Please Give This Page a Good Ass Kicking
-
This page on my site has a high bounce rate (around 90%) despite being right on point for the search queries that lead visitors to it (i.e. keyword data shows visitors are searching for this information exactly). Also, Google keeps giving the page good placement and it receives a good bit of traffic.
Anyone have thoughts as to why the bounce rate is so high? Feel free to offer candid criticism.
-
As far as answering the question of length of filing time periods, we absolutely do that. I appreciate the feedback nonetheless.
After implementing the content efficiency tool contained in this great bog post: http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/actionable-web-analytics-custom-reports-advanced-segments/
I was able to see that the average time on the page is almost 3 minutes. Further, I now see why my old getclicky stats (29%) bounce were so low. See this post:
http://getclicky.com/blog/214/why-clickys-new-bounce-rate-is-the-best-in-the-biz
Clicky calculates a bounce as someone who leaves immediately, if a user stays longer than 30 seconds, its not a bounce in clicky. I still plan to implement some of these suggestions (and appreciate the ass kicking), but ironically, the very first comment by designer boutique menswear was spot on. Users read the entire page, it answers their questions and they leave.
-
The "Talk to a Local Bankruptcy Attorney" looks like a banner ad positioned between the title and the text.
Depening upon how deep you are in the SERPs, the visitors will likely have already found a much better answer to the question presented in your title "How Often". The page does not mention the length of the periods where they are prohibitted from filing a subsequent chapter 7, 11, 12, or 13. None of the prohibitionary periods are addressed in the page. Depending upon the keywords your visitors are streaming in on, the title appears deceptive or the page is not helpful.
Way too many links. And, the links are so short, I doubt a reader would find them descriptive or useful.
My .02 Drachma (or Euro)
-
Hi,
My suggestions would be:
- "Article Provided by Moderator" - this doesn't look good. At least give the article an author or at the very least name it something generic like "National Bankruptcy Forum"
- The "Talk to a Local Bankruptcy Attorney" banner I immediately skimmed over. If this is your main call to action and you want people to fill in their details - improve this banner. Condense the 2 lines of text in to one, clear sentence of 5-7 words. Improve the image (perhaps have a picture of an attorney, but do NOT use generic cheesy customer service type images you find plastered all over the net). Also- try a different button colour, it's too similar to your header and the "Ask Question" button below. I don't think it looks good repeated down the bottom of the page either. If you are going to have it down the bottom, have it as a secondary call to action. It just looks spammy having the same banner twice.
- Fix the "How often can you file bankruptcy/" text under the image of the court house
- The text looks spammy. There are way to many text links (one of which has poor anchor text of "ankruptcy discharge". I would have a clear navigational menu to these links in the right hand side where the Recent Questions section is. E.g "More Information". You need to break up the text more with relevant images. Also, add a space between the last sentence of a paragraph and the subheading below, this will give a little bit of whitespace and make it more readable.
- I'm not sure of the Ask an Attorney section. Ask an attorney what? About bankruptcy, about my drink driving offence? I don't think it's clear enough what you want people to do here.
Above all, test test test.
Try some of these A/B testing tools:
http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/
www.google.com/websiteoptimizer
Hope this helps!
-
My first, 10 second response - I don't know where I'm supposed to look.
(and I waited and clicked to a few other pages, hopefully it might help your bounce rate )
-
Phil, thanks for the feedback and taking the time, no offense taken at all. I am definitely going to incorporate some of these suggestions.
-
I'm only being so direct because you asked for a good ass kicking which makes me think you're great at receiving feedback :). Here are my unfiltered, stream-of-conscious thoughts:
- This site reeks of spam to me. I realize it's not (and it actually has good content), but my first thought was SPAM. As a user, I would've gone back to the search engines after just a few seconds.
- I think it looks like spam because the "Talk to a Local Bankruptcy Attorney" banner looks like an ad and breaks up the headline from the copy. Also, the caption has a typo (which is one of the first things I see) and the copy is riddled with links. Plus, the fact that comments aren't allowed makes me think that maybe an actual person didn't write this.
- What do you want someone to do after reading this? It's not clear to me. Even if this page perfectly answered my question, I don't think I'd click anywhere to go somewhere else on your site.
- To add legitimacy, I suggest adding a picture and bio for the author. Perhaps link to some of his other work?
- What's the point of the "Recent Questions" on the right? It seems to give no value to me as a user, and really contributes to the page looking cluttered and non-genuine.
Alright, I hope this helps!
-
Thanks. Traffic is national, and mostly search driven. We get about 25,000 monthly unique visitors to the site.
-
I think its worth mentioning that the side module merges with the content to much try making it blue.
Phone number + login + google plus needs to be reworked i would make that phone number big
And if you want people to actually read the content get rid of mist the links if you want people to talk to a local attorney try a better call to action
Also is the traffic local, national or international cause we get local traffic for legal stuff bouncing at about 40%
I would take each suggestion and do just 1 at a time & see if it helps
-
Thanks for the candid feedback. Good suggestions.
-
I felt a sense of immediate text overload upon visiting. I think you need to break up the copy in a more attractive way.
-
Agree, Call to action is not clear - also design is "blah" with no real thought for UX.
There are WAY to many links in content - thus making it look spammy and affecting readability
No Design formatting (or care taken) in the content making, it all run together and look like word vomit.
Picture of the guy in right hand corner is a bad pic, off center ect (does not instill the fact that you care or give me trust you are reputable)
You said kick it in the A&*
-
Maybe its just because once you have read that page, the user doesn't feel the need to go any further and clicks off?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Deleted Rarely Visited Pages - Traffic Dropped (Big Time)
Hi folks: I'd appreciate any thoughts you might have on a problem I am having with organic traffic. One of our sites has about 500 pages/blog posts. We had about 200 pages that no one was visiting, or only one to ten people had visited in an entire year. As a result, we decided to experiment, and delete any page which had fewer than 5 visits in a year. This resulted in a deletion of about 90 pages.We did this on April 6 or 7 of this year. Two days later, we had a substantial drop in visits to the site. We had been getting about 300 sessions a day. Now, we are lucky to get that in a month. I know there was an algorithm update in late March, but our traffic dropped about two weeks after that, and a day or so after the deletion of the pages. There is a clear demarcation on analytics. I gave it a month, the traffic did not recover, so we decided to restore the pages. Traffic has not recovered and it has been about 3 months now. Does anyone have any thoughts on why we might have experienced such a drastic drop as well as what we might do to recover from it? Thanks very much
Reporting & Analytics | | jnfere0 -
Duplicate Title Errors on Product Category Pages - The best practice?
I'm getting quite a few 'Duplicate Title Error' on category pages which span over 2 - 3 pages. E.g. http://www.partwell.com/cutting-punches http://www.partwell.com/cutting-punches?page=1 http://www.partwell.com/cutting-punches?page=2 http://www.partwell.com/cutting-punches?page=3 All 4 pages currently have the same title... <title>Steel Cutting Punches</title> I was thinking of adding Page Numbers to the title of each corresponding page, thus making them all unique and clearing the Duplicate Page Title errors. E.g. <title>Steel Cutting Punches</title> <title>Steel Cutting Punches | Page 1 of 3</title> <title>Steel Cutting Punches | Page 2 of 3</title> <title>Steel Cutting Punches | Page 3 of 3</title> Is this the best way to go around it? Or is there another way that I'm not thinking of? Would I need to use the rel=canonical tag to show that the original page is the one I want to be found? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | bricktech0 -
Relation between Page and Landing Page
Hi all, I am looking through the Analytics data on a specific 'page' (404.html which is the Not found page) and as my secondary dimensions, I have Landing Page data. Now am I not sure how the page and the landing page are related here. Is it basically saying 58 Page views of the 404.html were originated by the users who landed on brochures.html? If someone could provide any pointers on it, it would be great. Thank you for your time. uZQJ
Reporting & Analytics | | nirpan0 -
Google analytics - landing pages
Hello, I have a website and it contains landing pages. after tracking and analyzing the data in Google Analytics , I found out that the traffic for the whole site is affected by the visits to the landing page. I mean, the bounce rate is less than one minute. this is because users fill their details in the landing pages and leave my website. to improve my website, I need clear data about the traffic, bounce rate etc. in my website. I also need can you help me solve this problem I thought about create another account in Google Analytics and set it to my websites pages (not including the landing pages). and keep the current code for the landing pages. my question is regarding this: Is it legal to use 2 different GA code (each one of them belong to different account) in the same domain ? can you provide me with more information about Multi Account in Google Analytics, and how can I use it to divide the traffic in my website between the traffic and the data for the landing pages and for the website itself ?
Reporting & Analytics | | JonsonSwartz0 -
Does anyone know of a way to do a profile level filter to exclude all traffic if it enters the site via certain landing pages?
Does anyone know of a way to do a profile level filter to exclude all traffic if it enters the site via certain landing pages? The problem I have is that we have several pages that are served to visitors of numerous other domains but are also served to visitors of our site. We end up with inflated Google Analytics numbers because people are viewing these pages from our partners' domains but never actually entering our site. I've made an advanced segment that serves the purpose but I'd really like to filter it at the profile level so the numbers across the board are more accurate without having to apply an advanced segment to every report. The advanced segment excludes visits that hit these pages as landing pages but includes visits where people have come from other pages on our domain. I know that you can do profile filters to exclude visits to pages or directories entirely but is there a way to filter them only if they are a landing pages? Any other creative thoughts? Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | ATIseo0 -
Google analytic conversion code in a single wordpress page
Hello How can I add/place the Google analytic conversion code in a single wordpress page? Example: http://www.newsmilecostarica.com/thank-you/ Thank you so much Andy
Reporting & Analytics | | newsmile0 -
If a page bounces in the woods, can Google Panda hear it?
I have read that after the Panda update a site's bounce rate is an important ranking metric. However, can anyone confirm whether all pages count equally? For instance, my home page gets 5000% more traffic than Deep Page X. If Deep Page X has a poor bounce rate, does it matter as much as if my Homepage has a bad bounce rate? I am guessing not, but wanted to open it up for discussion. If not, it has me wondering on what to do for some of my database driven content. I have some dynamically created pages that have higher bounce rates and minimal unique content. They aren't pure spam or junk, but are likely only about 1% unique from one another. Sounds like a no brainer change post-Panda, right? Well, what if I was the only one targeting the keywords for these pages? The pages pull from info I stored on the U.S. government stimulus program (related to my industry). It then has just about every city, state and county combo in the country for my product. For instance, a page <title>might be "Flemington, NJ Widgets - Somerset County". Something that no one else is targeting and drives minimal traffic.</p> <p> </p> <p>Do I take this content down? I didn't have any affects, positive or negative from Panda, so I am hesitant to take down thousands of Google cached pages.</p></title>
Reporting & Analytics | | TheDude0 -
If I change the URL of a page, but the old page canonicalizes to the new, do I need to change my Analytics goals to get data?
I changed the URLs of some pages recently (because the same thing that affects the internal anchor text also affects the URL - grr...) but considered it not a big deal because even if I looked at the source code of the old URL, the canonical tag was now pointing to the new one. The question is - if I had URL destination goals set up for those URLs in Google Anlaytics, do I now have to change them? Or does Google somehow know that anyone getting to the new URL is the equivalent of someone getting to the old URL because of the canonical tag that exists on the old URL source code? I still do see goal conversions for some of the old URLs even since I changed them - but it could be that people are still somehow finding the old URL somewhere - or that Google only reindexed it a week or so after I made the change. Any light to shed? Thanks in advance, Aviva B
Reporting & Analytics | | debi_zyx0