for different devices and same content will help to avoid content duplication and many other issues with SEO.
-
Hey MPO
This is a fairly common feature now and can be handled entirely in CSS rather than having some archaic system that detects the user agent and then displays a version relevant to that device. With this approach, the page is the page and the content is the same so there really is no SEO implication to worry about.
As a jump in point, if you pick up a Wordpress or Joomla theme from a vendor like woothemes.com or yootheme.com you will find they work on PC's, tablets and smart phones. They tend to trigger a simplified mobile theme for the smart phones whilst using the full theme for a tablet.
The themes have some great CSS features built in to automatically resize images for different devices etc and really take care of most of the heavy lifting.
Wordpress as well is a great SEO platform so as a starting point: Wordpress + Professional Theme + Yoast SEO plugin is pretty solid. Sprinkle a bit of design loveliness and some worthy content and you are well on your way.
In short, this should not be something you need to worry about in 2012!
Marcus
-
True, you wouldn't have to put rel=canonical all over the place (as suggested in this SEOmoz article: http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/top-8-mobile-seo-email-and-website-tips)
But does the Google Mobile Bot "understand" the responsive design? Technically it should be no problem but I haven't found any evidence for this yet.
Any idea/suggestion on this?
Thanks, Doug.
Andreas
-
Very interesting question, MPO. I am currently doing some research on the same topic and haven't come across anything useful either.
I'd especially like to know how responsive design impacts mobile SEO. As the design can also serve mobile devices does the Google Mobile Bot understand that the website servers both "normal computer devices" and "mobile devices"?
As MPO said, any suggestions greatly appreciated.
-
Having a website deliver platform optimised pages from the same URL is better than some of the alternatives such as having different URLs or subdomain delivering mobile content. Responsive web design should avoid the problem of having duplicate content all over the place!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Seeking SEO contractor
I would like to hire an SEO contractor to assist with some technical/SEO issues on our site (Schema, etc). Can anyone make a recommendation? I am looking to work with a small company. Thank you in advance for any referrals!
On-Page Optimization | | JulieALS0 -
Is page speed important to improve SEO ranking?
I saw on a SEO Agency's site (https://burstdgtl.com/search-engine-optimization/) that page speed apparently affects Google ranking. Is this true? And if it is, how do I improve it, do I need an agency?
On-Page Optimization | | jasparcj0 -
Have I chosen the wrong SEO consultant?
Hi all I've very recently started a small chimney sweeping business for which my friend has designed and built a website, kembersembers.co.uk. Not approaching this from a tech-savvy background I have learnt a lot over the past month but am still an utter novice and as such require some form of help to get me up and running. My main and immediate priority (sweeping season starts soon!) was to have it so when my company name, kembers embers, was googled I would come up at the top of the results. I understand this can take a little time but it has been a month now since I indexed and I have been told my domain authority is 0.1% so I have sought help. I don't want to sign up to a 3/6/12 month contract with a firm so I found an SEO consultant local to me who said they could spend a couple of hours doing the right things to hopefully help jump this initial hurdle. I parted with £120 for this which I deemed to be the going rate and they do/did seem honest and professional enough. Upon meeting the consultant he has since told me that he would like to set the website up under a Wordpress template and has cajouled me into changing my hosting over to one he uses also. He says it will take a couple of hours work to do this (there goes my £120) but without this he would hit walls which would be timely to get past and so will save me money in the long run. Do these kind of suggestions ring an alarm bell to anyone? It didn't seem right that a good SEO couldn't work with what I already have so it leads me to the question is this one to avoid? On a side note I have also received bad advice from friends of friends/family who claim to know SEO but have, for example, put me in the direction of a link scheme through fiverr.com which I understand may have done me more damage than good. I am now more aware of white hat vs black hat and wish to proceed with the development of my online presence in an ethical way growing organically. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | kembosabe0 -
Does anyone have any experience with Instart Logic, and its effects (if any) on SEO?
Instart Logic is a content delivery network CDN, which claims to have a positive effect on time to first bite (TTFB). Faster site = good for SEO, right? Our initial investigation seems to confirm its claims to some degree, which is great, but at the same time we think it may lower our score on Google's PageSpeed Insights tool, which sort of negates its effect in other areas. If the user experience is worse (according to Google's own tool), are we effectively shooting ourselves in the foot by concentrating on TTFB as a ranking algorithm factor? For reference: https://moz.com/blog/improving-search-rank-by-optimizing-your-time-to-first-byte
On-Page Optimization | | Natalie20120 -
Should a website have the same standard headings for product pages? And how does that affect SEO?
Hello! I hope my question is self-explanatory but let me give you an example. Suppose I have website X selling A, B and C and I have a dedicated page for each of those products. For SEO practises, Is it better to have the same webpage structure for all product pages (i.e. the same headings and sections) or is it better to vary the structure of the page? Or is it really not important? Again going back to the example, is it better for product page A, B and C to have the same sections in the same order (i.e. Pricing, Product Details, Product Reviews) or is it better to keep it as a flowing content page (product page A has same information in B and C but all those pages are different with different headings and questions asked depending on the product)? Many thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | MarketingDude0 -
Unoriginal Content Shared By Web Firm with Industry Niche
I have clients who have worked with Web Design companies that focus on a particular niche. As most of you may know, these type of web companies use the same content on all of their clients' sites (examples: Dentists, Law Firms, CPA's). I want to propose to this prospect for us to do a site redesign as part of their SEO contract. The site they use right now is managed by the type of web company that I have described above. But the main question is, if they keep using this site with unoriginal content - will it hurt their rank of have no effect? I plan to add plenty of original content to their site.
On-Page Optimization | | TalkingSheep0 -
Analyzing word count on page SEO
Hey guys quick question, when I am analyzing/ doing word count for a particluar key word and I want to make sure that i am no where near Keyword stuffing, does Google consider the alt and title tags keywords of images as part of the KW count when looking for on page Keyword stuffing. For example. let say I have a page that i just created with 1000 words. and Only 2 of the words are my target Keywords. Then, if i add a picture and add the keyword to both the alt and title tag and description of the image, does google now consider the "page" to have a total of 5 keywords? Also, a lot has changed recently since penguin and panda, is there a good rule of thumb for what ratio to stay under as far as keywords to text.?
On-Page Optimization | | david3050