Eligible To Rank For Few Queries
-
I can't figure out why this site (www.liveathomeseniors.com) is eligible for so few search queries on Google Webmaster Tools. I know there is a lot of work to be done, but this is my biggest puzzle right now. What am I not seeing? 379 pages are indexed and yet the site is has only been deemed eligible to rank for 3 queries over the past 3 months. Is it all the repetition in the way the content has been structured?
I'd appreciate people's thoughts on this. I can't see the forest for the trees.
Donna
-
Thank you EGOL and Chris Menke. Very helpful. Much appreciated.
-
Yes, "eligible to rank" and "competitive enough to rank" are the key differences.
This site is not competitive enough to rank for the very very general terms that are in the title tags of the posts.
Plus, as I pointed out above this site has a lot of very very thin content and that could have its rankings reduced because of a panda problem.
Getting to actionable items... If this was my site I would....
-
delete all of the pages that have just a few sentences and a link to another website... and stop creating them
-
start writing posts that focus on very specific topics that will not face enormous competition and have title tags that consist of a few very common words
-
any post that I did write would be deep, substantive, beefy content
And, I would evaluate if search is the best place to get traffic for this type of website. Commiserative topics can pull traffic much more effectively from social media rather than search.... but then you have a community that might be viewed as an alternative to the service that this site seems to be selling.
I don't offer SEO services to others because I am fully committed to my own sites. But if I did offer SEO services and the owner of this site asked me to help, I would decline because I don't see an easy way to bring her ROI.
-
-
This may be just a matter of semantics but when you say "eligible to rank", it sounds a bit odd. GWT shows you the terms for which your site has been present on a search result page that the searcher has viewed. GWT does not determine eligibility--it reflects results determined by the algorithm. If GWT shows that your site is being seen by searchers for only 3 terms, it means that for only three different terms has someone searched and your site was on a result page that they viewed.
GWT would probably show that your site showed up for more search terms if visitors searching for terms relevant to your pages/posts clicked through 20 or 50 or 100 pages of search results--but of course they don't do that, they only click through to page 1 or 2 or 3. The issue we were trying to help you recognize above is that by organizing and choosing your concepts and your keywords better (better optimizing) your other pages will rise from page 20 or 50 or 100 to page 1 or 2 or 3 and thus be seen by more people. When that becomes the case, your GWT will reflect that by showing the additional search terms that the algorithm deemed your pages were worth pushing to the top of the results.
-
"You are in a forest of trees that are really hard to tell apart or in a haystack with so many pieces of hay that getting yours showing up at the top of the search engines is going to be improbable."
-
Moz just prompted me to decide whether my question has been answered or not. I don't think I've been clear in my question.
My question is about Google Webmaster Tools. Why is www.liveathomeseniors.com not eligible to rank for more than just 3 queries? I realize there is much that can be done to improve the site from a SEO perspective, and I can see that the site has been indexed - including a lot of duplicate pages. Yet it only shows up as being eligible to rank for three queries:
- "live at home seniors" with an average ranking of 1
- "seniors living at home" with an average ranking of 40; and
- "indemnity plans" with an average ranking of 450.
I also realize GWT only shows us a sampling of queries, but feel I should be seeing more queries showing up after the site has been in existence for more than year. Any ideas or suggestions as to why this might be happening?
-
In a very simplistic way, Google sees your page something vaguely like the following list. This list indicates the words used on http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/can-family-caregivers-deal-feeling-overwhelmed/ and the number of times they're used. As is normal with most pages, at the top of the list are all the articles and conjunctions, etc. After that, there's usually a grouping of vocabulary that directly relevant to your topic. In this case, I see "family", "overwhelmed", "overwhelm" and "caregiver". With that info, I'll do a couple of other things: 1. look to see how much of the rest of the vocabulary relates directly to any or all of those terms (the more there is, higher the content quality and in this case there is almost none). 2. Look to see how well crafted the page's title tag is 3. Do a search for those terms and see who's competing at the top of the search results for those terms. If you do that search, you'll see the caliber of the pages you're competing against. Overall, pages on the site are only vaguely optimized for search.
With all of that said, the words are still only part of the battle for search visibility. Google also wants to see that people find a site relevant and important for the topics around which it is optimized. Back links and social activity are what you need to make the site strong enough to rise above competitors who are already ranking for your primary terms.
18 i
13 the
12 to
9 you
9 and
8 that
8 of
8 a
7 t
6 was
6 take
6 do
5 time
5 family
4 overwhelmed
4 overwhelm
4 on
4 make
4 feeling
4 didn
4 caregiver
4 care
3 yourself
3 when
3 what
3 self
3 overcome
3 my
3 like
3 jane
3 it
3 in
3 have
3 choices
3 can
3 by
3 buried
2 your
2 winter
2 video
2 something
2 snow
2 see
2 permission
2 out
2 minutes
2 meier
2 me
2 learned
2 if
2 heavy
2 hamilton
2 give
2 for
2 bush
2 be
2 at
2 as
2 action
2 about
1 would
1 with
1 wiser
1 will
1 while
1 we
1 way
1 visiting
1 understand
1 under
1 too
1 times
1 thought
1 this
1 think
1 things
1 there
1 than
1 talk
1 social
1 so
1 since
1 share
1 s
1 remember
1 recognize
1 realize
1 please
1 perhaps
1 path
1 partners
1 own
1 never
1 needed
1 myself
1 more
1 missed
1 maybe
1 many
1 making
1 made
1 lot
1 little
1 link
1 layers
1 laughter
1 joy
1 join
1 irritable
1 importance
1 hope
1 here
1 helpful
1 hadn
1 had
1 given
1 get
1 frustration
1 frantic
1 founder
1 focus
1 find
1 felt
1 feel
1 favorite
1 everything
1 even
1 enjoyment
1 end
1 done
1 don
1 doesn
1 difference
1 deal
1 days
1 day
1 d
1 could
1 control
1 completed
1 click
1 channel
1 caregivers
1 burdened
1 brings
1 blog
1 being
1 before
1 are
1 any
1 an
1 among
1 all
1 agree
1 absolutely -
The highest numbers that I see for my sites in that column is 10. Nice to know that higher numbers are possible.
-
Thanks for sticking with this EGOL.
"A query will be listed in Google Webmaster Tools when you have a page that competes in the top ten on the web for that query."
Then I'm not understanding what "average position" means because on other sites, I'm seeing numbers in that column that range from 1 to 750. Is it the average placement for:
- every page on your your site that's eligible to rank for that term, considering of course, personalization and location;
- every page on any site that's eligible to rank for that term; or
- something else altogether?
I searched GWMT looking for an answer and it's not clear (to me anyway) there either.
-
A query will be listed in Google Webmaster Tools when you have a page that competes in the top ten on the web for that query. Considering two things: 1) the enormous number of websites that compete for the words in the queries that I listed above; and, 2) the small amount of authority possessed by the site that we are discussing, I don't find it surprising that it is only in the top ten for a very small number of queries.
I agree that three is pretty small, but most of the title tags have nothing but extremely common words and that puts them in competition with milllions of other sites. They will not be in the Google Top Ten.
The other possibilities are:
-
the site is extremely weak (this is true in my opinion and it compounds the common keyword problem)
-
the site has a panda problem because of thin content. I found a lot of pages on the site that were really thin content. Here are a few. I could find a lot more.
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/learn-about-home-health-care/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/keep-your-aging-parents-safe-at-home/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/managed-care-at-home/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/why-hire-a-geriatric-care-manager/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/optimal-aging/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/exercise-keeps-aging-brains-healthy-see-more-evidence/
A lot of these types of pages will tank a site. I would stop making them and get rid of the ones that exist.
-
-
Thank you EGOL and Chris Menke for taking the time to look at the site and giving me your thoughtful responses. It's much appreciated.
I realize it's an uphill battle with this site and that the site author is competing with herself in many instances, but I'm wondering why when I look at Google Webmaster Tools (GWMT), she's not even showing up for many search queries. I know GWMT only shows us a sampling, but surely she's eligible to rank for more than just the 3 queries it's showing me now after more than a year in operation. That's why I think I'm missing something.
-
It may seem counter intuitive, but often, the way to get more traffic to a site is to narrow down the topics that you focus on. The broader your topics, the harder it becomes to come across as an authority--and it's all about authority--to your audience and to Google. The topics you cover on your site are broad, diverse and competitive, making the job of being visible for any of them triple tough.
Its nice to be able to write about your passion but when it comes to creating something that you want other people to find in search engines, there's a lot to keep in mind as you're writing. In addition to everything else, you have to think about your competition. With each page you create, you have to carefully consider the key concept you are writing about, what words you are using as your key concept, how reflective of the key concept is the vocabulary used in the body of the copy, how many other authors have also written about such a key concept, and how people actually search for such a key concept. All those things help with your visibility. If you haven't read it yet, this is a good guide on how to do keyword research.
-
I can't see the forest for the trees.
I looked at the title tags of the content and I think that they are in that forest of trees.
For example..... these titles....
What could you do to bring joy to your heart?
Gifts of Family Memories
Medicare Open Enrollment 2013: Part D Prescription Drug
Keeping Your Aging Parents Safe at Home
Learn About Home Health Care
The topics of these blog posts are either: A) composed of very common words that do not distinguish them in search; or, B) go up against an enormous enormous number of other pages on extremely powerful sites with the same words.
You are in a forest of trees that are really hard to tell apart or in a haystack with so many pieces of hay that getting yours showing up at the top of the search engines is going to be improbable.
Pulling in traffic from search with the types of titles that you currently have is going to be very difficult for a small site without a lot of power. To generate traffic from search, in my opinion, will require writing about topics and titles that have some more unique words that still have search volume.
I used to live in a tiny tiny town and someone asked me about getting a brand new site ranked for "gift baskets". There were almost zero customers who would drive to the town to purchase one. That left national search competition to obtain traffic. There are so so so many sites selling gift baskets that the resources required to become competitive would be enormous. Even going after long tail queries would be extremely hard because the web is so flooded with competitors. That, in my opinion, is what you are facing for these "common word" and "massive competition" queries.
Figure out a way to find topics that are not so crowded and competitive. Some of the current blog posts might be able to be retitled or refocused but it is probably better to build from scratch than recreate.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
My site ranking has dropped in recent 2 weeks ?
I have a quick question to ask you guys,
Technical SEO | | Mustansar
I have my site (www.webuycarstoday.co.uk) It used to rank very well for all my target keywords. But recently all keywords dropped massively. I can't seems to find a good reason of this drop. We have not change anything which may have caused such drop.
Any suggestion or advice to get into the problem. I would appreciate your kind responses.0 -
How do we build rank on a domain with an offsite blog?
We have a site (domain y) that we'd like to integrate a blog into but our team doesn't have the bandwidth to do this. So, we've been exploring the option of building the blog in WP and hosting on a separate domain (domain x) and redirecting from domain y to it. My concern is how this affects or undermines rank value on domain y (effectively all the value from the blog resides on the blog domain x). How might we go about integrating an offsite blog into the core domain while maintaining search value? Is there a way? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | J-Me0 -
Migrated site back in April and rankings have not returned.
I sure hope someone can help me with this. Back in April I migrated my site and did a website redesign. We implemented all the 301 redirect page for page. I lost about 40% of traffic. My main key word is baby headbands that goes to our home page. www.princessbowtique.com We were ranking at number two and have fallen down to number 9 and 10 and have recently come back up to number 8. My question is and I am wondering if there is something wrong with my HTML Code, or something else. All other pages stay lost some rankings but not as much a my home page. This home page is what gets most of my traffic and we are really hurting. I've had to let go of my employees and it's looking really bad for our business. Anyhow I'm trying to figure out what I can do it improve. I migrated to Big Commerce and they did all the 301 redirects. All catagories stayed the same url but the product pages did have 301 redirects.
Technical SEO | | PB20070 -
Awful ranking after site redesign
Hello everyone, I have a situation here and I’d like to have your opinion about it. I am working on a site which has been recently redesigned from scratch: in a nutshell, as soon as the new site went live their rankings dropped and, of course, so did their visitors and so on.. The guys who redesigned the site didn’t do any 301 redirect whatsoever, so now the old pages are just 404s and blocked by robots. My question is: if they 301 redirect now, do you think it would be possible they could get their rankings back? One more thing: when they launched the new site, the indexed pages basically doubled overnight; there were 700 and now there are 1400. Do you think this could affect their ranking as well? Thank you for you insights 🙂 Elio
Technical SEO | | Eyah0 -
Moving to New Domain - Ranking impact
I understand that when migrating to a new site, even if done perfectly (page level 301s etc) that rankings will drop in the short term and each site will be impacted differently. I picked up the following comment and was wanting to get a few experts thoughts on whether I can quote this to my client: "In our experience, even when 301's are correctly executed, we see a short term fall back (7-30) days and then about a 90% carry through after that period for about 90 days and then back to full strength. "
Technical SEO | | steermoz80 -
Website Migration Query
We are going to migrate our site but we cannot do this gradually, so before we complete the whole migration, we were thinking of launching the new site on a sub-domain and gradually redirect traffic to the sub-domain, starting with 10%, moving up steadily so that we then migrate to the new site within four/five weeks. The new site will have a new URL structure on the same domain, with a complete re-design and the IP address will be changing as well, even though the server geographical location will remain the same. a) Should we noindex the new sub-domain while the new site is on trial? b) Are there any other issues we should look out for? Thanks in Advance 🙂
Technical SEO | | seoec0 -
My Rankings Keep Going Down - Needs some more ideas on why...
Hi Everyone, I have been working on the website www.PetsSpark.com for a while now. I used to be on the first page for many of my keywords, now I am lucky if i am on the 2nd or 3rd. I stopped my SEO efforts for about 3 months while making changes to the website, its whithin these 3 months that I started dropping from the first page. The biggest thing I notice is the "type" of website now ranking for my main keywords. Mostly Forums, Blogs, or Product Review websites. Take for instance Dog Tear Stain Remover. I used to rank at about #5 for this keyword and now i rank at #20. I'm not sure if my loss of ranking is a combination of things like who Google is letting rank now or if there is something wrong on my website, etc. Can anyone give me a little insight?? Please.... I will also be happy to give more information about what has been going on if needed.
Technical SEO | | DTOSI0 -
Pages not ranking - Linkbuilding Question
It has been about 3 months since we made some new pages, with new, unique copy, but alot of pages (even though they have been indexed) are not ranking in the SERPS I tested it by taking a long snippet of the unique copy form the page and searching for it on Google. Also I checked the ranking using http://arizonawebdevelopment.com/google-page-rank
Technical SEO | | Impact-201555
Which may no be accurate, I know, but would give some indication. The interesting thing was that for the unique copy snippets, sometimes a different page of our site, many times the home page, shows up in the SERP'sSo my questions are: Is there some issue / penalty / sandbox deal with the pages that are not indexed? How can we check that? Or has it just not been enough time? Could there be any duplicate copy issue going on? Shouldn't be, as they are all well written, completely unique copy. How can we check that? Flickr image details - Some of the pages display the same set of images from flickr. The details (filenames, alt info, titles) are getting pulled form flickr and can be seen on the source code. Its a pretty large block of words, which is the same on multiple pages, and uses alot of keywords. Could this be an issue considered duplication or keyword stuffing, causing this. If you think so , we will remove it right away. And then when do we do to improve re-indexing? The reason I started this was because we have a few good opportunities right now for links, and I was wondering what pages we should link to and try to build rankings for. I was thinking about pointing one to /cast-bronze-plaques, but the page is not ranking. The home page, obviously is the oldest page, and ranked the best. The cast bronze plaques page is very new. Would linking to pages that are not ranking well be a good idea? Would it help them to get indexed / ranking? Or would it be better to link to the pages that are already indexed / ranking? If you link to a page that does not seem to be indexed, will it help the domains link profile? Will the link juice still flow through the site0