What happened on September 17 on Google?
-
According to mozcast:
and to my own stats, Google had a pretty strong algorithm update on September 17. Personally I have experienced a drop of about 10% of traffic coming from Google on most of my main e-commerce site virtualsheetmusic.com.
Anyone know more about that update? Any ideas about what changed?
Thank you in advance for any thoughts!
Best,
Fab.
-
Thank you jStrong, I have just posted something on that thread too. I am glad to know I am not alone! I hope we can figure out what happened and possibly tackle the problem.
Thanks!
-
Had something similar happen to a client of ours. On Sept 17 they lost about 85-90% of their organic traffic among all search engines. I mentioned this in a post I added yesterday.
http://moz.com/community/q/loss-of-85-90-of-organic-traffic-within-the-last-2-weeks
Still trying to figure out exactly what happened, but am also curious to see if anyone else ran into similar issues.
-
Thank you guys for your replies and information.
Peter: I understand what you mean and I do understand why it is not possible for MozCast to know which verticals are affected by a particular Google update. What you wrote makes perfectly sense.
Highland: you may be right about the Google Hummingbird, but I see that update was released about 1 month ago whereas I begun having a drop in traffic since September 17th (13 days ago). But we can't exclude it either since looks like my long tail keywords have been mostly affected (see below)...
It is worth noting the following events around the date the drop begun:
1. On September 15 our hosting provider had a major power outage which put our site offline for about 5 hours. I don't think Google cares too much for this since 5 hours it is not a huge down time and never happened for at least the past 3 years, but this happened just 2 days before the drop begun.
2. On September 17 (the day the traffic drop begun), we updated our website page rendering engine to improve our page speed of about 20% (this should be a good thing right?)
Also, I have analyzed the traffic coming to our website from Google and looks like that the most affected section has been our product pages which makes me think that long tail keywords have been mostly affected.
Any more clues?
Thank you again, I really appreciate your insights and thoughts on all this. And, please, if anyone has experienced a similar drop in traffic since September 17, please post it here!
-
It's a bit tricky. MozCast (and other trackers like it, to the best of my knowledge) basically look at how rankings change over time. For MozCast, we track two fixed sets (1K and 10K) of keywords every 24 hours, and then measure how the URLs in the top 10 shift. This is tricky for many reasons:
(1) There are a ton of ways to measure this "flux", all of them valid in different ways.
(2) Baseline flux is very high. I estimate that as many as 80% of queries change daily, to some degree. Google is much more dynamic and real-time than most SEOs think.
(3) "Baseline" flux varies wildly across keywords, based on factors like QDF. I wrote a post about just how extreme this can be (http://moz.com/blog/a-week-in-the-life-of-3-keywords).
Ultimately, we try to gauge to an average, and then look for extreme variations, but the noise-to-signal is extremely high. The reality is that SERPs are change all of the time, not just based on the algorithm, but on changes to sites. Google also makes more than 500 changes per year, so even "algorithm update" is a tough term to define. We're looking for the big ones.
It's important to note, too, that all of the current flux tools are focused solely on organic results and movement of those results (as are most SEOs). We're not looking at how verticals come and go, Knowledge Graph entities, etc. We're actually working on some tools to track these entities more closely. "Hummingbird" is, IMO, going to power these entities and expand them, possibly for months to come.
-
It's possible all these shifts are due to Google Hummingbird, which one person at Google called "the largest rewrite since 2001." This is the month-long rollout they've been talking about.
Still, Hummingbird is more about usability than SEO signals. The biggest shift is in "conversational search" (i.e. "How often has Rand Fishkin shaved his beard off?"). Google is now focused on returning more relevant results to those kinds fo searches. That would explain why temps never spiked. It doesn't seems to have affected generic search terms as much, if at all.
-
Thank you guys for your replies and insights. It is my understanding that MozCast draws its graph based on the number of sites affected by a Google update... is that correct? If so, I deduce that people (or the algorithm) beyond MozCast knows which sites and/or how many sites have been affected by a particular update. If that's the case, and I don't see any different scenario, I assume that we can potentially understand if those affected sites have something in common (are mostly e-commerce websites? News? etc...). That would help us to understand the nature of any update, most of all the major ones since we would have more data to crunch.
Am I wrong with my brainstorming here? I am eager to know your thoughts an this.
Thank you again.
-
Yeah, Robert's right - with 500+ updates, the task of figuring out which spikes really mean something is very difficult. The pattern of 9/17 on MozCast looks more like a traditional update, with a relatively quiet period around a one-day spike, but I don't have a lot more detail on that particular day.
The update Adam mentioned ("Hummingbird") apparently happened "about a month ago", but seems to be tied to semantic search, Knowledge Graph, etc. Google's statements are pretty vague. It's more likely that is related to the 8/20-21 spike spotted by multiple tools and webmasters than the 9/17 spike.
Sorry I can't give you more information. I've seen very little chatter or reports about 9/17, other than what we saw in the tracking data.
-
Earlier today, Google announced an algorithm change that should affect about 90% of search queries. They said this has rolled out over the past month. When more details come out and some people do some more testing, this may have something to do with it.
-
SER had a post a couple of days ago asking just that. I can't say my traffic suffered a lot (in fact, one site seems to have had a small bump in organic traffic) but given than it only got to 86 (100+ seems to indicate major shifts) I'd say it was likely a localized set that got hit. Probably a Panda shift (just a guess, tho).
-
Fabrizo,
I am intrigued whenever I see this question because it seems we notice only when we feel an effect. We handle multiple sites as an agency and I don't see any real "9/17" change across the board and no change that is noticeable for even a single site (I looked at five that I know are more likely to move).
With the mozcast, that is another area I find intriguing in that I respect those at Moz and their understanding of statistics and scientific method; I also scratch my head from time to time as to whether or not the given movement has any overall effect on "most" sites.
When you read the "About Mozcast," and they point out the numbers of algorithmic changes in a year, it is apparent that most won't have an appreciable effect on a given site. Unfortunately, for most of us change to any site we own or manage can have dire consequences so we have to always be vigilant.
I wish I could give you a better answer, good luck,
Robert
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Search Console Not Indexing Pages
Hi there! I have a problem that I was hoping someone could help me with. On google search console, my website does not seem to be indexed well. In fact, even after rectifying problems that Moz's on-demand crawl has pointed out, it still does not become "valid". There are some of the excluded pages that Google has pointed out. I have rectified some of the issues but it doesn't seem to be helping. However, when I submitted the sitemap, it says that the URLs were discoverable, hence I am not sure why they can be discovered but are not deemed "valid". I would sincerely appreciate any suggestions or insights as to how can I go about to solve this issue. Thanks! Screenshot+%28341%29.png Screenshot+%28342%29.png Screenshot+%28343%29.png
Algorithm Updates | | Chowsey0 -
How often does Google review Featured Snippets? What do you think?
Hi, I was wondering if anyone knows how often Google review Featured Snippets and if there is a way to find out? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | Chris29181 -
Changes in Google "Site:" Search Algorithm Over Time?
I was wondering if anyone has noticed changes in how Google returns 'site:' searches over the past few years or months. I remember being able to do a search such as "site:example.com" and Google would return a list of webpages where the order may have shown the higher page rank pages (due to link building, etc) first and/or parent category pages higher up in the list of the first page (if relevant) first (as they could have higher PR naturally, anyways). It seems that these days I can hardly find quality / target pages that have higher page rank on the first page of Google's site: search results. Is this just me... or has Google perhaps purposely scrambled the SERPS somewhat for site: searches to not give away their page ranking secrets?
Algorithm Updates | | OrionGroup1 -
If Google doesn’t know we’re hosted in the UK, does that affect our SERPs?
Hi, In November 2011 our eCommerce website dropped from between 3rd and 4th position in the UK SERPs down to 7th and 8th. A year after this happened, we still haven’t moved back up to the original ranking despite all our best efforts and we’re looking for a bit of insight into what could have happened. One of our theories is this, do you think it might be the problem? In October 2011 we moved from a single-site custom built CMS hosted in the UK to a multi-site custom built CMS hosted on a much better server based in the UK. As part of this move we started using CloudFlare to help with security and performance (CloudFlare is a security CDN). Because CloudFlare’s servers are in the US, to the outside world it almost looks like we went from a slow hosting company in the UK to a much quicker hosting company in the US. Could this have affected our rankings? We know that Google takes the server IP address into account as a ranking factor, but as far as we understand it’s because they (rightly) believe that a server closer to the user will perform better. So a UK server will serve up pages quicker to a visitor in the UK than a US server because the data has a shorter distance to travel. However, we’re definitely not experiencing an issue with being recognised as a UK website. We have a .co.uk domain (which is obviously a big indicator) and if you click on “Pages from the UK” in the SERPs we jump up to 3rd place. So Google seems to know we’re a UK site. Is the fact we’re using CloudFlare and hence hiding our real server IP address – is this penalising us in the SERPs? Currently out of the 6 websites above us, 4 are in the US and 2 are in the UK. All of these are massive sites with lots of links, so smaller ranking factors might be more important for us. Obviously the big downside of not using CloudFlare is that our site becomes much less secure and it becomes much slower. Images and some static content is distributed via a local CloudFlare server, which means it should tick Google’s box in terms of providing a quick site for users. CloudFlare say in a blog post that they used to have Google crawl rates and geo-tagging issues in the past when they were just starting out, but in 2010 they started working with “the big search engines” to make sure they treated CloudFlare like a CDN (so special rules that apply to Akamai also apply to CloudFlare). Since they’ve been working with Google, CloudFlare say that their customers will only see a positive SEO impact. So at the moment we’re at a loss about what happened to our ranking. Google say they take IP’s into account for ranking, but by using CloudFlare it looks like we’re in the US. We definitely know we’re not having geo-tagging issues and CloudFlare say they’re working with Google to ensure its customers aren't seeing a negative impact by using CloudFlare, but a niggling part of us still wonders whether it could impact our SEO. Many thanks, James
Algorithm Updates | | OptiBacUK0 -
Do you think Google is destroying search?
I've seen garbage in google results for some time now, but it seems to be getting worse. I was just searching for a line of text that was in one of our stories from 2009. I just wanted to check that story and I didn't have a direct link. So I did the search and I found one copy of the story, but it wasn't on our site. I knew that it was on the other site as well as ours, because the writer writes for both publications. What I expected to see was the two results, one above the other, depending on which one had more links or better on-page for the query. What I got didn't really surprise me, but I was annoyed. In #1 position was the other site, That was OK by me, but ours wasn't there at all. I'm almost used to that now (not happy about it and trying to change it, but not doing well at all, even after 18 months of trying) What really made me angry was the garbage results that followed. One site, a wordpress blog, has tag pages and category pages being indexed. I didn't count them all but my guess is about 200 results from this blog, one after the other, most of them tag pages, with the same content on every one of them. Then the tag pages stopped and it started with dated archive pages, dozens of them. There were other sites, some with just one entry, some with dozens of tag pages. After that, porn sites, hundreds of them. I got right to the very end - 100 pages of 10 results per page. That blog seems to have done everything wrong, yet it has interesting stats. It is a PR6, yet Alexa ranks it 25,680,321. It has the same text in every headline. Most of the headlines are very short. It has all of the category and tag and archive pages indexed. There is a link to the designer's website on every page. There is a blogroll on every page, with links out to 50 sites. None of the pages appear to have a description. there are dozens of empty H2 tags and the H1 tag is 80% through the document. Yet google lists all of this stuff in the results. I don't remember the last time I saw 100 pages of results, it hasn't happened in a very long time. Is this something new that google is doing? What about the multiple tag and category pages in results - Is this just a special thing google is doing to upset me or are you seeing it too? I did eventually find my page, but not in that list. I found it by using site:mysite.com in the search box.
Algorithm Updates | | loopyal0 -
How do you get photo galleries indexed on Google News?
I work for a news site and some of our photo galleries get indexed by Google News while others never do. I'm trying to determine why some are more successful than others even though they all follow the same guidelines regarding keyword-rich headlines & copy, h1s, etc. When comparing what's been indexed in the past with current galleries, there doesn't appear to be an obvious pattern. Can anyone share some insight into this?
Algorithm Updates | | BostonWright0 -
How To Rank High In Google Places?
Hello SEOmoz, This question has been hounding me for a long time and I've never seen a single reliable information from the web that answers it. Anyway here's my question; Supposing that there are three Google places for three different websites having the same categories and almost same keywords and same district/city/IP how does Google rank one high from the other? Or simply put if you own one of those websites and you would want to rank higher over your competitors in Google places Search results how does one do it? A number of theories were brought up by some of my colleagues: 1. The age of the listing 2. The number of links pointing to the listing (supposing that one can build links to ones listing) 3. The name/url of the listing, tags, description, etc. 4. The address of the listing. 5. Authority of the domain (linked website) You see some listings have either no description, and only one category and yet they rank number one for a specific term/keyword whereas others have complete categories, descriptions etc. If you could please give me a definite answer I will surely appreciate it. Thank you very much and more power!
Algorithm Updates | | LeeAnn300 -
Why would my keywords never ranking in Bing but have great position in both Google and Yahoo?
I have several keywords ranking top 5 for Google and Yahoo but nothing from Bing. Any ideas?
Algorithm Updates | | CIEEwebTeam0