What would be considered a bad ratio to determine Index Bloat?
-
I am using Annie Cushing's most excellent site audit checklist from Google Docs. My question concerns Index Bloat because it is mentioned in her "Index" tab.
We have 6,595 indexed pages and only 4,226 of those pages have received 1 or more visits since January 1 2013.
Is this an acceptable ratio? If not, why not and what would be an acceptable ratio? I understand the basic concept that "dissipation of link juice and constrained crawl budget can have a significant impact on SEO traffic." [Thanks to Reid Bandremer http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2013/04/08/fifteen-minute-seo-health-check/#sr=g&m=o&cp=or&ct=-tmc&st=(opu%20qspwjefe)&ts=1385081787]
If we make this an action item I'd like to have some idea how to prioritize it compared to other things that must be done. Thanks all!
-
Hi EGOL,
Wow, thank you so very much. This is one of the best answers I've ever received, probably the best, here in Q & A. Your thoughtful comments and suggestions are so appreciated. Honestly, you gave me a check list of things that have potential to be pure gold for us if we act on them.
Yes, you are correct, this is the site that had many issues with content being under tabs. It's also got a tremendous amount of duplicate and thin content issues, in addition to orphaned pages. Progress has been coming along, slowly and surely, but having your comments, and having them be so specific, pointed and concise are something I can take to my team and say "Here's an awesome check list of things that we can actually address right now, without re-platforming the site [you know, there are always people who think that the root of all a site's problems is the platform that it's on...pure mythology]."
I hope many others find your check list useful. Combined with Annie's audit spreadsheet in Google docs, I feel like I have the tools I need to go to battle and help this site fulfill its potential. Nearly every point you mentioned struck a chord. Better yet, now that I know my way around the "guts" of this homegrown CMS, I feel like I can actually make the necessary changes.
Egol, I really can't thank you enough.
-
I totally agree Keri. Every word Egol wrote , to me, is worth its weight in gold. I think this may be the best response I have ever received here in Q & A.
-
If only people realized how much good information members drop in Q&A...
Once again, thanks for this EGOL!
-
From my experience, that is a frightening number of pages that have not received a visit. I would definitely be taking some type of action. This hits to me like a site in very bad health. I have lots of little pages on a weak little site that get a lot more traffic than none since January. This would be high on my priority list of things to solve. Solving this could bring major income so this is potential opportunity as much as it is a problem.
To diagnose, I would check.... I know you and suspect that you have looked at all of these but just making a list, just in case.
A) Duplicate content problem? Does this site have lots of pages with very similar other pages on the same site. Does the company have another site that is running the same product descriptions? Does the site run product descriptions that are used from a datafeed supplied to vendors? Are affiliates using the same content? Have other websites stolen the content?
B) Have you been scraped and republished by a strong website? Just one is all it would take. A strong site was once scraping and republishing some of my short content pages and that killed the traffic into a section of my site. As soon as I asked them to stop traffic was back within days. One site can hurt you like that or numerous small sites - even minor sites in Asia can do this.
C) Lots of thin content? Do you have a lot of pages that might only have two or three unique sentences? Google could be disrespecting your entire site because of this.
D) Technical problem? I would be looking at robots.txt and .htaccess, noindex, badly coded links, content management system causing duplicated title tags or other problems? Faulty analyitics that make it look like these pages are not getting traffic when really they are.
E) Content cannibalization? Lots of separate pages for red widgets that are being filtered from the SERPs.
F) Inadequate linkjuice? This is not a huge site but not a small one. Does it have a nice amount of linkjuice coming in?
G) Does this site have pages that are really deeeeep down in the linkstructure? Many clicks down? Fix that either with a new linkstructure or some kickass powerful links that hit nodes deep in the site to force spiders down. I would solve with linkstructure.
H) This isn't the site that had all of the content behind tabs that I remember from a while ago? (My memory is really bad so it might not even be your site.) If you have pages like that I would get rid of those tabs immediately. I have a personal opinion that Google does not treat content hidden behind tabs as well as content that is out in the open.
I) Are there a lot of other sites - strong ones - publlishing very similar pages - like product description pages - competing for the same keywords. If that is the case you could be crowded out of the SERPs and receiving no traffic on these pages.
J) Does this site have a bad history? Does it have something that might be causing a penalty or filtering?
After doing all of that you might have something that is really worth fixing. If you can't identify the problem I would be slashing, hatcheting those pages from the site right away.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google is indexing our old domain
We changed our primary domain from vivitecsolutions.com to vivitec.net. Google is indexing our new domain, but still has our old domain indexed too. The problem is that the old site is timing out because of the https: Thought on how to make the old indexing go away or properly forward the https?
Technical SEO | | AdsposureDev0 -
Google Indexing of Site Map
We recently launched a new site - on June 4th we submitted our site map to google and almost instantly had all 25,000 URL's crawled (yay!). On June 18th, we made some updates to the title & description tags for the majority of pages on our site and added new content to our home page so we submitted a new sitemap. So far the results have been underwhelming and google has indexed a very low number of the updated pages. As a result, only a handful of the new titles and descriptions are showing up on the SERP pages. Any ideas as to why this might be? What are the tricks to having google re-index all of the URLs in a sitemap?
Technical SEO | | Emily_A0 -
What is the best way to stop a page being indexed?
What is the best way to stop a page being indexed? Is it to implement robots.txt at a site level with a Robots.txt file in the main directory or at a page level with the tag?
Technical SEO | | cbarron0 -
How much time for re-indexing ?
I was just checking Google Webmaster tools and I found 102 duplicate title pages. Just fixed them all now.
Technical SEO | | monali123
Shall I re-submit the site map again or how do we tell Google about the changes and then how much time does it take for them to clear SERPS cache and re-index re-count ?0 -
Omitting URLs from XML Sitemap - Bad??
Hi all, We are working on an extremely large retail site with some major duplicate content issues that we are in the process of remedying. The site also does not currently have an XML sitemap. Would it be advisable to create a small XML sitemap with only the main category pages for the time being, and then after our duplicate content issues are resolved, uploading the complete sitemap? Or should we wait to upload anything until all work is complete down to the product page level and canonicals are in place? Will uploading a incomplete sitemap be fraudulent or misleading in the eyes of the search engines and prompt a penalty, or would having at least the main pages mapped while we continue work be okay? Please let me know if more info is needed to answer! Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | seo320 -
301 redirect from root to /index.aspx
I have taken over the SEO for www.domain.net. The way i've inherited the setup is that www.domain.net is 301 redirected to www.domain.net/index.aspx Looking at top pages and linking root domains in Opensiteexplorer I can see that www.domain.net/index.aspx has 1,006 linking root domains www.domain.net has 806 linking root domains. I assume that www.domain.net is passing the value of it's 806 domain links to www.domain.net/index.aspx via the 301 redirect and because of this would expect www.domain.net/index.aspx to be the strongest page on the site and be the url that ranks in the listings for many relevant searches. It appears however that www.domain.net is what is shown in listings and not www.domain.net/index.aspx ?? Can anyone explain why this might be?? If I do a site: search in Google then www.domain.net is indexed and not www.domain.net/index.aspx ??
Technical SEO | | QubaSEO0 -
Javascript bad for SEO?
If we utilize javascript to pull information from a database to display on a site, is that bad for SEO? Can search engines still see the data?
Technical SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
Can spammy links affect indexing?
Meaning, if you have a lot of bad quality links (directories, blog comments) that are giving great rankings for some terms (on a homepage of a site), could the low quality of these links negatively affect the crawling frequency of interior pages or perhaps even give interior pages a ranking penalty?
Technical SEO | | qlkasdjfw0