Why are we not seeing similar traffic patterns in a new market?
-
Good afternoon!
We have a large real estate site with over 400,000 urls. We do pretty well with long-tailed search terms (like addresses--- 123 Main Street, Atlanta GA) so we get a decent amount of traffic (3,500-4,000 uniques a day). 2 months ago we opened up in a new market (Nashville) and hoped to see similar traffic for that market after a few of months, but so far we haven't. In fact, we only get about 200 visits a day. I can't seem to figure out why it's taking so long for us to generate similar traffic in Nashville that we see in Atlanta. All of the Nashville properties are in our sitemap and are being indexed by Google. Any ideas why we aren't seeing similar effects?Thanks in advance for any help you can provide!
David
-
400,000 isn't an unreasonable number of pages on a real estate site if they have reasonable amounts of unique content and the pages are implemented well within the site.
That said, it's much more difficult to pull off with a site that has lower DA & PA and few links.
-
True, I don't think site size will by itself hurt you, but I do think there is something to building your site up over time.
I think having a great first impression goes a long way. If google finds the bathroom stall before it sees the grand lobby then google my just quite at " this is a crap website."
... granted, I've never built a website with 400,000 pages... I mean there are a lot of bugs in the world, but would you read 400,000 pages about pest control?
-
Here are a few of the questions I would start with from what you have asked:
- How much of each site's traffic is coming from Google?
- How many inbound links does the original site have?
- How thin is the content of the new site?
- How quickly were the 400,000 pages added to the new site?
- How many of those pages are indexed by google right now?
- How original is the content?
While domain age in of itself isn't always a factor, a site's history in the search engine is. I am going to assume that your new site is created dynamically. If you simply plop down 400,000 pages then it's going to take some time for google index and evaluate all of those pages. Whereas your older site may have started with more history. It may have begun with a few less pages and gradually built up.
From my own personal experience, I have used the same format on several different websites and while it would seem that since the formula is the same and the search engine is using the same set of rules, I still get varying results. The formula works most of the time so I just move on and let the sites simmer. If formula A never kicks in then I move to formula B.
You may want to try a different city to check your formula A and make sure that your first success wasn't just lucky.
-
Number of URLs alone independent of anything else shouldn't be a reason to randomly deindex a lot of your site to an arbitrary number. Can you offer any more background on your suggestion?
-
You say that you have "400,000 urls" and you do not seem to realize that THIS is the problem!
You need to de-index a lof your site to gain the trust back from Google.
Trust does not come from having 400.000 urls - it comes by having 200 + good pages with original content per location.
-
Hi David,
I'm following up on older questions that are still marked unanswered. Are you still seeing this discrepancy, or has it sorted itself out now that you've had the site up longer? Are you still looking for advice about this issue?
-
It looks like the disparity of traffic is largely due to your recent entry into the market, the primary contributor to the SEO factors already mentioned. Many factors are at play, as usual, and here are some interesting sidenotes:
(According to Wikipedia)
The Atlanta metropolitan area, with 5,268,860 people,<sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference">[4]</sup> is the third largest in the Southern United States and ranks fourth in the number of Fortune 500 companies headquartered within city boundaries, behind New York City, Houston, and Dallas. Atlanta Metropolitan Area ranks as the 10th largest cybercity (high-tech center) in the US, with 126,700 high-tech jobs (tech jobs=high turnover=more home sales=internet savvy population).
Atlanta is far more dynamic in the real-estate market than Nashville
The Nashville metropolitan area = 1,600,358
Music industry professionals don't tend to move around much, especially country music industry professionals.
My opinion: with time and some SEO effort, you can reduce the traffic gap, but not close it.
-
In order to rank for specific terms you must have relevant links with the right anchor text to those pages. If you have just made more pages and are only linking to yourself then you are effectively trying to just tell everyone that you are an authority without anyone else's opinion. So if you aren't being voted for (ie linked to) by other pages to say that your Nashville pages are what they are then you may just have a whole lot of low authority pages and need to build up more value.
Taking a look at your site you only have a little over 1000 links to your site with most of them going to the domain. deep linking is going to be key to your success or else you are trying to determine your own relevance.
hope this helps
-
This is a side note to the previous comments. You can try to boost your rankings quickly (quick is relative) with social media metrics. This is a real-estate agent in my city, http://hometourgoodness.com/ he gets a lot of interaction on Facebook and Twitter. If you are able to engage in social media you will boost your in-bound traffic, and help serps.
-
For me this is guess work as I don't know the URLs, but is it possible that people in Nashvile use other search terms than you are ranking for or have other ways to search for property? ans do you use those search terms as well? I've seen somthing simular within Germany where it turned out people were using a slightly different version of the keywords.
Are all pages in the Nashville section being measured properly? Is the GA code implemented on all the pages? As you mention that you have only 70% of traffic compared to that of Atlanta.
And I think it could also be a matter of trust. is your brand new in the Nashville area? Than people might be more responsive towards your competitors.
Geddy
-
Hi Barry-
We are not ranking as well for Nashville, but we follow the same formula for links/layout in both markets. We don't have any inbound links to property pages (example: http://clickscape.com/9753-Palmeston-Place-0-Johns-Creek-GA), but we rank on the first page of SERPs in Atlanta for these similar long-tailed terms due to site architecture/navigation. The formula is not working in Nashville and I was just curious if there was a reason why that might be.
Also, you are correct. The search volume in Nashville is about 70% of the volume in Atlanta so that definitely plays a role.
-
Are you ranking as well for terms in Nashville the same as Atlanta?
I would imagine other sites are outranking you and you need to build 'Nashville' specific links into some of your pages to start showing up.
Also are the search volumes for real estate terms as large in Nashville as Atlanta?
A combination of all of these could be the cause of the lower search volumes.
-
All thing being equal, the age of a domain accounts for a very tiny amount of ranking weight, if any at all. It's not really ever a reason I would give for why a website is or is not ranking for any given set of terms.
-
First, are you being outranked by competitors? Try doing some long tail searches similiar to what you get for areas like Atlanta.
If you seem to be ranking for those searches just as well as you normally would, it could be that areas like Nashville have less heavy internet users. Keep in mind that you're likely to have more results for a good ranking result based in NYC compared to the boondocks of Oregon... simply because of the number of people in the area searching for the item in quesiton.
-
Some of the following will be guesswork since you didn't provide any URLs, but I'll try my best. This old (Atlanta targeted) website, has it been around for a (quite) longer time than the newer (Nashville) domain? Besides the amount of links the older domain has most likely collected, domain age appears to influence ranking on its own (even though only slightly, #10 in the ranking factors http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors). Does the Nashville targeted website have the same amount of local (and related) backlinks as the Atlanta targeted website? You've mentioned that the Nashville website is only live for about 2 months, which I'd consider a really short time to draw any real conclusions to be honest.
With some more time and the same effort as you've put into the Atlanta targeted website, I'm sure the new one will perform in a similar fasion!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Drop in indexation but increase in organic traffic
We've had a puzzling drop in indexed pages on our ecommerce website. My crawl returns just over 25k items. Until 19/6 we had about 23-24k indexed. Then we experienced a sudden drop from 19/6 to 26/6: from 23,400 to 18,999, losing 4.4k pages from one week to the next. At the same time, our organic traffic has not decreased, it actually increased, however, it's only been a couple of weeks so that may be coincidence. A few things that have happened during the past few weeks: 31/5: we implemented pagination on category pages to avoid issues with duplicate content - could it be that this led to a decrease in indexed pages 3 weeks later? However, I can only find about 1.5k pages in my crawl that are page 2+ 18-19/6: we had some website outages over the weekend; as a B2B business, we don't get much traffic over the weekend, so I can't see an impact to traffic. However, the following week, indexation dropped by another 250 (then stayed the same this past week), so I don't think this was a factor. 21/6: we retired another website and migrated it to our main website. However, all pages were redirected to existing pages so no new pages were created for the migration. This doesn't really explain a decrease in indexation, but may account for some of the increase in organic traffic; however not all as the retired website hardly got any organic traffic. So, should we be worried? As our website is quite large, it would probably be quite difficult to pin point exactly which pages dropped off the index, but a loss of 19% of pages is quite significant. Then again, it doesn't appear to have negatively impacted organic traffic... Have you got any suggestions for what I should be looking at to find out what happened? Should I be worried at this point? I will definitely continue to have an eye on how our organic traffic (and indexation) develops but I am not sure if there is anything I can do at this point. I'd appreciate your advice on this, to make sure I am not missing something blindingly obvious. Thanks! RmWaNib JJm4tC3
Reporting & Analytics | | ViviCa10 -
Google Analytics unexplainable traffic spike
Viewing this report **Behaviour > Site content > All pages **with primary dimensions of **Page ** and **Page title **are showing different results for one specific page on our site. We noticed a huge spike in pageviews and entrances to that specific page on our site. The user flow report shows traffic going through and from the page (in high volume) from other pages on the site which suggests that it's not the usual case of spam referrals. When I view the report above by page, I get unrealistic data. Over 600% increase in pageviews and over 900% increase in entrances. When I view by page title however, I get realistic results. Can anyone help shed some light on why these two reports will be different? Anyone else seeing similar issues?
Reporting & Analytics | | OptiBacUK0 -
Filter the Spam traffic
Hello everyone, We have to filter traffic from spam website like webcrawler.com semalt.com social-button.com etc. So we created custom filter with Filter field: referral Filter Pattern: Webcrawler.com|semalt.com|in-g61.mail.yahoo.com|d47c5f40.linkbucks.com|buttons-for-website.com|semalt.semalt.com|forum.topic34157145.darodar.com|social-buttons.com While verification of filter there is error displaying i.e. This filter would not have changed your data. Either the filter configuration is incorrect, or the set of sampled data is too small. Please help in resolving issue..
Reporting & Analytics | | Obbserv0 -
Google's Not Provided - What can I see and what can't I?
Hi Guys, I've been looking into my company's analytics's data recently to establish where most of our traffic is coming from. More so, I want to get an indication of the percentage of organic traffic that is coming from branded and none branded terms. Not provided takes up 80% of my organic traffic and the vast majority of keywords that are provided all mention the brand name. Does analytics's provide you with all of your branded traffic but just block others that it doesn't want you to see? Or is it just coincidence that the majority of the terms I can see are all branded? I am just trying to establish how strong our brand is and how much traffic the brand name brings against none brand terms. All help is appreciated! Thank you!
Reporting & Analytics | | Sandicliffe1 -
How can you tell if your new content has been indexed?
Other than simply doing a search in each case, is there any way I can tell (in Webmaster Tools, for example) if the 500-1000 new pages of content I have added have been indexed and are now appearing in search results? My traffic hasn't risen much, but I know at least a few of them are in there... How can I tell when they're all in?
Reporting & Analytics | | corp08030 -
If a site has 301 redirect - Will the Analytics of the target site show it as a referral or as the traffic source it came from?
Lets say I have a site www.abc.com and I rederect that site to www.xyz.com. If ABC.com is still ranking for keyword X and orgnically someone searches for X and they click on the ABC.com listing - In the XYZ site analytics (which is the target site) does it show as organic or referall, direct? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | M_80 -
Ideas Why Our Google News Traffic Disappearing?
The traffic to our major market newspaper website from Google News has dropped nearly 100% in the past ten days. Any ideas why might be happening?
Reporting & Analytics | | wlis990 -
Something strange going on with new client's site...
Please forgive my stupidity if there is something obvious here which I have missed (I keep assuming that must be the case), but any advice on this would be much appreciated. We've just acquired a new client. Despite having a site for plenty of time now they did not previously have analytics with their last company (I know, a crime!). They've been with us for about a month now and we've managed to get them some great rankings already. To be fair, the rankings weren't bad before us either. Anyway. They have multiple position one rankings for well searched terms both locally and nationally. One would assume therefore that a lot of their traffic would come from Google right? Not according to their analytics. In fact, very little of it does... instead, 70% of their average 3,000 visits per month comes from just one referring site. A framed version of their site which is through reachlocal, which itself doesn't rank for any of their terms. I don't get it... The URL of the site is: www.namgrass.co.uk (ignore there being a .com too, that's a portal as they cover other countries). The referring site causing me all this confusion is: http://namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/ (see source code at the bottom for the reachlocal thing). Now I know reach local certainly isn't sending them all that traffic, so why does GA say it is... and what is this reachlocal thing anyway?? I mean, I know what reachlocal is, but what gives here with regards to it? Any ideas, please??
Reporting & Analytics | | SteveOllington0