Local SEO Practice: Creating a Fictitious Business?
-
Has anyone tried fabricating a fake, brick-and-mortar store as an SEO experiment? Sort of along the lines of what Starwood is doing (check out this Wikipedia experiment with the Test Galaxy Sheraton), but with a legitimate physical address and all?
Was it useful? And are there any potential legal troubles that could arise from borrowing a vacant address?
I'm thinking this could be helpful for my Intern to gain practical experience in local SEO, without the politics of working for a client But I wouldn't want to blight that address for future occupants if the experiment went horribly awry.
We could instead offer pro bono services to a small business with a limited web presence – that would be useful to her, and constructive. But I'd like to have a better understanding of what signals Google looks for when deciding whether to index a website in local search, and see whether possible to dupe those algos.
What are your thoughts, Mozzers?
.
-
Duplicate post, sorry!
-
Thanks for your input, Keri! I think we're going to go the pro bono route.
Starwood's a curious case, and I also wonder to what extent those pages exist for SEO reasons. Some of their test properties look innocuous, like sandboxes for translation plug-ins or new templates, but the Wikipedia citation on the 'List of New York Hotels' is really interesting to me. When I was working in-house for a New York hotel chain, I also picked up on weird affinities between that page and rankings in local search. Back in May I noticed that the Magic 7 for "NYC Hotels" exclusively listed hotels with Wikipedia pages, and decided to create one for one of the properties. Bingo! Within a few weeks, we were usually among the top local results for "nyc luxury hotels", "nyc 4-star hotels", and "nyc 5-star hotels" (yeesh, Google, it's either one or the other...)
At the same time, hotels with Wikipedia pages started receiving snippets and thumbnails from their articles on the far right of the screen, adjacent to the map. This seemed to be exclusive to the hospitality vertical, and I didn't notice the same SERP formatting in other cities. You would also see thumbnails of related hotels (which as a rule, also had Wikipedia pages), and a list of features that it seemed to be cross-referencing from multiple sources, like:
Hotel Class: 4 Stars
Architect: Steven Jacobs
Style: Modernist
My hunch is that Starwood was testing two hypotheses with the Test Galaxy Sheraton:
- Does inclusion on Wikipedia's list of hotels in New York City influence rankings, either local or web?
- Does Google source a hotel's 'features' from lists and structured mark-ups on a hotel's own website?
In any case, Google did away with the Wikipedia-heavy SERPs a few months ago but I suspect it continues to inform local search. It makes sense from a business perspective that Google would want to use use open-source data whenever possible. They could crunch its geocoordinates and with their algorithms without paying license fees, I would think, no?
-
I'd totally avoid doing anything like this as well, and think that offering pro bono services would be much better all the way around.
My guess is that Starwood didn't realize that those URLs were live and indexable on the web. I must say that http://www.starwoodhotels.com/preferredguest/property/features/attraction_detail.html?propertyID=588&attractionId=1000027215 provided my ROFL of the morning though!
-
Think I needed this, Daniel. Thank you!
My conscience says that you're right. I've gone back and forth on this today, and whatever educational value there might be seems outweighed by the potential to confuse people and affect livelihoods.
There are things that I'd like to test that go beyond the standard on-page/off-page process of citations, schemata, and KML—things like EXIF data, geocaching, and Wikipedia mentions—but it doesn't seem fair to test any of them without having some skin in the game.
Ah, if only there were a sandbox for real company stuff...
-
Yikes!
No, no, no.
A thousand times no.
And once again: no.
Fakery is always and everywhere wrong. It's not complicated.
If that means nothing to you, consider the consequences of exposure.
As a former TV news director I can assure you this is a helluva story:
"Company in the sleazy SEO business is caught red-handed in the cynically calculated use of deceit to intentionally mislead the public by creating a fake business; calls it an "intern experiment" and says it did nothing wrong. Consumer advocates disagree and call for regulation and licensing of SEO industry. Part two tomorrow, as our series on the death of privacy and birth of web big brotherism continues. Are your children safe?"
Sheesh.
Few issues are black and white.
But this is one.
-
Thanks,
Let me know what you think of my post, I am trying to start establishing myself in the blogosphere, though that particular post is really is a high-level recap of Search Love, though I had a lot of points made in David Mihms Presentation, which was amazing.
In response to the local algos, they seem to be, in my opinion, even more neurotic than the organic ones. I mean they are ALL over the place, it is also VERY hard to track local rankings.
-
I agree with Zach and I would suggest going with the other option you already have in your head.
"We could instead offer pro bono services to a small business with a limited web presence – that would be useful to her, and constructive. But I'd like to have a better understanding of what signals Google looks for when deciding whether to index a website in local search, and see whether possible to dupe those algos."
In my opinion, that's the best way to go. @Zach, thanks for posting those links. I will check out your post.
-
You'd be treading in some murky water there. I had a conversation last week at SearchLove Boston with David Mihm, one of the most reputable local SEOs, and we had a conversation about creating fictitious addresses for businesses, the problem is that you cannot use a PO box, which leaves you to use things like UPS store mailboxes. Google can obviously tell that if your at a UPS Store and will take it down; David Mihm explained it as a Wack-A-Mole game.
Also, if you use fictitious addresses, what stops competitors from reporting you? Again, you could try it, but it's real tricky to do, and successfully get away with. I'm much more of a fan of #RCS.
Some good resources to learn from
http://protechig.com/seo/search-love-boston-2012-takeaways/ (not to toot my own horn, but I have a good amount of local tips in this post)
Hope this helps!
Zach
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What is a good forum or resource to contact fellow SEO professionals for SEO partnership opportunities i.e. link trades?
While Moz is an excellent resource, i get the impression that it is for community-based SEO questions that can serve as a knowledge database. I am looking for a forum or resource where I can contact other SEO workers to explore link exchange opportunities. For example, i want to reach out to those who do SEO for audio/visual, technology, and event-planning companies so i can offer them links in exchange for some recommended links to my site. Before anyone dogs on link trading as being spammy and not best practice, it would only be done in a useful, relevant, and non-spammy fashion with other high authority sites. Thanks! Ryan
SEO Learn Center | | RyanMeighan1 -
SEO Agency with experience in the loyalty rewards marketing space?
Looking specifically for an SEO agency that has experience doing SEO work for businesses in the loyalty/rewards market space. Brands that occupy this space could include Swagbucks, eBates, PCH (Publisher's Clearing House.) I've looked at the sample clients page of MANY agencies, but I never see any of these types of businesses being featured. Thank you so much for your help!
SEO Learn Center | | sgarrels0 -
SEO for business owners course link?
Hi, something I saw a few weeks back.. something Rand was doing titled something like 'SEO for business owners'? Could someone be so kind as to post the link (I'm sure i didn't imagine this!) Thanks 🙂
SEO Learn Center | | GregDixson0 -
Need Definitive Source on Wordpress SEO
I am a longtime practitioner of classic asp. I build sites with SEO built-in and administer largely to sites I have built. I have, up til now, had a policy of not working (SEO) on Wordpress projects because - I don't presently build Wordpress sites Am unfamiliar with how SEO could be implemented on CMS I have a long time client who wants me to do contract SEO work on various Wordpress sites on his servers. Can someone point me to a definitive source on the latest methods for Wordpress SEO. I am very proficient in SEO with conventional web sites - I just need to know how to implement it in Wordpress. I don't see how plug-ins can implement serious SEO, but my mind is open.
SEO Learn Center | | dcmike0 -
List of Local SEO business categories
Where would I find a list of the top business categories best served by local SEO. For instance dentists, plumbers, etc. I'm trying to develop a target list of business categories that I can approach and work with just 1 in each category.
SEO Learn Center | | KreativElement0 -
Universal Local Results & Venice Update - What's what?
There is some buzz in the community regarding the Venice Update of the Google Algorithm. Google has said the following about this: "Improvements to ranking for local search results. [launch codename “Venice”] This improvement improves the triggering of Local Universal results by relying more on the ranking of our main search results as a signal."
SEO Learn Center | | DeptAgency
source:http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2012/02/search-quality-highlights-40-changes.html A lot of Blog posts refer to this update and discuss the effect of the location of the googler on the ranking of "standard/traditional results". My question is: Does the term 'Local Universal Results' include "standard/traditional" results or is it used by Google to refer to 'Google Places' Results in the standard SERP? So, are the results that are impacted by Venice recognizable as 'Local Results' (by the teardrop and google Maps and so on), or does it influence 'standard/traditiona results' as well, other than simply pushing them down by inserting Google Places results in the SERP? Thanks a lot! 1WWBV.jpg0 -
Online SEO staff Tests
Hi, I've got a number of staff in the office that I am trying to get to learn SEO. I want to be able to test them on their ability and have already set them the SEOMOZ test: http://www.seomoz.org/seo-expert-quiz . Does anyone know of any other decent online SEO tests I can set them - I haven't really got the time to develop a test myself, so I am looking for some pre-build online testing. Thanks
SEO Learn Center | | James770 -
.ca and international SEO
So we are building out on some of our Ecommerce sites, and expanding and adding .ca domains to our already established .com. What techniques have you used to generate success in similar launches to this one. I will reply to each response with thoughts and questions 🙂 Enjoy the discussion 🙂
SEO Learn Center | | Blargh1230