Disavow Tool
-
2 Questions any help appreciated:
I have had a spam url in my Disavow file with Google since last September but it still shows up as linked to my site, is this correct?
If a url has say 100 pages all with your anchor text and it is a spam website do you Disavow the domain url or do you have enter all the pages in the Disavow spreadsheet?
-
For the sake of this argument, I have a website where there were some 120-150 spammy links created. Basically I see a ton of low quality bookmarking sites who are somewhat scraping content of each other. Very few anchor text names and those are taken from authority sites in the niche as well, the others (some 80% of them) are direct domain name anchor text links to the site in question now. So, would any of you recommend adding all those links into the disavow tool if nothing is happening in terms of penalties or ranking changes now? I am having a lot of opposite opinions about this matter. Thanks!
-
Remember it's one URL per line.
If you want to disavow all of geeky.com, all you need to do is:
domain:geeky.com
That's all!
-
Sorry to sound thick but on my spreadsheet it will look like this which is an actual spam link on my site:
domain:geeky.com http://www.geeky.com/ or like this
domain:geeky.com http://www.geeky.com/spam.html
-
If you want to disavow an entire domain, that's how you enter it.
Let's say you wanted to disavow http://www.spamsite.com/spam.html and all of seomoz.org (I'm sure you don't!)
This is what you'd put in your disavow file:
http://www.spamsite.com/spam.html
domain:seomoz.orgYou need to put that "domain:" bit in front of the site's root domain in order to disavow all of the links on the site.
-
Thank you for you response, can you explain what you mean by domain:spamsite.com do I just enter the full url address of the domain?
-
Hey there
First question - this is fine. The disavow file stops Google from counting that link as part of your link profile, but it doesn't stop it reporting as linking to your site. In order for that to happen, you would need to physically break the link.
Second - you're more than welcome to use the domain:spamsite.com command - Google are happy to accept that. So yes, for a site containing 100 links or more, use the domain: command and you'll be fine. I've tried and tested this and it's worked for me.
Hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best Site Architecture tool for analysis my & competitors site?
Hello All, I am really confused with my current architecture for Ecommerce site, can you please suggest any tool or software where I can analysis mine and competitors site architecture ? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | pragnesh96390 -
Code Quality checker tool?
Hi All, I have seen one tool - http://nibbler.silktide.com/ which give code quality score and if we go for pro version it's name is sitebeam - http://nibbler.silktide.com/en_US/pro Can anyone share experience of this tool? Also any other tool you can suggest to check code quality of ecommerce site? Pls don't suggest manual checking. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | pragnesh96390 -
If I am using Lazy Load & Ajax Technology then how "tools.pingdom.com" will consider website performance?
Hello Experts, If I am using Lazy Load & Ajax Technology then how "tools.pingdom.com" will consider website performance? I am not using this technology but few of my competitors are using this technology but still there performance in pingdom tool worst than my ecommerce site Little bit confuse please help. Thanks! Wrights
On-Page Optimization | | wright3350 -
Confused by Moz page grading tool
Can anyone shed any light on why moz ranks this page an F: http://www.traditional-cleaning.co.uk/cleaning-in-tynemouth.htm for 'cleaners in tynemouth' and 'cleaning in tynemouth' Many thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | EdwardoUK0 -
Can't get authorship to show in the rich snippets tool...
Can't get authorship to show in the rich snippets tool... am I doing something wrong? spokanepaintingcontractor.org
On-Page Optimization | | Superflys0 -
Tool to creat a good XML sitemap
Hello lads, I need to creat a XML sitemap for a website so I can add to Google Webmaster and Bing Webmaster. What do you guys recommend? Tks in advance! PP
On-Page Optimization | | PedroM0 -
SEO Site Planning Tool?
Does anyone know of a good SEO Site planning tool? I see that SEOBOOK has something that looked interesting but they want $300/mo! Thanks in advance! Andy
On-Page Optimization | | MaxOtto0 -
SEOMOZ tool - on page optmization question
Ok, I had the tool examine a page and while I got an A, it did say this..... Avoid Keyword Self-Cannibalization Easy fix <dl> <dt>Cannibalizing link</dt> <dd>"Kitchen Storage Racks", "Home Storage Racks", "Garage Storage Racks", "Wine Storage Racks", "Bicycle Storage Racks", and "wine storage racks"Explanation</dd> <dd>It's a best practice in SEO to target each keyword with a single page on your site (sometimes two if you've already achieved high rankings and are seeking a second, indented listing). To prevent engines from potentially seeing a signal that this page is not the intended ranking target and creating additional competition for your page, we suggest staying away from linking internally to another page with the target keyword(s) as the exact anchor text. Note that using modified versions is sometimes fine (for example, if this page targeted the word 'elephants', using 'baby elephants' in anchor text would be just fine).</dd> <dt>Recommendation</dt> <dd>Unless there is intent to rank multiple pages for the target keyword, it may be wise to modify the anchor text of this link so it is not an exact match.</dd> </dl> The keyword that was optimized was "storage racks". In the explanation it says that baby elephants is fine if elephants is your keyword so why isn't wine storage racks or kitchen storage racks ok what is the difference? why is mine cannibalizing but baby elephants is not? This may be very simplistic to you all but I'm learning as i go, thank you in advance
On-Page Optimization | | stacksofracks0