Issues with Moz producing 404 Errors from sitemap.xml files recently.
-
My last campaign crawl produced over 4k 404 errors resulting from Moz not being able to read some of the URLs in our sitemap.xml file. This is the first time we've seen this error and we've been running campaigns for almost 2 months now -- no changes were made to the sitemap.xml file. The file isn't UTF-8 encoded, but rather Content-Type:text/xml; charset=iso-8859-1 (which is what Moveable Type uses). Just wondering if anyone has had a similar issue?
-
Hi Barb,
I am sure Joel will chime in also but just to clarify that it is probably not the utf8 encoding or lack of it that is causing the issue. At least with the sitemap urls it is simply the formatting of the xml that is being produced. As to if the other errors you are seeing are caused by the same kind of thing, if you are seeing references to the same encoded characters (%0A%09%) then the answer is most likely yes.
So the issue is not utf8 encoding related (there are plenty of non utf8 encoded sites on the web still!) but how the moz crawler is reading your links and if other tools/systems will be having the same troubles. Have you looked in google webmaster tools to see if it reports similar 404 errors from the sitemap or elsewhere? If you see similar errors in GWT then the issue is likely not restricted to the moz crawler only.
Beyond that, since for the sitemap at least the fix should be relatively simple and quite possibly the other moz errors you see will also be able to be fixed easily by making small adjustments to the templates and removing the extra line breaks/tabs which are creating the issue then it is worth doing so that these errors are removed and you can concentrate on the 'real' errors without all the noise.
-
Joel,
The latest 404 errors have the same type of issue, and are all over place in terms of referrer (none are the sitemap.xml) that I can see.
My question is, can the fact that we don't use the UTF-8 encoding in our site potentially cause issues with other reporting? This is not something we can change easily and I don't want to waste a great deal of effort sorting through "red herring" issues due to the encoding we use on the site.
thoughts?
barb
-
Thanks Joel,
We're looking into this.
barb
-
Thanks Lynn,
We are looking at that. The 4k 404 errors are gone now, but it's possible they will return.
It's a major change for us to switch to UTF-8, so it's not something that will happen anytime soon. I'll just have to be aware that it might be causing issues.
barb
-
Hey Brice,
I just to add to Lynn's great answer with the reason you're seeing the URLs the way they are and to reinforce that.
You have it formatted as such:
<loc>http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-cms/david-hillis-10-predictions-for-web-content-management-in-2011-009588.php</loc>The crawler converts everything to URL encoding. So those line feeds and tabs will be converted to percentage tags. The reason your root domain is there is because %0A is not the proper start of a URL so RogerBot assumes it's a relative link to the domain your sitemap is on.
The encoding thing is probably not affecting this.
Cheers,
Joel. -
Hi,
It can be frustrating I know, but if you are methodical you will get to the bottom of all errors and then feel much better
Not sure why the number of 404s would have gone down, but in regards the sitemap itself the moz team might be right that utf-8 encoding could be part of the problem. I think it might be more to do with some non visible formatting/characters being added to your site map during creation. %09 is a url encoded tab and %0A is a url encoded line feed, it looks to me that these are getting into your sitemap even though they are not actually visible.
If you download your site map you will see that many (but not all) the urls look like this:
<loc>http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-cms/david-hillis-10-predictions-for-web-content-management-in-2011-009588.php</loc>Note the new lines and the indent. Some other urls do not have this format for example:
<loc>http://www.cmswire.com/news/topic/impresspages</loc>
It would be wise to ensure both the file creating the sitemap and the sitemap itself are in utf-8, but also it could be as simple as going into the file creating the sitemap and removing those line breaks. Once that is done wait for the next crawl and see if it brings the error numbers down (it should). As for the rest of the warnings, just be methodical, identify where they are occurring and why and work through them. You will get to few or zero warnings, and you will feel good about it!
-
interesting that a new crawl just completed and now I only have 307 404 Errors and a lot of other different errors and warnings. It's frustrating to see such different things each week.
barb
-
Hi Lynn,
I did download the csv and found all the 404 errors were generate from our sitemap.xml file. Here's what the URLs look like:
referring URL is http://www.cmswire.com/sitemap.xml
You'll notice that there is odd formatting wrapping the URL (%0A%09%09%09) + the extra http://www.cmswire to the front of the URL- which does not exist in the actual sitemap.xml file if I view it separately.
Also: Moz support looked at our campaign and they thought the problem was that our sitemap wasn't UTF-8 encoded.
Any ideas?
-
Hi Brice,
What makes you think the issue is that moz cannot read the urls? In the first instance I would want to make sure that something else is not going wrong by checking the urls moz is flagging as 404s, ensuring they actually do or do not exist and if the latter finding out where the link is coming (be it the sitemap or another page on the site). You may have already done this, but if not you can get all this information by downloading the error report in csv and then filtering in excel to get data for 404 pages only.
If you have done this already then if you give us a sample or two of the urls moz is flagging along with the referring url and your sitemap url we might be able to diagnose the issue better. It would be unusual for the moz crawler to start throwing errors all of a sudden if nothing else has changed. Not saying it is impossible for it to be an error with moz, just saying that the chances are on the side of something else going on.
Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
MOZ Versus HUBSPOT??? If We Discontinue MOZ Subscription and Get HUBSPOT, Anything Lost?
How does Hubspot compare with MOZ? Doe it provide similar features or is the functionality very different? Is Hubspot complementary to MOZ or could it be used as a substitute? If we stopped our MOZ subscription and subscribed to Hubspot would we lose anything? Thanks, Alan
Moz Pro | | Kingalan10 -
Errors in my coding how significant is this regarding rankings ?
I posted a question on here yesterday about the homepage asking for advice regarding the content and then was told by two people were very helpful bbut moved over comment not on content but to say taht the major problem was that the coding on my website basically has too many errors which would result in me receiving lower rankings in the search engines. I realise this website is old-fashioned Dreamweaver template which was constructed several years ago which I've updated and I'm certainly not a professional, but I watch my Google analytics and there doesn't seem to be any significant change in the stats from this time last year. This is the site http://www.endeavourcottage.co.uk/ I realise the site is old format and has been around for several years it's just from customer feedback they seem to think it looks okay for the products old cottages but I guess technically it's not the best now. I have run a test using Silktide Nibbler - a free online service that gives you a good complete overview of your website with an overall score. And it did give my website an overall good score but did point out errors in the coding but when I checked some of my competitors near the top of Google for the short tail keywords some of them also have errors in their coding, very similar to my own error score.. I then went to Google Webmaster tools and there were no warning messages. So the big question is how important are these errors scores when it appears that most of the top competition also are in the same situation? I think it's quite possible I could do with a redesign using responsive design Best Alan
Moz Pro | | WhitbyHolidayCottages0 -
How to fix the Crawl Diagnostics error and warnings
hi im new to the seo world and i dont know a lot about it , so after my site get crawled i found 1 error and 151 warning and 96 notices , it that bad ?? and plz cam someone explain to me how to fix thos problem , a will be very thankful
Moz Pro | | medlife0 -
Issue: Duplicate Page Content
For pro members: Is there a way to see exactly what "it" is that is duplicate? Also, what % of duplicate content is required to be labeled as dupped. Much thanks, Chenzo
Moz Pro | | Chenzo0 -
Crawl Errors Confusing Me
The SEOMoz crawl tool is telling me that I have a slew of crawl errors on the blog of one domain. All are related to the MSNbot. And related to trackbacks (which we do want to block, right?) and attachments (makes sense to block those, too) ... any idea why these are crawl issues with MSNbot and not Google? My robots.txt is here: http://www.wevegotthekeys.com/robots.txt. Thanks, MJ
Moz Pro | | mjtaylor0 -
GWT data v SEO Moz data
I'm sure there's a simple explanation but I can't find it - Looking through the GWT avg position data v SEOMoz ranking data and Market Samurai data there is a large discrepancy. For one term that we hold #1, and have held for a month or two GWTis showing that the avg position is 180 (and down 30). Any reason you know of why the GWT avg position data would be so out of whack with our SERP's and other data? Thanks.
Moz Pro | | MrPaulB0 -
Different Moz Scores Between Page and Subdomain
The Moz scores for a page-specific website:: www.website.com are different than the subdomain: www.website.com/. www.website.com: Page MozRank: 4.58
Moz Pro | | DanSpeicher
Page MozTrust: 4.9 www.website.com/ Subdomain MozRank: 5.21
Subdomain MozTrust 5.18 Does that have any significance? Should I be routing pages to the " / " version? Thanks, Daniel0