How to remove non-requested, non-desired backlinks
-
Dear Mosers,
Before Penguin update we start a link back profile study about who and why are linking and we found hundred of garbage sites like these:
http://rakeback-blogger.com/links/
and hundred more...
They don't have contact form or email address, so what is the best way to remove our link from there (there are any quick way), these sites are damaging our rank.
Thank you for your help
Claudio
-
If the drop started April 23 then it's not likely to be Penguin. However, it's a tough call because you could have had a natural drop that started on April 23 and then got augmented on the 24th. But, there were Panda refreshes on April 19 and 27th. I'm pretty reluctant to call it either without a real in depth look at your analytics.
Penguin is generally a keyword specific drop, so if you can pinpoint that you have dropped for particular keywords that have been overoptimized in your backlink profile then you could go in this direction. However, the backlinks that you pointed out originally all seem to have your url as anchor text so I have a hard time believing that this is Penguin. (With that being said, I haven't done a full analysis of your site and backlink profile.)
What made me wonder if this was Panda was that your inner pages have very little content above the fold. All of the content above the fold seems to be the same for each page. And then, the content that is below the fold is mostly brief product descriptions - not a lot that Google can recognize as substantial content.
Again, I'd be really hesitant to go removing links in this case. If this were my site I'd do the following:
-have a really thorough look at my analytics to see if the traffic drop can be attributed to one or more particular keywords
-if yes, then I'd start cleaning up links that contained those keywords as anchors.
-if no, then I'd start changing my pages so that there is more substantial content, especially above the fold, for each of these pages. I'd also go looking for other places where I could be violating the quality guidelines on page such as hidden text, etc. Then, once this was cleared up I'd wait for the next Panda refresh to see if I had recovered.
-
Dear all,
I found this history google update doc http://www.seomoz.org/google-algorithm-change
and Penguin starts on Apr 24 and Apr 27 another Panda.
In conclusion (I want to share my point of view coming from your knowledge):
1. Penguin hits our site because, we has a few high quality links and some of them was hitted by Penguin. Possible solution get more links (natural etc).
2. Panda, some of our pages specially categories and sub categories were including repetitive content and canonical problems between them (this issue was partially resolved). I'll continue resolving this.
Finally please give me your opinions about this.
Thank you again for all your help, Im very happy to participate with you in SEOMOz and I think this is a great community!
-
Dear Marie,
Our Drops starts on April 23 to April 30 (500 visitors to 280) you're correct, so it was a Panda hit?
Thank you for all your help
Claudio
-
I would not work to remove them, yet.
I think that you are getting great advice from Marie. I would listen to her opinions.
-
Have a close look to see if your traffic drop coincides with either April 19th or April 27th which are days of Panda refreshes. In looking at your inner pages I'm starting to wonder if this is a Panda issue....
-
I wouldn't go removing links until you know that the links are actually what are causing your drop. The majority of these links are pointing at your home page so it would be weird for your inner pages to drop if they were causing you a problem. If you remove a bunch of links you could possibly do more harm than good!
Can you pinpoint your traffic drop to a particular day? Try looking at your analytics and selecting organic search traffic. If you can pinpoint a particular day then you may be able to determine if this is Penguin related or not. It could be a Panda issue and if that's the case then it's really nothing to do with your backlinks, but rather an onsite issue.
And there are other possible reasons as well! So again, don't go on a massive link removal campaign until you are sure that that's what needs to be done!
-
Dear EGOL,
No warnings from google, only traffic drops -50% (actually our Home page ranks well) but the internal pages not.
I extract from SEOMoz the links and I start sending them emails asking for link removal and no one has responded, and some of them don't have contact form or email details, I'll try contact them via Whois records.
Do you recommends perform this HUGE and slave task with minimal results or only forget and go ahead.
I appreciate your opinions and help
Thank you
Claudio
-
Dear Marie,
Our traffic drops on Apr and May at 50%, and some pages (not home) was performing well (google 3 first positions) and now they are on the 2 or 3rd page.
Honestly Im very worried about that.
I appreciate all your help
Claudio
-
Some of my sites have lots of backlinks from trashy directories and mash-up sites. I had nothing to do with getting these links. They are gifts from people who are making spammy websites.
I think that most websites acquire lots of these links over time - especially if you have a website that ranks well in popular SERPs. If you had nothing to do with placing them then I would not worry about them unless google sends you a warning.
-
This doesn't look like any kind of negative SEO campaign to me. The majority of your backlinks (including the ones that you are asking about) use your url as an anchor. If someone was attempting to try to get you a penguin hit or an unnatural links warning they'd be spamming you with a keyword anchor. (And it's debatable whether that would even work.)
It looks to me like you are still in the index and you are ranking #1 for the term that you are targeting in your home page title.
How do you feel these links are affecting your traffic? If you had an unnatural links penalty then you wouldn't be ranking. If you had a penguin hit then there would be a dramatic traffic drop on April 24 or May 25.
Otherwise I'm guessing there's something else going on. How dramatic is your traffic drop? Is it for all keywords or just specific ones?
It's possible that you lost some link equity because sites that link to you got hit with a penalty. And there are many other possible reasons.
-
No one from here works with backlinks services, I think it can be performed by one competitor, from years til now.
our site is freesharewaredepot.com please take a look and give us your ideas or something that Im mis.
Thank you
Claudio
-
Have you tried the whois info? A site's contact info is USUALLY in there. However, I have found that only a small percentage of website owners actually respond to the emails I have sent via whois info.
Just a question, and not meant to be condemning at all, but how do you think you got hundreds of links like this? It sounds to me like something that would happen after using a backlink service. (You know, the kind that promises hundreds of links for one low price.) I've got a few such spammy links to my site, but not hundreds.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should you disavow backlinks even if your site spam score is 1%?
With a site spam score of 1% as indicated by Moz, is it worth the effort or necessary to disavow backlinks in Google? Even at just 1%, could those spammy links still hurt a site's Google search rankings, even in the slightest of ways? As it relates to disavowing backlinks, everything I read about is only related to sites with high spam scores. But what about sites with low spam scores? I'm interested in best practices for dealing with spammy links, regardless of one's site spam score. Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AndrewOrr100 -
Why has my website been removed from Bing?
I have a website that has recently been removed from Bing's index, but can't figure out why. The website isn't new, and it is indexed just fine on Google. These are the steps I've tried: The website is verified in Bing Webmaster Tools and successfully submitted the sitemap. I tested the URL to ensure that Bingbot is allowed to crawl the site I submitted URLs to Bing via the URL Submission tool There isn't a "noindex" on the site preventing it from being indexed When I do a URL Inspection, an error message comes up saying "The inspected URL is known to Bing but has some issues which are preventing us from serving it to our users. We recommend you to follow Bing Webmaster Guidelines." I contacted Bing to ask whether the website was removed in error, but received a reply that the website doesn't comply with Bing's quality guidelines, but they wouldn't go into detail as to which guidelines the website isn't meeting. The website URL is https://www.pardeehospital.org. Can anyone offer any advice or insight as to why Bing won't index our site? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lindsey.steinkamp0 -
HTTP vs HTTPS duplication where HTTPS is non-existing
Hey Guys, **My site is **http://www.citymetrocarpetcleaning.com.au/ Goal: I am checking if there is an HTTPS version of my site (duplication issue) What I did: 1. I went to Screaming Frog and run https://www.citymetrocarpetcleaning.com.au/. The result is that it is 200 OK (the HTTPS version exists - possible duplication) 2. Next, I opened a browser and manually replace HTTP with HTTPS, the result is "Image 1" which doesn't indicate a duplication. But if we go deeper in Advanced > Proceed to www.citymetrocarpetcleaning.com.au (unsafe) "Image 2", it displays the content (Image 3). Question: 1. Is there an HTTP vs HTTPs duplication here? 2. Do I need to implement 301 redirection/canonical tags on HTTPS pointing to HTTP to solve duplication? Please help! Cheers! uIgJv DsNrA El7aI
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | gamajunova0 -
Too many backlinks from one domain?
I've been in the process of creating a tourism-based website for the state of Kansas. I'm a photographer for the state, and have inked a nice little side income to my day job as a web designer by selling prints from Kansas (along with my travels elsewhere). I'm still in the process of developing it, but it's at least at a point that I need to really start thinking about SEO factor of the amount of backlinks I have from it going back to my main photography website. The Kansas site is at http://www.kansasisbeautiful.com and my photography website is http://www.mickeyshannon.com. This tourism website will serve a number of purposes: To promote the state and show people it's not just a flat, boring place. To help promote my photography. The entire site is powered by my photography. To sell a book I'm planning to publish later this year/early next year of Kansas images. To help increase sales of photography prints of my work. What I'm worried about is the amount of backlinks I have going from the Kansas site to my photography site. Not to mention every image is hosted on my photography domain (no need to upload to two domains when one can serve the same purpose). I'm currently linking back to my site on most pages via a little "Like the Photos? Buy a print" link in the top right corner. In addition, when users get to the website map, all photo listings click back to a page on my photography site that they can purchase prints. And the main navigation also has a link for "Photos" that takes them to my Kansas photo galleries on my photography website as well. The question I have: Is it really bad SEO-wise to have anywhere from 1 to 10+ backlinks on every page from one domain (kansasisbeautiful.com) linking back to mickeyshannon.com? Would I be better served moving all of the content from kansasisbeautiful into a subdirectory on my photography site (mickeyshannon.com/kansas/) and redirecting the entire domain there? I haven't actually launched this website yet, so I'm trying to make the right call before pushing it to the public. Any advice would be appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | msphoto0 -
Backlink Audit Tool Recommendation?
I need to do a back link audit on an e-commerce site, their number of back links large proportion of them are okay but we seem to have collected a few bad ones (not by us) along the way. Need a recommendation of a good quality reliable tool or set of tools with a proven track record. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
301 Externally Linked, But Non-Producing Pages, To Productive Pages Needing Links?
I'm working on a site that has some non-productive pages without much of an upside potential, but that are linked-to externally. The site also has some productive pages, light in external links, in a somewhat related topic. What do you think of 301ing the non-productive pages with links to the productive pages without links in order to give them more external link love? Would it make much of a difference? Thanks... Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Removing Content 301 vs 410 question
Hello, I was hoping to get the SEOmoz community’s advice on how to remove content most effectively from a large website. I just read a very thought-provoking thread in which Dr. Pete and Kerry22 answered a question about how to cut content in order to recover from Panda. (http://www.seomoz.org/q/panda-recovery-what-is-the-best-way-to-shrink-your-index-and-make-google-aware). Kerry22 mentioned a process in which 410s would be totally visible to googlebot so that it would easily recognize the removal of content. The conversation implied that it is not just important to remove the content, but also to give google the ability to recrawl that content to indeed confirm the content was removed (as opposed to just recrawling the site and not finding the content anywhere). This really made lots of sense to me and also struck a personal chord… Our website was hit by a later Panda refresh back in March 2012, and ever since then we have been aggressive about cutting content and doing what we can to improve user experience. When we cut pages, though, we used a different approach, doing all of the below steps:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Eric_R
1. We cut the pages
2. We set up permanent 301 redirects for all of them immediately.
3. And at the same time, we would always remove from our site all links pointing to these pages (to make sure users didn’t stumble upon the removed pages. When we cut the content pages, we would either delete them or unpublish them, causing them to 404 or 401, but this is probably a moot point since we gave them 301 redirects every time anyway. We thought we could signal to Google that we removed the content while avoiding generating lots of errors that way… I see that this is basically the exact opposite of Dr. Pete's advice and opposite what Kerry22 used in order to get a recovery, and meanwhile here we are still trying to help our site recover. We've been feeling that our site should no longer be under the shadow of Panda. So here is what I'm wondering, and I'd be very appreciative of advice or answers for the following questions: 1. Is it possible that Google still thinks we have this content on our site, and we continue to suffer from Panda because of this?
Could there be a residual taint caused by the way we removed it, or is it all water under the bridge at this point because Google would have figured out we removed it (albeit not in a preferred way)? 2. If there’s a possibility our former cutting process has caused lasting issues and affected how Google sees us, what can we do now (if anything) to correct the damage we did? Thank you in advance for your help,
Eric1 -
Can backlinks negatively influence your ranking, or worse, cause a penalty?
Hello everbody! I am the owner of a price compare website and have been running it succesfully for over two years now. However, since february the news and articles section of our website lost a great deal of it's traffic. We did not completely lose traffic but only for items that were posted after february 2011. We have skilled content writers who do good research on the topics covered in our news section, i can honestly say we write our content for our visitors and not just for the search engines. We have investigated every part of our source code but we did not find anything there that was violating any guidelines. So my next guess was that maybe some incoming links could harm our news section. The most backlinks we receive are directed to our news and article section. These links are generally put on sites which use our RSS feed. There is just one website that we think could be the reason. It had included our RSS feed on each page which resulted in over 2,500,000 backlinks from a single domain which hosts a very poor quality website. We never considered it to be harmfull so we never did anything about it. My question is if this case could be the reason for the drop in traffic? kind regards, Jeroen from the Netherlands
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jeroenpf0