Was I hit by Panda/Payday Loan/Penguin?
-
Good Mozzing,
So, as some of you may know based on my previous post, I am working with an odd situation here. I have taken over an account for a company and the Main domain pretty much falls into the category of everything Google hates. I have suggested to the CEO that the practices they did before me were sorta in the Grayhat realm bordering on Blackhat but I need empirical data before I can make any drastic changes.
In May and June of 2013 Panda, Penguin, and Payday Loan all had updates. Our company has nothing do to with porn, apartment rentals, finances, or anything like that, but the SEO methods used were, as I said, questionable.
In June of 2013 there was a drop from 8,000 sessions to 5,000 sessions from organic traffic. If I switch over to all referring traffic the loss increases to 11,000 to 7,000 sessions. To me that seems pretty substantial. Not only that, but according to the data we have not been able to recover.There was a steady climb for about 5 months before the drop, and then now we are in this middle ground.
I have only been here for about 2 weeks, so the things I have been uncovering are pretty amazing.
Is that enough to assume that we were indeed hit by the updates?
-
Who cares to admit complete defeat? Practically no one, of course. Every natural instinct cries out against the idea of personal powerlessness.
I have come to terms with the fact that I am going to need help on this one. I am trying to make a case to my boss for a "second opinion".
UPDATE As this window was open my boss called me in for our meeting. I explained the circumstance and basically his answer was:
"Give me a timeline of everything that needs to happen. We can't cut anything until we build anything (unfortunately I fear he may have stolen my sentence from my interview when I said "don't burn a bridge before you build a bridge")."
So we will go from there. I do think he is beginning to understand the severity. He made an analogy to the Corleone's going 'legit' in the Godfather but wasn't comfortable doing so until we had a plan to go 'legit.'
Thanks again everybody! You have all been a tremendous help!
-
First off...thank you EGOL for mentioning me as someone who understands penalties. The crazy thing is that even though that's all that I do these days, I can sometimes spend several hours digging in to a site's analytics, backlinks and the site itself and still not be completely sure what is causing the traffic drop. It seems that the important point that most are trying to get across in this thread is that you're not likely to be able to solve your problem in this Q&A.
With that being said, here are a few things that you can look at that might give you some clues:
-Have you checked in Webmaster Tools for any manual actions? Go to Search Traffic --> Manual Actions
-Have you run a check for malware? Run the site through sucuri.net.
-Take a look at just the organic non-branded traffic in Google Analytics. To do that look at click Acquisition --> Keywords --> Organic. Then near the right hand side click on "advanced". Set it to exclude your brand name.
Once you've done that can you see a distinct day where the traffic starts to drop? This might give you a clue as to which algorithm you were likely affected by. With that being said, although Panda officially rolled out May 20, many sites that had Panda changes started seeing changes as early as May 17 and Payday loans was live either May 17 or 18. Still, if your drop happened on a day other than May 17-20 then you could be looking at something else. I personally think there have been some minor Panda refreshes in June, but sites that were affected were the ones who saw a big change around May 20.
If there was no obvious change on that date then here's a list of other things you can look at that might be reasons for a traffic drop that are NOT algorithmic:
http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/reasons-for-traffic-to-drop-other-than-penalty/
But, I want to repeat that it's often not a simple diagnosis.
Just to clarify your original post, there was no Penguin update recently. The last one was October of 2013.
-
I want to come back to something important. I want to preach to your boss.
Search engine battles are won through smarts and resources. Resources are content, user experience and promotional investments that you have made in your website. Smarts includes these things: the knowledge, skill and ingenuity of a dedicated staff.
As I said above I have been doing this for a long time. I don't know everything. And, everything in SEO changes constantly. The knowledge that you have today will be less valuable over time. To continue building and revising my knowledge resource, I read and participate in a couple of SEO forums every - single - day. I read what smart people write every - single - day. Two hours a day. I don't have a large company, three or four people. But that investment is made in continuing education.
Above I told you that....
You are being sent out to fight the heavyweight champ alone.
You don't want to do that. If you have a consultant and make a few firm friends here then you can use those relationships to take a gang to your fights. By asking and answering questions for a long time here I can ask lots of people who I have helped but who know things that I do not for assistance and they give me enormous immediate help. You should start building this. Your boss should understand that this is a valuable investment for his business and give you that time.
You are the guy who will be makin' the rain.
Companies who understand this have entire teams of SEOs who will be competing against you. And, they will get advice from their consultants too. Don't fight them alone if you care about winning.
-
Wow....
This has actually turned into a really amazing thread. I can't thank you enough... I'll keep you all posted in some way or another.
Thanks guys!
-
Just to let you know. I have been doing SEO since about 2000 and posting every day in SEO forums since about 2002. I run websites that get millions of visitors per month. I have seen and solved lots of different SEO problems.
Still, when I have to make any important decision, an important repair, a change in the site, or even if I am just looking for ways to improve. I regularly consult with people who know more about these things than me. I often consult with two people on the same problem. Why? I run a few sites but they do SEO on MANY sites. Their experience is broad and they have seen many things that I have not.
I consult with at least one of them every week. Sometimes two or three. I am waiting to get on a call with one of them today. SEO is a highly technical, highly competitive business. Nobody knows everything. One piece of knowledge can increase the income of your site by thousands of dollars a month and millions over time.
You are being sent out to fight the heavyweight champ alone.
Your boss needs to understand this. Share some of the comments you receive here with your boss. I am not trying to sell you anything. I only work on my own sites. Just telling you what I have learned to be valuable.
I give you lots of credit for coming here to ask questions. As you learning and have questions post them here when people can help you. But, small questions about a single topic are the best. You can get quick answers.
Look at many questions here everyday. Subscribe to them so you learn answers. You should read everything that penalty experts like Marie Haynes write. Here is one of her sites and a good place to begin. http://www.mytrafficdropped.com/
She sometimes answers questions here in Q&A. Read penalty questions going back to about 2011 to hear what might affect your site. She has written many good posts on the moz blog. Here is a simple one about penalties.
Your boss should read it too.
http://moz.com/blog/google-algorithm-cheat-sheet-panda-penguin-hummingbird
You will also find that people, even experienced ones with lots of clients and websites under their care will not agree. Why? Because nobody knows exactly how search engines work and how they will respond to changes on a website. There is a lot of guessing but different people guess about different things and different people know about different things. That is why I regularly seek advice from others, here and in private.
Good luck in your work.
-
If it helps when speaking to your boss, know that I'm a Moz employee and do no consulting, and we do not have any type of lead compensation for when we recommend people on the recommended companies, and EGOL does not accept consulting gigs either. Neither of us are saying what we are saying to try to make any money off of you or your company, but rather to try to honestly help your company get the information it needs.
-
The problem I am having is that the CEO feels that he brought me on to solve these problems. He is struggling to justify bringing someone else on.
And yes, they are depending on these hits for cashflow. Thanks again for your input.
It is validating for me knowing that I'm not just incapable and that this is a legitimate problem. Seriously.
-
I remember you have 1500 domains with tons of links between them.
You might have been hit by Panda or Penguin or unnatural links or just been throttled for spam or many other possible problems.
These are complex things to diagnose. Anybody who gives you an answer without looking into your big bunch of sites, your historical traffic, looks at the content and links into your main site and examines your content for panda problems is guessing. Doing all of this work properly and making a recommendation will require a lot of work, and still there will be some guessing. A few to several days, done by someone who knows the problems of sites that have suffered traffic loss will probably be needed.
Some questions are too complex to solve with a quick Q&A consultation. This is one of them.
If your company is depending upon this income to support cashflow, jobs and pay the rent then spending the time needed to get your own skills up might be much more costly than going straight to someone who might be able to solve the problem and get you on track. Your current situation reflects man-years of poor work. Will not be solved overnight.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Search ranking for a term dropped from 1st/2nd to 106th in 3 months
Hello all, Just a couple notes first. I have been advised to be vague on the search term we've dropped on (in case this page ranks higher than our homepage for it). If you search for my name in Google though you should be able to figure out where I work (I'm not the soccer player). While I am looking for an answer, I've also posted this question on a couple other forums (see https://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4934323.htm and https://productforums.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/webmasters/AQLD7lywuvo/2zfFRD6oGAAJ) which have thrown up more questions than answers. So I have posted this as a discussion. We've also been told we may have been under a negative SEO attack. We saw in SEMRush a large number of backlinks in October/November/December - at about the same time we disavowed around 1m backlinks (more on this below) but we can't see this reflected in Moz. We just got off a call with someone at Moz to try and work this out and he suggested we post here - so here goes... On 4th October for the search term 'example-term' we dropped from number 2 to number 9 on Google searches (this was confirmed in Google Search Console). We also paid an external SEO consultant to review our site and see why we are dropping on the term 'example-term'. We've implemented everything and we're still dropping, the consultant thinks we may have been penalised in error (as we are a legitimate business and we're not trying to do anything untoward). In search console you could see from the graphs on the term we used to rank 1st and 2nd (you could go back 2 or 3 years and still see this). The thing we do find confusing is that we still rank very highly (if not 1st) for 'example-term + uk' and our brand name - which is very similar to 'example-term'. Timeline of events of changes: 2nd October 2018 midday: Added a CTA using something called Wisepops over the homepage - this was a full screen CTA for people to pledge on a project on our site helping with the tsunami in Indonesia (which may have had render blocking elements on). 4th October: we added a Google MyBusiness page showing our corporate headquarters as being in the UK (we did flag this on the Google MyBusiness forums and both people who responded said adding a MyBusiness page would not affect our drop in rankings). 4th October: dropped from number 2 to number 9 on Google searches (this was confirmed in Google Search Console) 4th October: Removed the Wisepops popup 5th November: Server redirect so anything coming in on / was redirected to a page without a / 12th November: Removed around 200 junk pages (so old pages, test cms pages etc that were live and still indexed). Redirects from any 404s resolved 19th November: Updated site maps and video site maps to reflect new content and remove old content. Reviewed the whole site for duplicate meta tags and titles and updated accordingly with unique ones. Fixed issues in Google Search Console for Google search console for 404 and Mobile usability. Removed embedded YouTube video from homepage. 11th December: Removed old content and content seen as not useful from indexing; 'honey pot' pages, old blog, map pages, user profile pages, project page ‘junk pages which have little SEO value’ (comments, contact project owner, backers, report project) from indexing, added ‘no-follow’ to widgets linking back to us 3rd January 2019: Changed the meta title from to remove 'example-term' (we were concerned it may have been seen as keyword stuffing) 7th January: Disavow file updated to refuse a set of external sites powered by API linking to us (these were sites like example-term.externalsite.co.uk which used to link to us showing projects in local areas - our SEO expert felt may be seen as a ‘link farm’) 11th January: Updated our ‘About us’ page with more relevant content 15th January: Changed homepage title to include 'example-term' again, footer links updated to point to internal pages rather than linking off to Intercom, homepage ordering of link elements on homepage changed (so moving external rating site link further down the page, removing underlines on one item that was not a link, fixed and instance where two h1 tags were used), removed another set of external Subdomains (i.e. https://externalsite.sitename.co.uk) from our system (these were old sites we used to run for different clients which has projects in geographical areas displayed) 18th January: Added the word 'example-term' to key content pages We're at a loss as to why we are still dropping. Please note that the above changes were implemented after we'd been ranking fine for a couple years on the 'example-term' - the changes were to try and address the drop in ranking. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Nobody15554510997900 -
Paid Link/Doorway Disavow - disavowing the links between 2 sites in the same company.
Hello, Three of our client's sites are having difficulty because of past doorway/paid link activity, which we're doing the final cleanup on with a disavow. There are links between the sites. Should we disavow all the links between the sites? Thank you.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobGW0 -
Do dead/inactive links matter?
In cleaning up the backlink profile for my parent's website, I've come across quite a few dead links. For instance, the links in the comments here: http://www.islanddefjam.com/artist/news_single.aspx?nid=4726&artistID=7290 Do I need to worry about these links? I assume if the links are no longer active, and hence not showing up in webmaster or moz reports, I can probably ignore them, but I'm wondering if I should try and get them removed regardless? I've read that google is increasingly taking into account references (i.e. website mentions that are not links) and I don't know if inactive spam links might leave a bad impression of a website. Am I being overly paranoid? I imagine disavowing them would be pointless as you can't attach a nofollow tag to an inactive link.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mgane0 -
Removing/ Redirecting bad URL's from main domain
Our users create content for which we host on a seperate URL for a web version. Originally this was hosted on our main domain. This was causing problems because Google was seeing all these different types of content on our main domain. The page content was all over the place and (we think) may have harmed our main domain reputation. About a month ago, we added a robots.txt to block those URL's in that particular folder, so that Google doesn't crawl those pages and ignores it in the SERP. We now went a step further and are now redirecting (301 redirect) all those user created URL's to a totally brand new domain (not affiliated with our brand or main domain). This should have been done from the beginning, but it wasn't. Any suggestions on how can we remove all those original URL's and make Google see them as not affiliated with main domain?? or should we just give it the good ol' time recipe for it to fix itself??
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | redcappi0 -
Hits in H1 will improve ranking by regular crawling ?
Hello ! I was wondering if it's a good idea to keep the "Hits" in the H1 ? http://www.ibremarketing.com/item/netapp-e5400-storage-system.html Will Google come to check regularly the update (new information if I'm right) or if he will not like the idea to come back just for hits update. As I have very good results on this part of the website, I do not want to take any risk. Thanks a lot !
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | AymanH0 -
Penguin issues
Hello everyone, I run about 10 sites and pretty much every single one got hit by Penguin (the traffic plummeted on 24th April). I have never done reciprocal links (except 1 domain upto 2005 or so), I have never bought links, I have never spammed message boards or anything like that (except 1 different domain got hit by negative SEO by someone else) and I have never employed anyone to do any of the above. The way I have created sites for the last 10 years is to try to make them useful and let the links build naturally which more or less worked until April this year. I've been tearing my hair out ever since. The only thing you can say about all of them (apart from that I own them but I've been careful with whois etc) is that the link profile is 100% natural apart from the 2 provisos above. Since April I've hired people but I'm down $20K but not any better in the rankings. A few of the sites are: short-hairstyles.com was number 1 for short hairstyles and short haircuts for years then Penguin came and its dropped off for both. It had 10000 or so spammy message board links posted by someone as negative seo I have got some removed but google webmaster tools still reports them as there. There are tentative signs of recovery (maybe) but no traffic increase. 1001-hairstyles.com has been there or there abouts for 10 years for the keyword hairstyles and hair styles until April. A site ourlipsaresealed.skyblogs.be has 30000 links to it (there are only 40000 total) with the anchor text haarstijls which is dutch for hairstyles, I don't think its malicious just they set a template and do a new page every day and they also link in the same way to a competitor who wasn't affected. An seo firm have been working on this one for a few months, the traffic increased 50% a couple of weeks ago but bombed the day after to worse than before. Prom-hairstyles.org when the same way as above in April. The only back link oddity is a site polyvore.com links to it about 400 times (out of 1000 or so total) they are using our pictures to sell their prom dresses (with out permission) but mostly deep link. Most of the other sites went in a similar way but have no obvious backlink anomalies. Do I use the link disavowel tool? I am a bit wary of it because if you watch matt cutts video he keeps reiterating that the tool is for people who have used dodgy link practises in the past and want to do a clean up but that isn't me so am I owning up to something I haven't done by using it? Are the search results as strange in everybody's niche? In mine there is some real dross as well as loads of pinterest and other user generated stuff. Sorry to go on for so long and thanks for getting this far. Ian
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | jwdl0 -
Improve CTR with Special Characters in Meta-Description / Title Tags
I've seen this question asked a few times, but I haven't found a definitive answer. I'm quite surprised no one from Google has addressed the question specifically. I ran across this post the other day and it piqued my interest: http://www.datadial.net/blog/index.php/2011/04/13/special-characters-in-meta-descriptions-the-beboisation-of-google/ If you're able to make your result stand out by using stars, smiley faces, TM symbols, etc it would be a big advantage. This is in use currently if you search for a popular mattress keyword in Google. It really is amazing how the special characters draw your attention to the title. You can also see the TM and Copyright symbols if you search for "Logitech Revue" Radioshack is using these characters in their adwords also. Has anyone found any definitive answers to this? Has anyone tracked CTR and long-term results with special characters in title or description tags? Any chance of getting penalized for using this? As a follow-up, it looks like you could also put check symbols into your meta-description tags. That has all kinds of interesting possibilities. http://www.seosmarty.com/special-symbols-wingdings-for-social-media-branding-twitter-linkedin-google-plus/
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | inhouseninja0 -
Will the links coming from an article in certain BLOG / NEWS SITE become a GOOD BackLink?
Such as, if i wrote a ymoz, and suddenly the articles is accepted, will the link to our site coming out of that Article Post increased our SEO Standing? Another example would be http://active.tutsplus.com , yesterday i have successfully pitched a tutorial idea, and they told me to write it so that they can published it , and they also promised that i will be able to put my site link (dofollow) ... But will these link be a Good BackLink that will increase our site's SEO Standing? The last one is exactly the same link , but this time coming from a News Site , such as http://teknologi.kompasiana.com/internet/2011/06/09/website-full-flash-dengan-inovasi-hebat-karya-indonesia/ , in this article (kompasiana is a very wellknown site news in Indonesia, in fact KOMPAS is the biggest newspaper firm in Indonesia) , our site is being featured , there is a link coming out of that article (DOFOLLOW), but will that link make our site much more SEO Friendly? Again please enlighten me 🙂
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | IKT0