My text does not show up in Google
-
Hi there. I've got an urgent question I hope someone can help me with.
I've made a website (www.tonyharrismakingcents.com.au) with a few content pages. I don't get a lot of traffic. All my pages are scrawled and I don't see any errors.
However, when I copy an entire paragraph and Google it, it does not show up in the search results. This makes me believe that the pages are not scrawled correctly. Only when I search for the exact paragraph by putting it between "", the website shows up on the results page.
What can be the reason for this?
Thanks for your help..It's much appreciated.
-
Hi Ryan
Thanks for your honest feedback. It's a good reality check and I completely agree with what you are saying. I guess I know the basic theory but fail to implement it. The SEOMoz beginners guide will be a good start...
-
After examining your web page, there are too many issues to list in a Q&A. A few examples:
1. Your page has an H1 tag "First home buyers" which is great, but the H1 tag is not visible on the page. This is a serious issue as you are presenting different content to users then search engines, which is often the cause of a penalty.
2. Your page title is "First home buyers" but the text is not used a single time in content. It is used in the URL and bread crumbs, but not once in content.
3. Your header image shows words. Search engines cannot "read" images. Yes, OCR is a valid technology but it is not used to index web content. Text should almost always be presented as html text. Doing such provides a better user experience, easier site maintenance and is better for search crawlers as well. The only time I would ever choose to present text in an image is if a very specific font was required.
There are numerous other issues as well. You have a very basic WordPress site. WP is a great platform to build a site upon, but the site is not professionally developed and you will have issues attempting to compete in search rankings against better designed sites.
Also, please forgive the harshness here but, your content is exceptionally poor. I can see the content is unique which means you likely wrote it, but ask yourself this question: If someone searches for "first home buyers" on Google.com.au and finds your article, will that user think "wow! This is exactly what I wanted!" or are they more likely to think "this is crap" and hit the back button on their browser and look for another site.
You offer a total of 161 words which are not even focused in any manner of what is supposed to be the primary topic of the page. This page is a perfect example of what search engines wish to filter out of search results. Other then an exact text match in quotes, this page should simply not rank.
-
Hi Ryan
Here it is..
You should never give up purchasing property. You have every right to start living your own Australian dream. Just like the older generation has done before you. But you’ll need to know how to do it the right way. The more knowledge you have about the mortgage process, the better.
And this is the page URL: http://tonyharrismakingcents.com.au/first-home-buyers/
-
I searched for the following sentence in Google.com.au: Tony Harris loves to share his finance and property knowledge and therefore he has given birth to the Tony Harris MakingCents website building on his belief that people need a trusted source of information.
Your site ranks #2. It is outranked by your Facebook page which has the same text. The rankings make sense.
Please provide the text phrase you used previously along with the target page URL.
-
Thanks Mat. I will do that. And you are right, I don't have any links yet. I need to work on that!!
-
Thanks Ryan for taking the time to respond.
It's just that the paragraph text I'm testing this with is very long and specific. So when it doesn't show up than it makes me worried that the website gets penalized or that there is something wrong.
I guess I just have to be patient (the website is quite new) and focus more on getting the optimization rights. Any feedback on how to improve the SEO for this website is much appreciated!
Thanks again!
-
I think that your problem is that you have no links pointing to your site. Literally - None.
Links are one of the main means that search engines like Google use to determine the importance of a website. The logic goes that a site that has authority sites linking to it must in itself be useful.
Your site is in a competitive niche and needs to demonstrate that it is worthy of appearing above the other sites in that niche. Having other sites link to you is a vital part of that.
Read this chapter of the seomoz beginners guide http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo/growing-popularity-and-links - this explains what you need to do fairly well. I'd also suggest reading the rest of that guide whilst you are there as it will really help you out.
Good luck.
-
If you search for a page on your site by using a phrase enclosed in quotes, and Google returns the page as a result, then your page has clearly been crawled and indexed.
Your issue is you expect to rank higher for the paragraph / phrase. To do such involves optimization. The question Google asks is, based on 200+ factors which indexed page is most likely to satisfy a user who uses the keyword phrase as a search query.
Your page having the exact matching text offers a strong relevancy boost, but there are other factors.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
HTML Copy in Image Alt Text Field
Hi all, A quick question regarding HTML copy in Image Alt Text fields. An extended client has some landing pages containing infographics, but contrary to our recommendation - no intro copy or surrounding copy was used. The infographic was simply placed on the page, and all of the text of the infographic was placed into the Image Alt Text field. As far as I know, Google would still see that content in the Alt Text field and attribute it to the Infographic, although this would not be sufficient enough of an effort for the page to rank for any of the content used in that field. I'd just like to check that I am correct? And as a consequence - we should insist that they include some copy with the infographic, or alternatively, use HTML text overlays on the infographic instead of flat text in the image itself? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | Saatchi_HU0 -
Sudden disappearance from google organic ranking
I have been ranked in top 5 for all relevant search terms for years. I have been in business for 25 years and am modestly speaking the best in our field. The name of my company is "Alaska Yacht Charters" and suddenly I have disappeared from Google search. Google "alaska yacht charters" and I am nowhere to be found. This all occured within days of my suspending my adwords account which I felt I didn't need because of my great organic ranking. What has happened?Geoff Wilson www.alaskanyachtcharters.com
On-Page Optimization | | akstory0 -
Google Is Ranking the Wrong Page
Howdy Folks- I have a case where Google is ranking the wrong page for a couple of different keywords. The home page is: http://healthtn.com Most notably, we're trying to optimize the home page for "Tennessee Health Insurance" but the below page is what continually ranks for it, and does so very poorly. We used to be page two with the home page, now we are page four and it ranks the following page. http://healthtn.com/tennessee/health-insurance/student I have started directing our Internal Linking to reflect the correct anchor text but succeeded in losing ranking for the term, but am still ranking the wrong page. Any thoughts or help would be much appreciated!
On-Page Optimization | | CRO_first0 -
Google index text that I can not find
Hello everybody, As you can see here: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:G-iicHoDJeYJ:www.billigste-internet.dk/&hl=da&gl=dk&strip=1 Google index the text "Forside" as the H1 tag, and "Right" and "Left" as body text, on my website. But I do not want that Google indexes this. But when I look in mine source code (see here: view-source:http://www.billigste-internet.dk/) I can not find "Forside", "rigth" or "Left", so I can delete it. Is there anyone who can help me where I need to delete the text "Forside", "Right" and "Left", so Google does not index this text? Hope someone can help.
On-Page Optimization | | JoLindahl910 -
SEOmoz Says 530 - Google Webmaster Tools Says 16
A SEOmoz crawl report on 1/20/2013 says we have 530 duplicate page titles most of which are pages like this these two: http://www.audiobooksonline.com/reviews/review.php/details/38 http://www.audiobooksonline.com/reviews/review.php/details/104 These pages are the result of allowing visitors to post their opinions and ratings about specific audio books. Google Webmaster Tools reports we have 16 duplicate page titles none of which are a review page. Why is SEOmoz reporting duplicate page titles? Should SEOmoz be reporting these pages as having duplicate page titles? Why isn't Google Webmaster Tools reporting the review pages as having duplicate titles?
On-Page Optimization | | lbohen0 -
Alt Text On Buy Buttons
Hello, On a E-commerce site with multiple buy buttons on the page (11 by Default). Should I be blocking the alt. img on these? when I use the seomoz toolbar and view my page I see this Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • Buy Now • along with other alt imges on page, Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | TP_Marketing0 -
Shall Google index a search result?
Hi, I've a website with about 1000 articles.Each article has one ore more keywords / tags. So I display these keywords at the article page and put a link to the intern search engine. (Like a tag cloud) The search engine lists als articles with the same keyword and creates a result page. This result page is indexed by Google. The search result contains the title of the article, a short description (150-300 chars.) and a link to the article. So, Google believes, that there are about 5.000 pages instead of 1.000 because auf the link to the search result pages. The old rule was for me: More pages in Google = better. But is this still true nowadays? Would be a "noindex, follow" better on these search result pages? (Is there a way to tell Google that this is a search result page?) Best wishes, Georg.
On-Page Optimization | | GeorgFranz0 -
Confirmation regarding canonical and syndication google tags
Hi, We are in the process of improving our CMS upstream to resolve our duplicate content issues. We were hit pretty hard by the Panda update. One of the steps we have taken is implementation of the canonical link tag across all domains in our site. You see, we are a news release service with muliple channels and websites to represent each. The problem is that a client will submit a release and in many cases the news item is relevant to multiple channels I.E. multiple websites under the same IP range. Site Examples:
On-Page Optimization | | jarrett.mackay
www.hotelnewsresource.com www.restaurantnewsresource.com
www.travelindustrywire.com From a user perspective, it makes sense that they should be able to access the article from the site they are browsing without being redirected to the site we feel carries the most relevance. We hope the canconical tag will resolve this issue for us. I have also read about the syndication tag and was looking for feedback or recommendations if we should implement that also, but it may be overkill as the two tags objectives seem to be similar. I guess my first question is if the syndication tag is only used by Google News. Secondly, and a little off topic is that we also offer an API and like many other sites, I have read, our content partners are now doing better in primary and long tail rankings even thought we are the original source. My assumption is that we should modify the API to force using both caconical and syndication tags as well. Lastly, I´m curious if anyone has tested the original source tag and if we should implement that as well. Thanks everyone. Jarrett0