Six Reconsiderations and Zero options left - Where do I go from here?
-
I have a client that I'm trying to get reindexed after they did extensive link farming in the past through other companies. We've poured countless hours in and I've submitted 6 Disavows/Reconsiderations and watched every video from Google on the topic. The client has also invested a significant amount of money into our work.
We've used the following to try and find links:-Google Webmaster Tools (Shows a limit of 1,000 domains)
-Bing Webmaster Tools
-Link Detox (paid)
-Google Analytics (Lifetime Referral Report)
-Open Site Explorer
All we've gotten is automated responses with 2 sample links. In the latest one, they only supplied 1 sample link, which was odd because it said 'sample URLs'.
Either way, we feel that we're out of options. Is it time to throw in the towel and inform the client, or are there other resources we can exhaust?
Where do we go from here?
Thanks!
-
Hi there,
Google's official policy is that you should try to have the links removed before disavowing. I'm assuming you've sent out some emails and tried to have some links taken down, but you haven't mentioned link removal yet - only disavow. I'm just making sure.
You say you disavowed links 6 times - did you combine those into a single file? Google will overwrite your previous disavow, so make sure you're combining the disavow lists.
Finally, if they were ranking well based on bad links, they can't expect to simply regain their former standing without those spammy links. The spot checkers on reconsideration are always a little arbitrary, so you just have to deal with that. Your only option is to decrease the odds that they'll find bad links by either increasing the proportion of good links or decreasing the bad links.
-
" If you didn't try very hard to clean up and just disavowed, then my guess (which seems obvious after 6 attempts) is that the reconsideration team said "you made a mess, you can't be bothered to clean it up and now you want us to help you? No, you need to spend more time in hell." "
I'm clearly not going to spend all of my time posting every thought-out reconsideration I wrote and every request for link removal I sent out on a MoZ message board. I find it a little strange that you'd take shots at our effort, being professionals and spending 50+ hours on it, and then reiterating all the basic steps taken during the process.
I asked for advice, not to have our efforts questioned and ridiculed. I'll just look elsewhere in hopes that another board is more helpful and will actually read the question so that I don't have to repeat myself multiple times.
-
It is only time to throw in the towel if your client doesn't care about the domain name and you don't care about any good links and you want to upset the good sites that linked to you.
You didn't say how you tried to clean up the bad links and you didn't say what you told google.
If you didn't try very hard to clean up and just disavowed, then my guess (which seems obvious after 6 attempts) is that the reconsideration team said "you made a mess, you can't be bothered to clean it up and now you want us to help you? No, you need to spend more time in hell."
So here is what I think you could do.
1. Go to all the same places you went, to find as many links as you can - there may be new ones now that those services didn't see before.
2. check to discover which ones are still in place.
3. If those bad links are NOT pointing to the home page, consider returning 404 or 410 for those pages and change the URL of them - DO NOT 301 redirect to the new page. This will lose the link juice and hopefully, it will be enough, but you should also at least try to get those links removed.
4. If those bad links point to the home page, you need to try much harder to get them removed.
5. You need to thoroughly document all of this.
6. Even if you get all the links removed and you 404 and then rename the pages, probably wait a month before doing another reconsideration, and just before you do it, try again to remove any you couldn't get before, and if that fails, disavow any you didn't disavow before.
7. request a reconsideration and document everything you did, so they can see the amount of effort you put in. Also, you need to tell them what bad links were added and when you stopped doing it, and that you won't do that again, and what your new strategy is - see the next paragraph.
As well as all of the above, immediately add new, high quality content that other people will want to link to, and hope that a competitor doesn't slam your new content with bad links.
If that fails, give up on the domain, unless it is a brand name, in which case, keep adding good content, forget search for now, and buy traffic. Go through 1-7 again in 3 months, 6 months.
-
I probably should have clarified more: they have a manual penalty for link farming. They have a brand new site that doesn't have any duplicate content, sneaky redirects or anything else. It's purely link farming and nothing else at all.
The WMT penalty is shown as Unnatural Inbound Links - Impacts Links, which is a downgrade from their previous penalty, but they're still taking hits on what is now a completely destroyed organic keyword profile.
I've sent in 6 Reconsiderations and have used the tools I mentioned above to find links to no avail (except getting the penalty downgraded). I'm just looking for other ideas as far as where to go from here regarding the manual link penalty.
Basically: Should I keep trying to fight it or throw in the towel? And if I do keep trying to fight it, what do I do next since I've used every tool imaginable?
-
Are their pages buried because they are seen as duplicates?
What happens if you take a chunk of text and search for a quoted copy of it?
Are they the only ones there or are they not there - and in the duplicate results?
And does WMT show a manual penalty?
-
Links were the only issue, but their link profile was massive and poisonous to say the least, haha.
They haven't been completely deindexed, but they don't show up in any non-branded terms anymore. They aren't even ranked 1 for branded terms (their company name). Very, very poorly indexed.
Everything else works fine: fetch as Googlebot, etc. They've just decreased so heavily in the rankings that being deindexed would just about do the same thing at this point.
-
Are you saying that the site is completely deindexed, or that it is just poorly indexed?
Were there other issues, not just the bad links? - such as duplicate content.
Are there technical issues? Does "Fetch as googlebot" work OK?
What did the reconsideration responses say?
Now that you have disavowed, have you tried again to get the links removed?
When you asked for reconsideration, did you detail how you had requested the link removals?
-
I've already progressed in the process to the point where I've disavowed everything that basically isn't Facebook, Google, or hugely credible sites similar to those. They're already doing PPC at the moment to try and account for the near 100% loss in Organic traffic that Google is pummeling them with.
I imagine the PPC representative won't be able to help me with my penalty, but I'm down to give it a shot. Anything at this point really =/
-
I know the end of the rope feeling, this is what I would do if I were in your situation.
I would use every link finding tool I could to find all of the links to their site, majestic, seo moz,ahrefs, everything. Then I would disavow anything that even remotely looks spammy. Next I would set up an adwords account and start advertising, maybe a few hundred dollars. I would let that go on for about a month or so, then I would contact the sales person that Google puts in charge of the account and see if they can do anything before you submit another reconsideration.
-
Any help would be appreciated, thanks!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is SEMrush Going Out Of Business?
We subscribe to both Moz and SEMrush to help administer our sites. However, SEMrush, which used to update our campaigns once per day, hasn't been functioning for over one month now ... and it isn't just our campaigns, people are complaining about their service all over the internet. Still, they haven't posted a single status update on their blog or on any of their social media even though everyone has been complaining about the issue. Emails go unanswered, and when they do answer, their response is that they are having technical issues and will have the problem fixed by Monday ... and they have been saying that for about 6 weeks now with no end in sight. Does anyone know if they are going out of business or are they just completely dropping the ball?
Industry News | | Humanovation0 -
When a company lets you go, what is the standard practice for a moz account? Do you simply turn it over and lose all access and moz identity? Or?
Since MOZ is a community, it seems odd to simply turn over my moz account now the company has let me go. Do people typically do this and simply start a new account every time they work someplace new? Or what? I wanted to seek out what the community thought about this -- so that I would have a better idea of how to handle this now and for the next time.
Industry News | | CCFilson0 -
Are large property portals going to continue to dominate Google's search results?
We are having a discussion (potential argument) in our office around whether large portals (namely property portals) have longevity in Google's search. Argument 1:
Industry News | | NeilPursey
Google's rise in local search and rewarding strong brand names rather than keyword driven domain names will devalue property portals with keyword rich domain names. Property portals are essentially duplicating content on smaller individually owned property websites, therefore in time Google will devalue property portals. **Argument 2: **
Property portals have more property stock listed on their websites so therefore Google will reward them by ranking these websites higher than the smaller real estate agencies with niche stock in their areas that they operate in. The property portals that already are already in a dominate position already carry authority and their own sense of branding, therefore it's difficult for Google to ignore them. If we assume that Google is looking into user behaviour as a ranking factor, then this will help portals as they have more stock which means higher engagement on the website. I'd love to read the moz community thoughts and opinions on this. I reckon it's a worthy debate..0 -
If you could go back in time and build any brands SEO what brand would that be and why?
Ok so yes this my idea of having fun when I think about SEO. For me it would be Coca Cola as they only have fast moving consumer goods and their whole brand just SCREAMS "please take me viral". Maybe Disney or a Gaming company..
Industry News | | ColinWhite2 -
How to go about removing bad/irrelevent links?
We have been made aware of a series of irrelevant links on some rather dodgy sites. http://www.designerdogstop.com/level-static/http://www.bestfirepits.net/some-of-the-best-vacations-for-families/2010/05/05/ http://whatcigarsdoismoke.com/cigar-lighters/cigarette-cigar-2/ http://dollfuss.org/build-bear-hawaii/ Absolute rubbish im sure you will agree. These links must surely be causing our link profile some damage. They are currently wordpress sites with no means of contacting the authors. What ways and means are there of removing these negative pages and links? Cheers all, any help appreciated.
Industry News | | TimHolmes0 -
Does it make sense to go after broad search with less competition vs. narrow search with very high competition?
We are in the process of analyzing our current site structure, on-page optimization and keywords to form a new strategy around our site. What we are finding with the keyword research we’ve done thus far is keywords that are shorter-tail have less competition, but far more searches than some of the long-tail keywords. For purposes of illustration I will give an example. Let's say we sell Wedding Cakes and the keyword string “Garden Wedding” has approximately 246,000 monthly local searches and medium competition, but “Garden Wedding Cakes” only has 880 searches and very high competition. We believe that if we create a very effective landing page for "Garden Wedding" with all kinds of great content surrounding "Garden Wedding" that we have a much better chance of ranking on page 1 than if we were to go after the term "Garden Wedding Cakes". Furthermore, the volume of search far exceeds the "Garden Wedding Cakes" and hopefully will reach a much larger audience. However, because "Garden Wedding" is such a broad term, we are concerned that we don't necessarily understand what folks are searching for vs, when someone types in "Garden Wedding Cakes" we know they are looking for a cake. Here are the questions we have: Targeting broader terms with higher search, has anyone implemented this type of strategy? We think in the long run, this will help us with exposure, but also with help our targeted page of "Garden Wedding Cakes" rank higher (if we can earn a great PR for the page "Garden Wedding". Would we run the risk of creating a higher bounce rate with this strategy for people who are looking specifically for Garden Wedding items/supplies, etc.. Is this a major concern? Could we monetize the effort put into new, rich content surrounding Garden Weddings, when we are in the business to sell Wedding Cakes? Any insight that one can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Industry News | | UrbanityStudios0 -
Reconsideration Request denied for 3rd time!!! - Could Use Some Fresh Eyes Please?
I have read the FAQs and checked for similar issues: YES
Industry News | | LVH
My site's URL (web address) is:http://www.recoveryconnection.org/
Description (including timeline of any changes made):n mid-June, we were penalized. We received a message in WMT that our site was penalized for Doorway Pages, thin content, and pages trying to rank for just 1 KW. 1. We removed all doorway-style pages (according to guidelines) and consolidated content to target no less than 3 KWs per page, and not over-optimized.
2. Submitted first reconsideration request.
3. Denied 8 days later via MSG in WMT that stated simply that the site still did not meet Google's Guidelines.
4. Printed fresh copies of Google's guidelines, and rewrote almost every page of the site. We took down the blog in case of old thin content or possible doorway pages. We reduced the overall size of the site from over 400 pages down to around 80.
5. Submitted 2nd reconsideration request.
6. Denied 10 days later via MSG in WMT that stated simply that the site STILL did NOT meet Google's Guidelines.
7. Restructured site and it's content.
8. Denied 3rd time. http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=43c09330ab7b25b5&hl=en Note: We have checked our link profile over and over, and we have NO Paid links. We have moved our entire site to a new platform, with clean code, new URL structure, etc. Does anyone have any feedback? Thanks.0 -
What is the best SEO Seminar/Training option in the US?
I have 3 years of SEO experience and am an SEO Manager. I am well versed, though much room for growth and education. I want to find an SEO Seminar or training program that best suits my needs. It seems most are a one size fits all seminars. Any recommendations, thoughts or ideas?
Industry News | | dkamen0