Which top 10 organic results are my competitors?
-
Hi all,
This is a question about whether the top 10 ORGANIC Google results for a broad match is your competition, or whether it's the top 10 for a phrase match, or an exact match.
I'm a newbie here but not a newbie to the world of SEO. I hope to be able answer just as many questions as I ask
QUESTION: If a customer comes to me and says, "hey, who's my (organic) competition for wedding present?" and I want to use Google to get the top 10 organic results, do I use a broad, phrase, or exact match?
It seems many people think an exact match is the way to go but I think they were more referring to Adwords results / competition. I'm not trying to determine search volume for Adwords or even the search volume for organic results... I'm only interested in the top 10 competitors in the organic results.
No one types in "wedding present" (with inverted commas" when doing a search in Google, so surely to see who ranks organically for wedding present I'd want to simply type in wedding present (no inverted commas, aka broad match).
I understand all the concepts about how Google results cary whether you're logged in, etc, etc so I don't want to get distracted by that. And I know there's a bunch of tools we can use like the SEOMoz Keyword Analysis Tool. But I just want to know specifically what people would use (broad, phrase or exact) to look at the top 10 organic competitors are when doing a manual search in Google.
-
Thanks Adam! (and thanks for reading my post too)
I would love to hear from SEOMoz about the reason for using [exact match] - perhaps because that gives the more relevant results instead of broad match results, which as we all know, get progressively less relevant and sometimes completely irrelevant by the time you get to page 3. Since there's no sense in trying to compete with irrelevant results, it's probably better to know what the true results are for an exact match.
Just a thought. Perhaps someone from SEOMoz can chime in?
-
Hi Dana,
Very strange, I am just reading your blog post now and here you are answering my question. Thanks for the quick reply.
I agree the definition of "competitor" will vary. My question was asked with the definition of "competition" to be anyone taking up a position on the first page because if all 10 positions for shure microphones are taken up by major suppliers / manufacturers then the recommendation to my client would be "don't bother".
What I'm finding with varying tools (SEO Moz, SEM Rush, etc) is they all give search volumes in terms of phrase or exact matches. But when someone searches for wedding present in Google (as a broad match), the number of results is the number of results we care about.
I'm simply not confident in my own opinion because I would have thought all these tools would have put in enough research to decide that phrase or exact results are better. Using a phrase or exact match to provide "search volume" figures makes sense to me, but if you want:
-
the top 10 organic / paid results for a keyphrase
-
the number of organic / paid results for a keyphrase
Then broad match would be the obvious choice.
I'm not sure if anyone from SEOMoz wants to explain why the Keyword Analysis Tool shows results using exact match, but I'm sure there's a logical reason for it - I just can't see it!
-
-
Hi Adam,
This is a great question. My answer (which is my own and not endorsed by any committees or special interest groups, lol), is yes, broad match. You are correct that no one (unless they are librarians or grad students working on their dissertations) uses boolean search elements like "(" or quotes. One thing I will say, is to consult with your clients about your results because the companies who are in the top 10 results for a particular term may or may not be considered to be true "competitors." For example, I work for a company that sells "Shure" brand microphones. If you type in "Shure microphones," you will inevitable get results from the manufacturer in the top 10. While yes, they might be "competitors" in terms of top 10 results, but they aren't competitors in terms of doing business. Most likely, my company is never going to be able to outrank "Shure" for "shure microphones. So, the true "competitors" are the other resellers who are managing to make it into the top 10.
The other thing to consider is location. If your company only sells in the USA, but is being beat out by a company that sells internationally, well, are they really a competitor? I think what I'm trying to say is that there are "competitors" in terms of "who do you have to compete with in order to make it into the top ten of a given term." And there are "competitors" - "Companies that you directly compete with for real customers." I'm absolutely certain that these two groups aren't identical.
Whew, that was a little longer than I intended, but I hope it's comprehensible!
Dana
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Missing tab in Competitor research Template
The template provided in https://moz.com/blog/competitor-analysis-for-seo is missing the 'Audit Data' Tab. Can you please update it or share the Original Template
Competitive Research | | AnkitaDwivedi3 -
Competitor research: No data / results displaying on Keyword tools, Aexa
Hi there! I'm trying to research a few competitors using various Keyword tools (SEM Rush, Compete, Keyword Spy -- even Alexa for high level insight). While the bulk of the competitors generate expected results through these tools (a smattering of their top organic and paid search keywords, some traffic estimations through Alexa), ONE of these competitors lists "No results" across all categories and all tools: http://www.bgstar.ca Despite this, we know that they invest heavily in search -- and my SEM Rush toolbar indicates that they have a Google PR of 5 (though I recognize that that should be taken with a grain of salt). So I'm stumped! Has anyone encountered this before? Is there something structural that they might be doing, that's blocking not only Google-based platforms, but Alexa too? Thanks for your help!
Competitive Research | | MACJ0 -
What if your content is way better than competitors?
Do you have any suggestions if you are being outranked by competitors even though your page has way better content and better links?
Competitive Research | | Charlessipe0 -
How do i improve my site's google ranking against my competitors?
the searches that i would like to improve my ranking on are
Competitive Research | | oswaldjr
st kitts real estate
nevis real estate
st kitts and nevis real estate. my website is www.sknlistings.com0 -
Is it possible to see how many visitors a competitor has received for any given keyword over a set time period?
Is it possible to see how many visitors a competitor has received for any given keyword over a set time period via either Organic / Paid means? Thanks
Competitive Research | | jaycfc1230070 -
How come the results in Google vary with domains
Hello, How is everyone doing? My question is about the google search engine results page. How come some results have the www. in front of them and some don't. Also what are the SEO implications of having www. in front of your search results vs. not. Is this something to do with canonical? I have included a screen shot so you will see what I mean. One result is www.gearyi.com and the result without the www is ingenexdigital.com. R6GLL.png
Competitive Research | | digitalops0 -
Image only site on top of Google
Hi Everyone, I'm trying to rank in Google for 'Hid xenon' in the netherlands, but there is one site above all results: http://bit.ly/qlsjne As you can see the site almost has no backlinks, and has not a single word in it's content, all images. it's a keyword only domain, and that's probably the only reason why it's ranking that high, but that means then that i can never get higher then him in Google because of it's domainname? Even when it's such a shitty site? Thank you, regards yannick
Competitive Research | | iwebdevnl0