Google Places - Advanced Question
-
Hi All,
Ive found multiple threads about previous issues but I haven't found any tailored to my specific question.I know there are a large amount of factors so I wanted to see if any other individuals had ran into this previously.
We are currently in a centralized position in a major city. We are discussing moving the main office about 15 miles away into another city, moving us out of the main city where we have been for the past 3 years. The city where we are currently located has a lot more GEO search volume compared to the new city search terms and variants of.
If we move will our local rankings drop when someone searches in the city where we were previously? How long would it take for this ranking to fall? Or would we still rank because we are moving a short distance away and have a large amount of citations there?
I know we would need to change over all our online directories, on page etc..Any other suggestions on a smooth transition?
I know there are many factors that go into this and any past experience, guidance and/or assistance is greatly appreciated.
Cheers!
-
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the taking the time to provide the valuable insight and information.
A couple of points to add:
“So that I am clear, you are currently in City A which has good ranking/traffic for city A plus keyword.”
This is partially the case, what I am also seeing is that the main URL (www.url.com) is ranking for many head terms (In the 7 Pack). Not including the Geo terms. Which seem to be driving a large percentage of the traffic. So it seems like there may not be much we can do about this, as that ranking in the 7 pack would remove over time. (This is my main concern because it seems to be pushing most of the traffic)
Also in the analytic platform I am seeing that a large majority of the searches are being made near the centralized position of the city. (Very close to our office now)
Since a large majority of the searches are being made from the centralized location would it be worth maintaining another small office in this area? From reading through some of your points seems like even if we don’t have an office in the area we can still rank a local page? But this wouldn’t be in the 7 pack hence a drop in CTR..?
Also just recently I discussed with another individual that had made a similar move. He informed me he communicated directly with Google to change the address as well as get the reviews pushed to the new location. (He said he saw a considerable drop in traffic and rankings in a short period of time) which I'm sure can be from numerous factors, just not sure if you have had similar experience.
Thanks for your assistance.
Sam
-
Thanks for the response and info! I'm going to check out the links to gain a bit more insight.
-
Vadim,
I appreciate what you have given Sam here.
I think the link to David Mihm's post http://moz.com/blog/local-search-moving-locations, is appropriate but I caution Sam not to panic in that SCORE had a major issue which created many of their problems prior to the move. SCORE, had a branding problem - NAME - wherein in Austin and nationwide the name had many variations. That in and of itself (NAP= Name, Address, Phone) played as much if not more of a role in their problems than the move did. What David Mihm gives that is great, is the information on how to address the move at the citation and directory level.
So, good points, but please don't panic Sam.
Best,
-
Sam,
So that I am clear, you are currently in City A which has good ranking/traffic for city A plus keyword.You are concerned that when you move to city B you will lose ranking and traffic in City A.
If this is the case then the answer is yes, no, and maybe. I am not being flippant and I will offer you a way to handle it. Assuming there are good business reasons for the move and it is hard not to do it, then you need a strategy for retaining as much of what you have as possible. So, first and foremost you need to know what url (s) receive your CityA + keyword traffic (as you may need to do redirects after the move and you change the site to take into account the move).
Next, when you move to city b, you want to make sure you take care to handle your Google Places / Google plus correctly. Do not try to keep the old listing as it is a fools errand. Let me say the reason I tell you is that we work with clients who have made every Local / G+ / microsite vs. sub directory mistake known to man. The effort to fix what you will break by trying to have two locations with one not real or to keep the old and not use the new is well beyond benefit if you succeed. If you break this piece and the listings get merged in some way, you can spend a ton of $ and up to a year trying to correct it if you work with a Local pro.
If you look at your current rankings around CityA + KW, you will likely see that if you are in a 7 pack, that url will be different from any url ranking organically. Your concern re traffic, conversions, etc. will be to maintain organic as you will lose the ranking in 7 pack over time (anywhere from a week or two to several months depending on a lot of factors). So, where will that traffic go to? When you create the page(s) for city B + keyword, make sure you your url structure for City A either stays the same or is 301 redirected to new urls for the new CityA + KW url.
Next, if you are not currently using these next few things, they will assist you with maintaining your other rankings for CityA (If you are, keep it up):
Do you have Exif data in the images where you have City A images on the pages? Add it if not.
Do you have a Google maps API in the page with the location? (If the location is not there, put the map with the city only).
Are you using structured markup for place on all the pages for city A? If not, add it.
Pay attention to on-page SEO for city A (and B) + KW. So, url with cityA + KW. Title tag with same and following this convention (IMO): KW | City A | Brand, make sure your H1 has some version of KW and city A and that you have it appropriately in the content, alt text, etc.
The reason for all of this is that any place where you were weak before gives you room to improve with the hope the improvement offsets some of the negatives brought about by being in a different city.I really hope this helps you with the move. I can tell you we have clients who were using all types of devices trying to rank in cities where they were not located. When it was done cleanly, with the City + KW as an individual page/sub-directory and then a contact page with Google Map API as the "local" presence, we have shocked clients that they could be ranked and not be in the city. Understand, we are holistic in our SEO approach in that we believe in getting as close as possible to the holy grail of 100% SEO'd. (All, please no - Google doesn't want perfect SEO, etc. - I've heard it and read it; I also know what has worked in my efforts.)
Best,
Robert
-
Hi Sam,
If we move will our local rankings drop when someone searches in the city where we were previously? Yes, you will have to do much more work to rank for the previous location, being farther away from it. Google Local prefers to rank you locally. It is easier to move to a competitive area and rank well there and have a spill out effect to rank in low-competition areas. But since you are moving from high competition into low competition it will be more work to rank for that.
All the citations will need to be changed as well to match the new NAP. You mentioned you have read previous threads, not sure if you can across this resource for a smooth transition: http://moz.com/blog/local-search-moving-locations
More experience here: http://moz.com/ugc/local-seo-and-moving-business-5-steps-4-lessons
Also do not close your previous listing when moving (plus other experiances): http://www.seroundtable.com/google-places-moving-15176.html
Hope this helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Sitemap and content question
This is our primary sitemap https://www.samhillbands.com/sitemaps/sitemap.xml We have a about 750 location based URL's that aren't currently linked anywhere on the site. https://www.samhillbands.com/sitemaps/locations.xml Google is indexing most of the URL because we submitted the locations sitemap directly for indexing. Thoughts on that? Should we just create a page that contains all of the location links and make it live on the site? Should we remove the locations sitemap from separate indexing...because of duplicate content? #
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | brianvestSitemap Type Processed Issues Items Submitted Indexed --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1 /sitemaps/locations.xml Sitemap May 10, 2016 - Web 771 648 2 /sitemaps/sitemap.xml Sitemap index May 8, 2016 - Web 862 730
0 -
Why Did My Google Crawls Hit A Wall?
Hello, One my the sites I work with, http://www.oransi.com, has seen a significant decrease in crawl Googlebot activity in the last 90 days. See screenshot. This decrease in crawl stats runs in conjunction with less Kb downloaded per day & an increase in how much time it took Google to download a page. The client did just go through a redesign, however that happened on 4/16/15, which was after the decrease in Googlebot activity, so that should not be the issue. Same could be said for the mobilegeddan algorithm change. Any help would be greatly appreciated. 5u1lM6B
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BrandLabs0 -
How to leverage Google Images?
My Google search rankings are improving rapidly at the moment, but a lot of my rankings are for images (presume that means the images are appearing near the top in Google Images). How do I capitalise on that? It's not really much help to me that my images are popular unless it results in traffic to the pages where those images are used. I am running Wordpress so I have the option to have images embed as "no link", "link to attachment page", "link to original image", etc. Is there any advantage of using one of these over the other? I'd really like to set it up so that when a Google Images user clicks "View Image" it loads the attachment page or the host content page rather than the image. Bad SEO? I'm not sure if the fact that I'm using Jetpack Photon CDN image hosting will make this more complicated or not. Tony
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gavin.Atkinson0 -
A few important mobile SEO questions
I have a few basic questions about mobile SEO. I'd appreciate if any of you fabulous Mozzers can enlighten me. Our site has a parallel mobile site with the same urls, using an m. domain for mobile and www. for desktop. On mobile pages, we have a rel="canonical" tag pointing to the matching desktop URL and on desktop pages we have a rel="alternate" tag pointing to the matching mobile URL. When someone visits a www. page using a mobile device, we 301 them to the mobile version. Questions: 1. Do I want my mobile pages to be indexed by Google? From Tom's (very helpful) answers here, it seems that I only want Google indexing the full site pages and if the mobile pages are indexed it's actually a duplicate content issue. This is really confusing to me since Google knows that it's not duplicate content based on the canonical tag. But - he makes a good point - what is the value of having the mobile page indexed if the same page on desktop is indexed (I know that Google is indexing both because I see them in search results. When I search on mobile Google serves the mobile page and when I search on desktop Google serves me the desktop page.)? Are these pages competing with each other? Currently, we are doing everything we can do ensure that our mobile pages are crawled (deeply) and indexed, but now I'm not sure what the value of this is? Please share your knowledge. 2. Is a mobile page's ranking affected by social shares of the desktop version of the same page? Currently, when someone uses the share buttons on our mobile site, we share the desktop url (www. - not m.). The reason we do this is that we are afraid that if people are sharing our content with 2 different url's (m.mysite.com/some_post and www.mysite.com/some_post) the share count will not be aggregated for both url's. What I'm wondering is: will this have a negative effect on mobile SEO, since it will seem to Google that our mobile pages have no shares, or is this not a problem, since the desktop pages have a rel="alternate" tag pointing to mobile pages, so Google gives the same ranking to the mobile page as the desktop page (which IS being shared)?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | YairSpolter0 -
Another footer question
Hi to all, Maybe this question is already answered (in that case sorry) but I didn't find it. Currently, with the latest changes is really useful to have a 'seo footer'. I mean, it seems that can give you more problems that benefits. In my case the idea of the footer is only to obtain more traffic. Having this in mind, I'm right thinking that is better don't write anything ? Thanks in advance
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nsimpson0 -
Google + under Google business domain email account
Hello there, I have a quick and straight question and I am hoping to find answer here. What do we do with a G+ profile that was set up through a business domain's email account that is used by more than one person? We want to use the company name, but we can't as it is considered personal email account although it is under business domain verified by Google. Is there a way that we ask Google to change it and allow us to use the name of the company or should we just deactivate it? Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | montauto0 -
Question about copying content
Hi there, I have had a question from a retailer asking if they can take all our content i.e. blog articles, product pages etc, what is best practice here in getting SEO value out of this? Here a few ideas I was thinking of: I was thinking they put canonical tags on all pages where they have copied our content? They copy the content but leave all anchor text in place? Please let me know your thoughts. Kind Regards
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Paul780 -
Pagination Question: Google's 'rel=prev & rel=next' vs Javascript Re-fresh
We currently have all content on one URL and use # and Javascript refresh to paginate pages, and we are wondering if we transition to the Google's recommended pagination if we will see an improvement in traffic. Has anyone gone though a similar transition? What was the result? Did you see an improvement in traffic?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline0