Why is a sub page ranking over home page?
-
Hey guys!
I was wondering whether any of you Mozzers out there could shed some light on this query for me.
Currently, one of our clients is ranking (on the second page, at least) for one of their target keywords.
However, it's not the home page that is ranking - it is a sub page. I guess you could say both are targeted to rank for the keyword in question but the home page has a considerable more PA (+10) and has a lot more incoming links so it's a little bit baffling as to why the sub page has been given an advantage.
Does anyone know why this may be?
Also, on a secondary note, should I continue to build links to the home page or target this particular sub page to have a better chance of ranking higher for the keyword?
Any advice on this welcome!
Cheers!
-
Another good answer, Lynn. Thanks a lot. I'll be sure to take on board the advice you've passed on!
-
I don't think changing the .com links will move the needle, there are only a couple of them and they are being 301 redirected so not going to make that much of a difference I wouldn't think.
If you are going to shift that phrase over to the internal page then in the first instance I would focus on trying to get some more content on that page to reinforce that this is the main page about kitchens. You could add some content describing how/why each of the sub categories (worktops, doors etc) are relevant to the DIYer for example. You could use your internal blog for informational type posts that can further reinforce the main category page.
I guess what I am saying is that since the top sites for that term seem to be mainly root domains and partial/full EMDs to boot, then your content is going to need to stand out a bit for you to realistically get onto the first page. So, I would concentrate on that before I jumped into more external link building which has the potential to look slightly unnatural given the nature of the content as it is now.
Might be worth focusing on some social signals before external links also, which could sync with your internal blogging efforts, try encouraging clients to leave reviews on relevant sites, that kind of thing. Once the content is there and the social signals are supporting it then external links will seem more credible and probably be more effective.
Hope that helps!
-
Hey Lynn, great answer.
The .com links were built initially when the site was intended to be a .com. Would you recommend trying to change these links to .co.uk - would it be beneficial?
I definitely take your point that, from a consumer's point of view, it's probably more beneficial for the /kitchens/ page to be ranking. With that in mind, do you think it would be wise to concentrate link building efforts towards that sub-page?
-
Hi Mathew,
Well a couple of things stand out at first glance (not necessarily in order of importance)
1. You have a handful of exact / partial match links to both the home and secondary page, so potentially confusing to the search engines which one is best suited to show.
2. Some of the relevant links to the homepage are going to a .com version of the site which is being redirected to the .co.uk
3. All your internal linking is indicating that the internal page is the most relevant for this phrase.
All things considered I think your content/internal linking is the main issue. The internal page is much more kitchen focused (texts, products etc) while the homepage to me seems more focused on flooring. That in combination with the external links into the internal page and perhaps some lost value in the 301 redirects to the homepage is likely why the internal page is ranking for the term.
Beyond the technical side of it, as a user searching for diy kitchens I would prefer to see the internal page anyway, it is more immediately relevant so maybe a rethink of which phrases you are trying to focus for on each page is worthwhile and focusing the diy kitchen phrases on the internal page makes sense in this case.
My two cents!
-
Hi Mathew,
Care to share the site/keyword in question? Pretty tough to give an idea without seeing the pages, there could be a number of factors at play.
-
Can anyone else provide insight into this?
-
Hi Matthew,
With e-commerce sites the content (if not there) is greatly obtained by the text from the product so the product titles , the product descriptions, and the alt-text from the product images.
-
Oh, and it may be worth mentioning that for another competitive keyword, we have a second page ranking and that one is the home page.
-
Hey Lynn, thanks for your detailed response.
The links we've built have all been carefully sourced and managed in a way that there should be some good variation in anchor phrases while steering well clear of underhand techniques like mass paid directories.
-
Never link to the home page? Can't say I've heard that one before. Why would the ranking be suppressed?
-
Hey Ard. The site in question is an ecommerce one so it has very little text on both of the pages. In fact, it has more on the home page.
-
Hi Matthews,
It could be a cause of better relevant and quality content on the keyword on the subpage than on homepage.
-
Hi Mathew,
Just this week I saw something very similar, a newish site that had unfortunately gone the route of mass paid directory links with loads of exact match text variations (not saying this is your case!). From one day to the next I saw the second page ranking they had for their homepage and main keyword get switched out with another page on their site. I got the impression this was a specific page+specific keyword type of penalty or suppression. If the site in question has been a bit over enthusiastic on the exact match linking game then it is something I would keep an eye out for. I think that is what Irving is implying also....
-
never link to the homepage, you can't 404 a homepage if the page gets ranking supressed. This is what might have happened to you already.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do we need to maintain consistency in page titles suffix?
Hi all, We usually give "brand & primary keyword" across all pages in website like "vertigo tiles". Do we need to maintain this suffix across all page titles? What if we change according to the page? Will Google downlook for not maintaining these page titles suffix like I mentioned? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Lots of dublicate titles and pages on search page
I own a paiting website with a lot of searchable paintings. The "search paintings" feature creates tons of dublicate pages and titles. See here:
Algorithm Updates | | KasperGJ
http://www.maleribasen.dk/soegmaleri.asp I guess the problem is, that the URL can actually be different and still return the same content. First time you click the "Search paintings" the URL will shown as above. But as soon as users
begin to definere they search to the left and use the "Search button" the top URL changes. So, depending on how the top URL looks different results are shown. This is pretty standard in searches. But it returns tons of dublicate pages and titles. How, do you guys cope with that? Is there a clever way to use ref="cannonical" or some other smart way to avoid this? /Kasper0 -
Ranking Software
Hello Can anyone recommend the best rankings/tracking software - something that will track upto position 500 in the serps. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | webguru20140 -
Best Moz article on landing pages?
From what I understand, building landing pages to link back to sites is a thing of the past. I am looking for a good article that explains best current landing page practices (post Panda and Penquin). Any suggestions?
Algorithm Updates | | cschwartzel0 -
Have I been Hit by a Penguin? No Warning in Webmaster / Some Pages still Rank
Hi all, I have recently signed up to MOZ as I have seen a large drop in the turnover of a site I work with as well as a slump in visitors. I know part of this slump is the transition from google product search from being free to paid and chewing through our adwords budget quicker. The other part though seems a little more tricky, I have always been under the impression from reading online that an algorithm update would see a site destroyed for most terms and a notification generated in webmaster tools, however the site still seems to still rank for some terms, others however it has fallen off the face of the earth for. As you can see in the attachment webmaster tools is showing much decreased visibility, and MOZ agrees with this. Key terms that have lost rank have done so by around 4-10 positions. The content on the site has all been hand written by myself, however some of the pages are a little "stale" so I am currently running through re-writing every product page on the site (1000 products or so) all my product pages grade a minimum B with 99% A on the Moz page grader. I am keeping my fingers crossed that fresh content should assist in getting google interested again? However my real questions is, Is this Penguin? or is this just stale content? dmDdMr5.jpg pYkzck0.jpg 9f4mgM9.jpg
Algorithm Updates | | speedingorange1 -
Do links from unrelated sites dilute your rankings for your key phrases?
do links from unrelated sites dilute your rankings for your key phrases? i've always heard don't get links from unrelated sites but if that mattered, then how would sites with totally diverse pages such as newspaper sites, sears, and other catalogue sites rank for these diverse subjects on their site? How does Facebook rank when it gets 100,000 links a day from sites that have nothing to do with a social media site? I'd love to hear everyone's opinion on this. Also, Do links from unrelated sites give less push than related links? Take care,
Algorithm Updates | | Ron10
Ron0 -
A rating on report card - Massive drop in rankings (Is it Penguin?)
Hi All, I would really like a second opinion on my current issue and I'd be very grateful for the communities knowledge please . I have a been running a successful campaign for one of my clients, increase in natural SERP's, etc. But since the 24th of April they were hit and hit hard and continued to decline now. They had many top 5 listings for terms and now most are not in top 50 serps. Openly I know they have a bad or not great backlink profile which was inherited from the past agency, but we're working on this using white hat techniques, contextual copy, brand etc. The copy is a great, contextual and no where near spammy at all... Very nicely written, factual, etc. What I don't understand is this SEOmoz's On-Page report card gives an A rating for the target term which is also a secondary term but was ranking high. Factor Overview <dl class="scoreboard clearfix"> <dt>Critical Factors</dt> <dd>4 / 4</dd> <dt>High Importance Factors</dt> <dd>6 / 7</dd> <dt>Moderate Importance Factors</dt> <dd>7 / 9</dd> <dt>Low Importance Factors</dt> <dd>8 / 11</dd> <dt>Optional Factors</dt> <dd>2 / 5</dd> <dd> On-Page Keyword Usage for </dd> </dl> Title 1 URL 0 Meta Desc 1 H1 1 H2-4 0 Body 1 B / Strong 1 IMG ALT 0 Total Keyword Usage for this Page = 5 Fall from grace is SERP 5 to 25 and still going down. So the questions are: 1. Has this happened to you? 2. Could it just be down to their bad backlink profile which now needs much more attention? 3. Is this Penguin for sure? 4. What would you recommend? If anyone requires any further info please let me know and thank you in advance. Cheers,
Algorithm Updates | | JosephGourvenec
Joseph Gourvenec
SEO and Search Specialist0 -
Stop google indexing CDN pages
Just when I thought I'd seen it all, google hits me with another nasty surprise! I have a CDN to deliver images, js and css to visitors around the world. I have no links to static HTML pages on the site, as far as I can tell, but someone else may have - perhaps a scraper site? Google has decided the static pages they were able to access through the CDN have more value than my real pages, and they seem to be slowly replacing my pages in the index with the static pages. Anyone got an idea on how to stop that? Obviously, I have no access to the static area, because it is in the CDN, so there is no way I know of that I can have a robots file there. It could be that I have to trash the CDN and change it to only allow the image directory, and maybe set up a separate CDN subdomain for content that only contains the JS and CSS? Have you seen this problem and beat it? (Of course the next thing is Roger might look at google results and start crawling them too, LOL) P.S. The reason I am not asking this question in the google forums is that others have asked this question many times and nobody at google has bothered to answer, over the past 5 months, and nobody who did try, gave an answer that was remotely useful. So I'm not really hopeful of anyone here having a solution either, but I expect this is my best bet because you guys are always willing to try.
Algorithm Updates | | loopyal0