Acquired Old, Bad Content Site That Ranks Great. Redirect to Content on My Site?
-
Hello. my company acquired another website. This website is very old, the content within is decent at best, but still manages to rank very well for valuable phrases. Currently, we're leaving the entire site active on its own for its brand, but i'd like to at least redirect some of the content back to our main website. I can't justify spending the time to create improved content on that site and not our main site though.
What would be the best practice here?
1. Cross-domain canonical - and build the new content on our main website?
2. 301 Redirect Old Article to New Location containing better article
3. Leave the content where it is - you won't be able to transfer the ranking across domain.
Thanks for your input.
-
Thanks Andy and Travis -
Yeah, I think the enhancement and/or citation route is probably the safest for us. Thanks for your help!
-
It would be best to lightly revamp the poor content on site that is ranking for the important key terms you are targeting. In doing so why not just write a lead in or make reference to something on your main website to encourage click through traffic. By doing this, you will likely help to maintain the good rankings for the new 'junk' site while generating referral traffic to your main site. Additionally, a site ranking well for your target terms linking to your main site could be beneficial to your rankings.
-
Hi Blenny,
What you have to think abut is that Google say never lead someone to a page, only for them to be redirected to somewhere they don't expect. Never try to bypass that.
However, there is no reason not to add some annotation to the post and link this to your current site, or even to a better blog post. Perhaps move away from links and just use co-citations and mentions.
-Andy
-
Thanks Bill -
You're exactly right - I'm definitely not considering redirecting the entire site for the reasons you point out - there ARE some shady practices to the product pages in particular.
What I'm wondering though is if I can at least gleam some content authority from individual articles and such?
-
Blenny, I would be extremely cautious about redirecting another site to your site, even if it's ranking well now. There are a lot of issues that you need to consider, especially given the fact that all of the factors (links, history, content issues, etc.) are going to be passed on to the new site.
You'll need to look at the site's link profile in depth to make sure that the site isn't ranking well for a particular reason. The site could be ranking well right now because of certain links to the site: but Google, for example, has not penalized those links yet. I've seen sites that have a lot of low quality links that help a site rank: but when Google gets around to re-analyzing the site (i.e., Google Penguin), the site then literally falls out of the rankings and becomes penalized.
If it's a new site that you recently bought, are you sure the former site owner didn't just pump up the site's rankings in order to sell it? Perhaps they used techniques that would eventually get the site penalized?
I don't like to sound pessimistic here, but you have to look in depth into the site before you redirect it to your current site. Your current site could end up banned or could end up with a penalty, especially given the fact that you say that the content isn't that great.
-
Just to clarify the whole 'bad' content thing. The content is outdated but was good in its day..and did acquire links. It needs updated and improved..which I am prepared to do.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
When does updating site content affect SERPS?
Can any of you shine a light as to when updating content on a website had any effect on its 'general' placement in the search engines? I appreciate that for an online newspaper, it must be important, but has anyone noticed from theirs or a client's site that by not uploading i.e. product descriptions or articles in general, that their site has taken a hit?
On-Page Optimization | | SDavis110 -
To redirect or not to redirect...That is the question
We have old product data that is being updated (approx 30k sku's). Most of the old pages have been indexed and drive the majority of our online sales. But, the updated products have different titles, H1's, etc and have been re-formatted for the better in terms of usability. So, should we redirect thousands of pages to the new pages? Will Google be ok with that?...or should we reformat the current url's with the new data? And, if we reformat current url's with new data...the fear is that the on-page elements that the pages are being pick up for will get wiped out, (be it the H1 in some cases or the title or alt tag for another, etc) because it's simply too much to retain them during the import. Please share
On-Page Optimization | | nisvision0 -
Duplicate Content on our own website
Our website sells tickets for events. We also have an news articles section with information about events / artists / venues. From time to time we release a product page and a related news article on a separate page. Some of the content in the news article would be perfect for our product page. Essentially its our product page we want too rank. Would it harm our SEO if we had some of the same content on both of these pages?
On-Page Optimization | | Alexogilvie0 -
Help With Duplicated Content
Hi Moz Community, I am having some issue's with duplicated content, i recently removed the .html from all of our links and moz has reported it as being duplicated. I have been reading up about Canonicalization and would to verify some details, when using the canonical tag would it be placed in the /mywebpage.html or /mywebpage file? I am having a hard time to sort this out so any help from you SEO experts would be great 🙂 I have also updated my htaccess file with the following Thanks in advance
On-Page Optimization | | finelinewebsolutions0 -
Duplicate Content
Hi I have Duplicate content that i do sent understand 1 - www.example.dk 2- www.example.dk/ I thought i was the same page, whit and without the / Hope someone can help 🙂
On-Page Optimization | | seopeter290 -
Footers... Good or Bad?
I know in the past footers have been seen as a bad idea. I need to get up to date. Does having footer links that point to your own site with anchor texts keywords create problems? or is it safe to have? Will it do anything to our google rankings? Is it going to penalize us? As well, how many is acceptable, do I want all 77 links or have 15 with sub-categories?
On-Page Optimization | | HCGDiet0 -
What to do with old content in light of the Panda update?
Let's say you operate a laptop review website. After several years, the individual product review URL's (like site.com/dell/xp1234-review/) aren't receiving much traffic, they may have a few links here and there. In general and considering the panda update, would the best option be to 301 the old URL's back to the category page (site.com/dell/)or just keep them where they are? Any potential issues like having excessive 301's which could slow down the site or appear fishy to search engines?
On-Page Optimization | | BryanPhelps-BigLeapWeb0 -
Would it be bad to change the canonical URL to the most recent page that has duplicate content, or should we just 301 redirect to the new page?
Is it bad to change the canonical URL in the tag, meaning does it lose it's stats? If we add a new page that may have duplicate content, but we want that page to be indexed over the older pages, should we just change the canonical page or redirect from the original canonical page? Thanks so much! -Amy
On-Page Optimization | | MeghanPrudencio0