Eligible To Rank For Few Queries
-
I can't figure out why this site (www.liveathomeseniors.com) is eligible for so few search queries on Google Webmaster Tools. I know there is a lot of work to be done, but this is my biggest puzzle right now. What am I not seeing? 379 pages are indexed and yet the site is has only been deemed eligible to rank for 3 queries over the past 3 months. Is it all the repetition in the way the content has been structured?
I'd appreciate people's thoughts on this. I can't see the forest for the trees.
Donna
-
Thank you EGOL and Chris Menke. Very helpful. Much appreciated.
-
Yes, "eligible to rank" and "competitive enough to rank" are the key differences.
This site is not competitive enough to rank for the very very general terms that are in the title tags of the posts.
Plus, as I pointed out above this site has a lot of very very thin content and that could have its rankings reduced because of a panda problem.
Getting to actionable items... If this was my site I would....
-
delete all of the pages that have just a few sentences and a link to another website... and stop creating them
-
start writing posts that focus on very specific topics that will not face enormous competition and have title tags that consist of a few very common words
-
any post that I did write would be deep, substantive, beefy content
And, I would evaluate if search is the best place to get traffic for this type of website. Commiserative topics can pull traffic much more effectively from social media rather than search.... but then you have a community that might be viewed as an alternative to the service that this site seems to be selling.
I don't offer SEO services to others because I am fully committed to my own sites. But if I did offer SEO services and the owner of this site asked me to help, I would decline because I don't see an easy way to bring her ROI.
-
-
This may be just a matter of semantics but when you say "eligible to rank", it sounds a bit odd. GWT shows you the terms for which your site has been present on a search result page that the searcher has viewed. GWT does not determine eligibility--it reflects results determined by the algorithm. If GWT shows that your site is being seen by searchers for only 3 terms, it means that for only three different terms has someone searched and your site was on a result page that they viewed.
GWT would probably show that your site showed up for more search terms if visitors searching for terms relevant to your pages/posts clicked through 20 or 50 or 100 pages of search results--but of course they don't do that, they only click through to page 1 or 2 or 3. The issue we were trying to help you recognize above is that by organizing and choosing your concepts and your keywords better (better optimizing) your other pages will rise from page 20 or 50 or 100 to page 1 or 2 or 3 and thus be seen by more people. When that becomes the case, your GWT will reflect that by showing the additional search terms that the algorithm deemed your pages were worth pushing to the top of the results.
-
"You are in a forest of trees that are really hard to tell apart or in a haystack with so many pieces of hay that getting yours showing up at the top of the search engines is going to be improbable."
-
Moz just prompted me to decide whether my question has been answered or not. I don't think I've been clear in my question.
My question is about Google Webmaster Tools. Why is www.liveathomeseniors.com not eligible to rank for more than just 3 queries? I realize there is much that can be done to improve the site from a SEO perspective, and I can see that the site has been indexed - including a lot of duplicate pages. Yet it only shows up as being eligible to rank for three queries:
- "live at home seniors" with an average ranking of 1
- "seniors living at home" with an average ranking of 40; and
- "indemnity plans" with an average ranking of 450.
I also realize GWT only shows us a sampling of queries, but feel I should be seeing more queries showing up after the site has been in existence for more than year. Any ideas or suggestions as to why this might be happening?
-
In a very simplistic way, Google sees your page something vaguely like the following list. This list indicates the words used on http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/can-family-caregivers-deal-feeling-overwhelmed/ and the number of times they're used. As is normal with most pages, at the top of the list are all the articles and conjunctions, etc. After that, there's usually a grouping of vocabulary that directly relevant to your topic. In this case, I see "family", "overwhelmed", "overwhelm" and "caregiver". With that info, I'll do a couple of other things: 1. look to see how much of the rest of the vocabulary relates directly to any or all of those terms (the more there is, higher the content quality and in this case there is almost none). 2. Look to see how well crafted the page's title tag is 3. Do a search for those terms and see who's competing at the top of the search results for those terms. If you do that search, you'll see the caliber of the pages you're competing against. Overall, pages on the site are only vaguely optimized for search.
With all of that said, the words are still only part of the battle for search visibility. Google also wants to see that people find a site relevant and important for the topics around which it is optimized. Back links and social activity are what you need to make the site strong enough to rise above competitors who are already ranking for your primary terms.
18 i
13 the
12 to
9 you
9 and
8 that
8 of
8 a
7 t
6 was
6 take
6 do
5 time
5 family
4 overwhelmed
4 overwhelm
4 on
4 make
4 feeling
4 didn
4 caregiver
4 care
3 yourself
3 when
3 what
3 self
3 overcome
3 my
3 like
3 jane
3 it
3 in
3 have
3 choices
3 can
3 by
3 buried
2 your
2 winter
2 video
2 something
2 snow
2 see
2 permission
2 out
2 minutes
2 meier
2 me
2 learned
2 if
2 heavy
2 hamilton
2 give
2 for
2 bush
2 be
2 at
2 as
2 action
2 about
1 would
1 with
1 wiser
1 will
1 while
1 we
1 way
1 visiting
1 understand
1 under
1 too
1 times
1 thought
1 this
1 think
1 things
1 there
1 than
1 talk
1 social
1 so
1 since
1 share
1 s
1 remember
1 recognize
1 realize
1 please
1 perhaps
1 path
1 partners
1 own
1 never
1 needed
1 myself
1 more
1 missed
1 maybe
1 many
1 making
1 made
1 lot
1 little
1 link
1 layers
1 laughter
1 joy
1 join
1 irritable
1 importance
1 hope
1 here
1 helpful
1 hadn
1 had
1 given
1 get
1 frustration
1 frantic
1 founder
1 focus
1 find
1 felt
1 feel
1 favorite
1 everything
1 even
1 enjoyment
1 end
1 done
1 don
1 doesn
1 difference
1 deal
1 days
1 day
1 d
1 could
1 control
1 completed
1 click
1 channel
1 caregivers
1 burdened
1 brings
1 blog
1 being
1 before
1 are
1 any
1 an
1 among
1 all
1 agree
1 absolutely -
The highest numbers that I see for my sites in that column is 10. Nice to know that higher numbers are possible.
-
Thanks for sticking with this EGOL.
"A query will be listed in Google Webmaster Tools when you have a page that competes in the top ten on the web for that query."
Then I'm not understanding what "average position" means because on other sites, I'm seeing numbers in that column that range from 1 to 750. Is it the average placement for:
- every page on your your site that's eligible to rank for that term, considering of course, personalization and location;
- every page on any site that's eligible to rank for that term; or
- something else altogether?
I searched GWMT looking for an answer and it's not clear (to me anyway) there either.
-
A query will be listed in Google Webmaster Tools when you have a page that competes in the top ten on the web for that query. Considering two things: 1) the enormous number of websites that compete for the words in the queries that I listed above; and, 2) the small amount of authority possessed by the site that we are discussing, I don't find it surprising that it is only in the top ten for a very small number of queries.
I agree that three is pretty small, but most of the title tags have nothing but extremely common words and that puts them in competition with milllions of other sites. They will not be in the Google Top Ten.
The other possibilities are:
-
the site is extremely weak (this is true in my opinion and it compounds the common keyword problem)
-
the site has a panda problem because of thin content. I found a lot of pages on the site that were really thin content. Here are a few. I could find a lot more.
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/learn-about-home-health-care/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/keep-your-aging-parents-safe-at-home/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/managed-care-at-home/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/why-hire-a-geriatric-care-manager/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/optimal-aging/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/exercise-keeps-aging-brains-healthy-see-more-evidence/
A lot of these types of pages will tank a site. I would stop making them and get rid of the ones that exist.
-
-
Thank you EGOL and Chris Menke for taking the time to look at the site and giving me your thoughtful responses. It's much appreciated.
I realize it's an uphill battle with this site and that the site author is competing with herself in many instances, but I'm wondering why when I look at Google Webmaster Tools (GWMT), she's not even showing up for many search queries. I know GWMT only shows us a sampling, but surely she's eligible to rank for more than just the 3 queries it's showing me now after more than a year in operation. That's why I think I'm missing something.
-
It may seem counter intuitive, but often, the way to get more traffic to a site is to narrow down the topics that you focus on. The broader your topics, the harder it becomes to come across as an authority--and it's all about authority--to your audience and to Google. The topics you cover on your site are broad, diverse and competitive, making the job of being visible for any of them triple tough.
Its nice to be able to write about your passion but when it comes to creating something that you want other people to find in search engines, there's a lot to keep in mind as you're writing. In addition to everything else, you have to think about your competition. With each page you create, you have to carefully consider the key concept you are writing about, what words you are using as your key concept, how reflective of the key concept is the vocabulary used in the body of the copy, how many other authors have also written about such a key concept, and how people actually search for such a key concept. All those things help with your visibility. If you haven't read it yet, this is a good guide on how to do keyword research.
-
I can't see the forest for the trees.
I looked at the title tags of the content and I think that they are in that forest of trees.
For example..... these titles....
What could you do to bring joy to your heart?
Gifts of Family Memories
Medicare Open Enrollment 2013: Part D Prescription Drug
Keeping Your Aging Parents Safe at Home
Learn About Home Health Care
The topics of these blog posts are either: A) composed of very common words that do not distinguish them in search; or, B) go up against an enormous enormous number of other pages on extremely powerful sites with the same words.
You are in a forest of trees that are really hard to tell apart or in a haystack with so many pieces of hay that getting yours showing up at the top of the search engines is going to be improbable.
Pulling in traffic from search with the types of titles that you currently have is going to be very difficult for a small site without a lot of power. To generate traffic from search, in my opinion, will require writing about topics and titles that have some more unique words that still have search volume.
I used to live in a tiny tiny town and someone asked me about getting a brand new site ranked for "gift baskets". There were almost zero customers who would drive to the town to purchase one. That left national search competition to obtain traffic. There are so so so many sites selling gift baskets that the resources required to become competitive would be enormous. Even going after long tail queries would be extremely hard because the web is so flooded with competitors. That, in my opinion, is what you are facing for these "common word" and "massive competition" queries.
Figure out a way to find topics that are not so crowded and competitive. Some of the current blog posts might be able to be retitled or refocused but it is probably better to build from scratch than recreate.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I canonicalize URLs with no query params even though query params are always automatically appended?
There's a section of my client's website that presents quarterly government financial data. Users can filter results to see different years and quarters of financial info. If a user navigates to those pages, the URLs automatically append the latest query parameters. It's not a redirect...when I asked a developer what the mechanism was for this happening, he said "magic." He honestly didn't know how to describe it. So my question is, is it ok to canonicalize the URL without any query parameters, knowing that the user will always be served a page that does have query parameters? I need to figure out how to manage all of the various versions of these URLs.
Technical SEO | | LeahH0 -
Not ranking - Scarped content
Hi, I have a problem with a website, that never compe up with before. The website is: https://www.enallaktikidrasi.com It has a bunch of excellent articles, good enough on-page SEO and a medium backlink profile. However, it is ranking just for very very few keywords. The major problem is that there are original articles that searched by their title won't appear in top100 results but they will appear in other websites that scapre them (even if they give a backlink to our original article!) Also, the website has good rankings in Bing and Yahoo but not in Google. There are keywords ranking in #1 in Bing but nowhere in top10 pages in Google.... I am guessing for 3 issues: 1. Majestic shows a very low trust score (just 13). However, the website has not got any kind of penalty in the last 3 years. 2. There are many scarpers. The odd is that scarpers with no real value outrank our content. (Scarpers with almost zero backlink profile) 3. We ran Sucuri on website as there were a large bots attack. Is there a correlation between it bots attack and Google results? (but why not in Bing and Yahoo too?) It seems like Google underestimates the website when indexing websites for some reason. Moreover, some of the articles are really the best around but the keywords they are targeted are not either within the 30 first pages... Any help?? Thanks..
Technical SEO | | alex33andros0 -
Buying a domain to 301 redirect for increased rankings
A large competitor has recently purchased a large marketing company that specializes in their industry. As a part of this acquisition they obtained ownership of www.digitalsherpa.com, which is now 301 redirecting some 50K links to www.costar.com/. When I did a site:www.digitalsherpa.com search all of the origin URLs had title tags from the costar site in place of their own. My question is: Does this violate Google spam guidelines? search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8&q=site%3Adigitalsherpa.com&oq=site&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j69i65j69i60j0l2.1919j0j7
Technical SEO | | Reis_Inc.0 -
Mobile site not ranking
Hello, Our main site ranks well for all the keyword terms, and yet, our mobile site is buried. It is a "m." configuration, and I am wondering if it is a question of not using the correct programming language to get it there? Or if the redirects to the main site should relate differently? I have tried to read up on the topic of mobile site SEO and cannot find (or understand) the answer? Could someone please help? Thanks so much in advance!
Technical SEO | | lfrazer0 -
# in url affecting rank
Hi I am building links to a page www.companyname.com/category.index.php There is also another similar url www.companyname.com/category.index.php#. This page is linked to from the non # page. This is a new client and I'm not entirely sure why that link is there. Am I correct in thinking that these two urls are different in the eyes of the search engines? If so, would some of the link juice to www.companyname.com/category.index.php be transferred to www.companyname.com/category.index.php# and affect the ranking of the non # page? I hope this makes sense! Thanks
Technical SEO | | sicseo0 -
Best Strategy to Rank Wordpress Category
Does anyone some suggestions for best practices when trying to rank categories using Wordpress? Unless you filter it, a category provides a complete list of all posts in that category. I can add a good title and description but am not sure beyond that. Has anyone tried using a sticky post in the category and putting keyword body text in that? Lookin' for ideas.
Technical SEO | | waynekolenchuk1 -
Sudden ranking drop, no manual action
Sort of a strange situation I'm having and I wanted to see if I could get some thoughts. Here's what has happened... Monday morning, I realized that my website, which had been showing up at the bottom of page 2 for a specific result, had now been demoted to the bottom of page 6 (roughly a 40 spot demotion). No other keyword searches were affected. I immediately figured that this was some sort of keyword-specific penalty that I had incurred. I had done a bit of link building over the weekend (two or three directory type sites and a bio link from a site I contribute to). I also changed some anchor text on another site to match my homepage's title tag (which just so happened to be the exact phrase match I had dropped in) - I assumed this was what got me. I was slowly beginning to climb up the rankings and just got a bit impatient/overzealous. Changed the anchor text back to what it originally was and submitted a reconsideration request on Tuesday. This morning, I get the automated response in Webmaster Tools that no manual action had been taken. So my question is, would this drop have been an automated deal? If that's the case, then it's going to be mighty hard to pinpoint what I did wrong, since there's no way to know when I did whatever it was to cause the drop. Any ideas/thoughts/suggestions to regain my modest original placement?
Technical SEO | | sandlappercreative0 -
PR Ranks
Do they really have a lot of value on how a site performs on Google? What is the best way to raise your PR Rank?
Technical SEO | | CalgaryRealtor390