Title Tag: Phrases vs. Keywords Separated by "|"
-
Hello,
One of my client's old sites has all category titles of the form (for example)
running shoes | running shoe | walking shoes | walking shoe
including many that perform well with over 60 characters.
I'm in the process of rewriting the titles into something like
Running and Walking Shoes, A quality shoe at OurShoes.com
The reason I'm rewriting them is for future google penalties, and to look better to possible guest post opportunities. Also to look better in the SERPS
But the old style is performing very well.
What are the real pros and cons of each?
Thanks.
-
Thanks Ryan, very clear. I learned to look at the page and the goals of the page, and with a new site to start with one keyword, etc. Wow. very nice thank you
-
Approaches vary widely based on the client, site and SEO involved. I agree with the logic Martin applies, although there are other ideas as well. Of course, that response is likely not helpful so I will share the approach I prefer.
When working with a new site, I first determine what is the goal of the page. While you wish to attract search engine traffic, you also wish to present your brand in a specific manner as well. For example, Wikipedia style writing is very effective, but it is also mechanical and does not necessarily scale to ecommerce sites.
The typical approach I prefer is to take an all out "I want tot rank #1 for this keyword" stance. The title I would choose is "Running Shoes" and I fully optimize the page. I would ensure internal linking is solid, work to earn external links, and watch the SERPs for 30 days. Next, I may make some tweaks to the page and watch SERPs for another 30 days. At this point, the rankings are likely as good as they will get without earning more links to the page.
Now you can ask yourself, how can I make changes to improve CTR or branding without losing any ranking positions. Here is when you can try adding the pipe and your brand, or an alternate keyword, etc. I still would not create a single page for Running Shoes and Walking Shoes. Running is higher impact and a different audience.
-
Ryan, do you agree with the "piping" that MartinEvolveRetail recommended below? You're one of the best SEOs I know of, you would know.
-
I'm a fan of piping, from personal experience CTR have been higher from dashes or commas. Which one is best, well according to Matt Cutts it's neither:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2_7PTio3Qc
As he suggest, it's trial and error. See what works best for you.
In terms of keywords, i'd try and keep it to two keyword phrases, use Wordtracker or Google's keyword tool to see what is getting the most traffic and split between.
Remember the value of each keyword is diluted the longer the meta title gets, as Ryan Kent suggest, focus on one or two, depending on if you want branding in the Meta title.
My rule of thumb is:
Just keywords:
"Keyword phrase 1" | "Keyword Phrase 2"
Keywords and Brand:
"Keyword phrase 1" | "Brand Name"
Hope this helps
-
Hi Bob,
If you are new and trying to build the brand online, you can include the brand at the beginning of the title along with doing some value based link building with branded anchors. So this would be your brand building phase and then comes your ranking phase for certain keywords/ phrases. This is when you push your brand name to the end of the title and this can be beyond the 65 character limit. Google strips the text after this limit in the SERPs but this does not mean that Google cannot read or will not consider text beyond this limit for ranking. So, I always say, try to include the essence or vital SEO info in the first 65 characters but come up with good titles that read natural and at the same time very enticing.
Best regards,
Devanur Rafi.
-
Both responses bring up another good discussion point. When is it best to incorporate branding into the title if it is already performing well?
Also, it seems that titles a little longer than 60 characters work well sometimes in the SERPs even if the term is partially cut off. Is it just that that last term is diluted with the long title?
-
Hi Bob,
All of us SEOs run into situations like this very often where a client's website though not up to Google's guidelines performs well in the search engines and we as SEOs tend to correct these so called, 'not so Google compliant' elements despite apprehensions from both the client's side and our side about these changes being made.
Personally, I always stick to what's going to be a winner in the long run and go ahead and implement it. At times, we might need to educate our clients about the purpose behind these changes. We have to make it very clear that, just because something is working out really well does not mean it will do so forever and it takes just another update from Google with some black and white animal name to make the website vanish overnight from the SERPs.
Believe me my friend, I did a lot of practical research with live domains that I maintain which are dedicated just for the search engine tolerance level tests and learned the above. Whenever I train someone in SEO, I always urge them to stick to the best practices and they can reap the fruits from search engines. Going or taking the other route might give you or your client some temporary gains but in the long run, this will not only destroy the rankings of your website but also leave a big dent to your reputation.
Always remember, a happy customer might fetch you one or two new customers but an unhappy customer can sometimes cause irreparable damage.
Let me cut the crap and conclude by saying, please have those titles re-written in a descriptive way and so enticing that they literally force the visitors click through the listing in the SERPs. If possible, include a call to action in the description. And always remember to push the brand towards the end of the title and let the primary keyword /phrase be at the beginning. Also never include multiple keywords/ phrases in the title tag as this will leave the search engines confused. Ideally wherever or whenever possible, optimize a page for only one keyword/ phrase
The above is based on my experience and please do consider the other valuable suggestions that our friends write in here.
Good luck my friend.
Best regards,
Devanur Rafi.
-
There are a lot of variables to consider Bob. A few are:
-
the page's content
-
the site's internal links to the page
-
the site's external links to the page
-
the site's ranking and traffic for each term
All things being equal, if you had a title tag of "running shoes" you will likely perform noticeably better for the term "running shoes" then with the current title tag, but not as well for the other terms. By targeting 4 keywords the page is not focusing on any one term leaving the page vulnerable to competitors with an optimized page.
If I were in your situation, I would recommend tracking your rankings and traffic on each term, then changing a couple pages, then review the results in both SERPs and analytics. At that point, you can test further tweaks or choose to roll out the change site wide.
I would expect a site named OurShoes.com to have a separate category page for Running Shoes and Walking Shoes.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Title Tag Change - Drop in Organic Placement?
I've been working on increasing CTR my changing the title tag & meta descriptions. Has anyone ever noticed a drop in organic SERPS from doing so? Even if CTR goes up? It seems to me that if the CTR goes up and user experience in that way is improved these changes should yield an increase in the average position. Would you agree? Thank you!!
On-Page Optimization | | leslieevarts2 -
The meta tags: Title and Description, showing unexpected results on google
When I type my company name on google "Navneet Gems", it shows a very different meta tag then what it actually is. How do I change this meta descrption when its non-existent on my homepage? The worst is, it is having a spelling mistake. We want to correct this.
On-Page Optimization | | Navneet.Agarwal20160 -
Ranking well for 3 keyword phrase but not for 2?
Hi all, We have a site that sells whisky and is ranking well for a specific 3 keyword phrase for example "glendronach hielan whisky" (brand, product, type) which is great but the site isn't doing well for 2 keyword phrase for example "glendronach whisky" or "glendronach hielan". I'm a little confused as to why it wouldn't rank higher for the 2 keyword phrases given that there present in the 3 keyword phrase. Is there a massive jump between ranking well between 3 and 2 keyword phrases? If so what could anyone suggest to try and rank on the 2's?
On-Page Optimization | | Jon-S0 -
Title tag length
Hi, I am fairly new to SEO and have just noticed the end of my title text has been cut off by Google in the serps results. Everything i have read tells me titles should be maximum of 70 characters, however, Google is only displaying 54. See below Security systems | wireless | battery powered | Police... Nobody else on the page is showing more than 54 characters. Am i missing something obvious? Any and all help gratefully appreciated. Thanks Si
On-Page Optimization | | DaddySmurf0 -
How to determine what is causing an "F" on-page Report ?
I have a number of pages that I believe are optimized just like other pages that have "A" reports, but they get Fs. How can I specifically drill down and discover the cause of the F?
On-Page Optimization | | enotes0 -
How bad is it going over 70 character for title tag length?
I know less than 70 is recommended. I am about to run a script to create some title tags and a few will be between 71-74. Is going just the few characters over ok until I can get in there and manually do them?
On-Page Optimization | | EcommerceSite0 -
Www vs "non" www site addresses and SEO
I first apologize for the lame question title - didn't really know how to word it... I'm having a bit of a conundrum and cannot figure out whats going on, but in the mean time I thought I would ask to see if its hurting my ranking. My site at www.ap-mg.com is built on WordPress using the Thesis them by DIY (just a little upfront info). I am very careful to make sure that all my links are in a particular format i.e. http://www.ap-mg.com - on my site, as well as other sites I have my profile on. My site also used to be hosted on the /home directory until about a month ago. My problem is that when I click on the DA MoxBar link while at my sites homepage, it takes me to Open Explorer, but to ap-mg.com and shows no results - I then add the www to the front of the address and vuala - results. But then the second issue I'm having is then it tells me that my site is redirecting the the /home directory, which its not and I'm still trying to figure that one out. So with all the craziness with my site, www, no www, /home....is this killing any chance of real ranking?
On-Page Optimization | | apmgsmith0 -
Tag clouds: good for internal linking and increase of keyword relevant pages?
As Matt Cutts explained, tag clouds are OK if you're not engaged in keyword stuffing (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYPX_ZmhLqg) - i.e. if you're not putting in 500 tags. I'm currently creating tags for an online-bookseller; just like Amazon this e-commerce-site has potentially a couple of million books. Tag clouds will be added to each book detail page in order to enrich each of these pages with relevant keywords both for search engines and users (get a quick overview over the main topics of the book; navigate the site and find other books associated with each tag). Each of these book-specific tag clouds will hold up to 50 tags max, typically rather in the range of up to 10-20. From an SEO perspective, my question is twofold: 1. Does the site benefit from these tag clouds by improving the internal linking structure? 2. Does the site benefit from creating lots of additional tag-specific-pages (up to 200k different tags) or can these pages become a problem, as they don't contain a lot of rich content as such but rather lists of books associated with each tag? Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | semantopic0