HOW TO: City Targeted Landing Pages For Lead Generation
-
Hi guys,
So one of my clients runs a web development agency in San Diego and for lead generation purposes we are thinking of creating him city targeted landing pages which will all be on different domains ie. lawebdesginstudio / sfwebdesigngurus
I plan to register these 20-30 domains for my client and load them all up on a my single linux server I have from godaddy.
I noticed however today using google's keyword tool that roughly only 5-10 cities have real traffic worth trying to capture to turn into leads. Therefore I am not sure if its even worth building those extra 20 landing pages since they will receive very little traffic.
My only thought is, if I do decide to build all 30 landing pages, then I assume I will have a very strong private network of authority websites that I can use to point to the clients website. I mean I figure I can rank almost all of them page 1 top 5 within 2-3 months.
My question is:
1. Do city targeted micro sites for the purpose of lead generation still work? If so are there any threads that have more info on this topic?
2. Do you suggest I interlink all 30 sites together and perhaps point them all to the money site? If so i'm wondering if I should diversify the ip's that I used to register the domains as well as the whois info.
Thanks guys, all help is appreciated!
-
Hi Ruth,
I guess you are right after reading what I have been focusing on. I am making of mountain out of a mole hill and please understand I don't mean to waste your time l I do agree there are many other things considering putting your address on your website will probably get you more than what I'm inquiring about but I thought I would find out. Thank you for taking the time to respond to me and my question. The main reason I kept asking was I did not want to ever give somebody the wrong information so in the future I will not list this as good or bad for SEO until I know better.
Thank you again and I want to say what wonderful job everyone here at SEOmoz has done.
Respectfully,
Thomas Zickell
-
Hi Thomas,
I think you are over-thinking this. Go ahead and put in your location - but also do other things to let Google know where you are located. This one thing is not going to make or break your local rankings. I would recommend putting this energy into local signals on your site, rather than worrying about your location in your DNS.
-
I have taken a screenshot of my any cast DNS and exactly what it's looking for under the option of "LOC"
you can view it here https://blueprintmrk.sharefile.com/d/s1384a16f958407a8
I apologize about the information contained in the document I just gave you it was not what I wanted to show you when discussing this. If I am wrong I am sorry I wasted your time and appreciate you taking the time to let me know what this feature could or could not do for search engine results.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
The service you link to here appears to be more about displaying localized content to users based on their IP - a good example would be a news site that has a widget saying "local weather for Seattle, WA" when I visit. This will not have a benefit for SEO since search engines will view the default content when they crawl the site, but can be a good user experience.
Google understands that your site isn't always hosted at your same location, so allows you to send local signals in several other ways. Adding your location to your DNS is a start. You should also be sure to put your city name and state on the site where it makes sense to do so. Schema.org also provides a lot of options for marking up your address to make it clear to search engines "here is my address." Check out www.schema.org/place, www.schema.org/localbusiness, and www.schema.org/restaurant for more on this.
-
Dear Ruth,
while I have you here–should say when I spoke to the gentleman in private yesterday his decision was exactly what you spoke about just now to optimize landing pages methods like PRWeb but only use the one domain. I wanted to ask you your opinion on local IP http://www.neustar.biz/enterprise/digital-marketing/what-is-localized-web-content
As I do not want to give up the wrong information however I am getting conflicting information on the web about rather not it will get you to rank for local I know DYN & UtraDNS will allow me to put in my latitude longitude and height above sea level. In your opinion is this of value to local seo?
respectfully,
Thomas
-
Hi,
I would not recommend taking this approach, for a few reasons:
- As you say, individual city-keyword combinations have a low amount of traffic - even if you were to get all 30 of these sites ranking for that combo, you probably wouldn't see a bump in traffic to make it worth the work.
- Building 30 different sites on 30 different domains means building 30 times as many links in order to get the same domain authority, which will take a lot of time and effort.
- It will be very easy for Google to tell that all of these sites belong to you (all on the same server, all linking to each other, etc). In the best case scenario, Google will simply devalue all of these links from one site to the other. A far more likely scenario is that Google will actively penalize you for attempting to build this kind of link network.
This is exactly the kind of strategy that both Panda and Penguin are intended to combat, and I don't think that the potential payoff is worth the risk and effort this strategy will take. Instead, I recommend spending that time and energy on making your client's site as strong as possible. Use schema.org to send strong local signals that you're in the San Diego area. If you're having trouble ranking for head terms such as "web design," look for lower-volume, more specific keywords to target. Create great content showing your design prowess and cultivate an audience to share it with.
To answer your questions - micro sites for lead generation CAN work, but I don't think local-focused is the way to go for a product like web design for which Google doesn't provide local search results. I DO NOT suggest that you build 30 microsites, interlink them and then point them to your home page, as this is likely to incur a penalty.
I hope that helps! Good luck.
-
just wanted your opinion on what I said below as you are an associate please tell me if it is unfair or incorrect in any way of me to say that. Again I will say I do not wish to have any answer for this regardless of if I am right or not just because I've brought this up and I would not want to look like somebody trying to change the score if you know what it mean.
-
Oh hey I just wanted to give you a heads up that the way most people and a message that has been answered is with a thumbs up or a thumbs-up and a good answer to the person that gave the best answer. You can use thumbs up if you agree with both as well as good answer to as many people as you like and you can use thumbs down if you disagree however it is commonly only done if you strongly disagree with what they say. That is the way that all of us get ranked here on SEOmoz so just a heads up for post in the future give people recognition if they help you and that's kind of the way the whole system works.
Just so you know I felt like saying that because I think a lot of people ignore the thumbs-up or answers when starting out and that's normal because you're just getting acquainted. However just thought I'd let you know and I would NOT give me a thumbs up for best answer on this because number 1 I private message to you number 2 I have shared this information with you and don't want you to feel like you are being asked to give an answer that is not deserved.
All the best man and enjoy a SEOmoz
-
Hi Aim213, I'm popping by because this thread was posted in the Local SEO category, but because Google stopped displaying true local results for web design firms several years ago, this is pretty much a straight up SEO/SEM question. I'm going to ask some of our other associates to stop by and contribute what they can here. Please, stand by.
-
you will not want to run them all off same server. You will need different C blocks for each site or Google will penalize you if this is not done exactly right. I would Google hosting for SEO C Class IP's use http://www.seohosting.com/
I just sent you a private message because I did not want to post the link I have built for a similar site. As long as you keep the content 100% new and relevant to the website do not spin it or try to use The same site for every major city. You may use the same template but do not use the same wording. in fact make the wording very very different even though you're going to be selling the same thing over and over again. Have a look at the link I posted below and please look at the link I sent you in the private message I built that and it returns a good amount revenue.
Sincerely,
Thomas Zickell
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Third part http links on the page source: Social engineering content warning from Google
Hi, We have received "Social engineering content" warning from Google and one of our important page and it's internal pages have been flagged as "Deceptive site ahead". We wonder what's the reason behind this as Google didn't point exactly to the specific part of the page which made us look so to the Google. We don't employ any such content on the page and the content is same for many months. As our site is WP hosted, we used a WordPress plugin for this page's layout which injected 2 http (non-https) links in our page code. We suspect if this is the reason behind this? Any ideas? Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | vtmoz1 -
Page plumetting with a optimisation score of 97\. HELP
Hi everyone, One of my pages has an optimisation score of 93, but ranks in 50+ place. What on earth can I do to address this? It's a course page so I've added the 'course' schema. I've added all the alt tags to say the keyword, UX signals aren't bad. Keyword is in the title tag. It has a meta description. Added an extra 7 internal, anchor-rich links pointing at the page this week. Nothing seems to address it. Any ideas? Cheers, Rhys
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | SwanseaMedicine1 -
Will Removing My Keyword from Breadcrumb Title to Simplify UI Hurt Page SEO?
Working on the UI of a new site and I would like to simplify the breadcrumbs so they do not take up as much space. They will still communicate the same message to user. See example below: Before: Home > Widget Dealers > Tennessee > Nashville After: Home > Dealers > Tennessee > Nashville The page title and/or menu item would still be "Widget Dealers". So my question is, if I remove the keyword "Widget" only from the breadcrumb could that hurt me in any way?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | the-coopersmith1 -
SEO for Career sites and sup-pages
For main job categories: We manage several career pages for several clients but the competition for the main keywords (even several long tail) is from big names like Indeed and similar job boards?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | rflores
What would you recommend? For job posts: Since the job posts that our clients post are short lived (80% live less than a month) would it still be incorrect to purchase backlinks? or is it always a big no Thanks for your help. And if a similar question has been asked I would appreciate if you could point me to it. I could not find one.0 -
Pagination for Search Results Pages: Noindex/Follow, Rel=Canonical, Ajax Best Option?
I have a site with paginated search result pages. What I've done is noindex/follow them and I've placed the rel=canonical tag on page2, page3, page4, etc pointing back to the main/first search result page. These paginated search result pages aren't visible to the user (since I'm not technically selling products, just providing different images to the user), and I've added a text link on the bottom of the first/main search result page that says "click here to load more" and once clicked, it automatically lists more images on the page (ajax). Is this a proper strategy? Also, for a site that does sell products, would simply noindexing/following the search results/paginated pages and placing the canonical tag on the paginated pages pointing back to the main search result page suffice? I would love feedback on if this is a proper method/strategy to keep Google happy. Side question - When the robots go through a page that is noindexed/followed, are they taking into consideration the text on those pages, page titles, meta tags, etc, or are they only worrying about the actual links within that page and passing link juice through them all?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | WebServiceConsulting.com0 -
Looking for a Way to Standardize Content for Thousands of Pages w/o Getting Duplicate Content Penalties
Hi All, I'll premise this by saying that we like to engage in as much white hat SEO as possible. I'm certainly not asking for any shady advice, but we have a lot of local pages to optimize :). So, we are an IT and management training course provider. We have 34 locations across the US and each of our 34 locations offers the same courses. Each of our locations has its own page on our website. However, in order to really hone the local SEO game by course topic area and city, we are creating dynamic custom pages that list our course offerings/dates for each individual topic and city. Right now, our pages are dynamic and being crawled and ranking well within Google. We conducted a very small scale test on this in our Washington Dc and New York areas with our SharePoint course offerings and it was a great success. We are ranking well on "sharepoint training in new york/dc" etc for two custom pages. So, with 34 locations across the states and 21 course topic areas, that's well over 700 pages of content to maintain - A LOT more than just the two we tested. Our engineers have offered to create a standard title tag, meta description, h1, h2, etc, but with some varying components. This is from our engineer specifically: "Regarding pages with the specific topic areas, do you have a specific format for the Meta Description and the Custom Paragraph? Since these are dynamic pages, it would work better and be a lot easier to maintain if we could standardize a format that all the pages would use for the Meta and Paragraph. For example, if we made the Paragraph: “Our [Topic Area] training is easy to find in the [City, State] area.” As a note, other content such as directions and course dates will always vary from city to city so content won't be the same everywhere, just slightly the same. It works better this way because HTFU is actually a single page, and we are just passing the venue code to the page to dynamically build the page based on that venue code. So they aren’t technically individual pages, although they seem like that on the web. If we don’t standardize the text, then someone will have to maintain custom text for all active venue codes for all cities for all topics. So you could be talking about over a thousand records to maintain depending on what you want customized. Another option is to have several standardized paragraphs, such as: “Our [Topic Area] training is easy to find in the [City, State] area. Followed by other content specific to the location
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | CSawatzky
“Find your [Topic Area] training course in [City, State] with ease.” Followed by other content specific to the location Then we could randomize what is displayed. The key is to have a standardized format so additional work doesn’t have to be done to maintain custom formats/text for individual pages. So, mozzers, my question to you all is, can we standardize with slight variations specific to that location and topic area w/o getting getting dinged for spam or duplicate content. Often times I ask myself "if Matt Cutts was standing here, would he approve?" For this, I am leaning towards "yes," but I always need a gut check. Sorry for the long message. Hopefully someone can help. Thank you! Pedram1 -
Page 1 Ranking - Disappeared!
Hi All We launched our client's website http://rollerbannerscheap.co.uk in January this year. We have been building links making sure we are not over optmising anchor text and only following ethical SEO tactics. Our client's site eventually hit page 1 for it's main key word 'Roller Banner' 1 week ago, the site received impressions/clicks from the SERPS and has started to gain traffic from that particular keyword. I have checked today, and I cannot our client's website URL within the first 10 pages of Google, nevermind on page 1. Our client is currently undercutting competitiors on price, which we stated (the price) in the meta tag. Is it possible other SEOs could de-rank our website? If not, what would be a likely explaination for this occurance? Would just like to add, I recently build a link with anchor text 'Roller Banner Website, but one of my older links uses anchor text 'Roller Banners Cheap Website' - They're not exact match, but could this affect our ranking? Awaiting help Lewis
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | SO_UK0 -
Single Domain With Different Pages Deep Linking To Different Pages On External Domain
I've been partaking in an extensive trial study and will be releasing the results soon, however I do have quite a strong indication to the answer to this question but would like to see what everyone else thinks first, to see where the common industry mindset is at. Let's say SiteA.com/page1.html is PR5 and links out to SiteB.com/page1.html This of course would count as a valuable backlink. Now, what would happen if SiteA.com/page2.html, which is also PR5, links out to SiteB.com/page2.html ? The link from SiteA is coming from a different page, and is also pointing to a different deeplink on SiteB, however it will contain the same IP address. What would the benefit be for having multiple deeplinks in this way (as outlined above, please read it carefully before responding) as opposed to having just a single deeplink from the domain? If a benefit does exist, then does the benefit start to become trivial? This has nothing to do with sitewide links. Serious answers only please.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | stevenheron1