What's better ...more or less linking C-blocks?
-
I'm a little confused about c-blocks, I've been reading about them but I still don't get it.
- Are these similar to sitewide links?
- do they have to come from websites that I own and hosted in the same ip?
- and finally, what's better ...more or less linking c-blocks?
Cheers
-
More is best.
C Block refers to the "group" that an IP address links to. Lots of domains linking from the same C Block might suggest related sites or a network. Having your links coming from a wider spread of C Blocks is generally seen as good.
Like with most things in SEO it is not just a case of "more wins". the C Block of a site that links to you is just one factor amongst hundreds, maybe thousands that influence rankings. Most importantly an unusually low number compared with linking root domains can be a sign of something odd.
-
This is a very useful article which I hope you find of help - http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/what-is-a-c-block-ip-address
-
Hello there!
When you read an IP address it is something like 45.452.456.77 - this is the actual "address" on the internet where your website lives. It is like your phone number. When you put a domain on top of it the domain "maps" to the IP, it is an alias (like speed dial), they type in the name and you are sent to the right number.
The IP address has sections separated by periods. In my example above it would be aa.bbb.ccc.dd The "C-block" (and dont confuse that when you are at a bar and your buddy cuts in on a conversation you might be having with a cute young lady), is the 3rd group of numbers in an IP address starting from the left, or in my example 456
Usually, when the "c-block" section of the IP address of two different websites is different, that means that the websites are hosted on separate servers. Why does this matter? It is very easy for sites to share an IP address or even to share C-blocks. Kind of like houses. You can share the same IP address, would be the equivalent of a lot of people in the same apartment complex, the street address is the same. Having the same C-block is more like you live on the same street. Having different C-blocks is like being on different streets, or even in different zip codes or cites etc. Not a perfect analogy, but you get the idea. Sites with different C-blocks are seen as more "separate" than those that share a c-block.
Why does this matter?
If you get a ton of links from sites that all share a c-block - it looks like a link farm or link scheme and Google may ignore those links or could penalize them for you. Back in the day (not that I ever did this) you would setup a bunch of sites quickly and cheaply and they would share IPs or even be on the same c-block of IPs. You could generate a bunch of links that way. This was obviously spammy and Google cracked down.
Note that this could be one link per website linking to you, but if all the websites were in the same c-block it looks suspicious.
So, you can get links from the same c-block - it is not like an automatic penalty, but if ALL your links are from 1 or 2 c-blocks - it looks suspicious. If you host websites that are truly different from each other, they all produce original content and it makes sense to cross link, I would talk to your hosting company and make sure that each site is on a separate c-block - just to be safe. You could be "linking properly" from one site to the other, but the c-block issue could make your link pattern look suspicious.
Your host might say, "Well we cant control what IP we give you", blah blah blah. They do use different ones over time. What we have done is had one site setup on an IP, then wait a while (few months) then get a new IP for the next one etc. Naturally over time, your host will be getting new IPs all the time and so you can work it that way. You will need to update your DNS settings etc, so you need to be technically astute to change IPs, again if you think you need to (it may be that you do not).
Usually, worrying about c-blocks for links is not an issue assuming that you are getting links naturally, so this conversation may become old hat, but if you are hosting sites and linking them together, it is just something to consider.
One more, you can actually do a lookup of what sites share the same c-block. If you find a bunch of p0rn sites on that c-block or other questionable sites, that could cause an issue with your site as you are seen in the same neighborhood. Most hosts today you do not have to worry about and/or they keep those sites on separate blocks anyway, but just something to consider.
-
C-blocks basically refer to where an IP address is located. C-blocks are like the neighborhood and sites that share it are basically your neighbors. More linking c-blocks is better.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does redirecting a duplicate page NOT in Google‘s index pass link juice? (External links not showing in search console)
Hello! We have a powerful page that has been selected by Google as a duplicate page of another page on the site. The duplicate is not indexed by Google, and the referring domains pointing towards that page aren’t recognized by Google in the search console (when looking at the links report). My question is - if we 301 redirect the duplicate page towards the one that Google has selected as canonical, will the link juice be passed to the new page? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Lewald10 -
Should I better noindex 'scripted' files in our portfolio?
Hello Moz community, As a means of a portfolio, we upload these PowerPoint exports – which are converted into HTML5 to maintain interactivity and animations. Works pretty nicely! We link to these exported files from our products pages. (We are a presentation design company, so they're pretty relevant). For example: https://www.bentopresentaties.nl/wp-content/portfolio/ecar/index.html However, they keep coming up in the Crawl warnings, as the exported HTML-file doesn't contain text (just code), so we get errors in: thin content no H1 missing meta description missing canonical tag I could manually add the last two, but the first warnings are just unsolvable. Therefore I figured we probably better noindex all these files… They appear to don't contain any searchable content and even then; the content of our clients work is not relevant for our search terms etc. They're mere examples, just in the form of HTML files. Am I missing something or should I better noindex these/such files? (And if so: is there a way to include a whole directory to noindex automatically, so I don't have to manually 'fix' all the HTML exports with a noindex tag in the future? I read that using disallow in robots.txt wouldn't work, as we will still link to these files as portfolio examples).
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BentoPres0 -
Links to external site (hotels link)
Hello, I am currently designing the webpages of my website and I am wondering if I should link externally or if it going to hurt me ? I am in the travel industry and for example in the France in the Loire valley, I want to list hotels that people can stay at in pre and pods trip. Is it ok to link to maybe 10 of those hotels websites or can it hurt me ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Google Not Seeing My 301's
Good Morning! So I have recently been putting in a LOT of 301's into the .htaccess, no 301 plugins here, and GWMT is still seeing a lot of the pages as soft 404's. I mark them as fixed, but they come back. I will also note, the previous webmaster has ample code in our htaccess which is rewriting our URL structure. I don't know if that is actually having any effect on the issue but I thought I would add that. All fo the 301's are working, Google isn't seeing them. Thanks Guys!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HashtagHustler0 -
Development site is live (and has indexed) alongside live site - what's the best course of action?
Hello Mozzers, I am undertaking a site audit and have just noticed that the developer has left the development site up and it has indexed. They 301d from pages on old site to equivalent pages on new site but seem to have allowed the development site to index, and they haven't switched off the development site. So would the best option be to redirect the development site pages to the homepage of the new site (there is no PR on dev site and there are no links incoming to dev site, so nothing much to lose...)? Or should I request equivalent to equivalent page redirection? Alternatively I can simply ask for the dev site to be switched off and the URLs removed via WMT, I guess... Thanks in advance for your help! 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart1 -
Blog content - what to do, and what to avoid in terms of links, when you're paying for blog content
Hi, I've just been looking at a restaurant site which is paying food writers to put food news and blogs on their website. I checked the backlink profile of the site and the various bloggers in question usually link from their blogs / company websites to the said restaurant to help promote any new blogs that appear on the restaurant site. That got me wondering about whether this might cause problems with Google. I guess they've been putting about one blog live per month for 2 years, from 12/13 bloggers who have been linking to their website. What would you advise?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart0 -
Domain Links or SubDomain Links, which is better?
Hi, I only now found out that www.domain.com and www.domain.com/ are different. Most of my external links are directed to www.domain.com/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet
Which I understand is considered the subdomain and not the domain. Should I redirect? (and if so how?)
Should I post new links only to my domain?0 -
Culling 99% of a website's pages. Will this cause irreparable damage?
I have a large travel site that has over 140,000 pages. The problem I have is that the majority of pages are filled with dupe content. When Panda came in, our rankings were obliterated, so I am trying to isolate the unique content on the site and go forward with that. The problem is, the site has been going for over 10 years, with every man and his dog copying content from it. It seems that our travel guides have been largely left untouched and are the only unique content that I can find. We have 1000 travel guides in total. My first question is, would reducing 140,000 pages to just 1,000 ruin the site's authority in any way? The site does use internal linking within these pages, so culling them will remove thousands of internal links throughout the site. Also, am I right in saying that the link juice should now move to the more important pages with unique content, if redirects are set up correctly? And finally, how would you go about redirecting all theses pages? I will be culling a huge amount of hotel pages, would you consider redirecting all of these to the generic hotels page of the site? Thanks for your time, I know this is quite a long one, Nick
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Townpages0