Large scale change of incoming anchor text/alt tag image links
-
I provide SEO services in-house and for clients for a ecommerce and web design company. For every client site we create or host we provide a image link on the bottom linking back to our company website.
I started researching competitors that offer same services for our industry that have top Google rankings for all the terms we are targeting and i just realized they rank that well because their image/anchor text link they place on client sites is alt tagged for that specific keyword. We have not been optimizing or utilizing this easy keyword backlink method.
I am now wanting to go to all of our clients sites and change our backlinks to target the keyword we are optimizing for but my concern is will that number of incoming anchor text/image alt tag links cause us to get penalized from google for either over optimization or them seeing 100's of backlinks keyword specific just change overnight.
What is the best way to go about this change in a safe way to avoid or risk penalty from Google?
99% of all of our client backlinks are in the footer so they show up on every single page and they are all images.
Would it have a different affect if i add a alt tag to those images so that we get the oncoming link juice of that specific keyword?
One of my concerns is over optimization, since some of our clients have 1000's of pages on their website. so that is 1000's of incoming exact match keyword links. I feel like the danger is low for being penalized but i would rather be safe then sorry and get additional feedback.
Thanks,
Stephen
-
Hard to say, but I'd be hesitant to include any "money" keyword in sitewide footer links.
-
Thank you for your response, Would it make any different if i changed the image alt text to say: "Keyword" by/at "company name"?. Instead of just putting the keyword would it make any difference if i add the company name in with the keyword?
If i decide to make this change it will definitely be gradual, probably start with the most authoritative client and wait a few months or so then change another clients site, but i will only make the change for a handful of sites instead of all of them, so most of the clients sites will just say "Powered By Brand Name".
Thanks,
Stephen
-
The problem with sitewide footer links is that they are not "editorial" - meaning they are part of the CMS and not actually written by a human within the context of actual content.
Over and over again we see these types of link devalued by the search engines. Often it's the fast track for NOT ranking for the keywords you're trying to optimized for.
See this case study on WPMU.org and how sitewide footers caused a Penguin penalty for them.
Google, and search engines in general, are getting better and better at detecting "unnatural patterns" in links and doing more and more to devalue them. This doesn't mean all sitewide links are bad, and that they shouldn't be used, but to make it a major part of your linking strategy might be subjecting yourself to risk that you don't want.
Unfortunately, as you noted this method is working for some of your competitors. It sucks when you see folks get away with stuff that you know will get you burned. With this in mind, I totally agree with Jason's statement:
"Additionally, I've always been of the opinion that one good footer link on a website's homepage - or an in-text link on the client's "about" page - is more valuable than a site-wide footer link. While I don't have any proof of this, it's something you might test. On sites we design, we like to put an "about this website" sub-heading on the client's about page, then link to our site in that text. It seems natural to me, and my site does OK."
If it were me, I'd adopt Jason's policy, or something editorially similar, 100%. The advantages are:
- The links are truly editorial, not part of a CMS
- Text links tend to carry more weight than image links
- You could write more about your site and services, which may convert better.
Of course, if you are doing this across 100's of sites, it may be tempting to try to scale it with pre-written text or a template. Again, this creates pattern and smacks of non-editorial linking. It's best to craft each page of content unique to the site you've worked on. Otherwise, where is the value?
Best of luck!
-
Yes, I'd put it on the slow motion housekeeping list. and don't do every single link you can find.
I'd prioritize in-context links from high authority pages way above masses of footer links, which are often not a great user experience anyway.
Over time, look at the link profile/anchor text in open site explorer. If it looks too targeted, it probably is Go for less than 40% targeted anchor text.
Definitely cut your footer link load.
Good luck!
-
There are a lot of differing opinions about footer links, particularly how to optimize them.
One camp says that these links should be innocuous, brand-name only links (i.e. alt tags that are your domain name or corporate name). Too many optimized inbound links (or alt tags on images that link to your site) could cause some sort of over-optimization penalty. While I think this is solid advice, I too have seen companies use highly optimized site-wide footer links, and they seem to be beneficial...so I'm not inclined to say that footer links shouldn't be optimized at all.
Another camp argues that you should go ahead and optimize all the link text, but to do so slowly and naturally. My concern with this approach is outlined above...at some point, you're going to have dozens or hundreds of links pointing to your site with optimized text/alt tags. That's not necessarily natural.
A middle-of-the road approach is to just change some of the links, and if I were you this is how I'd start. I'd identify the most trusted sites, change the alt tags on half of them to something optimized, then sit back and wait 3 months.
Additionally, I've always been of the opinion that one good footer link on a website's homepage - or an in-text link on the client's "about" page - is more valuable than a site-wide footer link. While I don't have any proof of this, it's something you might test. On sites we design, we like to put an "about this website" sub-heading on the client's about page, then link to our site in that text. It seems natural to me, and my site does OK.
Anyways, good luck. Whatever you do, I think gradual change is the key.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is Link equity / Link Juice lost to a blocked URL in the same way that it is lost to nofollow link
Hi If there is a link on a page that goes to a URL that is blocked in robots txt - is the link juice lost in the same way as when you add nofollow to a link on a page. Any help would be most appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Andrew-SEO0 -
Phone number link / critical crawler issue
I've got 15 critical crawler issues coming up, all of which are ( tel: )links to the contact phone number. As this is a taxi firm, these links are pretty vital to customer conversion. Should I worry about these issues from an SEO perspective? If so, is there anything I can do about it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Paul7300 -
Changed all external links to 'NoFollow' to fix manual action penalty. How do we get back?
I have a blog that received a Webmaster Tools message about a guidelines violation because of "unnatural outbound links" back in August. We added a plugin to make all external links 'NoFollow' links and Google removed the penalty fairly quickly. My question, how do we start changing links to 'follow' again? Or at least being able to add 'follow' links in posts going forward? I'm confused by the penalty because the blog has literally never done anything SEO-related, they have done everything via social and email. I only started working with them recently to help with their organic presence. We don't want them to hurt themselves at all, but 'follow' links are more NATURAL than having everything as 'NoFollow' links, and it helps with their own SEO by having clean external 'follow' links. Not sure if there is a perfect answer to this question because it is Google we're dealing with here, but I'm hoping someone else has some tips that I may not have thought about. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HashtagJeff0 -
Domain Authority... http://www.domain.com/ vs. http://domain.com vs. http://domain.com/
Hey Guys, Looking at Page Authority for my Site and ranking them in Decending Order, I see these 3 http://www.domain.com/ | Authority 62 http://domain.com | Authority 52 http://domain.com/ | Authority 52 Since the first one listed has the highest Authority, should I be using a 301 redirects on the lower ranking variations (which I understand how works) or should I be using rel="canonical" (which I don't really understand how it works) Also, if this is a problem that I should address, should we see a significant boost if fixed? Thanks ahead of time for anyone who can help a lost sailor who doesn't know how to sail and probably shouldn't have left shore in the first place. Cheers ZP!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mr_Snack0 -
How fast to change keyword rich anchor text
Hello, A client of mine has a site with almost all keyword rich anchor text, The problem is on on a bunch of little blogs and some (mostly sitewide) paid links. We are working to move into 100% white hat SEO, but we're doing it slowly. My question is, how fast can we change the anchor text on all of these links? I'm worried that if I do it too fast that it will be a red flag. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobGW0 -
How to get around Google Removal tool not removing redirected and 404 pages? Or if you don't know the anchor text?
Hello! I can’t get squat for an answer in GWT forums. Should have brought this problem here first… The Google Removal Tool doesn't work when the original page you're trying to get recached redirects to another site. Google still reads the site as being okay, so there is no way for me to get the cache reset since I don't what text was previously on the page. For example: This: | http://0creditbalancetransfer.com/article375451_influencial_search_results_for_.htm | Redirects to this: http://abacusmortgageloans.com/GuaranteedPersonaLoanCKBK.htm?hop=duc01996 I don't even know what was on the first page. And when it redirects, I have no way of telling Google to recache the page. It's almost as if the site got deindexed, and they put in a redirect. Then there is crap like this: http://aniga.x90x.net/index.php?q=Recuperacion+Discos+Fujitsu+www.articulo.org/articulo/182/recuperacion_de_disco_duro_recuperar_datos_discos_duros_ii.html No links to my site are on there, yet Google's indexed links say that the page is linking to me. It isn't, but because I don't know HOW the page changed text-wise, I can't get the page recached. The tool also doesn't work when a page 404s. Google still reads the page as being active, but it isn't. What are my options? I literally have hundreds of such URLs. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SeanGodier0 -
Rankings tanked after sitewide title tag changes
Hi Guys, One of our clients are a big brand but their brand is a keyword domain. After signing up to seo moz and utilising the recommended changes to the on page seo, something drastic happened. Every page of my clients site appended the site name at the end of the title tag. Example: <title>keyword | keyword 2 | domain name keyword</title> I felt, and also with seomoz reports, that having the main keyword appended to the end of every title tag was far too spammy and as seo moz suggested could possibly have different pages fighting for ranks on that phrase. We decide to remove the domain from the end on all page titles, and since google re cached the site, the rankings have tanked big time. The site is still indexed so thats good but when you consider a single lead is worth over £1000 to my client and with 20-30 leads per month, he isnt too happy. Has anyone experienced this before? My guess is google is re evaluating the rankings to reflect the new title tags, and thus put my clients site out until it's finished updating the rankings etc? Any help? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | glasgowseoguy0 -
Link Anchor Text
As I keep studing SEO I reach to the conclusion that the Anchor Text from other site is crucial to get more positive results for our website and for the link-building strategy. My question is - Is it better to have an Anchor Text to my main link our should I ask for a determine targeted keyword? Tks in advance! Pedro M Pereira
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PedroM0