Looking for services to publish articles or blog posts with everlasting links.
-
I'm looking for link exchanges or something like this. Where you can pick web sites or blogs and place articles with your links in there without monthly payments, but with single fee.
-
What about a once a year fee?
Local neighborhood associations
Local Art Associations
http://www.proartsgallery.org/
Local small business affiliats
Local Chaimber of Commerce
http://www.oaklandchamber.com/
Local new outlets (these guys have a monthly, but I'm sure you can get a yearly rate)
Look in your area for these type of organisations to join up, they get you links, service, community enrichment & maybe even a few clients. Not all of these will fit every solution but they do range in value as well as price from 25.00/year to 200+/year.
-
We don't generally condone paid links here on SEOmoz, because we feel the risks often outweigh the rewards. However, Eppie fairly notes that they do (too often) work. The problem is that, even putting ethics aside, most people just don't do it very well.
I actually think Shane makes a good point - some of these links aren't really "everlasting" in the full sense of the word. Article marketing and paid blog posts often get archived quickly, and while the links continue to exist, they get rapidly devalued simply by moving in the internal structure. These paid networks have to continue to sell new links, and selling new links often means archiving old links and diluting existing content. So, if you pay once, expect your link to be treated like a 2nd-class citizen down the road. That's just the nature of that business, IMO. With a monthly fee, they can at least afford to keep your link active.
There are "paid" options that Google tends to not view as critically, such as:
(1) Editorially-reviewed directories
(2) Sponsorships and membership organizations
(3) Paid press-release services (although not really "everlasting")
People tend to only think of the big ones for (1) and (2) and often overlook niche directories, smaller organizations, local organizations, etc. The nice thing about the smaller sites is that you may be one of a half-dozen paid listings/sponsors, as opposed to one of 10,000 articles in an article-marketing network.
I'll leave this open as a discussion in case others have constructive suggestions.
-
Eppie, I think it is totally reasonable to acknowledge that it is there and that it works. Frankly, If you look at Wil's post re Google Making Liars Out of All of US, that clarifies a ton. Anchor text manipulation is king, that is a fact.
My point was that I don't like it. It is that simple. I was against and still am against SOPA and its iterations; however, when I see quality content turned to trash and someone claiming they produced an article, page, etc. I do see the harm done by it. So, that said, if someone wants to spin I cannot stop them. If they want to be involved in paid linking, link exchanges, link wheels, etc that is their choice. I do not have to stand by and allow it to be passed off as if hey, go ahead, everyone does it. No harm, no foul.
I simply am voicing my opinion of the effects of it on everyone. Remember most who are involved in SEO are seen as common street scum because we allow this stuff to go on and we can say either everyone does it or Google doesn't stop it. I challenge anyone to show me where even half the population has a positive opinion of those in SEO.
So ask yourself, why is that?Best to You, I fully realize you were not condoning it per se.
-
I guess that's the difference between search engines. Our local search engine Yandex counts old articles properly even years after they published, and yet bans poor content much faster then Google.
-
Gotchya Kynduvme,
I must have misunderstood that comment, I thought you were stating that it is "Okay" to trick consumers or "Bait and Switch"
But i see now i was mistaken
w00t!
-
Yeah, I got that, I am still not so sure that everlasting is the correct word or even mentality with the tool you suggested, as it will only "last" for about 3 - 6 months, then it will either get de-indexed or penalized... The fact that it does not have to be paid is a moot point, why would you care if it is everlasting if the benefits are not everlasting?
This is not a 100% statement, but it is even more of a constant, and will continue to be as such with more Panda Style Updates,
So from an SEO perspective, and the "Goal" of SEOMOZ Community, just giving someone a tool that is possibly out of their realm of understanding the consequences, is just not a good practice in my personal opinion.
-
Shane,
Everlasting links means it's placed once and it stays without need for ongoing payment. The tools I noted absolutely fit that requirement.
Further, noting that a tool accepts spun content doesn't require him to create spun content. You can push unique content through AMR and ALN -- it's all about how you use the tools.
I do agree with you 100% that guest posting is a great approach to this question as well, though it's definitely slower as it requires 1:1 communication.
-
NO you don't understand what I meant by that. I don't consider myself really in marketing. I do SEO which is like a branch of marketing, but when I say there is no ethics in marketing, I am really talking about the in your face television ads and promises made to sell things by and large. Think of the whole ORGANIC cabal in marketing.
Obviously I am "ethical" in my SEO practices otherwise I would not have been successful for over 10 years. There is no longevity in the dark side of SEO period. sorry for the confusion.
A smart consumer is a skeptical one. I never make promises to my clients, I am always 100% honest about what SEO is and what the potential is for success and the possibility of failure. SEO's who guarantee anything more than doing their best and relying on a proven track record is lying to you or buying PPC.
-
I am not so sure it completely answers his question.... His question was about "Everlasting" Links, as an SEO the term everlasting and spun content, in content farms does not fully align....
I would also think that he wanted those links to "pass rank" for "eternity
I understand your response may be that even High Quality Content and Blogs are not "Eternal"
But you have a much better chance of longterm success, over a 3 - 6 month gain, unless this is for this purpose, but without knowing more I am afraid to say you did not "answer" his question.
You only gave him an answer that was a possible solution to one aspect of his question if you are getting technical about it
-
My advise is not going with any service to select blogs and also to build links.
Most of the providers have thousands of own blogs/domain or some relationship with such sites.
Instead try to engage full time or part time professionals who could follow ethics in selection. Result may take time but there won't be any risk.
-
I am really disappointed that I can only give one thumbs up point to Robert's post.
-
**No I don't mind I think it is funny. I don't believe "Ethics" and "Marketing" belong in the same sentence frankly. **
That is kind of a scary comment not only for Users, but also for your clients in my opinion from MANY!!! angles
So without ethics in Marketing, how are consumers to trust anything?
Personally it is outlooks like this in my opinion that are the "Bad Apple" that spoils the bunch...
-
No I don't mind I think it is funny. I don't believe "Ethics" and "Marketing" belong in the same sentence frankly.
-
I'm no fan of spun content and I don't think blog networks should be nearly as effective as they are at manipulating rankings... but I'm also not going to pretend that stuff I dislike doesn't work.
-
What about text-link-ads, payperpost and linkworth?
Rewrites are quite common practice for SEO oO. I'm not sure about stuffing directories, in Russia our local search engine a bit more sophisticated than Google and it reacts not really well to such thing, and i would prefer cleaner methods.
-
Hyperbolic or not, it's a service that actually answers the OP's question. I don't believe he asked for a debate about the ethics of spun content or link networks -- he asked where he can drop links without paying a monthly fee. ALN fits the bill.
It's fine to caution against the dangers of such an approach -- and there certainly are some -- but I think it's also important to actually answer the question.
-
Hi,
everlasting is a term that is rarely associated with the type of links it appears you are looking for, as unless you are submitting high quality articles/blogs to sites that are not just content farms, "everlasting" is a term i think you will rarely find.
Personally, I think http://myblogguest.com/ is good, but there is a monthly fee.
Will Critchlow from Distilled did a recent post and talked about different tools they used...
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/link-building-tools
There was a specific tool called http://ontolo.com/ that would satisfy the ability to look for Blogs/site by keyword, niche ect... But this DOES NOT allow the automatic placement of links, you still must build a relationship, and have high quality content.
But onto the actual question, I am not sure there are any tools that are single payment, and would give the benefit of everlasting link that you would actually want (or would give authority) for longterm purposes.
-
I wish that article spinning and web trash were funny. Guess I lost my sense of humor when the brainless "SEO experts" took articles I had written, changed the verbs, pronouns, nouns, etc. and made, "Voila" new articles. What freshness. What I wonder is would they do it to my face?? This is called web trash to those who actually produce for a living.
I recently had a client go with a major publishing company (Newspapers) and they produced a new website, Facebook page, etc. (and were in the middle of canceling her Google Local, Bing Bus, etc. and setting it up their way). When I communicated with their rep about who wrote the content she proudly stated "Our SEO partner!" (happened to be owned by same large media firm....).
She was a bit shocked when I highlighted their stuffed in keywords and left the other content plain. Along with that I sent them copies of pages I had personally written a year and a half ago. The client is my wife.
There is no fast in SEO. But by all means suggest as much trash as is possible.
-
We focus our article link building on non-networked sites / blogs. The reason being that there are loads of very-spammy articles already on most sites that are part of such networks, and they tend to need a monthly fee.
Contacting bloggers / journos directly takes a lot longer than a submission to spinning/posting service, but tends to be a) free, b) high(er) quality, and c) the articles stay online as long as the site does. We tend to find sites/pitch articles inhouse, then outsource the actual writing to freelancers for £10-15 per hit.
Some great resources for finding blogs/journos that are open to guest bloggers:
-
Watch #journorequest
-
Use the twitter tool to find blogs using a keyword who have recently posted about other guestposts they've had - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvrsfAmTCtRudFRnMFE5RTlGZ0RzNkdzT3NreEFwd2c
-
"ATTENTION: this is the best thing ever happen in SEO..."
hahahah that is on authoritylinknetwork homepage. I love hyperbole in marketing
-
If you're looking to do article submissions, you can get a product like Article Marketing Robot, which has a one-time fee and will submit to a wide range of article directories. It accepts spun content as well.
If you're looking for a blog network (which it sounds like) that doesn't require a monthly fee, your best bet is to join Authority Link Network (http://www.authoritylinknetwork.com/regis.php), which is free if you add in your own domain(s) to their system. Keep in mind that the domains you add in need to have PR.
Outside of those options, all the major blog networks I can think of require monthly fees and many are closed to new membership.
-
I think Blogvertise.com does what you are looking for, but the cost may be monthly check it out.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Relaunching a site that has had thousands of posts linking to the same 20 articles. How to properly setup internal linking?
I'm in the process of relaunching a music news site (www.prefixmag.com) that once did quite well in search (over a million monthly search visits in its prime). The site got crushed by Panda, etc. and we stopped updating it. I'm starting to do more research but one thing that I noticed was we have modules in the right rail (desktop) that are found on all of our article pages that point to the same posts. (Edit: Added attachment. The links in the right rail under Editor Picks, Features, News, Media, etc. are found on every page of the site). In other words, we have thousands of posts that all link to the same 20 or so articles. Should we not do this if we're not trying to emphasize these posts in Google? Assuming this is the case, what is the proper way to do internal linking? Do we simply setup a sitemap and link to it? I'm hoping to have the thousands of articles we've published over the years have a chance to rank in search again. Also, we have a number of posts that are thin in content should those pages not be submitted in the sitemap? Thanks in advance! 2KmX0
Link Building | | leggo0 -
Unnatural Links To Your Site — Impacts Links warning, Should I do something?
Hi, I got: "Unnatural Links To Your Site — Impacts Links Google has detected a pattern of unnatural artificial, deceptive, or manipulative links pointing to pages on this site. Some links may be outside of the webmaster’s control, so for this incident we are taking targeted action on the unnatural links instead of on the site’s ranking as a whole. " I don't see any dropping at rankings, could the best solution here to be, just to leave everything as it is and be more careful with the link building in the future? Or is there a danger that Google gives further penalties if I don't act on this one do something? I am little afraid that if I start removing links, my rankings will drop, even though they have remained same if don't do anything? Any help is appreciated.
Link Building | | pok3rplay3r0 -
Has anyone used Fat Joe as an outsource solution for blog links?
Hi guys, I have seen a company on social media a lot recently who offer a guest blog posting service. It seems to be reasonable quality from the reviews and the blurb they give as they at least seem to find you a relevant blogger to match up with, actually write good content with as many reviews as is needed and then post it to just that one page. I noticed on their site they have claimed that their service is Loved by Moz but I couldn't find any reference to them anywhere on the Moz site. My question is - has anyone used them and are the links going to be any good for my site?
Link Building | | OrderBlinds1 -
Reposting my articles on other blogs - good or bad?
Hi there! Our blog is full of really good articles on consumer finance topics. Recently we established contact with some local media and even government agencies who said they will be happy to repost our articles on their sites. Question: is it ok to repost our articles as they are and link back to us, or shall we rewrite them to make them 100% original? The media doesn't insist on original content, but I'd like to get SEO benefit from it (the sites are really good). If original content gives us more SEO value, we're happy to do it Please advise. P.S. Using rel=canonicals is not an option (it's government websites and some old school media - they are very not tech savvy).
Link Building | | imoney0 -
Deleting links
I've got 280 links on my wordpress blog site, apparently it's recommended to keep under 100 links. How would I know which links to get rid of and which links to keep?
Link Building | | gimes0 -
Are the following considered bad links for Link Building.
I've been doing a lot of research lately on link building & I've read a lot about having a diverse amount of links. Social links, Blog links, comment links, footer links, No follow links, Directory links as well as links with Anchor text URL match, brand match, partial brand match, non-descriptive, and with keywords. But there is a lot of talk of removing those links that look like a site that's built just for link building purposes.... but Directories are basically built for link building are they not? I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if they feel links from the following directories would be bad links. (Non-Paid) http://www.yoganza.com http://www.wkool.com http://www.wee-directory.com http://www.voicelet.com www.hotfrog.ca http://www.webdirectorieslist.com http://multiplelistingboard.com http://mozdirectory.net http://freedirectorypr.info Industry specific below: http://bestautolinks .com http://automotivedome.com http://automobilebuzz.com http://craigsautolinks.com Thanks so much for the help!
Link Building | | DCochrane0 -
Link Building - Post Penguin
Hi, We have an eCommerce site that has recently been hit for some unnatural linking, resulting in a warning in our Google Webmaster Tools account. We weren't doing anything particularly underhand (and indeed before Penguin there wasn't a cause for concern) but nevertheless Google has picked up and penalised us. We've instantly removed the worst offending links and requested a resubmission. If this doesn't result in positive action from Google we're planning on employing the services of an Oracle member on SEOmoz who was kind enough to give us some fantastic free advice in order to go through and remove any further links that may be seen as questionable. Moving forward however I'm a little bit overwhelmed as to exactly what we should be doing in order to create a positive, natural link portfolio. I understand the emphasis is on ‘natural’ linking but we’ve been online for 8 years and I think it’s fairly safe to say that the number of links we have now is probably representative of about our ‘lot’ when it comes to 100% natural links. It would be nice to give our portfolio a nice gentle push in the right direction. I’ve checked through SEOmoz and the most up to date link building article they have appears to be http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo/growing-popularity-and-links - This guide however does seem to suggest some things that are potentially frowned upon now (for example, highly optimised anchor text I understand is now a no-no). Obviously, in days gone by I could look at Open Site Explorer to try to emulate my competitors but, to be honest, most of them have what I would describe as a fairly poor link profile and if I'm going to invest real time in to this I want to make sure I'm heading off in the right direction. Does anybody on here know of a really high quality post penguin link building guide, either on SEOmoz or elsewhere that I can use as some bedtime reading? Our website is eCommerce in nature so an article tailored towards online selling would be ideal. Thanks for reading! Chris
Link Building | | ChrisHolgate0 -
Are links in sponsored articles juicy?
Hi There I've been offered a sponsored article in a national newspaper that can contain up to 3 dofollow links. Something similar to this http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/271282 The question is would this be seen by Google as a paid link (which it is really I guess) and thereby pass no link juice? It's pretty expensive so don't want to get it wrong. Any thoughts gratefully received!
Link Building | | mou0