Link Placement and Trust
-
Hey all
I am looking at a new SEO campaign and am just starting to have a look at the competition and their links. This is a client in the website design industry who operates in a given city in the UK. Taking a quick look, the competition seems well established and there is plenty of companies ranking on the first page for all of the key terms.
When I start to dig a little deeper though it gets a little more interesting and this maybe relatively unique to this industry but I think it also applies to spam links and any company that supplies white label website based services.
Basically, the competition have lots of links. I have reviewed the top 10 competing sites across various terms and there is no shortage of links and lots of anchor text variations. Here is the stats from open site explorer for the one site that commonly comes up again and again.
Page Level 61 - Page Authority 6.78 - mozRank 6.13 - mozTrust 30,144 - Total Links 30,064 - External Followed Links 33 - Internal Followed Links 325 - Linking Root Domains
Domain Level 53 - Domain Authority 5.13 - Domain mozRank 5.10 - Domain mozTrust 47,969 - Total Links 44,788 - External Followed Links
So, this gives us lots of nice metrics and the new deep analysis tool in keyword research easily allows us to get some more data on what exactly is driving the ranking of this site and the others who all rank in a similar way.
Link Quality
This is where it gets a bit more interesting and this applies to all the sites in the first ten results for the various keywords we are interested in (general keywords for the homepage at this stage).
The links are primarily domain wide and in the footer. They are things like:
website designed by x
web design by x
website design
website design in <area name="">
<area name=""> website design
(you get the picture)Quality vs Quantity
So, whilst the competitors have lots of links, from a reasonable number of sites, they are pretty much all site wide footer links. This is fairly clear when we look at total links 30,000 from only 300 sites.
My thinking here is that the quality of these links is not that great:
- poorly positioned on the page
- domain wide
- narrow anchor text and in some cases no 'click to visit' type links
Content
These sites are pretty much all dull as hell. Service pages, clients, jobs done, maybe a case study but really, nothing I would really class as interesting (hence only links from their clients sites hey).
So, my question is
Has anyone built a campaign with quality vs quantity? Do you have any tips, experience or feedback? Our strategy will be built around great content, promotion of that content and much more (not explored that) but at the foundation it will be a content and promotion strategy.
Really, if I break it down, I am looking at the above as 300 links, from the footers of various sites. If we were to get 300 links from quality sources and then bulk it out with some similar footer style links from the clients clients (they are not 100% keen on this so we may not go that route yet) then... these established big boys really should not be too difficult to topple in my mind given enough time, content and effort.
What are your thoughts people? Anyone conducted a quality vs quantity campaign like this? Any feedback?
Cheers
MarcusP.S. SEOMoz - is there any chance that a link trust or quality metric could be built into the tools at some point in the future as sheer volume, is not always the best indicator and as times goes on I would imagine that to be even more true.
-
Thanks for the great feedback in the P.S. - we really appreciate it!
Did you know we have a feature request forum? It's a great place to share your ideas. Other people can vote on them and it will help us determine priorities. You should check it out: http://seomoz.zendesk.com/forums
Thanks!
Keri
-
This seems to be a useful resource on the different value of links and ties in well with my 300 quality links should outweigh 300 site wide footer links:
Search Engines Valuation of Links http://www.seomoz.org/blog/10-illustrations-on-search-engines-valuation-of-links
I guess I did not phrase the original question all that well and I guess what I am looking for is some kind of metric for footer links and site wides. Is a footer link worth maybe 10% of link in the content of a page? Does a sitewide links value degrade over X links?
I am not even sure it matters and I can guess and will feed back over a period of months, maybe it is a great piece of content / study to publish to the site but the part of my nature just wants some way to make this work on a spreadsheet.
-
Hey Buddy, thanks for the answer.
I guess what I am looking for is some kind of metric to structure my campaign around.
I am thinking the best I can do at the moment is to go for 300 quality links as there are 300 linking sites to the #1's but would love to hear if anyone has put this into practice in anyway and what if any lessons they learned along the way.
Cheers
Marcus -
Hey Sha, yeah, I have read a bunch of that, and I know it's the general consensus, but I was wondering if anyone had any quality vs. quantity experience - that is, have you conducted a campaign to pitch quality against quantity?
These guys rank well, for competitive terms, so the approach works. Equally, the moz tools only look at volume and the overall quality of the linking site and page and in no way asses the value of the link with regards to it's placement on the page or repetition across the site.
You had any experience with this? Was wondering about a metric or a way to topple this approach and would love to hear your feedback.
-
I have read many times that footer links hold less value than links mentioned in the content areas of pages and posts, but that does not mean they do not have reasonable value. When coming from a site with a higher value of trust, these links will have even more juice.
If somebody offered me a mixed amount of anchor text from 300 different footer links with differing IP"s, I would take them in a heartbeat(as long as they are from reliable and trust worthy sites of course.)
The great thing is, you know how the link building has been done for your competition, and now the real work begins.
While there are no guarantees as there are many factors beyond links, you most likely have an excellent shot at getting your client to the top if you put in the effort.
-
Hi Marcus,
There is a general belief that Google and probably other search engines can generally identify and ignore credit links and that part of this is attributed to location on the page. Footer links are the most obvious of these.
If you search Google Webmaster Central for references to credit links in footer or footer link value, you will find quite a lot of discussion of this.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does a nofollow link from a high DA site count towards trust?
I've been checking out competitors through the 'link intersect function in my Moz account. Many have got nofollow links from high DA websites. I understand that nofollow links do not count count as a backlink, but will they add towards the trust factor?
Link Building | | ThorUK0 -
Do links from between common sites you run count as "bad" links?
Hi everyone,
Link Building | | AMA-DataSet
Iv recently been asked to review a group of sites. There are 3 sites, each of these sites has a link to the other two sites within the footer or the navigation.
These site are about a similar topic each provides a different perceptive or aims at a specific section of the industry so its not like the links are to irreverent sites. However because the links are in a global section they are repeated thousands of times on each site and count for a large proportion of the link profile to each site, I don't think this is good practise and I want to remove them or at least add a no-follow but my client insists they are relevant to each other and doesn't not want the links removing. What would be best in this situation? remove them? no-follow them? or leave them? Thank you in advance,
Liam0 -
When do my links show up?
For the last two weeks I have been working on linkbuilding. I have downloaded competitors link reports and started contacting or submitting links. In the last two weeks I have gotten about 50-60 or so. In the newest report it shows I went up four c-blocks. Why is that? It is kind of discouraging.
Link Building | | EcommerceSite0 -
How to beat This with Links?
Hello, So i am trying to beat this website gujratdetectives.com/ with a new website which has no backlinks as of now.
Link Building | | hardik_hrc
Now, I checked in open explorer that this site has many moderate level links. No high authority links but the problem is these links they all have title as the search keyword "detective in Gujarat" so maybe this is why this site rests on the top of this search keyword. So if building authority links into a different domain(Not detective related) with very high PR but WITHOUT title of relevancy. Anchor text would be the keyword but not the title of page. So the question is will those authority sites beat this gujratdetectives.com/ ???0 -
How many links is too many?
I know this is a bit of a difficult one to answer but would appreciate some opinions.
Link Building | | Entrusteddev0 -
Link building
Hello all ! I would love some opinions about one Link Building technical aspect from SEOs, link builders ... How important is the number of outgoing links on the page you have the opportunity to place a link ? (from a scale of 1-10 / what about where dose this factor fits overall with your check list , as important to consider as far as link building) Would you place a link on a page with 200+ outgoing external links if the page is ok (not involved in selling links, all links are related with the subject, target page, anchor text etc) or you would go with a link on a 10-15 links per page but not that 'powerful' and not that related (not spammy but more general on the subject that can contain links to some other non related resources). Eg: Option 1: www.whatever-name.com/links.html the entire domain is about x. It has 250 links in that page (in the links.html) all links on the links.html pages are somehow related / resources with x. Your link can be placed with an anchor text related with x that will target a page on your site related with x. Domain page rank : 6 (as a general indicator), Page PR, the links.html one, PR: 2 Option 2: www.some-other-name.com/x-is-so-great the entire domain is NOT about x, just the page. It has 5..10 links in that page (external links more or less related with x - but not spammy) Your link can be placed with an anchor text related with x that will target a page on your site related with x. Domain page rank : 3 (as a general indicator), Page PR, the links.html one, PR: 1 What's your best option ? Thanks !
Link Building | | eyepaq1 -
Total Links vs Ext. Followed Links
Hi I'm fairly new to SEO and SEOMOZ. I've created a campaign for my own site and I've added 3 competitor sites. There are 1,385 total links to my site and a massive 49,450 links to one of my competitor's site. However under "Ext. Followed Links", there are 1,045 to my site and only 911 to the same competitor site. Am I correct that it is the "Ext. Followed Links" which are more important from an SEO point of view as the other links have the "no follow" attribute set? Or have I got this wrong? Thanks James
Link Building | | avecsys0 -
Would you truste this link building buissness ?
http://www.actuallyrank.com/85.php i am working on french site and i don't have a tone of budjet. would you truste this link building buissness ?
Link Building | | martinLachapelle0