Https & www
-
Hi,
I've looked all over for this, maybe I am searching for the wrong thing but here is my question.
My site is https://mysite.com yet I want it to display as www.mysite.com in the SERP. Is this possible? I realise people like secure but I would rather display it as www because I believe people are going to skip over a result (sometimes) if it they are not sure what the https is.
My SSL certificate is for mysite.com, would my issue be resolved if I bought it for www.mysite.com instead?
Thanks in advance!
-
If your site resolves to https, then it's likely Google will display it that way. I haven't seen any click-through studies of https vs non, so it's hard to say how having the https will effect you. That said, I have seen correlation studies that say shorter domain names are better correlated with higher rankings, so you may be onto something.
If I want to get rid of https from showing will that mean I have to take the certificate from the homepage and just have it on the relevant pages of my website?
Yes, if you remove the https from the homepage then Google won't display it.
Fairly certain rel=canonical is not what you're looking for here, as even if you point it to http I suspect Google will likely ignore it.
Hope this helps!
-
Hi, Shaun,
rel=canonical is used when you have multiple pages with same product pages so you can set it for avoiding error of duplicate title and content, but if you do 301 redirect in.htaccess then your site is open with the URL which you want, and Google webmaster preferred setting is used for showing domain in SERP with or without WWW.
-
Marcus,
Ok, I think my confusion started when google displayed google as www but then it redirected to https. I've recently found out this happens when your logged in to google so that explains that.
One last question, if I change my certificate to WWW will my SERP show this or will it still say https://www.mysite.com. If I want to get rid of https from showing will that mean I have to take the certificate from the homepage and just have it on the relevant pages of my website?
-
Hey Shaun, you can't do that.
www.mysite.com is potentially different to mysite.com (whatever the protocol).
If you want the results to show the www. version this has to be the main version of the site so Sanket's answer is perfectly right.
- make the site resolve on www.
- do whatever you need to do with your cert
- set the preferred domain in webmaster tools.
OR
Make do with the non www domain.
Cheers
Marcus
-
Hi Sanket,
Thanks for your reply. If I change my webmaster tools settings to a preferred domain of www, this is like a rel=canonical?
I don't think I quite got the answer I'm looking for.
Basically I want to display mysite which is https://mysite.com as www.mysite.com in the SERP. I need to keep the site as https://mysite.com though as the certificate I have is for that and not WWW
-
Hi,
You should display mysite.com instead of www.mysite.com. It is possible to display your site in SERP with WWW Go in webmaster select preferred domain which you want to display. But make sure you have to set .htaccess file in you FTP and set domain which you want to open when people search your site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Dark Traffic & Long URLs - Clarification
Hi everyone, I've been reading the 2017 report by Groupon and the 2017 article by Neil Patel r.e. dark traffic. Both of these articles work on the assumption that most long URLs are not direct traffic because people wouldn't type a long URL into their browser. However, what happens to me personally all the time is that I start typing a URL into the browser, and the browser brings up a list of pages I've visited recently, and I click on some super long URL that I didn't bookmark but have visited in the past. That is legitimate direct traffic, but it's a long URL. I'm just wondering if there's something flawed in my reasoning or in the reasoning of Patel and Groupon. Maybe most people aren't relying on browsers like I am, or maybe things have changed a lot in the past 3 years. What do you think? And are there any more recent resources/articles that you would recommend r.e. trying to parse out dark traffic? https://neilpatel.com/blog/dark-traffic-stealing-data/ Thanks!
Search Behavior | | LivDetrick0 -
Blog Post SEO - Bounce Rate & Layout
Mozzers, I wrote the following blog post about Microsoft’s current offer to receive $100 free in bing ads. http://www.cildermansolutions.com/blog/free-bing-ads-coupon-for-2017-get-100-in-free-advertising-credits I noticed that the bounce rate on the post is higher than i was expecting; I am wondering if this is because I put the eligibility rules for collecting the ads coupon in the 2nd paragraph...and people are just seeing that right away and bouncing. I obviously don’t want to lie or trick readers, but i am wondering if the community has any idea/suggestions. Thanks, Matt
Search Behavior | | matt.nails0 -
Within the Q&A forum, is it spam to include a website in our signature?
Hello Mozzers! I've seen several contributors that end their questions and responses with a website. Just for the sake of the argument, this is an example: -- Some text about the response/question --- Hope I've helped. Gaston Riera www.domain-Gaston-company.com To clarify more, the URL does never have a link. I've always considered that this is a place to share and help other by ours/others expertise not to self promote implicitly our company.
Search Behavior | | Gaston Riera
So, my question is related to the rules and best practices in the forum: Is it spam to include a website in the signature of a message? Does Moz's community staff take some action about those? Thanks!
GR.0 -
How & What is the best advice on Keyword Cannibalization & get onpage optimized perfectly?
Hi all mozzers, I am having confusion to understand the fact and importance to target a single or related grouped keywords which is quite broader in terms of relevancy being found within our business. Let's explain more in detail:
Search Behavior | | KammySEO
Suppose we have a website: abc.com deal businesses in "Party Supplies, Party Decorations" Where the term "Party Supplies" being used exact or randomly many places, please see below finalized Titles respective to each landing page: abc.com/birthday/
title - Birthday Party Supplies - Kids Birthday Party Decorations Ideas abc.com/wedding/
title - Wedding Favors - Wedding Party Decorations & Centerpieces abc.com/baking/
title - Buy Baking Supplies - Cupcake & Cake Decorating Supplies abc.com/occasions/
title - Special Occasions Parties Supplies & Events - Party Time My main concern is, do our keyword party supplies gets stuck with "Keyword Cannibalization" ? If yes then what is the best advice you folks like to input here in order to safeguard and optimize best our landing pages for the such broader related search terms within the businesses. I am looking for best answer here0 -
HTTPS
Does it matter if you have an Extended Validation Certificate or will a standard one do. This is for an Enterprise site with many sub domains etc. Thank you Mozzers! Sincerely V
Search Behavior | | vijayvasu0 -
Using https: Beyond the standard seo metrics
Hi All, I've been doing quite a bit of browsing around the topic of utilising https vs http when constructing urls and I wanted to know if anybody has research on the customer perception of a site where all urls are https. We originally used rel canonical tags to inform the browsers that the http and https were the same but we are considering stepping this up to having the http pages redirect to the https and I'm wondering how customers may react if they know that all pages are https. Anybody have insights on possible outcomes? Thanks, Tom
Search Behavior | | Tmon0 -
Dating Blog Posts & How Fast Google Picks up on New Pages
I had until a few months ago included the original post date of a new blog post on the site. I then removed it and none of my results in Google now include the blog post date, although for some (for articles written about events) Google includes the date of the event where you would usually see the post date. Since I did this, it seems like new blog posts are taking longer to rank on Google, some results are ranking well, and others declined relative to what I would have previously expected. What's the best thing to be doing? To include a date (considering a lot of my content is not time-relevant) or to keep it as it is now? The second thing, is I often go through and update my articles with new information and re-post it in my rss feed etc - ie the date becomes new again. How does Google treat this? Any ideas or comments would be great! Thanks
Search Behavior | | ben10001 -
Http v https
We have an ecommerce site retailing relatively high value products - precious metals - We have a VeriSign SSL certificate for the domain... Weighing up the advantages of pointing all visitors through https on the domain, there is a benefit of customer confidence, but from a search engine - say Google's point of view, will delivering the site over https have any trust factor or benefits?
Search Behavior | | digitalarts0