Product Has Many Fitments - Is it ok to create a page for each fitment?
-
Hello
We are working on a site that sells motorcycle parts. The site sells some parts that fit several different motorbikes e.g. a motorcycle cover that fits many bikes. We know that when a customer searches they usually search for "BIKE MAKE & MODEL Cover" e.g. "Yamaha R1 Cover".
It would be silly to simply list every bike the cover fits in one advert as the list would be far too long so my question is would it be acceptable to create a separate product page for each fitment e.g. "Yamaha R1 Cover", "Yamaha R6 Cover", "Kawasaki ZX9 Cover".
I realize it is duplicate content and yes I suppose it will affect Google search results so would we be in line for a penalty? There could be hundreds of pages. We do not want the site to be removed from the index but we do feel that this is a sensible way of doing it as it would help the sites customers no end.
Thanks
-
Specific to your industry or similar industry no. But as you suggest - in principle across ecommerce, yes.
If your title tags and product descriptions are not unique enough, you will get flagged for duplicate content in Webmaster tools. If you've got a bunch of products with a couple of words or product numbers or colors that make up the difference, you'll most likely get dinged - we have.
Will you get a site wide penalty drop in rank, product drop in rank or failure to improve rankings probably depends on how widespread your duplicate content is.
You'll want to use rel canonical tags on all your pages. There are other advanced steps to take in terms of identifying product landing pages, % exit pages and sales. Index the producers and no-index others etc.
I would also look at top ranking competitors and glean what you can from their structural delivery. If they're page 1, they're doing something right.
I'd also do a keyword search of this site for duplicate content and you may find other suggestions more specific to your products and industry. Good luck.
-
Thanks for the responses. Listing for each make/model does increase sales and traffic. How likely do you think it is that this strategy would result in a penalty?
It seems logical that this is in the customers best interest since most people will search for "BIKE MAKE MODEL Motorcycle Cover" as opposed to just e.g. "Medium size motorcycle cover". I guess this must be the same for many product ranges e.g. laptop chargers which fit different models.
Has anyone tried these tactics and been penalized?
-
Thanks - I have my moments :). Winnowing the field is the hard part. You've got to lay it all out there in a well-structured way that won't get you banged for duplicate content.
Then you've got to give it time for the products to percolate to the top.
If you've got a site with some authority I suppose the process will move more quickly, but if you're a start-up or a few years into it, you need the money now so you hang on to as much low hanging fruit as you can.
Its challenging.
-
You said it much better than I did.
-
Like most retail there are gonna be about 20-30% of your products doing 80% of your business. Attack those.
-
First thing to find out is if there is sufficient traffic to any of the individual searches (Yamaha R1 Cover). I'm going to assume that some motorcycles are more popular than others. If that's the case, then I would start with the most popular motorcycle, and start creating landing pages specifically about that. Maybe do this for the top 10 types that are purchased.
Make sure the content on these 10 pages is pretty convincing on why they should buy from you, but also make sure they are optimized for search. Then it's the simple part:
- Get ranked
- Get traffic
- Study analytics
If they lead to sales, keep going with other pages! If not, then forget about it. It's easy for one of us to tell you what to do, but the reality of the situation is that you could possibly benefit from this additional traffic, or it could just be a learning experience.
-
Hi Simon,
When faced with stuff like this, I try to vary the keyword research as best I can and start with broad match and narrow it down from there.
You used a conversational keyword in your question: "motorcycle cover" albeit a short tail. Would creating and optimizing a page for motorcycle covers be an option and then in the drop down put the different bikes they would fit?
Edit: Yamaha Motorcycle Covers exact match looks pretty good. Maybe parse it that way.
Its ironic you say, "I know say its silly to list all the bikes the cover fits", because your alternative is to create a whole page for every other option and as you suggest, there is inherent risk in that.
I'd try to identify the best option for generating traffic that will convert and minimize your exposure to duplicate content.
Ultimately, you'll probably find your solution will be a combination of doing things both ways depending on the product and traffic patterns.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does pages with same products but with different orders count as duplication?
Let's say I got an e-commerce website. In that website I have 3 different pages: New products: display paged products order by created time descendingly Hot products: display paged products order by viewed Random products: display paged products randomly
On-Page Optimization | | vuquangchien
So are those 3 pages should be considered duplicated content? Should I canonicalize them to New product page (with paging), or should I create a new page without paging and point all of 3 pages above to that page (this page doesn't make sense from user experience but look good for crawler)?0 -
Can you canonical from one domain page to a different domain page
We are a boating site and have our main site with all it's products. We have an engine section within our main site. But we also have an outside domain, specific to a certain manufacturer of engines. So we want our customers to still find the engine information for this manufacturer within our main site, as well as find the manufacturer targeted engine site in the SERPS. My question is this: Can I canonical those pages within our main site to pages on the outside domain? Or does are canonicals to be used only within the same domain? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | tdawson090 -
Too many page links warning... but each link has canonical back to main page? Is my page OK?
The Moz crawl warns me many of my pages have too many links, like this page http://www.webjobz.com/jobs/industry/Accounting ...... has 269 links but many of the links are like this /jobs/jobtitles/Accounting?k=&w=3&hiddenLocationID=463170&depth=2 and are used to refine search criteria.... when you click on those links they all have a canonical link back to http://www.webjobz.com/jobs/industry/Accounting Is my page being punished for this? Do I have to put "no follow" tags on every link I do not want the bots to follow and if I do so is Roger (moz bot) not going to count this as a link?
On-Page Optimization | | Webjobz0 -
How to improve On-Page Grades for Top Ranking Pages
please help me - i dont know or understand how to improve on-Page Grades for Top Ranking Pages
On-Page Optimization | | pwwukpw0 -
Why a page with an On Page A grade has a less good rank than a page with a F grade?
Why a page with an On Page A grade is ranked 17 in Google when the home page with a F grade is ranked 9 ? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Amadeus_eBC0 -
To Optimize Brand Name or Product Name First on Product Pages for E-Commerce Website?
We are using your free month trial for optimization of our E-Commerce website. In regards to individual product pages such as this one http://www.amgair.com/air-purifiers/iqair-healthpro-plus-air-purifier/, would it be more effective to have the page title start with the brand name and then the product (as we have it now) or forgo the brand name and start with just the product. IE: IQAir Healthpro Plus Air Purifier or HealthPro Plus Air Purifier by IQAir. These are commodity type products and are price restricted so all competitive websites advertise at the same pricing and it would be helpful not only to have a keyword phrase that is searched for a lot but also one that is easy to rank for. Please give me a recommendation when possible.
On-Page Optimization | | youhow0 -
Optimization of home page
Hi there I have an issue which, despite searching hard, I simply cannot find the right solution for. We have an index page that used to rank pretty well for a main industry keyword. However following a revamp of the site last year the kw slipped and no longer brings in decent traffic levels. The problem seems to be that the old static site had a sprinkling of variable anchor text links that brought value to the home page. Instead of the main anchor being "home" we would revert to "main keyword" and variations across the site sometimes in t he content but mainly on the nav bars. However the new CMS design structure restricts us considerably with anchor distribution and so instead we opted for the site logo on the masthead to have an ALT tag for "main keyword" but so as not to game google too much we added .."home" to the tag. Probably pointless but we figured it could do no harm. This ALT text is site wide Problem now is that we have lost the spread of internal nav bar anchors and variety etc. We have slipped in the serps for "main keyword" and I cant help thinking we are not maximising the anchors as we should. So what Im coming to is this.... How can we tell if Google is picking up the ALT tage anchor as the main anchor to rank the site at the expense of all internal text anchors. Despite retaining lots of embedded anchors - according to the Moz metrics these are not being picked up because OSE suggests the ALT tag anchor is taking precedence. The serps probably support this view as well. Should we: a) Vary the masthead ALT if there is no way of avoiding this being the most important link / anchor on the page b) Remove the ALT anchor and instead opt for content links high on the page (we do have nav bar links saying "Home" site wide as well which may overrid the embedded links?) c) Leave the ALT alone and still push for content anchors as described in b) What is the best way to handle this..? Best wishes and thanks Morch
On-Page Optimization | | Morch0 -
Avoiding "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" - Best Practices?
We have a website with a searchable database of recipes. You can search the database using an online form with dropdown options for: Course (starter, main, salad, etc)
On-Page Optimization | | smaavie
Cooking Method (fry, bake, boil, steam, etc)
Preparation Time (Under 30 min, 30min to 1 hour, Over 1 hour) Here are some examples of how URLs may look when searching for a recipe: find-a-recipe.php?course=starter
find-a-recipe.php?course=main&preperation-time=30min+to+1+hour
find-a-recipe.php?cooking-method=fry&preperation-time=over+1+hour There is also pagination of search results, so the URL could also have the variable "start", e.g. find-a-recipe.php?course=salad&start=30 There can be any combination of these variables, meaning there are hundreds of possible search results URL variations. This all works well on the site, however it gives multiple "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" errors when crawled by SEOmoz. I've seached online and found several possible solutions for this, such as: Setting canonical tag Adding these URL variables to Google Webmasters to tell Google to ignore them Change the Title tag in the head dynamically based on what URL variables are present However I am not sure which of these would be best. As far as I can tell the canonical tag should be used when you have the same page available at two seperate URLs, but this isn't the case here as the search results are always different. Adding these URL variables to Google webmasters won't fix the problem in other search engines, and will presumably continue to get these errors in our SEOmoz crawl reports. Changing the title tag each time can lead to very long title tags, and it doesn't address the problem of duplicate page content. I had hoped there would be a standard solution for problems like this, as I imagine others will have come across this before, but I cannot find the ideal solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Kind Regards5