Microsite campaign good or bad idea for SERP
-
I have a group of microsites for renters insurance, mostly geo long-tails. I wrote some content and have a GREAT back-end through Kemper. First 4 weeks they all did great. It looks like Panda went through on June 25 and by the 27'th they got moved totally out of the SERP. I have 67 microsites. All have unique contact (about us, why us, benefits...). I post to them often; not all of them but i put up about 10 new posts / week. Havent done much SEO, no link building or anything that could be spammy or causeing trouble. I have them in webmaster tools and no messages about problems. If i've been penalized or if something is seriously wrong i'd like to know. I know that Google can see 67 websites all on 1 ip but i'm not trying to fool or trick Gbot so not interested in using proxies or specialty hosts with many ip's.If there is no critical flaw, next i'm just going to continue writing content, buy traffic, and build quality backlinks. Your comments are appreciated. Not one site is in top 1000 as far as i can see, and all were in top 30 by week 4. Banned on week 5, today is week 12.http://onlinerentersinsurance.orgIf you want to see the other 66, click on the 'renters insurance' link on the right. Its a random link through the micronetwork.
-
Thought I'd throw in my 2 cents and experience...
My experience: Built a network of about 50 microsites, SEOed them to the max, built some strong links to them and boom, week later was getting some real traffic. Time goes by, new algorithms released and the sites start to lose their rankings. In fact, the only thing they rank for is their EMD terms (which you don't have). Granted, you seem to have a better upkeep of them but the SERPs trend is not in your favor.
I agree with the others, you should focus on building 1 powerful site vs many microsites. Microsites were the shit back in the day several months back, but today its the big dogs that rank. First page results are filled with brands (usually multiple listings per domain) and microsites are trending down. Quality > quantity, for both links and sites.
My suggestion is to combine all those microsites into one super site that is most easily branded + contains all or a portion of your target keyword in the URL. Just copy/paste all the articles from the microsites to the one site and 301 redirect to the new respective pages.
Also, make sure you do a search before you jump to conclusions about keyword traffic. "life quotes" returns results about life related quotations. Trying to rank for insurance with that keyword is an uphill battle.
If you go through with the transferring all content to one site and 301ing the pages, be sure to post your results here!
Cheers,
Oleg
-
Never mind Donnie,
It looks like you used Google keyword tool, exact...
-
Hey Donnie,
I was reviewing your suggestions and have a quick question: what is the number after the keyphrase you listed here:
online renters insurance - 210
Disability quotes - 480
consumer insurance guide - 58
life quotes - 301,000
renters insurance illinois - 46
e health insurance - 2,400
-
Penguin bait? We have a handful of professional writers in house putting up GREAT content at ConsumerInsuranceGuide.com, and have done this before--successfully. The last time we made this 'Penguin Bait' we sold it to QuinStreet for 16 million. http://www.elliotsblog.com/insure-com-sells-for-16-million-7361 The value was in the 7,000 authorative articles and their respective pagerank and backlinks. Like you say good content beats SEO every time.
Do you really think its 'penguin bait'????
What specifically (or generally) is wrong there??? Initially i wasnt posting question about ConsumerInsuranceGuide.com but now that you mention it i'm VERY interested--especially since we have several hundred thousand dollars spent there already on high-quality original content.
-
I also own ConsumerInsuranceGuide.com and have 1000 articles published in many insurance verticals. But I thought it was too vague.
I would call this Penguin bait.
I would attack this with one site, 20 articles that are best-on-the-web for their topic and all of my remaining resources would go into getting editorial links into those 20 articles.
If you are targeting "renters insurance in statename" then those articles would target the 20 states with highest renter value. That might be units*household income.
These articles would not be yada yada yada renters insurance yada yada yada. They would be kickass stories that people would link to and share on facebook.
-
I work 8 minutes on all 300 sites and get as much done as most people can in 40 hours!
I know that is efficient. I use a similar method. But that is only good for the factory work part. To win in this niche you gotta promote the site and have at least one page of great content on each domain.
You put one page of great content on each of your domains and I'll put all 300 on mine. I am going to win.
When that is done you still have just 8 minutes per week to promote your sites and I still have 40 hours.
-
Tell that to Dick Portillo, millionaire owner of Portillo's hot dogs chain, one of the best in Chicago. He makes more money than Jean and Georgettis (best steak house in Chicago).
Anyway, this rhetoric isnt helpful to any of us. I'm looking for opinions based on working knowledge of microsite campaigning vs. single site. Obviously your hunch is that a microsite is a 'losing battle'. I get it. Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise.
By the way, all 300 sites are build dynamically from 1 page of code using Wordpress as CMS. I work 8 minutes on all 300 sites and get as much done as most people can in 40 hours!
-
@EGOL lol/lmao.. @lifeQuotes I would focus on one site and add the SEOmoz blog feed to your RSS for some ideas : )
It's challenging but not impossible.
-
On the right nav (middle) if you click 'renters insurance' it randomly goes to one of the 67 live sites. Click and look at the domain
-
Anyway, i asked google for a list of the next 300 best 'renters insurance' keywords and bought ALL 300 exact-match domains.
speechless
These types of battles are not won in a factory. They are won using content, smarts, and solid promotion. The more competitive the niche the more solid promotion will be needed.
Your niche is pretty competitive.
You build your armada of hotdog stands and I'll build a single website. I'll work 40 hours a week on my site and you work 8 minutes per week on each of your 300 sites. I know that I am going to win.
One of the main strategies of battle is to "divide and conquer". The hotdog stand strategy plays to defeat.
=============
Full disclosure... I used to own an armada of hotdog stands... then build a big site that kicked all of their asses - and their competitor's too!
-
I clicked on the renters insurance tab however I don't see the 67 links. However I see the quick links to instant quotes which link to external sites like lifequotes.com.
I've never really heard of a microsite campaign however in my opinion yes it's bad because it's spread out.
I do know that having a URL structure of www.brandname/keyword allows you to build a brand rather than a bunch of micropages. Google wants to rank sites that will help their users.
-
I see,
However these are not exact match domains.
An exact match domain must be exact:
If I wanted to rank for cars and I had cars.com or cars.net those would be exact.
These are you links...
- Auto Insurance
- Business Insurance
- Disability Insurance
- Health Insurance
- Home Insurance
- Renters Insurance
- Life Insurance
- Travel Insurance
- Long Term Care Insurance
These are your URLs:
online renters insurance - 210
Disability quotes - 480
consumer insurance guide - 58
life quotes - 301,000
renters insurance illinois - 46
e health insurance - 2,400
You have a gold URL out of all of these...
I would forget all the other URLs and invest all my time on lifequotes.com
You can still have lifequotes.com/auto-insurance and that counts as having the keyword in your URL. In fact Lifequote is your brand name in this case and all your anchored text which are [exact] will also look natural.
-
Hey Donnie,
Duplicate content: Thats just my footer (same in all 67). Should i block that from the bot(s)???
Also: the microsites were an effort to target long-tail keywords with exact-match domains.
OK: blocked s of 4:30 pm 8-24. I get a clean copyscape now
-
All have unique contact (about us, why us, benefits...).
Unique means exclusive one of a kind...
Type the URL you provided into: http://copyscape.com/ Seems like you have some duplicate content.
Also, I don't understand why you built soo many microsites.. You're better off having one quality website with all of the targeted keywords. It's easier to get ranking to a page that also has some Domain Authority.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Sudden Rankings Drop for Good Keywords.. Did I Do This? Please Help :(
Hello, I noticed a gradual rankings drop for 3 important keywords over the last month, with a pretty big plummet the last two weeks. Overall in the last month+ we dropped from position 9 to 41.I noticed this when I dug further after noticing traffic dropping since February (not a drastic traffic drop). I should note that the keywords took people to my client's homepage. Their branded keywords have no suffered and I looked at a couple others that haven't either. Now, there is a link in the site footer (we have site wide header and footer) that takes you to a static page that contains links for the 2 digital flipbook catalogs the customer has (one for US and one for Canada). My concern is that at the end of January I had a developer implement a noindex/nofollow meta robot & robots.txt disallow specifically on the HTML pages/URL of the Canadian catalog ONLY. It specifically pointed to that flipbook URL. This catalog is nearly identical to the US catalog and I thought I'd be eliminating duplicate content and helping with crawl budget. After looking further into it last week (reading up about internal nofollows not necessarily being detrimental, but not recommended) and noticing the drop in search visibility traffic (starting gradually in March), I had the disallow/nofollow removed. This was last week, and over this last week the traffic took an even bigger drop (not amazingly drastic but enough to be concerned) and I noticed the keywords that we did ok for dropped even more this last week (down to 41). I'm concerned this has to do with the change I made at the end of January and reversed back. I should note that I don't think these catalogs or the static page that links to them brought any traffic. The keywords I am concerned about fell on our homepage (where the link to the static page that contains the links to both catalogs is in the sitewide footer) The catalogs are a couple hundred pages. I honestly don't see how this could do it, unless it has something to do with the footer being sitewide? There have been site upgrades/dev changes over the last couple months too (although I am not sure if that affected other clients who received the same upgrade), so this is hard to pinpoint. Sorry this is so long but I'd appreciate someone offering some insight to help ease my mind a bit!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AliMac260 -
Volatile SERPS?
I have a new client whose rank is jumping around a lot. I took over the account 7 weeks ago, but they'd been doing SEO with a decent provider. They switched to me because they thought he wasn't working very hard and he's not very nice. I just took them on in December and they started out at #18. On Dec 24 they were at 9, Jan 1 at 12, Jan 2 at 14, Jan 3 at 24, Jan 12 at 19, Jan 15 at 28, Jan 16 at 25, Jan 19 at 28 and today at 24. Some of the really bad black hattish providers have bounced up to the top. Any idea what's going on?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | julie-getonthemap0 -
Is Building a Local Directory of Businesses on a Subdomain Good SEO?
Hello Fellow Moz'ers: I own a small digital shop in a major US city. We had a marketing idea which I'd like some input on the soundness of. We are creating a professional services directory of 'digital professional services providers' in our hometown. The directory's membership will only be open to firms located within our city limits. The directory will be curated and maintained, ongoing, by us. Our motivation is 75% selfish and 25% benevolent. The idea is that, by building the directory on our subdomain, we hopefully will collect links, which ultimately will enhance search visibility. But I'm concerned about the devaluation directories have incurred in recent years and I've even seen advice given to the effect that listings in some directories might be harmful to a site's link profile. It is not our intention to harm those who might list in our directory. Any thoughts on this matter would be greatly appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Daaveey0 -
Is our Third Party Subdomain hurting our SERPs?
Hello! Our Moz report under the root domain godelta.com displays 696 high priority issues that we cannot control that are all caused by a third party subdomain. promotionalproducts.godelta.com We don’t have any control of the SEO on the third party website. Our blog posts link to the third party subdomain from our blog subdomain. blog.godelta.com Is the third party subdomain affecting our SERP and should we replace the subdomain with its own domain name? Hopefully we can clear this up and end the debate with our internal team and our HubSpot account manager. David
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wakadaca0 -
Massive SERP crash
I came in this morning to a swath of email updates from Moz. Our site had jumped in ranking in the four geographic regions we target and we were seeing (more or less) the best results we've ever had. Most of the jumps were only 1 - 4 places but they were for our most competitive keywords. Late this afternoon I did some spot checks on keywords to confirm that we were still holding roughly in the same positions and before I reported this to the wider business. We're not. What's more we have dropped off the first page for some terms and don't seem to be ranked at all for for others. The only keywords we're getting good rankings for are branded search terms. I can only assume this is due to a technical issues over the weekend our developers caused. I'm not completely across this but I at some point our sitemaps stopped working and a huge number of links on the site were broken. Could a massive surge in 404s cause this? I'm checking google analytics and I can't see a drop in organic traffic yet although I don't have the full figures for today. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ahyde0 -
A good review schema markup tutorial?
Howdy Moz, Still kind lost of review markup and the best way to get it implemented into a Wordpress site. Any suggestions on a good tutorial that walks you through the process?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AaronHenry0 -
Weird title tag in SERps (see attachment)
Hi Mozzers Does anyone know why my clients title tag appears like it does in the image attached? It seems as though Google is pulling the parent page url and putting that at the front. All other title tags are normal. Anyone any ideas and is it anything to be worried about? Thanks Anthony @Anthony_Mac85 9KhTgk5
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Tone_Agency0 -
Are dropdown menus bad for SEO
I have an ecommerce shop here: http://m00.biz/UHuGGC I've added a submenu for each major category and subcategory of items for sale. There are over 60 categories on that submenu. I've heard that loading this (and the number of links) before the content is very bad for SEO. Some will place the menu below the content and use absolute positioning to put the menu where it currently is now. It's a bit ridiculous in doing things backwards and wondering if search engines really don't understand. So the question is twofold: (1) Are the links better in a bottom loading sidemenu where they are now? (2) Given the number of links (about 80 in total with all categories and subcategories), is it bad to have the sidemenu show the subcategories which, in this instance, are somewhat important? Should I just go for the drilldown, e.g. show only categories and then show subcategories after? Truth is that users probably would prefer the dropdown with all the categories and second level subcategories, despite the link number and placement.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | attorney1