Devalued links or negative affect?
-
Hi there,
I'm looking into an issue with a site that was hit after Penguin was introduced.
The site lost 70% of traffic over night.
The site in question seemed to have a large number of backlinks with over optimized anchor text which seems to most likely be the reason for drop in rankings.
But there is also some links from blog networks here too unfortunately, so my question here really is do Google just devalue these links and discount them from consideration in their ranking algorithm or do the links still count but instead of adding positive affects in SERPs add a negative affect?
My reason for this question is I'm trying to determine whether it's worth saving this website or just starting fresh with a new domain.
That does bring me to another question, if I have to start fresh on a new domain is it a possibility to reuse the content from the old site? (providing I remove the URLs from Google via Webmaster tools).
Any help/advice/answers here would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
-
If you have a manual penalty you will have a warning in your Webmaster tools
_Honestly speaking I did not know that thanks for the update .. _
-
If you have a manual penalty you will have a warning in your Webmaster tools.
Now, if a website didn't have webmaster tools, you could set it up and then file a reconsideration request. If there was no manual warning to start with you will get a notice from Google telling you so.
However, when you ask for a reconsideration request you are opening yourself up to potentially have a manual review from Google. So if you're not squeaky clean you could end up attracting yourself a manual penalty on top of the algorithmic issues you have.
As far as diagnosing Penguin, here is some information on how to diagnose Penguin, but it's not always a simple diagnosis.
-
_But how do you know that your website is hit by penguin? I hope there is no way to tell whether a website is hit by penguin or manual penalty. _
-
Hi Marie,
That's a great response and inline with our thinking here. The links are not within our control and we've decided to start a fresh.
The site content ranked really well before Penguin so I am hoping it will recover fast.
Thanks and best regards,
Jason
-
A reconsideration request will not help if there is no manual warning in WMT. Penguin is algorithmic.
-
Ok, Here is the thing.
Did you send a reconsideration request?
_If not, please send reconsideration request after getting rid of some spammy links. Make sure you have listed all the URLs where the link references are still available in a separate Google Spreadsheet File along with the reconsideration request. If you get a response that no manual action is taken, we can be sure of one thing that your website is hit by algo shuffle and this will make things murkier.
Now if your website is hit by manual penalty, you will get a response that the manual penalty is partially removed or not removed at all._
_Now, as some reputed online marketers say if you have not built those links, you would not have to care for them at all but if you have done it themselves, you need to get them down. _
-
I really do think that sites with bad links are penalized as opposed to just losing the link juice from those links. I am working on a site right now that was ranking well for years. Then they hired an SEO to try to rank even better. The SEO built a bunch of anchor texted links and on April 24 (Penguin) their rankings plummeted.
No one knows exactly what is necessary for recovery from Penguin. I think a site can recover if the backlink issue is an easy one to fix. For example, the SEOMoz article on WPMU recovery showed that they were able to remove a pile of footer anchor texted links and regain their rankings with the Penguin refresh on May 25. But for most sites, if you've got anchor texted links in a bunch of places, recovery is pretty much impossible.
In doing unnatural links penalty removal I have found that maybe 15% of webmasters respond to my requests to remove links. For some niches that number is higher. But in order to recover from Penguin I'm guessing you'll need 85-95% of bad links removed and that is probably not going to happen.
I'd start fresh. Definitely don't redirect the old domain to the new.
You can noindex all of the content on the old domain and reuse it on the new domain. It may help to go into webmaster tools for the old domain and ask Google to remove the old urls from the index.
Of course, you'll be starting fresh and have to earn good quality backlinks. Good luck!
-
Hi Alison, thanks for your help with this.
We started contacting webmasters initially however this proved to be a waste of time for the most part as the majority of webmasters didn't respond to requests.
A new site is looking like the way to go, thanks again.
-
Thanks Deb Dulal Dey, unfortunately there are too many links to make this worth while doing. On the other hand the content on the site is very good though.
Thanks again for your thoughts.
-
Thanks Baptiste, you've given me a lot to think about there.
-
Well, @Jason Brooks
Sorry to say but you need get rid of these crappy links otherwise your website will never be able to recover from Penguin update. And in the mean time, you need to make your website awesome by publishing great content that will help you earn some quality links the natural way.
-
Hi Jason,
To answer the first question, low quality links can have a negative effect on rankings, particularly those associated with link networks or if the links look manipulative. That being said, most sites have some sort of spammy sites linking to them for reasons beyond their control, and Google don't seem likely to penalise a small amount of these - they will probably just ignore the links and discount any value that they would have passed.
Have you tried to clean up your link profile by contacting the webmasters of the blog networks and asking them to remove the links?
Starting completely from scratch seems a little extreme, but if you feel that the links are very extensive and hard to rectify, and if the current domain isn't ranking and doesn't have much authority, then it might be the easiest way to "start fresh". Bear in mind that a new domain is likely to be sandboxed and will take a substantial amount of time to gain trust and authority. It would be fine to reuse the content provided that the original content is removed and deindexed.
Good luck.
-
Hi Jason,
With infos from the latest slideshare of Ian Howells, http://slideshare.net/ianhowells/life-after-penguin, I think some of these links are devaluated, and some are penalizing the site. You may remove them and confess to Google, or start on a new domain, or maybe use a new URL for every page, including the homepage.
This is a though question, penguin recovery is still an unknown process and nothing is guaranteed.
About content re-use, Howells did put the same content on another page, without 301 and it worked. Maybe you can put 404 or remove the content and put it on a fresh domain.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Nofollow links on our site menu
Hi Our site's front page has almost 900 internal links on it (it's an ecommerce site with about 25,000 products). A lot of these are on a pretty involved dropdown menu, which is on every page. I can't really do anything to get this figure down (its outside my remit), but one thing the developers have done is make all the menu links nofollow on the mobile version of the menu (site is responsive) - otherwise there would be even more links! My question is as to whether doing this for the mobile menu is a good idea, in terms of SEO?
Technical SEO | | abisti21 -
Can I redirect a link even if the link is still on the site
Hi Folks, I've got a client who has a duplicate content because they actually create duplicate content and store the same piece of content in 2 different places. When they generate this duplicate content, it creates a 2nd link on the site going to the duplicate content. Now they want the 2nd link to always redirect to the first link, but for architecture reasons, they can't remove the 2nd link from the site navigation. We can't use rel-canonical because they don't want visitors going to that 2nd page. Here is my question: Are there any adverse SEO implications to maintaining a link on a site that always redirects to a different page? I've already gone down the road of "don't deliberately create duplicate content" with the client. They've heard me, but won't change. So, what are your thoughts? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Rock330 -
Referencing links in Articles and Blogs
Hi I am wondering if the <sup>tag in html is picked up by google as a reference point?</sup> I.e when you put a superscript in word it puts a small number next to your sentence. Then you have a list of reference at the end of the blog/article does google recognise this?
Technical SEO | | Cocoonfxmedia0 -
Internal Link Analysis Tool
I want to get a better handle on what internal link text (and co-occurance if possible) my site currently has. We have a lot of old blog articles that provide link juice back to the main site, but with thousands of pages, we never kept track of when we internally link to a page. Are there any tools that will provide an analysis of this? OpenSiteExplorer seems like a very tedious way to do it and it didn't appear to be 100% accurate. Also, are there any tools that will provide analysis and recommendations based on keywords targeted?
Technical SEO | | TheDude0 -
Specific Link Page in Domain
Hi everyone: I have seen that many SEO Agencies have contacted my business (Also SEO but In- House) in order to interchange links. They have created a specific page on their site with the Label "Links" or similar, and on that page they add multiple links of the competence. I have heard that you can only do that if you make sure you add two things: No follow in links. Not inserting links of websites that have nothing to do with our sector. Either way, I have never found this amusing. I always recommend people not to do this but I have my doubts after all. ¿Could some one give me their opinion? Cheers !
Technical SEO | | Tintanus0 -
What are some of the negative effects of having duplicate content from other sites?
This could include republishing several articles from another site with permission.
Technical SEO | | Charlessipe0 -
Internal Linking
Where is the best information on internal linking. I'm so confused and everything I read says something different. Ahhhh Thanks
Technical SEO | | meardna770 -
External Sitewide Links and SEO
I have one big question about the potential SEO value -- and possibly also dangers? -- of "followed" external sitewide links. Examples of these would be: a link to your site from another site's footer a blogroll link a link to your site from another site's global navigation Aside from the link's position in the HTML file (the higher the better, presumably), are these links essentially the same from an SEO point of view or different (and how)? There used to be an influential view out there that the link juice value of a sitewide link was the same as that of a single link (presumably from the linking site's home page), even though a sitewide link may in fact result a huge number individual links. Is this true or false? What is the math here? Should one worry about having "too many" sitewide links, in the sense that this may raise red flags by way of the algo? I talked to someone a few months ago (before the recent algo updates) who believed that he had got a minus 10 penalty or whatever it was for getting too many sitewide links We offer website design and development as well as SEO, and we put a keyworded link to ourselves in the footer. I think this is a fairly common practice. Is this a good or bad idea SEO-wise? One opinion is that for external sitewide footer links, you should best have a dofollow link on the home page, but nofollow it on all other pages. What is your opinion about that? Is there anything else that is distinct, interesting or important about sitewide links' SEO value and pitfalls? Thank you!
Technical SEO | | Philip-SEO1