New more "helpful" internal linking causing SERP & traffic drop?
-
Still dealing with the weird traffic drop on my website.
I have removed a bunch of old links from a defunct blog, 301 thin pages, added text to remaining pages.
I'm still stumped.
So awhile ago I freshened up my website and thought I was "helping people" by making sure they could CONTACT the studio more easily... I added more links to the "contact page" I thought this would help conversions...This changed the number of links to my entire site....Would this be the problem with my ranking/traffic drop?
-
I saw that video, yes it is a good one.
Interesting theory about the new "spam search queries" I can see that might be an issue with some sites, I'm not sure it is with mine.
There is something called "pink filter" that I have heard of that if google determines your website to be porn, it will not allow it when safesearch is on.
According to theory if I have not been hit by the "pink filter" I am not labeled porn and should not have my rankings dropped. It does look like Google is changing, I'll keep this in mind.
-
Well said! That's exactly what I was thinking and hoping... That if my idea is not the problem, maybe a real geek with chime in and fix it. Anyway, here goes...
There has been some new additions to Google's algo announced just a few days ago. Emphasis on "Announced", who know but Matt Cutts on how long it has actually been active, right?
They (Google) have started targeting anything that "they consider" bad, misused, search terms. Two such terms are "PayDay Loans" and anything that "They Consider" to be of a Pornographic nature.
Although your site is a classy photo studio for private "Intimate" photography and not a porn site, it does have semantic terms on the site that "They May Consider" worth lowering just a little.
Below is a link from which I got this info and formed this theory. This is probably not the problem since I'm not a big-shot and no big-shots have mentioned it, or they "have" mentioned it but found out to not be the issue. But I'm having fun with the exchange and hope to learn more myself... Just like you said above.
Here's the link (I hope)
-Gary.
Oops! I meant to add this quote from the page,
Google has officially launched a new search update to target “spammy queries” such as [payday loan], pornographic and other heavily spammed queries
-
Geek away....
If this was a simple problem with one simple answer I would have fixed it 4 months ago
I've had lots of suggestions and lots of bits of help.
I'm always glad for more, if your suggestion does not work, someone will pipe in and we all learn from it.
Here is another thread that has more data too to help you out.
http://moz.com/community/q/web-traffic-tanked-not-penguin-nor-panda-i-am-stumped
What do you see?
-
Sorry to see your rankings going down. It's obviously not the "shake down" thing I was referring to. However...
I looked at your site after looking at your graph and think I may have found something that could possibly be a contributing factor to your rankings issue.
In my home town I'm a seo big-fish, but here on "The Moz", I'm just a wee lil minnow, so I do not claim to be an SEO Jeenyus outside my physical area. That being said,
Do you mind if I share with you what I think I see to be a possible issue? I don't want to offend you or anyone by coming across as a self proclaimed super-geek, this is why I'm asking.
-Gary.
-
Fascinating theory, but this has been a slow steady decline since March.
Not an instant drop.
Here is an awesome graph of Jan to now.
http://www.bayareaboudoir.com/capture2.jpg
I erased all my stats Jan 1st from previous years.
But they had been slowly climbing.
-
I admit that I don't know your whole situation. But based on my own experience with Local SEO I can say this...
I can very often count on Google to Severely Drop the ranking of the site and or the individual site-page shortly after I do a medium to large amount of SEO Tweaking on the given client site.
Personally I call this "The Google SEO Shake Down" (not sure where I got that term). I don't know if they do this on purpose, but it is predictable like clock-work, so I can only assume there really is something to this "Google SEO Shake Down" idea.
This DROP In Ranking only lasts a few days to a week or so (for me so far).
If your ranking problem has been less than two or three weeks, I would suggest to just stop all your activity and play the waiting game with Google for 5 days to as much as 3 weeks (usually 4 to 7 days, but does vary). If this is the "SEO Shake Down", your site will pop right back up. However, if this has been going on for over 3 weeks, I'd think there is a more serious problem.
Parting Thought:
I frame this "SEO Shake Down" in my own mind like this... Google does this in order to see if there is an SEO spammer that may panic and throw a bunch of spammy SEO tactics at the site. This has worked well for me so far without fail! When I see a big dip in ranking just after doing some SEO tweaking I WILL always stop and wait... So far, the rankings have always came back.
I hope this helps to shine just a little more light on your situation. No one has taught me this, I'm only speaking from my own personal experience alone. But since this so far has been absolutely 100% predictable, I figured it wouldn't hurt to share.
-Gary.
Up Date: I forgot to mention that the "SEO Tweaking" mentioned above is "On-Page" SEO only. OFF-SITE back linking may be a different beast all together! Cool?
-
Update:
I just went through and fixed the last of the 404 errors with 301.
I also changed the internal linking structure to have more links going to the home page and not to the contact page.
I hope this helps.
I'd love some more input on this issue.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What’s the best tool to visualize internal link structure and relationships between pages on a single site?
I‘d like to review the internal linking structure on my site. Is there a tool that can visualize the relationships between all of the pages within my site?
Web Design | | QBSEO0 -
Is there anything wrong to have large number of internal links pointing to homepage? Including links from sub domains or sub directories?
Hi all, Generally more number of internal links will be pointed to homepage. But I see some modern suggestions that too many internal links to homepage are not good. I'm just wondering if most number of internal links pointing to homepage may hurt? Also we have sub domains, can we point a link from every page of sub domain or sub directory to homepage? Usually the answer here is about users. Of course, the content is about same product across all pages. Thanks
Web Design | | vtmoz0 -
What is the Estimated Time for SERP Rankings to Replenish after a Site Redesign?
Hello Fellow Moz'ers, My company's website, www.1099pro.com, is currently OLD and not mobile-friendly! However, we rank #1 for out most important keywords and don't want to lose that ranking. I've recently redesigned our site, currently in testing, to use the same standard desktop pages but to also have responsive, mobile friendly, pages for different view ports. My question is if anyone knows an estimated time frame that search engines (mainly Google) takes to re-crawl the site and restore SERP rankings to their previous levels? The reason is because we are HIGHLY seasonal and if we are not back at our top rankings by early December, at latest (November would be better), then we stand the chance to lose a considerable amount of traffic/revenue. -The Unenlightened One
Web Design | | Stew2220 -
Moving to new site. Should I take old blog posts with me?
Our company website has needed a complete overhaul for some time now and the new one is almost ready to go live. We also have a separate "news" site that is houses around 800 blog posts and news items. (That news site will be thrown away because it's on a completely different domain and causes confusion.) So we have a main site with about 100 decent blog posts and a separate news site with 800 poor posts. I plan on bringing all the main site blog posts over to the new site (both WordPress), but my question is whether or not to bring over the news site posts? All, handful, none? Another issue is the news site doesn't have Google Analytics, so I'm not sure if any posts actually generate traffic, but I can from the main site we do get some referrals from it. As far as quality of content goes, it's poor. Not sure who wrote it all, but it's mainly text press releases that aren't very interesting. Is it worth bringing over for SEO purposes or simply delete the site and create a mass redirect so all of those pages will direct to the new website's blog page? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Web Design | | codyfrew0 -
Does Google count the domain name in its 115-character "ideal" URL length?
I've been following various threads having to do with URL length and Google's happiness therewith and have yet to find an answer to the question posed in the title. Some answers and discussions have come close, but none I've found have addressed this with any specificity. Here are four hypothetical URLs of varying lengths and configurations: EXAMPLE ONE:
Web Design | | RScime25
my-big-widgets-are-the-best-widgets-in-the-world-and-come-in-many-vibrant-and-unique-colors-and-configurations.html (115 characters) EXAMPLE TWO: sample.com/my-big-widgets-are-the-best-widgets-in-the-world-and-come-in-many-vibrant-and-unique-colors-and-configurations.html (126 characters) EXAMPLE THREE: www.sample.com/my-big-widgets-are-the-best-widgets-in-the-world-and-come-in-many-vibrant-and-unique-colors-and-configurations.html (130 characters) EXAMPLE FOUR: http://www.sample.com/my-big-widgets-are-the-best-widgets-in-the-world-and-come-in-many-vibrant-and-unique-colors-and-configurations.html (137 characters) Assuming the examples contain appropriate keywords and are linked to appropriate anchor text (etc.,) how would Google look upon each? All I've been able to garner thus far is that URLs should be as short as possible while still containing and contextualizing keywords. I have 500+ URLs to review for the company I work for and could use some guidance; yes, I know I should test, but testing is problematical to the extreme; I look to the collective/accumulated wisdom of the MOZVerse for help. Thanks.1 -
Managing international sites
Hi all, I am trying to figure out the best way to manage our international sites. We have two locations, 1 in the UK and 1 in the USA. I currently use GEOIP to identify the location of the browser and redirect them using a cookie to index.php?country=uk or index.php?country=usa. Once the cookie is set I use a 301 redirect to send them to index.php, so that Google doesnt see each url as duplicate content, which Webmaster tools was complaining about. This has been working wonderfully for about a year. It means I have a single php language include file and depending on the browser location I will display $ or £ and change the odd ise to ize, etc. Problem I am starting to notice is that we are starting to rank better and better in the USA search result. I am guessing this is because the crawlers must be based out of the USA. This is great, but my concern is that I am losing rank in the UK, which is currently where most of our business is done out of... So I have done my research and because I have a .net will go for a /uk/ or /us/ sub folder and create two separate webmaster tools site and set them up to target each geographic location. Is this okay? http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=182192#2 HERE IS THE PROBLEM: I don't was to have to run two separate website with two separate sets of copy. Also, I dont want to lose all the rank data on urls like: http://www.mysite.net/great-rank-result.html now becomes http://www.mysite.net/uk/great-rank-result.html. On top of this I will have two pages, the one just mentioned and now adding http://www.mysite.net/us/great-rank-result.html, which I presume would be seen as duplicate copy? (Y/n) Can I use rel canonical to overcome this? How can I don't this without actually running the two pages. Could you actually have 1 site in the root folder and just use the same GEOIP techology to do a smart MOD REWRITE adding either UK or US to the url therefore being able to create two webmaster accounts targeting each geographic location? Any advise is most welcome.
Web Design | | Mediatomcat0 -
Preserve Rankings When Switching to a New Site
Hello community! I have a quick question for you regarding preserving my SERPs once I switch a development site to replace the current production site. Basically, we are switching to a new CMS and will be featuring the same content, architectural layout, URL structure, etc. Again, the only difference is that it's going to be on a new CMS. Upon switching to the new version of the site, what would be the best strategy for making sure we preserve our rankings for content already ranking highly within the search engines? Likewise, is there anything additional we may be able to do right-off-the-bat in order to assist content that may not be ranking highly in the SERPs, rank more highly?
Web Design | | NiallSmith0 -
Is the server or host a metric for SERPs? Amazon Webstore a plus?
Hello Friends, I have been pondering a question that I bet Ben or some of the other clever folks this list will know. Do the search engines give a preference to sites hosted and served from larger companies like Amazon? With an Amazom Webstore, it would have our domain name but Amazon would supply much of the structure and back end like card processing and check out. Could having amazon as the server be an indicator of better results in the SERPS similar to having a stronger Domain Authority? Are there any draw backs for optimization when using an Amazon Webstore? Thank you. QP
Web Design | | QuietProgress0