Is building links just to risky to do nowadays?
-
Hi,
How risky is link building nowadays? I have a site which has been left on its own and over time has generated links which is great, its a resource type of site so works well in that department. The reason it picks up links by itself is because I have spent time on it and in the past I could just leave and the links it would pick up would maintain its rankings.
Over the last 6 months a lot of marketers have noticed this large traffic, and have produced 1 page sites going directly for my main term - then putting adsense all over it.
So problem is, my site can't build links by itself as fast as these marketers are doing manually. Don't get me wrong I can do what they are doing but they don't care about their 1 pager as much as I do about my site - a lot of work has gone into it.
Can I link build without running a 'big' risk of having my site hit by Google? how does one build links the way Google is ok with?
Thanks.
-
Most of the content that I write is "evergreen".
However, I often find new information on a topic and update the pertaining pages on my site. Then I promote those pages on my site, through my RSS feed and to my email subscribers. I use Feedburner to collect subscribers and distribute the RSS feed and email updates.
Feedburner gives you links that deliver interested subscribers to a subscription form. You can use that link on small banners on your site, text links, however, you want to promote.
When Feedburner distributes the information about updated articles, I usually get a lot of traffic from subscribers, and places where subscribers have shared. I don't do much to promote my content. I let visitors and subscribers do it for me. I think that is what you have successfully done in the past.
-
Agree totally, im going to stick it out for a bit longer - make my site better and see if that helps. If in 3/4 months nothing changes ill have to start looking at ways of gaining SE exposure again because every position I lose to a one pager or brand with a blog post going for the traffic is affecting my rev stream.
I suppose the only positive is I know how to do SEO, I just don't like having to do it.
-
You're welcome Followuk,
And just so you know, the links above speak to link earning as well as the best ways to go about finding and requesting links that will hold up over time and not put you at risk of a Google penalty.
-
Thanks for the kind words.
Well my pages are better than the one pagers problem is its Q&A type of content.
So 1+1 is always 2 - once they got the answer from either me or a competitor its done and there gone. I just provide the answer better - more indepth with a better design like an actual resource so the sharing on my site is far greater than say the one pagers.
Well I got an even better design coming, responsive, faster load times, more pages so hopefully this helps.
I do have one Question for you though EGOL - how important is freshness? Can content go stale?
-
Thanks Donna for advice and the resource links - much appreciated.
-
I would be inclined to agree with EGOL, though Donna dropped some pretty good resources. The problem with 'link building' is that it will eventually look unnatural, even if one is quite artful. One person's 'good link' is another person's 'spam'.
I've dealt with people that build links for the sake of building links 'Because Link Building LOL!!!'. It never ends well and they're generally left saying; "But we paid a lot for those links!" The irony of that statement never gets old. Actually it does, but it sounds better if I say it never gets old.
It sounds like you ascribe to the concept of Link Earning, which is safer and the recommended course.
It's true enough that absolute crap/lack of content can be propped up by many absolute crap links. That is not a viable long term strategy, however. Pre-Penguin, I somewhat ruined some guy's six figure payday pointing out the same. Within a few months, without reporting the site, I was correct. He had propped up a thin site with a ton of exact match anchors. It didn't end well. (I, and my agency at the time, got called every name in the book over that one. )
So, if you must 'build links' do so in a way that would drive real traffic to your site. Avoid a preponderance of exact match anchors and try to bring some sort of value wherever you go. But it appears your core competency is adding value to your pages. Maybe you should stick with that.
There's nothing wrong with passive 'link building'.
-
The reason it picks up links by itself is because I have spent time on it and in the past I could just leave and the links it would pick up would maintain its rankings.
Nice work! Very few people are able to do this. Many could do it but they don't have the courage.
If you start putting resources into linkbuilding you will have to take resources away from what you are currently doing so then did you really gain that much?? And if you were going to put resources into linkbuilding above and beyond your current work then why don't you just invest that spend into what you are already doing that is working?
I would not put a lot of faith in the staying power of these one-page sites. I bet their content is crap and people go into those sites and then visit yours. So, I would only give those one page sites serious consideration if that one page is kickass content for what the searchers are looking for or if your traffic is really down only because those one-page sites are taking it from you.
You gotta make up your mind on what you should do.... if it was me, and I might be a fool, but, I am not going to let these one-page site people move me off of my successful course. I'll just work harder on the plan until I know that the plan isn't workin'.
-
Hi Followuk,
Good question. Things have certainly changed making link building much harder than it was not too long ago, but that doesn't mean you should stop altogether. You DO need to follow best practices though.
Where to find best practices?
I have suggestions on where to start:
- The Moz Beginners Guide - Chapter 7 - Growing Popularity and Links;
- the Link Building Category of YouMoz has lots of good and detailed information;
- I also like Point Blank SEO's Link Building Strategies; and
- Digital Current 2014 Link Building Best Practices.
You might also want to think about being alerted to new publications on the topic. Rand did a whiteboard Friday recently that explains how to setup alerts and identifies free and paid tools you can use. I found it tremendously helpful from a variety of perspectives.
Hope that helps.
D
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How do we find keyword opportunities - but not just against 3 competitors...
Hello everyone! How can I find out what might be a keyword opportunity against a competitor but make sure it's still a realistic opportunity in SERPS generally?* After all, we are not just competing with 2 or 3 competitors. We are competing against everyone! Perhaps there is a part of the keyword research process that helps? I can't help but think there's a wasted effort to just beat a couple of competitors unless you can rank well generally - especially if it's a competitive sector. (*I'm not in the position of making lots of pages as part of a long-tail keyword/ content strategy so I need to focus on just a few and make them count) Thanks in advance. Mp
Competitive Research | | mark_seomoz10 -
Via this intermediate link?
I'm doing some work on an ecommerce site for an electronics distributor and I've been seeing these "Via this intermediate link" notations from GWT under our "Links To Your Site" section. I understand how and why these notations would normally be displayed, however, these links are mainly coming from our direct competitors. Fearing that we might be a victim of a negative SEO attack, I looked into the situation and noticed that all of the links are from PDF's (technical data sheets) provided by the manufacturer that both we and our competitors use on our product detail pages. This still seems odd to me because, we download these pdf's and host them on our own site on our own servers under a completely different name (as I'm assuming our competitors do as well), yet, there still seems to be a connection between our sites through these PDF's. I've included a screenshot of some examples. Since we have thousands of SKU's on our site - with technical PDF's for nearly all of them - we're seeing a lot of links from competitors sites. I'm not sure if this is good or bad, I'm just trying to understand the situation more clearly. Has anyone had any similar experiences or some information from Google that might explain what I'm seeing here? fpWvB5T
Competitive Research | | GalcoIndustrial0 -
What type of links to focus on...
Hi all Having just built a new site, I'm now looking at how best to SEO it. In past years, I gave into the temptation to outsource the backlinking altogether. For this project though, I am taking a much more hands on approach: I am either writing or working with good content writers I am posting to Twitter + FB more regularly With regards to backlinks, I am being much more specific as to how I go about it. I want to remain very niche specific and use only trustable sites. The question I have though, is how to know how to split the backlink types? I've looked at competitors using LinkDetective, but cannot seem to work out any common denominators. Some have more blogs than articles, while others have a lot of 'unknown' types (according to LinkDetective) If you're starting from scratch, what do you aim for? If you're aiming to build 100 backlinks (hypothetically), how would you decide on the breakdown (e.g. 20% blogs, 20% articles etc) Do Panda or Penguin updates this year influence choice? Thanks!
Competitive Research | | avgjoe0070 -
Online checkers for Anchor Links ?
Okay, we are looking for online tools to check our backlinks, and anchor links top domains, etc. OSE is not working for us, because looks like , it gets updated in some months. We are looking for something, which can drag the statistics in fw hours and show up. Let me know.
Competitive Research | | qubesys0 -
Does SEOMoz (or anyone) offer a measurement of "overlapping" links between 2+ domains?
I'm trying to judge how much incremental value we'd see from 301'ing an old domain vs. revitalizing the old domain's content. My gut feeling is that most of the links to the two sites are from the same set of websites so it wouldn't add much value to 301 the old domain. I've seen the opposite of this done with Competitive Link Analysis (e.g show links that you don't have that your competitor does have). Is there a tool available that can take 2 or more sites and tell me for instance - 72% of the inbound links or linking root domains are the same?
Competitive Research | | Jeff_DomainTools0 -
Link Attack
Here is an interesting situation. Overnight SEOMoz is now reporting about 1.1 million new backlinks to my site. The links look like they were added in March of 2011 and they are all on porn sites and link back to me with the words like "Indian Sex", "Sex Bathe", and "insex." This appears to be yet another attack on my site and it looks like it happened right before the April Panda update that hosed me. As an example of one of the pages you can look at seapotentialdifference.com/inurlife/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3081 and look for the link for Indian Sex. They linked to my forum and not the home page. At the same time SEOMoz discovered these links my DA dropped from 62 to 58. I'm wondering if anyone thinks these issues are connected. More importantly, does anyone have a suggestion on how to deal with this? For some reason the PA and DA of the porn site pages is above 70. This will probably be an ongoing battle for me since I am a journalist that covers the debt relief world and scammers don't like for me to expose them in an effort to protect consumers.
Competitive Research | | rockpaper0 -
Blog Comment Links
Hi everyone! Using the Open Site Explorer tool I can see many of my competitors leave blog comments which (according to the tool) are providing link value to their sites. This seems like something that can easily be used in a black hat sort of way. My question is this - Is leaving comments on blogs an effective way of generating positive links to my site? Adrian
Competitive Research | | adrianaldous0 -
Question regarding back link analysis and anchor text
Hello, I am looking at my competitors back link analysis and comparing a range of link based metrics from the top 10 SERPS. I am then putting this data into excel and comparing our back link profiles. When looking at the anchor text distribution i am not sure whether to look at exact match anchor or phrase match anchor. For example, one of the companies I am looking at holds positions 3 and 4 in the SERPS. Looking at their linking profile I can see that only 1.7% of their links use the exact match anchor 'widget'. Looking at their phrase match anchor is an entirely different story, 93.5% of anchor links contain 'widget' somewhere. i.e. 'cheap widgets', 'widget sale', 'buy widgets at www.examplewidget.co.uk' etc. Obviously their exact match and phrase match anchor distribution tell a completely different story. THIS IS TRUE FOR MANY OF THE TOP 10 SERPS. Therefore, should I be looking at phrase match anchors instead of exact? Side note: would people recommend targeting anchors with 'brandname widget' based on predictions of Google giving weighted anchor more weight. Robert.
Competitive Research | | 87ROB0