Gah, unfairly hit by massive google penalty :/
-
Hi Guys,
We're the folk behind http://wpmu.org and have just been hit by a massive fall in google referrals, see attached
There's no reason in webmaster tools for this, were not engaging in any spammy or dodgy practices and are a massively established and well staffed news *& tutorial site for WordPress (one of the biggest, in fact!)
We've upgraded WP, and requested a referral, but without actually knowing what's going on it's extremely hard to figure out what to do
Maybe we're a wrong hit regarding this: http://www.webmonkey.com/2012/04/googles-new-search-algorithm-to-crack-down-on-black-hat-webspam/ ?
At the moment pretty much the only thing I can think of is one of our authors being dodgy, but I don't think they would be, and I don't know how to go about finding out.
Anyway, if you guys could take a look and let us know anything you think might be up, and share any advice that'd be super super appreciated!
Cheers, James
-
@Georg, tanks for that!
@Boodreaux, ugh, that's shocking service, wasn't like that back in the day
-
James,
If you want more responses you may need to post a new discussion question with your latest information you found out. Your question is far down the list now and only a 4 people are in this thread.
-
Hi James,
your are not alone. Our site lost 50% traffic...
Here is our thread: http://www.seomoz.org/q/lost-50-google-traffic-in-one-day-panic
-
Still looking, it looks like it could be victim of our own success / couple of minor errors around http://edublogs.org
Essentially we tried to remove all links from blogs there to wpmu.org back in the day, but missed, literally, about 3.
And then there's been a lot of splogging on edublogs of late that we're really working hard to clamp down on.
And they are choosing the theme with the wpmu.org links on it.... so 2+2 it coudl be that.
We've now removed all links and are splogging like crazy, using http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/anti-splog/ (one of our plugisn too).
And have p[ut in another request.
Would love to hear from a Mozzer too, given our 4+ year membership here (in which time we've asked like 4 questions
-
Ouch...great looking site. Very scary. Hope to hear back from you on what the issue was in your being dropped so low.
-
Thanks guys.
@Kevin on edublogs it's only the homepage that links to wpmu.org, sub blogs only link to WPMU DEV (separate site) which hasn't been impacted.
Given the prominence of our other sites in the WP space, and the relevance of the topic, I'm not sure if removing links from them to wpmu.org would necessarily be the best approach?
Thanks for other link and we'll go and post in the wbmaster forums now too.
@stubby yes, no paid links, only footer links are from themes (like the 'Powered by Wordpress MU' ones and at least 3+ years old), not at all odd for a WP provider either.
Open to other thoughts / ideas!
-
I have an opinion that many of the other sites that I have seen recently have one of a few things going on.
Either -
- They have crappy links that were bought on blog networks (which I didn't see in your case)
- They have footer links that they installed when people used their services (as in "designed by ABC web Design),
- They have footer links that were installed when people used their software (Powered by Wordpress MU)
The net result that I see from any of these scenarios is that the site in question gets lots and lots of anchor text links from lots of unrelated sites all over the place, which makes the "designed by" or "powered by" links look like an unnatural build, or possibly even look like paid links.
This is just my opinion and it could be wrong - but I am seeing it more and more.
-
I would cut down the sitewide links, in particular the ones on other domains you own. I see the edublogs "main site" has a image link to wpmu.org; too lazy to check the user blogs. Other than that, I don't see anything that would get you hit by the penguin update.
You might have better luck if you posted in the Webmaster product forums at google.
They also just release this form for people who think they've been wrongly affected.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dEVxdmdRWFJRTjRoLWZVTHZkaTBQbkE6MQ&ndplr=1
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Analytics Event Tracking
Hi Guys, I want to set up a goal in Google analytics for this site http://www.dfrsolicitors.co.uk/contact.php and the contact us form is in php (so there is no thank you html page). I know there is a piece of code "onsubmit" or whatever it is, but I can't find it. I want to be able to track successful submissions. Kind Regards Neil
Reporting & Analytics | | nezona0 -
Not many pages being indexed on google
Hi I am putting in to Google: site:www.mysite.com to see the pages listed on Google - the figure Google is coming back with is much lower than the actual pages, I have no crawer warning etc... What could the problem be? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | acumenadagency0 -
Loss of Google referral traffic after server move / CMS move
I have a client that changed from MoveableType to Wordpress. He also changed from a dedicated server to WP Engine. He may have blocked search engines for a week or two, so his organic traffic is down but only by 25%. He's 301 redirecting all of the old pages. The mystery is that his referral traffic from Google is down 90%. It's a popular blog, so that's thousands. It's been going on a month now. Anyone seen this before?
Reporting & Analytics | | Hyper-Dog0 -
Google Webmaster Preferred Domain Settings Help
I was recently running my SEO Moz report for my domain and saw a drastic drop in page rankings on the report. After some trouble shooting, I checked my Google Webmaster Tools and saw the "Preferred Domain for my Site has changed" the last week in which I saw the drastic drop. Under the "preferred domain" area, I have it set to www.marware.com but on most of the links to my site, it reads www.marware.com/ . We also have http://marware.com , but am not sure if this carries any relevance as the preferred domain is set for www.marware.com . Does the "/" make a difference in the "Preferred Domain" section? If so, how do I update it? Is there a way to confirm it is set up correctly? In the photo attached, what does "Linked Property" "Analytics Web Property" and "Associated Webmaster Tools Site" mean? Thanks in advance! T5tSCxm
Reporting & Analytics | | Khadaran0 -
KissMetrics Experience / Feedback
Hi Mozzers. Can anyone share their experiences using KissMetrics: pros, cons, how it compares to Google Analytics etc? Thanks, I appreciate any input.
Reporting & Analytics | | David_ODonnell0 -
Panda 3.8 and Google query report
Today I was plugging the SEOMoz Google change log into my analytics and noticed that our site took an impression jump (30%) on the day Panda 3.8 was released but also, if I'm reading the chart right, a drop in keyword avg. ranking. Does this make any sense or am I misunderstanding the chart? googleseomozq.jpg
Reporting & Analytics | | IanTheScot0 -
Google analytics reality check?
Looking back over a 9 month period tracking analytics with getclicky my site showed a 29% bounce rate, with only about 1/4 of visitors spending 1 minute or less on my site. I've recently implemented GA (removed old clicky code) and although traffic is strong, my site now shows a bounce rate of about 82%. Engagement stats also show that 82% of visitors spend between 0-10 seconds on my site. My site is built on Wordpress and the GA tracking code wasn't placed directly in the footer, my developer built a field in the admin area to insert the UA number which automatically adds the code to all pages. I've checked the code and the tracking seems to appear on all pages. I took a look at AW Stats. It corroborates GA and says that 80% of visitors are spending 0-30 seconds on the site. Potential issues/clues: browser tests show small loading problems in Internet Explorer 7,8,9 (the phone number at the top of the header loads on the wrong side of the page) and major issues in Internet Explorer 6 (site doesn't load at all in IE 6). The thing is no one who uses IE 6 is coming to the site. Second, the site gets a grade of C in YSlow, it's not lightning fast at the moment. GA is showing average page load of 2.4 seconds, but don't think either of these issues should cause an 82% 0-10 seconds engagement number. My site is content rich/focused with very minimal advertising. Content is accessible well above the fold. My question: Does the fact that AW Stats and GA agree mean that those numbers are accurate, or is there a bug I should be looking for? How to explain the clicky numbers?
Reporting & Analytics | | JSOC0 -
Google Docs Paranoia
Recently, there has been a lot of great information on SEOmoz about using Google Apps, Docs, etc. However, I suffer from Google paranoia (the fear that Google can see what's going on in my Google products). Is this fear unreasonable? Should I be concerned about using Google Apps, docs, analytics, etc. for SEO data (including keyword position tracking, back link analysis, etc)?
Reporting & Analytics | | Gyi0