I'm still not convinced by Panda/Penguin...
-
Okay, granted, it's still early. But supposedly Panda/Penguin has "changed SEO" so spammy back links from web 2.0 sites (like Squidoo and Hub Pages) won't be worth anything, right?
Why then, did I get a Google Alert yesterday (for one of the keywords I'm trying to rank for) for a Squidoo lens that has not only pushed a certain website up to top 10, but overtook my top 10 spot (pushing me back to page 2 or 3)?
It's pretty frustrating (doubly so on an already poopy Monday!) to try to be all white-hat with link building, including writing good content (which I do), and yet get beat consistently by other folks who are clearly doing the grayish-hat stuff.
Thoughts?
-
Thanks for the reminder of that post – had completely forgotten about it!
-
Personally, it's only helped me as it's knocked down a couple of truly horrible backlink spammers in my niche...but I still think Penguin is bull. I should not be able to hurt competitors, period. And for all of those that say "A good backlink profile will trump the bad links"...that may be true for Amazon and SEOmoz, but for the Barbecue Restaurant in a Pop. 20k town on the interstate, it can mean disaster. It's bad enough with all of the fake reviews going around, but add in the fact that 20 bucks can get your competitor 20k bad links compared to their 5 good ones, it's going to make a huge difference.
Search engines cannot should not operate like this. They should be moving forward instead of backward, it's simply not fair to the real businesses that try to do good. They need to focus on rewarding the good instead of punishing the bad. Heck, regardless of fairness that's just good operant conditioning technique. Anyway, there's got to be a better way...
-
I think Google really wants to return SERPS which are naturally popular and circulated through the internet. As with any intent, once its known it can be exploited.
The whole industry that has sprung up around SEO can be considered in a small sense, a way to manipulate the search engines intent. If on one hand as a search engine you're going to give credit to a website that many other websites link to, then you also have to know that once that is understood there are going to be people and companies who will exploit that.
In a perfect world one would build a website, make the website great and enjoy top position in the search engine. In our world, one makes a website, makes its great and watches droves of copy cats decimate it by manipulating the search engines.
We all struggle with it. Personally, I have worked in 2 completely different industries and seen the exact same things happening. You get to a point where you say, well I can't rank unless I do X, so you do, then something changes and now you look like a chump. While the real exploiters work on a way to get a round it, only to re-market their solution in greed. It can be quite frustrating so I really do understand your plight.
That said, I like to wear the white hat, treat my customers, viewers and website followers as my best tools, because they are. If you're running an e-commerce site, treat a customer like they are worth 100x whatever profit you made from the sale. Keep your tools sharp, help them help you. If you treat somebody well, give them the necessary tools to let others know your site is a great place to do business, then the referrals, whether it is just word of mouth, anchor links or social buzz will come back to you.
Zappos.com is the model of customer service, and you know what, Amazon realized it and purchased them. In all fairness to Amazon.com I have spent well over a 100k personally with them and I have never once had a bad experience. Of course there has been issues with stuff I bought, but they treated me like I spent a million dollars with them and took care of each issue well over my expectations. Those 2 companies operate at a level I only wish other major sites would.
Now I'm a web guy, I have competed with Zappos and Amazon and still do to this day. But here I am giving them a glowing review. I'm still one of their customers and competitors and have nothing bad to say about them without being a liar. I hope those who use the sites I work on, have the same feeling, and strive every day to make that a reality.
My thoughts...
-
I completely understand and agree. I think it's a constant cat and mouse game.
I don't know if you have read this post by Will or not, but if you haven't do read it: How Google Makes Liars Out of the Good Guys in SEO
-
Don't believe everything you read. Vary your link profile, promote with quality content and stay consistent.
I still have lens' on top of 200 million plus result terms that have been sitting there for years with only other web 2.0 sites linking in.
What is working for me is daily content creation and at least 2 tiers of promotion.
The top level being higher level social sites (think pintrest) being promoted by second tier links such as bookmarking and the profile based social media sites.
This really is a content game in my eyes and my method usually takes a minimum of five pieces (video,article etc). These are placed strategically along the top tier and promoted on the second tier and yes I am still using squidoo in my procedures.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I'm stuck by internal linking.
What structure should a football website follow? Silo or Topic Cluster?
Link Building | | gogoanimetp
I need advice on my website. My website: https://tructiepbongda.site
I hope there are answers!
Thanks0 -
Are directories still a valid practice? If so what are some of your favorite and most authoritative directories?
After combing over several competitor sites I have found many if not the majority of their links are from directories. I am curious to know if individuals/companies/seos etc. still use directories, if so what are some of the favorites?
Link Building | | Firestarter-SEO1 -
01 November 2013 - A possible Google's update??
Hello Guys! On 01 November 2013, one of our website's traffic has been dropped by more than 70%. We had added plenty of domains to the disavow tool, I am just wondering if its a Google's update or the disavow tool has destroyed the site? Any ideas? 9p3sN3p.jpg
Link Building | | TheSEOGuy10 -
Is anybody else noticing a dramatic change to their 'links to your site' section in Google Webmaster Tools?
Hey,
Link Building | | ChrisHolgate
Over the last six months or so we've been going through our backlink profile and cleaning up links from poor quality sources. Week by week there have been small changes in our Google Webmaster Tools 'links to your site' section to reflect this. I logged on this morning however and there has been a dramatic shift in the information displayed. Pretty much every bad link has been removed from the list including sites I know for a fact are still linking to us as they didn't communicate at all to our removal requests. Additionally, rather than showing the top 1000 links to our site as it used to, WMT is only showing 73 linking domains. The remaining 73 domains are good natural links from high quality sources. I'm guessing Google are just in the middle of an update and that the remaining linking domains (including the bad ones) will reappear shortly. This isn’t a request for advice or help but I’m just curious as to whether anybody else is seeing anything similar?0 -
Joomla's weblink component, do the links count as backlinks?
If your using the default Joomla weblink component do the links you add to others sites count as backlinks to those sites? example: http://www.yakangler.com/helpful-links/26-fishing-blogs-sites
Link Building | | mr_w0 -
Can't rank with certain keywords for the life of me
I have a website http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com in which functions as a scrabble dictionary lookup and word finder for scrabble. There are many keywords that rank well for this niche but the main ones I target are Scrabble Dictionary Scrabble Cheat Scrabble Word Finder Scrabble Help I used to rank well for all these keywords, I am 4th with scrabble dictionary currently but with the other 3 am no where near the top. On March 24th I dropped off the map for scrabble cheat, scrabble word finder and scrabble help. I actually dropped to 9/10th for scrabble dictionary on that date as well but since then I have been able to hold on steady to 4th. I can't figure out why I can't rank for those other keywords anymore. Its almost like Google has penalized me for those keywords. I have contacted Google a few times to ask if I have any penalties and they have told me that I don't. Even though in my backlinking I have targeted these keywords I can't seem to rank for them no matter what I do. The only idea I have come up with is that Google has re-associated those other 3 keywords in a group and separated scrabble dictionary on its own. I have other sites I have created in the same niche and I have noticed if the URL contains "word", "Finder" and/or "cheat" I can rank in the 3 keywords within about a week all the way up to the second page. My main site FSD has the highest DA and PA compared to my other sites. Any idea why I can't seem to rank for those other 3 keywords anymore?
Link Building | | cbielich0 -
Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links to http://www.loveandlucky.com/
On FEB I got a message on my Google Webmaster Tools saying "Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links to http://www.loveandlucky.com/" How can I know what inbound links Google considered as unnatural? thanks.
Link Building | | cardif0