Duplicate Content: is it a myth?
-
Hi everyone, just wanted to clarify some things, i've heard about a million different things on this; I just wanted to ask if duplicate content is a myth or its not thanks.
Peter
-
It took me about 2-3 weeks each time. I have a large list of Wordpress ping services and I manually pinged everything I could so it's possible it could take longer. Make sure you have a sitemap in WMT and it should speed you along as well. If you just made the change, I'd suggest resubmitting a map so they recrawl fresh.
-
How long did it take for the tags to drop from Google's index?
I have a site with about 800 tags indexed. Even after I did no-index follow, they're still showing up after a month. Do I have to wait it out... or could it not be picking up the noindex?
-
Thanks for the answer Matt I appreciate it
-
Our tested answer is that it's both. And therein lies the problem and the different answers you'll get.
Matt Cutts has repeatedly said "don't put your entire blog post on your homepage but if you have a teaser and link to the actual location that's a good way to do it." (http://www.webpronews.com/google-duplicate-content-2011-12)
He says Google understands blog structure but that you should only show excerpts other than the main page.
The issue is that it conflicts with a lot of things we've seen & heard including older stuff he's said.
"typically a whitehat site doesn’t neet to worry about 1-3 versions of an article on their own site"
The problem is say on Wordpress you tag a post with 15 tags. If you don't no-index a lot of your "ways" of seeing it, you don't have 1-3 versions. You can have 15 tags+ the permalnk + archive pages + category pages + ... and it just adds up. You shouldn't worry about 1-2 versions on your site. You should worry about 15-30 versions.
Out of curiosity, I ran a test on 2 generic wordpress.com blogs. I tagged one with 15 tags, tagged the other with 2 tags. Same subdomain length and topic. I indexed 3 posts with long random strings. In all 3 cases the one with 2 tags beat the one with 15 tags.
Then I no-indexed the 15 tag posts and they passed the 2 tag posts within 2 weeks. So in my experience, fewer duplicated posts meant more juice. However, no-indexing just the tags improved my SEO.
Small scale test but one I'd love to see repeated on a much larger scale sometime. In my opinion, duplicate content hurts unless it's excerpts (news sites, blog front pages).
Hope that helps (and explains why people give you both answers.)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate content on site->citations? How important is it to change it?
Hi there, I recently realised that the citations and directories i was building used the same content than the one on my website. I know this is not best practice. I will for sure make sure it doesn't happen in the future, but I am affraid of the ones i built in the past. How much do you think this would affect my rankings, and do you think this is a priority to go through my citations and directories to modify it?
Link Building | | H.M.N.0 -
Where would we get the most bang for the buck? Fresh Content, Internal Links, or Schemas & Metatags
We cannot change the content on our website.And we have a lot of it. Where would we get the most bang for our buck: Adding lots of fresh content; Linking Content Internally in ways that make the relationship between the content more clear; Creating schemas and metatags for the content. Or something else that we haven't thought of. Our content is not really conducive to social. It is legal information. We have a Domain Authority of 61 / 100 Your help and experience is appreciated.
Link Building | | SamD12340 -
Will linking to very similar (or duplicate content) hurt SEO
One of my clients started working with a traditional PR company to get media placements and they've placed articles on some very excellent and relevant sites. However, the article's content is nearly identical on each site. We would like to link my client's site to these articles, but will the duplicate content hurt SEO? Because there are some very minor variations within these articles, will that be enough of a difference where we don't need to be concerned if we did link our site to each article?
Link Building | | Liggins0 -
Duplicate Content Link Juice
Hello SEO Community, So sometimes I will pitch one guest post to multiple outlets and if multiple reply positively, I will tell all but the single most authoritative site that the article is being published elsewhere and it won't be unique for their site. But some don't mind and still post anyway. I definitely don't mind because it just means that more people will read my article and more sites will be linking back to me. What are the implications on the link juice from the most authoritative site? What about the other ones (which are still authoritative, just not as much)? Is there any reason I should explicitly tell them not to post if I know it will appear somewhere else? Thanks much,
Link Building | | CleanEdisonInc0 -
How much important is the connection between content and backlink relevancy?
My question is about the connection between web page content and backlink relevancy, how much it is important? Let’s have an example: If I publish a guest post about “cell phone model review” and get a link back to my website which is on the subject of “cell phone monitoring”. Now my question is: Is this a relevant and good quality backlink? As content is about “cell phone Model Review” while the backlink is about “cell phone Monitoring”, How Google would take this as if; 1- Anchor text is “cell phone monitoring” 2- Anchor text is URL based
Link Building | | shaz_lhr0 -
US company that can write stellar content for us, your suggestions
Hello, Does anyone know of a US or Canadian company that writes stellar content at good rates? Looking to spend $10-$25/article on 125 articles. 500 words, unique content, linkbait Delivered in Microsoft Word is fine. Thanks!
Link Building | | BobGW0 -
Is this a good way to create engaging content?
Hi all, I believe this is my first question in this forum, so be nice 🙂 I am an SEO consultant who has recently gone out and started my own SEO consultancy. Obviously, I now find myself in a place where I am trying to create good content for my website visitors. Maybe it's link bait, or more than likely it's a way to hold myself up as an expert in the industry, while providing visitors to my site some reason to keep on coming back. As I love whiteboard Friday, I did consider - and I'm not ruling it out in the future - creating my own whiteboard Friday videos discussing the SEO issues I was focussing on. In the meantime, I am thinking of posting up SEOmoz's whiteboard Friday videos and then making my own comments and insights for my website visitors. So, what I really wanted to ask - do you guys think this is a good idea, a valid way of creating good content and has merit/credibility? http://www.nustudio.com.au/local-seo-the-basics/ contains an example of what I am talking about. Cheers, Steve
Link Building | | stevedeane1 -
How Do You Monitor & Deal With Plagiarism Of Your Content?
Hi everyone - hope you can help. I have an e commerce store with lots of products. I write unique, original content for all of the products we sell. I must be doing a good job because I repeatedly find my content being used in blogs, word press sites, and pay per posts which then link back to competitors. I have the standard free copyscape logo pasted a the bottom of each page - hasn't deterred anyone. I'm now thinking about using some sort of a cookie based software and installing the code on each page so that when they lift my content and use it, it will send a link back to that page on my site. I have called numerous plagiarizers in the past and threatened to sue using the "Digital Millennium Copyright Act" phrase in the course of my conversation. It's tiresome. It's work. I am thinking after many years of frustration, that if I can't beat them I might as well try using this type of cookie based script/software approach to at least garner a link out it. And if the abuser catches it then maybe he'll stop mid stream and think twice about using...I mean copying my content. Is using this type of cookie/link back to us script a good or a bad idea? How do you all prevent your unique, original content from being used? And finally, if I'm looking at this from a positive link building standpoint (meaning, maybe I'm looking at it from the wrong angle), what is the best practice for garnering a link from this type of ongoing occurrence?
Link Building | | dmedirect_sbcglobal.net0