301 redirect from root to /index.aspx
-
I have taken over the SEO for www.domain.net.
The way i've inherited the setup is that www.domain.net is 301 redirected to www.domain.net/index.aspx Looking at top pages and linking root domains in Opensiteexplorer I can see that
www.domain.net/index.aspx has 1,006 linking root domains www.domain.net has 806 linking root domains.
I assume that www.domain.net is passing the value of it's 806 domain links to www.domain.net/index.aspx via the 301 redirect and because of this would expect www.domain.net/index.aspx to be the strongest page on the site and be the url that ranks in the listings for many relevant searches.
It appears however that www.domain.net is what is shown in listings and not www.domain.net/index.aspx ??
Can anyone explain why this might be??
If I do a site: search in Google then www.domain.net is indexed and not www.domain.net/index.aspx ??
-
These could be mostly internal links - are you linking to "/index.aspx" from your navigation, logo, etc.? In OSE, select "from [only external]", and you won't see your internal links. That can really skew the count.
-
Thanks once again Brian.
I have double checked the header response and the redirect from "index.aspx" to the international pages is definitely a 302.
I'm hoping that Google is not assuming that the 302 is intended to be a 301 as I want the link juice to stay at the root domain and I assume this is why 302s were used by whoever setup the IP redirects to international pages.
-
Thanks Dr. Pete,
I am comforted slightly by what you say about Google having a strong preference for the root and that you've seen it before. With the volume of links coming in to "index.aspx" you can see why seeing the root in Google listings made me nervous that all of those links were being ignored.
This comment also comforts me..
301/302 chain could exacerbate the problem, although it would typically leave link-juice after the 301
as that is what I would expect too.
I am hesitant to make changes because of the risks it involves and might just have to accept that I'll never know for sure whether those links to "index.aspx" are definitely being counted.
-
Well, here are some more possible issues....
1. Are you sure the redirect to the English page is a 302 and not a 301? As Dr Peter suggested - check the headers.
2. Google has said that in cases where it believes the 302 is a mistake it will treat the 302 as a 301....if this is the case, there's really nothing you can do, besides getting rid of the 302 and using a meta refresh instead. The meta refresh is commonly used in situations like yours, and while not a perfect solution, it would seem to be better than using a 302, which is typically not a good solution at all anymore. I'd bet this is your issue.
-
Google seems to have a strong preference for the root domain, and I've seen this before. Unfortunately, ASP/.NET can be really stubborn about going for the "index.aspx" or "default.aspx" page. You're probably still getting credit for the back-links, but it can be tough to tell. A couple of things:
(1) Make sure you're linking internally to the canonical version (in this case "index.aspx"). Otherwise, you're sending a mixed signal and that can disrupt the 301.
(2) Add a canonical tag to the "index.aspx" page. It can't hurt to double up, in this case.
Oh, sorry - just saw your follow-up. That 301/302 chain could exacerbate the problem, although it would typically leave link-juice after the 301. It's a bit complex, though. You could consider moving your English home-page up a level and only redirecting other audiences. That is a tricky proposition, though, and carries risk.
I'd also grab a header checker and just make sure Google is seeing what you're seeing. It's always best to verify that your redirects are working as expected.
-
Thanks again for giving this some thought and trying to help!
OK, I left out some info that I thought would complicate my description of setup but I wonder whether it is pertinent to the problem....
The site has international content areas and is geo-targeted using the directory method i.e /en-gb, /en-au,, /en-us etc
I have mentioned that www.domain.net does a 301 redirect to www.domain.net/index.aspx but I did not mention that www.domain.net/index.aspx then 302 redirects to the relevant international landing page based on IP address.
I'm pretty sure that the Google spider crawls from a US IP address so I believe that what it will see is:
www.domain.net 301 redirects to www.domain.net/index.aspx
www.domain.net/index.aspx 302 redirects to www.domain.net/en-us/index.aspx
Could the 302 redirect from www.domain.net/index.aspx be responsible for Google keeping www.domain.net in their index despite the 301??
Also, and concerning me more, do you think the considerable link juice to www.domain.net/index.aspx is being lost in all of this??
-
Quba I've thought about this more, and...I have to say that I'm at a loss. All of the links to the domain.net should be lost to domain.net and gained by domain.net/index.aspx
Is it possible that the index.aspx url has a noindex instruction from the robots.txt?. Is index.aspx showing up at all?
-
Thanks for your response Brian,
it could be that most of the links are initially directed at www.domain.net.
According to Opensiteexplorer www.domain.net/index.aspx has more links than www.domain.net though?
Where is your non-www domain directed? Is it directed to www.domain.net or or www.domain.net/index.aspx ? If it's directed to the former then that could explain some or all of your issue.
domain.net redirects to www.domain.net/index.aspx
-
Quba it's hard to say, but....
1. We know that (according to Google) some PR is lost in redirection, and it could be that most of the links are initially directed at www.domain.net.
2. Where is your non-www domain directed? Is it directed to www.domain.net or or www.domain.net/index.aspx ? If it's directed to the former then that could explain some or all of your issue.
-
Why has the main domain been redirected to index.aspx? it makes no sense
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Redirect indexed lightbox URLs?
Hello all, So I'm doing some technical SEO work on a client website and wanted to crowdsource some thoughts and suggestions. Without giving away the website name, here is the situation: The website has a dedicated /resources/ page. The bulk of the Resources are industry definitions, all encapsulated in colored boxes. When you click on the box, the definition opens in a lightbox with its own unique URL (Ex: /resources/?resource=augmented-reality). The information for these colored lightbox definitions is pulled from a normal resources page (Ex: /resources/augmented-reality/). Both of these URLs are indexed, leading to a lot of duplicate indexed content. How would you approach this? **Things to Consider: ** -Website is built on Wordpress with a custom theme.
Technical SEO | | Alces
-I have no idea how to even find settings for the lightbox (will be asking the client today).
-Right now my thought is to simply disallow the lightbox URL in robots.txt and hope Google will stop crawling and eventually drop from the index.
-I've considered adding the main resource page canonical to the lightbox URL, but it appears to be dynamically created and thus there is no place to access (outside of the FTP, I imagine?). I'm most rusty with stuff like this, so figured I'd appeal to the masses for some assistance. Thanks! -Brad0 -
301 Redirects, Sitemaps and Indexing - How to hide redirected urls from search engines?
We have several pages in our site like this one, http://www.spectralink.com/solutions, which redirect to deeper page, http://www.spectralink.com/solutions/work-smarter-not-harder. Both urls are listed in the sitemap and both pages are being indexed. Should we remove those redirecting pages from the site map? Should we prevent the redirecting url from being indexed? If so, what's the best way to do that?
Technical SEO | | HeroDesignStudio0 -
Will a Robots.txt 'disallow' of a directory, keep Google from seeing 301 redirects for pages/files within the directory?
Hi- I have a client that had thousands of dynamic php pages indexed by Google that shouldn't have been. He has since blocked these php pages via robots.txt disallow. Unfortunately, many of those php pages were linked to by high quality sites mulitiple times (instead of the static urls) before he put up the php 'disallow'. If we create 301 redirects for some of these php URLs that area still showing high value backlinks and send them to the correct static URLs, will Google even see these 301 redirects and pass link value to the proper static URLs? Or will the robots.txt keep Google away and we lose all these high quality backlinks? I guess the same question applies if we use the canonical tag instead of the 301. Will the robots.txt keep Google from seeing the canonical tags on the php pages? Thanks very much, V
Technical SEO | | Voodak0 -
301 redirects without .htaccess
I have a client that recently moved from an old ZenCart e-commerce site to Volusion. The domain name did not change. We need to redirect a bunch of the old URLs; however, Volusion's redirect tool does not work for URLS with "?" . The old ZenCart structure is: http://www.mydomain.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=563 Volusion is a hosted platform and we do not have access to the .htaccess file. Any suggestions on a workaround? Thanks!Nancy <colgroup><col width="960"></colgroup>
Technical SEO | | NancyVPS
| |0 -
Questions about the Sandbox and 301 Redirects
Does the sandbox still exist? What if you have a brand new URL and do a 301 redirect from another website because the name of the service business changed? Thanks for any insight and help.
Technical SEO | | SDSLaw0 -
Should we 301 redirect our old domain to the new domain
We have a product that when started was under the domain appnowgo.com. We've since changed the name and the domain is now knackhq.com. The latter domain doesn't rank nearly as well as the former for many of the keywords we are targeting. For example... "online database builder" and "web app builder" are two of those keywords. Obviously having app in the domain is not a bad thing but it is our old name. The question is, should we 301 the appnowgo.com domain to knackhq.com? Or should we use that better rank and just link users to knackhq.com from the appnowgo.com site until we can increase our ranking for knackhq.com? We don't plan to update the content on appnowgo.com anymore and we obviously don't want to drop off rank if at all possible. Thanks! Eric
Technical SEO | | sitestrux0 -
Should I change a 301 redirect?
I recently moved all the content from an old site to a new site on a new domain. I lost a significant amount of traffic as a result. There are 301 redirects for every page on the old site. Generally, these point to the same content as was on the relevant page of the old site. However, the 301 redirect for the homepage on the old site points to the homepage on the new site, not to the content from the old site homepage. I'm wondering whether to change the 301 to point at the content from the old site homepage. Any advice would be much appreciated.
Technical SEO | | seqal0